Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Guido Barbagli is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Guido Barbagli.


The Journal of Urology | 1996

Dorsal free graft urethroplasty

Guido Barbagli; Cesare Selli; Aldo Tosto; Enzo Palminteri

PURPOSE Dorsal free graft urethroplasty was performed to reduce the incidence of urethrocele. MATERIALS AND METHODS We treated 12 patients with penile and 13 with bulbous strictures. Of the 13 patients with a bulbous stricture 6 received a dorsally placed tube graft and 7 received a patch graft. RESULTS Temporary fistulas were seen on postoperative urethrography in 5 cases but they all resolved spontaneously. At a mean followup of 35.8 months clinical and radiological findings were excellent in 23 cases and good in 2. No signs of graft weakening, such as post-void dribbling or diminished ejaculation, were apparent. CONCLUSIONS The use of free skin grafts for urethral reconstruction is anatomically healthier in the dorsal than in the ventral position.


The Journal of Urology | 2000

INTRAVESICAL RESINIFERATOXIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERSENSITIVE DISORDER: A RANDOMIZED PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY

Massimo Lazzeri; Patrizia Beneforti; Michele Spinelli; Alberto Zanollo; Guido Barbagli; Damiano Turini

PURPOSE Present therapeutic approaches to control hypersensitive disorder of the lower urinary tract and bladder pain are clinically and scientifically unsatisfactory. We performed a randomized placebo controlled study with followup after 1 and 3 months using intravesical resiniferatoxin to treat hypersensitive disorder and bladder pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively randomized 18 patients into 2 groups to receive a single dose of 10 nM. resiniferatoxin intravesically (group 1) or a placebo saline solution only (group 2). All patients had at least a 6-month history of frequency, nocturia, urgency and symptoms of pelvic pain as well as no urinary tract infection within the last 3 months, functional disorders of the lower urinary tract, or other vesical or urethral pathology. Pretreatment voiding pattern and pain score were recorded. Patients were evaluated after 30 days (primary end point) and 3 months (secondary end point). RESULTS The 2 groups were adequately homogeneous in regard to patient age, sex ratio, disease duration, voiding pattern and pain score. At the primary end point mean frequency plus or minus standard error of mean was decreased from 12. 444 +/- 0.70 voids to 7.111 +/- 0.67 and nocturia from 3.777 +/- 0. 27 to 1.666 +/- 0.16 (p <0.01). We observed a lesser significant improvement in mean frequency in group 1 at the secondary end point to 10.444 +/- 0.94 voids (p <0.05). No significant modification was noted in patients assigned to placebo. Mean pain score significantly decreased in group 1 at the primary end point from 5.555 +/- 0.29 to 2.666 +/- 0.23 (p <0.01) but not at the secondary end point (4.777 +/- 0.66, p >0.05). No statistically significant improvement in mean pain score was observed in placebo group 2. During resiniferatoxin infusion 4 group 1 patients noticed a light warm or burning sensation at the suprapubic and/or urethral level. CONCLUSIONS Intravesical resiniferatoxin may significantly improve the voiding pattern and pain score in patients with hypersensitive disorder and bladder pain. Because resiniferatoxin did not cause a significant warm or burning sensation at the suprapubic and/or urethral level, it may be considered a new strategy for treating hypersensitive disorder and bladder pain. However, further studies are necessary to confirm our results and define the resiniferatoxin mechanism of action, dose and necessary treatment schedule.


BJUI | 2004

Consensus statement on urethral trauma.

Christopher R. Chapple; Guido Barbagli; Gerald Jordan; Anthony R. Mundy; N. Rodrigues-Netto; V. Pansadoro; Jack W. McAninch

In this continuation of the section on genitourinary trauma, the authors describe the consensus on urethral injury. This is an in‐depth statement, describing all aspects of the condition, from anatomy to general recommendations.


European Urology | 2008

One-Stage Bulbar Urethroplasty: Retrospective Analysis of the Results in 375 Patients

Guido Barbagli; Giorgio Guazzoni; Massimo Lazzeri

OBJECTIVE To review the outcome of bulbar urethroplasty using one-stage surgical techniques. METHODS Of 375 patients, who underwent one-stage bulbar urethroplasties, 165 patients (44%) underwent anastomotic repair (AR), 40 (10.7%) underwent augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) using penile skin grafts (PSGs) or oral mucosal grafts (OMGs), and 170 (45.3%) underwent onlay grafting techniques (OGTs) using PSGs or OMGs. Clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. The chi2 and Fishers exact test for categorical data were used. The sample size of 375 patients provides a statistical power (1-beta) of 99% at alpha=0.05; p<0.05 was set as significant. RESULTS The average follow-up was 53 mo. Of 375 cases, 313 (83.5%) were successful and 62 (16.5%) failures. Of 165 ARs, 150 (90.9%) were successful and 15 (9.1%) failures. Of 40 AARs, 24 (60%) were successful and 16 (40%) failures. Of 170 OGTs, 139 (81.8%) were successful and 31 (18.2%) failures. The AR showed statistically significant higher success rate compared to OGT (p=0.023) and AAR (p=0.0001). Of 47 PSGs, 28 (59.6%) were successful and 19 (40.4%) failures. Of 163 OMGs, 135 (82.8%) were successful and 28 (17.2%) failures. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS One-stage bulbar urethroplasties showed an overall 83.5% success rate. The AR showed the higher success rate compared to the OGT or AAR. OMGs (82.8% success rate) perform statistically better than PSGs (59.6% success rate).


European Urology | 2009

Lichen Sclerosus of the Male Genitalia and Urethra: Surgical Options and Results in a Multicenter International Experience with 215 Patients

Sanjay Kulkarni; Guido Barbagli; Deepak Kirpekar; Francesco Mirri; Massimo Lazzeri

BACKGROUND Surgical options in male patients with genital lichen sclerosus (LS) involving the anterior urethra still represent a challenging issue. OBJECTIVE To review the outcome of surgical treatment in patients with genital and urethral LS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, international, retrospective, observational descriptive study performed in two specialized centers. Two hundred fifteen male patients underwent surgery for histologically proven genital LS involving the foreskin and/or the anterior urethra. INTERVENTION Circumcision (34 cases), meatotomy (15 cases), circumcision and meatotomy (8 cases), one-stage penile oral mucosal graft urethroplasty (8 cases), two-stage penile oral mucosal graft urethroplasty (15 cases), one-stage bulbar oral mucosal graft urethroplasty (88 cases), and definitive perineal urethrostomy (47 cases). MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed, including dilation, or when recurrence was diagnosed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The average follow-up was 56 mo (range: 12-170 mo). Circumcision showed 100% success rate with no recurrence of the disease; meatotomy, 80% success rate; circumcision and meatotomy, 100% success rate; one-stage penile oral mucosal graft urethroplasty, 100% success rate; two-stage penile oral mucosal graft urethroplasty, 73% success rate; one-stage bulbar oral mucosal graft urethroplasty, 91% success rate; and definitive perineal urethrostomy, 72% success rate. Limitations include short follow-up for recording neoplastic degeneration and no instrument to investigate quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Patients with LS disease restricted to the foreskin and/or external urinary meatus showed a high surgery success rate. In patients with penile urethral strictures or panurethral strictures, the use of one-stage oral graft urethroplasty showed greater success than the staged procedures.


The Journal of Urology | 2001

LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF URETHROPLASTY AFTER FAILED URETHROTOMY VERSUS PRIMARY REPAIR

Guido Barbagli; Enzo Palminteri; Massimo Lazzeri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Damiano Turini

PURPOSE A urethral stricture recurring after repeat urethrotomy challenges even a skilled urologist. To address the question of whether to repeat urethrotomy or perform open reconstructive surgery, we retrospectively review a series of 93 patients comparing those who underwent primary repair versus those who had undergone urethrotomy and underwent secondary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1975 to 1998, 93 males between age 13 and 78 years (mean 39) underwent surgical treatment for bulbar urethral stricture. In 46 (49%) of the patients urethroplasty was performed as primary repair, and in 47 (51%) after previously failed urethrotomy. The strictures were localized in the bulbous urethra without involvement of penile or membranous tracts. The etiology was ischemic in 37 patients, traumatic in 23, unknown in 17 and inflammatory in 16. To simplify evaluation of the results, the clinical outcome was considered either a success or a failure at the time any postoperative procedure was needed, including dilation. RESULTS In our 93 patients primary urethroplasty had a final success rate of 85%, and after failed urethrotomy 87%. Previously failed urethrotomy did not influence the long-term outcome of urethroplasty. The long-term results of different urethroplasty techniques had a final success rate ranging from 77% to 96%. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that failed urethrotomy does not condition the long-term result of surgical repair. With extended followup, the success rate of urethroplasty decreases with time but it is in fact still higher than that of urethrotomy.


BJUI | 2009

One-sided anterior urethroplasty: a new dorsal onlay graft technique.

Sanjay Kulkarni; Guido Barbagli; Salvatore Sansalone; Massimo Lazzeri

To investigate the feasibility, tolerability, safety and efficacy of using a new surgical technique for the repair of anterior urethral strictures to preserve vascular supply to the urethra and its entire muscular and neurogenic support.


The Journal of Urology | 2009

Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated With Perineal Urethrostomy for Anterior Urethral Stricture Disease

Guido Barbagli; Michele De Angelis; Giuseppe Romano; Massimo Lazzeri

PURPOSE We performed a quality of life assessment for patients treated with perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral stricture disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients (median age 55 years) who underwent perineal urethrostomy (from 1978 to 2007) as part of a plan for a staged urethroplasty repair for a complex anterior urethral stricture. The perineostomy was made using flap urethroplasty. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when postoperative instrumentation was needed. A questionnaire was used to evaluate patient quality of life and satisfaction. RESULTS Stricture etiology was unknown in 50.3% of the cases, lichen sclerosus in 17.3%, catheter in 13.3%, instrumentation in 8.7%, failed hypospadias repair in 4.6%, trauma in 4.1% and infection in 1.7%. Stricture length was 1 to less than 2 cm in 1.2% of cases, 2 to less than 3 cm in 3.5%, 3 to less than 4 cm in 12.1%, 4 to less than 5 cm in 13.8%, 5 to less than 6 cm in 7.5%, greater than 6 cm in 4.1% and panurethral in 57.8%. Of 173 patients 91 (52.6%) underwent prior urethroplasty. Median followup length was 62 months (range 12 to 361). Of 173 cases 121 (70%) were successful and 52 (30%) were failures, requiring revision of the perineostomy. Of 173 patients 135 (78%) were satisfied with the results obtained with surgery, 33 (19.1%) were very satisfied, 127 (73.4%) with a median age of 57 years (range 23 to 85) refused to do the second stage of urethroplasty and 46 (26.6%) with a median age of 47.5 years (range 27 to 72) are currently on a waiting list for the second stage of urethroplasty. CONCLUSIONS Perineostomy is a necessary procedure for patients with complex urethral pathology and satisfaction rates are high.


European Urology | 2008

Muscle- and Nerve-sparing Bulbar Urethroplasty: A New Technique

Guido Barbagli; Stefano De Stefani; F. Annino; Cosimo De Carne; Giampaolo Bianchi

BACKGROUND To describe a new surgical technique for the repair of bulbar urethral strictures to preserve the bulbospongiosum muscle and its perineal innervation. OBJECTIVE Surgical steps of muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty are described. The outcome is provided regarding semen sequestration and postvoiding dribbling. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed the procedure in 12 patients (average age: 43.58 yr) with bulbar urethral strictures (average stricture length: 4.47 cm). SURGICAL PROCEDURE Six patients underwent urethroplasty using a ventral oral mucosal onlay graft, and six patients underwent urethroplasty using a dorsal oral mucosal onlay graft. In all patients, the surgical approach to the bulbar urethra was made avoiding dissection of the bulbospongiosum muscle from the corpus spongiosum and leaving the central tendon of the perineum intact. MEASUREMENTS Clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. The primary outcome examined the technical feasibility of the muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty. The secondary outcome examined the presence or absence of postoperative postvoid dribbling and semen sequestration using a nonvalidated questionnaire (Appendix). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In all patients, postoperative voiding cystourethrography was performed 3 wk after surgery and no urethral sacculation was evident. Urethrography were repeated after 6 mo and 12 mo. No postvoid dribbling or semen sequestration was demonstrated in all patients at 6 mo and 12 mo after surgery. No patient showed stricture recurrence. The average follow-up was 15.25 mo (range 12 mo to 26 mo, median 13.5 mo). CONCLUSIONS Bulbar urethroplasty preserving the bulbospongiosum muscle, the central tendon of the perineum, and the perineal nerves is a safe, feasible, minimally invasive alternative to traditional bulbar urethroplasty.


The Journal of Urology | 2010

Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of 1,176 Patients With Failed Hypospadias Repair

Guido Barbagli; Sava V. Perovic; Rados Djinovic; Salvatore Sansalone; Massimo Lazzeri

PURPOSE To our knowledge epidemiological data on the incidence of failed hypospadias repair and the number of patients seeking further surgical treatment remain unknown. We report an observational, descriptive survey of patients who were evaluated and treated for urethral stricture disease and/or penile defects after primary hypospadias repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective observational chart analysis of patients evaluated and treated for urethral stricture disease and/or penile defects at 2 tertiary European centers from January 1998 to December 2007. In each case we investigated the primary abnormal meatal site, the number of operations needed to repair primary hypospadias and complications of this primary repair. Patients were offered surgical repair for previous failed hypospadias treatment. After surgery evaluation was scheduled at 3, 6 and 9 months. Success was defined as a functional urethra without fistula, stricture or residual chordee and a cosmetically acceptable glanular meatus after the completion of all secondary procedures. RESULTS A total of 1,176 patients with a mean age of 31 years were evaluated and treated. To treat failed hypospadias repair 760 (64.6%) and 416 patients (35.4%) underwent 1-stage and staged repair, respectively. Mean followup was 60.4 months. Of 1,176 cases 1,036 (88.1%) were classified as successful and 140 (11.9%) were considered failures. CONCLUSIONS Failed hypospadias repair may be corrected by multiple and complex surgeries. Its effects are experienced during the lifetime of the patient and parents.

Collaboration


Dive into the Guido Barbagli's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay Kulkarni

Memorial Hospital of South Bend

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Lenzi

University of Florence

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesco Montorsi

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge