Günter Emons

Antiproliferative Signaling of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Human Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer Cells through G Proteinα I-Mediated Activation of Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase1

The signaling pathway through which LHRH acts in endometrial and ovarian cancers is distinct from that in the anterior pituitary. The LHRH receptor interacts with the mitogenic signal transduction of growth factor receptors, resulting in down-regulation of expression of c-fos and proliferation. Only limited data are available on the cross-talk between LHRH receptor signaling and inhibition of mitogenic signal transduction. The present experiments were performed to analyze in endometrial and ovarian cancer cells: 1) whether mutations or splice variants of the LHRH receptor are responsible for differences in LHRH signaling, 2) the coupling of G protein subtypes to LHRH receptor, 3) the phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP) activation counteracting growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity. For these studies, the well characterized human Ishikawa and Hec-1A endometrial cancer cell lines and human EFO-21 and EFO-27 ovarian cancer cell lines were used, which express LHRH and its receptor. 1) Sequencing of the complementary DNA of the LHRH receptor from position 31 to position 1204, covering the complete coding region (position 56 to position 1042) showed that there are neither mutations nor splice variants of the LHRH receptor transcript in Ishikawa and Hec-1A endometrial cancer cells or in EFO-21 and EFO-27 ovarian cancer cells. 2) All analyzed cell lines except for the ovarian cancer cell line EFO-27 expressed both G proteins, alpha(i) and alpha(q), as shown by RT-PCR and Western blotting. In the EFO-27 cell line only G protein alpha(i), not G protein alpha(q), expression was found. Cross-linking experiments using disuccinimidyl suberate revealed that in the cell lines expressing G protein alpha(i) and G protein alpha(q), both G proteins coupled to the LHRH receptor. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced c-fos expression by LHRH, however, was mediated through pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G protein alpha(i). Moreover, LHRH substantially antagonized the PTX-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of G protein alpha(i). 3) Using a phosphotyrosine phosphatase assay based on molybdate-malachite green, treatment of quiescent EFO-21 and EFO-27 ovarian cancer cells and quiescent Ishikawa and Hec-1A endometrial cancer cells with 100 nM of the LHRH agonist triptorelin resulted in a 4-fold increase in PTP activity (P < 0.001). This effect was completely blocked by simultaneous treatment with PTX, supporting the concept of mediation through G protein alpha(i). As shown by quantitative Western blotting, EGF-induced tyrosine autophosphorylation of EGF receptors was reduced 45-63% after LHRH (100 nM) treatment (P < 0.001). This effect was completely blocked using the PTP inhibitor vanadate (P < 0.001). These results demonstrate that mutations or splice variants of the LHRH receptor in human endometrial and ovarian cancer cells are not responsible for the different signal transduction compared with that in pituitary gonadotrophs. We provide evidence that the tumor LHRH receptor couples to multiple G proteins, but the antiproliferative signal transduction is mediated through the PTX-sensitive G protein alpha(i). The tumor LHRH receptor activates a PTP counteracting EGF-induced tyrosine autophosphorylation of EGF receptor, resulting in down-regulation of mitogenic signal transduction and cell proliferation.

Phytoestrogen genistein stimulates the production of osteoprotegerin by human trabecular osteoblasts.

The anti‐resorptive effects of estrogen on bone metabolism are thought to be mediated through modulation of paracrine factors produced by osteoblastic lineage cells that act on osteoclastic lineage cells. Receptor activator of nuclear factor‐κB ligand (RANKL) is the essential factor for osteoclast formation and activation and enhances bone resorption. By contrast, osteoprotegerin (OPG), which is produced by osteoblastic lineage cells acts as a decoy receptor that neutralizes RANKL and prevents bone loss. Recently, 17β‐estradiol was found to stimulate OPG mRNA levels and protein secretion in a human osteoblastic cell line through activation of the estrogen receptor (ER)‐α. In this study, we assessed the effects of the phytoestrogen genistein on OPG mRNA steady state levels (by semiquantitative RT‐PCR and Northern analysis) and protein production (by ELISA) in primary human trabecular osteoblasts (hOB) obtained from healthy donors. Genistein increased OPG mRNA levels and protein secretion by hOB cells by up to two‐ to six‐fold in a dose‐ (P < 0.0001) and time‐dependent (P < 0.0001) fashion with a maximum effect at 10−7 M. Co‐treatment with the pure ER antagonist ICI 182,780 completely abrogated the stimulatory effects of genistein on OPG protein secretion, indicating that these effects were specific and directly mediated through the ER. Pre‐treatment with genistein partially prevented the inhibitory effects of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone on OPG mRNA and protein production. The stimulation of OPG mRNA levels by genistein was not affected by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide and was shown to be due to enhancement of OPG gene transcription. In conclusion, our data suggest that the phytoestrogen genistein is capable of upregulating the production of OPG by human osteoblasts. Thus, dietary sources of phytoestrogens may help to prevent bone resorption and bone loss by enhanced osteoblastic production of OPG. J. Cell. Biochem. 84: 725–735, 2002.

Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in ovarian cancer

The expression of GnRH (GnRH-I, LHRH) and its receptor as a part of an autocrine regulatory system of cell proliferation has been demonstrated in a number of human malignant tumors, including cancers of the ovary. The proliferation of human ovarian cancer cell lines is time- and dose-dependently reduced by GnRH and its superagonistic analogs. The classical GnRH receptor signal-transduction mechanisms, known to operate in the pituitary, are not involved in the mediation of antiproliferative effects of GnRH analogs in these cancer cells. The GnRH receptor rather interacts with the mitogenic signal transduction of growth-factor receptors and related oncogene products associated with tyrosine kinase activity via activation of a phosphotyrosine phosphatase resulting in downregulation of cancer cell proliferation. In addition GnRH activates nucleus factor κB (NFκB) and protects the cancer cells from apoptosis. Furthermore GnRH induces activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/activator protein-1 (JNK/AP-1) pathway independent of the known AP-1 activators, protein kinase (PKC) or mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK).Recently it was shown that human ovarian cancer cells express a putative second GnRH receptor specific for GnRH type II (GnRH-II). The proliferation of these cells is dose- and time-dependently reduced by GnRH-II in a greater extent than by GnRH-I (GnRH, LHRH) superagonists. In previous studies we have demonstrated that in ovarian cancer cell lines except for the EFO-27 cell line GnRH-I antagonist Cetrorelix has comparable antiproliferative effects as GnRH-I agonists indicating that the dichotomy of GnRH-I agonists and antagonists might not apply to the GnRH-I system in cancer cells. After GnRH-I receptor knock down the antiproliferative effects of GnRH-I agonist Triptorelin were abrogated while the effects of GnRH-I antagonist Cetrorelix and GnRH-II were still existing. In addition, in the ovarian cancer cell line EFO-27 GnRH-I receptor but not putative GnRH-II receptor expression was found. These data suggest that in ovarian cancer cells the antiproliferative effects of GnRH-I antagonist Cetrorelix and GnRH-II are not mediated through the GnRH-I receptor.

Growth-inhibitory actions of analogues of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on tumor cells

The expression of LHRH and its receptor has been demonstrated in a number of human malignant tumors, including cancers of the breast, ovary, endometrium, and prostate. These findings suggest the presence of an autocrine regulatory system based on LHRH. Dose-dependent antiproliferative effects of LHRH agonists in cell lines derived from these cancers have been observed by various investigators. LHRH antagonists also have marked antiproliferative activity in most of the ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer cell lines tested, indicating that the dichotomy of LHRH agonists and antagonists might not apply to the LHRH system in cancer cells. Findings from our laboratories suggest that the classical LHRH receptor signal-transduction mechanisms, known to operate in the pituitary, are not involved in the mediation of antiproliferative effects of LHRH analogues in cancer cells. Results obtained by several groups, including ours, instead suggest that LHRH analogues interfere with the mitogenic signal transduction of growth-factor receptors and related oncogene products associated with tyrosine kinase activity. The pharmacological exploitation of these direct antiproliferative actions of LHRH analogues might provide new therapeutic approaches to these cancers.

Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Induces Nuclear Factorκ B-Activation and Inhibits Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer Cells

More than 80% of human ovarian cancers express LHRH and its receptor as part of a negative autocrine mechanism of growth control. This study was conducted to investigate whether LHRH affects apoptosis in ovarian cancer. EFO-21 and EFO-27 ovarian cancer cells were treated with LHRH agonist Triptorelin or with cytotoxic agent Doxorubicin in the absence or presence of Triptorelin. Apoptotic cells were quantified by flow cytometry. Expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappaB) was assessed by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. For determination of Triptorelin-induced NFkappaB activation, cells were transfected with a NFkappaB-secreted alkaline phosphatase reporter gene plasmid (pNFkappaB-SEAP) and cultured for 96 h with or without Triptorelin. The causal relation between Triptorelin-induced NFkappaB activation and Triptorelin-induced protection against apoptosis was investigated using SN50, an inhibitor for nuclear translocation of activated NFkappaB. Apoptosis induction by Triptorelin was never observed. Treatment with Doxorubicin (1 nmol/L) for 72 h increased the percentage of apoptotic cells in EFO-21 and EFO-27 ovarian cancer cell lines to 31% or 34%, respectively. In cultures treated simultaneously with Triptorelin (100 nmol/L), the percentage of apoptotic cells was reduced significantly, to 17% or 18%, respectively (P < 0.001). RT-PCR and immunoblotting experiments showed that NFkappaB subunits p50 and p65 were expressed by ovarian cancer cell lines EFO-21 and EFO-27. When EFO-21 or EFO-27 cells were transfected with pNFkappaB-SEAP and subsequently treated with Triptorelin (100 nmol/L), NFkappaB-induced SEAP expression increased 5.3-fold or 4.7-fold, respectively (P < 0.001). Triptorelin-induced reduction of Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis was blocked by SN50-mediated inhibition of NFkappaB translocation into the nucleus. We conclude that LHRH induces activation of NFkappaB and thus reduces Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian cancer cells. This possibility to protect ovarian cancer cells from programmed cell death is an important feature in LHRH signaling in ovarian tumors, apart from the inhibitory interference with the mitogenic pathway.

Elevated Concentrations of Serum Relaxin are Associated with Metastatic Disease in Breast Cancer Patients

Relaxin (RLX) is known to induce remodeling of benign stromal tissues through upregulation of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs). Recently, we could show that RLX also induces MMPs in breast cancer cells and enhances in vitro invasiveness. To investigate its potential role for progression of breast cancer in vivo, RLX serum concentrations were determined in 160 breast cancer patients during post-surgical follow-up. RLX concentrations in cancer patients were significantly higher than in a control population of healthy blood donors and patients with various other diseases (0.47 versus 0.29 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between patients with metastases (0.62 ng/ml) and those without (0.38ng/ml, p < 0.0001). Overall survival was shorter in RLX-positive ( > 0.4ng/ml) than in RLX-negative patients (p= 0.016). Cox regression analysis showed that RLX was not an independent variable, in contrast to metastatic disease and primary lymph node involvement. Taken together, the detection of elevated RLX concentrations especially in patients with metastases supports the assumption that there is a role for RLX in tissue remodeling during breast cancer progression.

Atorvastatin stimulates the production of osteoprotegerin by human osteoblasts

Recently, HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), potent inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis, have been linked to protective effects on bone metabolism. Because of their widespread use, prevention of bone loss and fractures would be a desirable side effect. However, the mechanisms how statins may affect bone metabolism are poorly defined. Here, we evaluated the effect of atorvastatin on osteoblastic production of receptor activator of nuclear factor‐κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), cytokines that are essential for osteoclast cell biology. While RANKL enhances osteoclast formation and activation, thereby, promoting bone loss, OPG acts as a soluble decoy receptor and antagonizes the effects of RANKL. In primary human osteoblasts (hOB), atorvastatin increased OPG mRNA levels and protein secretion by hOB by up to three fold in a dose‐dependent manner with a maximum effect at 10−6 M (P < 0.001). Time course experiments indicated a time‐dependent stimulatory effect of atorvastatin on OPG mRNA levels after 24 h and on OPG protein secretion after 48–72 h (P < 0.001). Treatment of hOB with substrates of cholesterol biosynthesis that are downstream of the HMG‐CoA reductase reaction (mevalonate, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate) reversed atorvastatin‐induced enhancement of OPG production. Of note, atorvastatin abrogated the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on OPG production. Treatment of hOB with atorvastatin enhanced the expression of osteoblastic differentiation markers, alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin. In summary, our data suggest that atorvastatin enhances osteoblastic differentiation and production of OPG. This may contribute to the bone‐sparing effects of statins.

Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone

OBJECTIVES To compare a composite ultrasonometry variable, the stiffness index (SI), with its two component variables of speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), in identifying post-menopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) and/or osteoporotic fracture. METHODS A cross sectional sample of 1217 women (mean (S.D.) age 53.9 (9.7) years) was studied. Risk factors for osteoporosis were assessed by detailed questionnaire and women with diseases, or those taking treatments known to affect bone metabolism were excluded. Women were allocated to one of four groups: pre-menopausal women (n = 476), healthy post-menopausal women (n = 583), post-menopausal women with low BMD (n = 101), and post-menopausal women with osteoporotic fracture (n = 57). An Achilles ultrasonometer was used to perform quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) at the os calcis. The SI. calculated mathematically from SOS and BUA, was computed. RESULTS Analysis of receiver operating curves (ROC) between healthy post-menopausal women and post-menopausal women with low BMD but no fracture, showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for SI was significantly greater than that for BUA (P < 0.001) or SOS (P < 0.05). For healthy post-menopausal women compared to women with fracture, the area AUC for SI was significantly greater than that for BUA (P < 0.05) or SOS (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found for AUC between BUA and SOS. CONCLUSION QUS variables discriminated women with low density or fracture from healthy postmenopausal controls. The SI was a significantly better indicator than BUA or SOS in this retrospective study.

Membrane-bound melatonin receptor MT1 down-regulates estrogen responsive genes in breast cancer cells.

Abstract:  Melatonin possesses anti‐estrogenic effects on estrogen receptor expressing (ER+) breast cancer cells in culture by reducing cell cycle progression and cell proliferation. There is increasing agreement that on a cellular level the effects of melatonin are primarily induced by the membrane‐bound receptor MT1. The participation of a second, nuclear receptor of the group of ligand‐dependent transcription factors, called RZRα, is under debate. In this study we used a number of breast cancer cell lines differing in their expression of the estrogen receptor and the two known melatonin receptors. In MCF‐7 breast cancer cells transfected with a vector carrying the MT1 gene (MCF‐7Mel1a) binding of CREB‐protein to the cAMP‐responsive element of the breast cancer suppressing gene BRCA‐1 was more strongly reduced by treatment with melatonin than in the parental cells. Expression of estrogen responsive genes was determined in serum‐starved cells, cells stimulated for 16 hr with estradiol and cells subsequently treated with melatonin. Expression of BRCA‐1, p53, p21WAF and c‐myc were up‐regulated by estradiol. Treatment of the stimulated cells with melatonin counteracted the increase induced by estradiol almost completely. The more MT1 a cell line expressed, the stronger was the reduction of the expression of the estradiol‐induced genes. There was no correlation between the expression of the nuclear receptor RZRα and the effects of melatonin on these genes.

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Its Relation to FV Leiden, FII G20210A and Polymorphisms of Plasminogen Activator and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor

Thrombophilic disorders and hypofibrinolysis were demonstrated to be risk factors in a majority of women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and infertility. We investigated the association of FV G1691A mutation, F II G20210A gene polymorphism (PM), 4G/5G PAI-1 and Alu I/D tPA PM in 32 women with infertility and 49 women with at least 2 unexplained early abortions. FV Leiden mutation was significantly more common in women with RPL (10%, p = 0.02) and infertility (19%, p = 0.0005) compared with controls (2%). PAI-1 4G PM and t-PA Alu I PM, alone or in combination, were not associated with RPL or infertility. 9/49 women with RPL showed coagulation disorders with heterozygous FV Leiden mutation (5), FXII (1), protein C (1) or protein S (2) deficiency. However, due to the small number of patients studied, no definite conclusion can be drawn.