Guangliang Fu
Delft University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Guangliang Fu.
Monthly Weather Review | 2016
Sha Lu; X. Lin; A.W. Heemink; Guangliang Fu; Arjo Segers
Volcanic ash forecasting is a crucial tool in hazard assessment and operational volcano monitoring. Emission parameters such as plume height, total emission mass, and vertical distribution of the emission plume rate are essential and important in the implementation of volcanic ash models. Therefore, estimation of emission parameters using available observations through data assimilation could help to increase the accuracy of forecasts and provide reliable advisory information. This paper focuses on the use of satellite total-ash-column data in 4D-Var based assimilations. Experiments show that it is very difficult to estimate the vertical distribution of effective volcanic ash injection rates from satellite-observed ash columns using a standard 4D-Var assimilation approach. This paper addresses the ill-posed nature of the assimilation problem from the perspective of a spurious relationship. To reduce the influence of a spurious relationship created by a radiate observation operator, an adjoint-free trajectory-based 4D-Var assimilation method is proposed, which is more accurate to estimate the vertical profile of volcanic ash from volcanic eruptions. The method seeks the optimal vertical distribution of emission rates of a reformulated cost function that computes the total difference between simulated and observed ash columns. A 3D simplified aerosol transport model and synthetic satellite observations are used to compare the results of both the standard method and the new method.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Sha Lu; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Arjo Segers; Guangliang Fu
In this paper, we reconstruct the vertical profile of volcanic ash emissions by assimilating satellite data and ground‐based observations using a modified trajectory‐based 4D‐Var (Trj4DVar) approach. In our previous work, we found that the lack of vertical resolution in satellite ash column data can result in a poor estimation of the injection layer where the ash is emitted into the atmosphere. The injection layer is crucial for the forecast of volcanic ash clouds. To improve estimation, Trj4DVar was implemented, and it has shown increased performance in twin experiments using synthetic observations. However, there are some cases with real satellite data where Trj4DVar has difficulty in obtaining an accurate estimation of the injection layer. To remedy this, we propose a modification of Trj4DVar, test it with synthetic twin experiments, and evaluate real data performance. The results show that the modified Trj4DVar is able to accurately estimate the injection height (location of the maximal emission rate) by incorporating the plume height (top of the ash plume) and mass eruption rate data obtained from ground‐based observations near the source into the assimilation system. This will produce more accurate emission estimations and more reliable forecasts of volcanic ash clouds. Also provided are two strategies on the preprocessing and proper use of satellite data.
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2017
Astrid Manders; Peter Builtjes; Lyana Curier; Hugo Denier van der Gon; Carlijn Hendriks; Sander Jonkers; Richard Kranenburg; Jeroen Kuenen; Arjo Segers; Renske Timmermans; A.J.H. Visschedijk; Roy Wichink Kruit; W. Addo J. van Pul; Ferd Sauter; Eric van der Swaluw; D. Swart; John Douros; Henk Eskes; Erik van Meijgaard; Bert van Ulft; Peter F. J. van Velthoven; Sabine Banzhaf; Andrea Mues; R. Stern; Guangliang Fu; Sha Lu; A.W. Heemink; Nils van Velzen; Martijn Schaap
The development and application of chemistry transport models has a long tradition. Within the Netherlands the LOTOS–EUROS model has been developed by a consortium of institutes, after combining its independently developed predecessors in 2005. Recently, version 2.0 of the model was released as an open-source version. This paper presents the curriculum vitae of the model system, describing the model’s history, model philosophy, basic features and a validation with EMEP stations for the new benchmark year 2012, and presents cases with the model’s most recent and key developments. By setting the model developments in context and providing an outlook for directions for further development, the paper goes beyond the common model description. With an origin in ozone and sulfur modelling for the models LOTOS and EUROS, the application areas were gradually extended with persistent organic pollutants, reactive nitrogen, and primary and secondary particulate matter. After the combination of the models to LOTOS–EUROS in 2005, the model was further developed to include new source parametrizations (e.g. road resuspension, desert dust, wildfires), applied for operational smog forecasts in the Netherlands and Europe, and has been used for emission scenarios, source apportionment, and long-term hindcast and climate change scenarios. LOTOS–EUROS has been a front-runner in data assimilation of ground-based and satellite observations and has participated in many model intercomparison studies. The model is no longer confined to applications over Europe but is also applied to other regions of the world, e.g. China. The increasing interaction with emission experts has also contributed to the improvement of the model’s performance. The philosophy for model development has always been to use knowledge that is state of the art and proven, to keep a good balance in the level of detail of process description and accuracy of input and output, and to keep a good record on the effect of model changes using benchmarking and validation. The performance of v2.0 with respect to EMEP observations is good, with spatial correlations around 0.8 or higher for concentrations and wet deposition. Temporal correlations are around 0.5 or higher. Recent innovative applications include source apportionment and data assimilation, particle number modelling, and energy transition scenarios including corresponding land use changes as well as Saharan dust forecasting. Future developments would enable more flexibility with respect to model horizontal and vertical resolution and further detailing of model input data. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 4146 A. M. M. Manders et al.: Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model This includes the use of different sources of land use characterization (roughness length and vegetation), detailing of emissions in space and time, and efficient coupling to meteorology from different meteorological models.
Monthly Weather Review | 2017
Sha Lu; A.W. Heemink; Hai-Xiang Lin; Arjo Segers; Guangliang Fu
Remote sensing, as a powerful tool for monitoring atmospheric phenomena, has been playing an increasingly important role in inverse modeling. Remote sensing instruments measure quantities that often combine several state variables as one. This creates very strong correlations between the state variables that share the same observation variable. This may cause numerical problems resulting in a low convergence rate or inaccurate estimates in gradient-based variational assimilation if improper error statistics are used. In this paper, two criteria or scoring rules are proposed to quantify the numerical robustness of assimilating a specific set of remote sensing observations and to quantify the reliability of the estimates of the parameters. The criteria are derived by analyzing how the correlations are created via shared observation data and how they may influence the process of variational data assimilation. Experimental tests are conducted and show a good level of agreement with theory. The results illustrate the capability of the criteria to indicate the reliability of the assimilation process. Both criteria can be used with observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) and in combination with other verification scores.
Atmospheric Environment | 2015
Guangliang Fu; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Arjo Segers; Sha Lu; T. Palsson
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Guangliang Fu; A.W. Heemink; Sha Lu; Arjo Segers; Konradin Weber; Hai-Xiang Lin
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017
Guangliang Fu; Fred Prata; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Arjo Segers; Sha Lu
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Guangliang Fu; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Arjo Segers; Fred Prata; Sha Lu
Geoscientific Model Development | 2017
Guangliang Fu; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Sha Lu; Arjo Segers; Nils van Velzen; Tongchao Lu; Shiming Xu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Sha Lu; Hai-Xiang Lin; A.W. Heemink; Arjo Segers; Guangliang Fu