Gurmail Singh
Punjab Agricultural University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gurmail Singh.
Chemosphere | 2011
Gurmail Singh; Sanjay Kumar Sahoo; Reenu Takkar; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh; G. S. Chahil
The study was undertaken to determine the disappearance trends of flubendiamide residues on chickpea under field conditions and thereby, ensure consumer safety. Average initial deposits of flubendiamide on chickpea pods were found to be 0.68 and 1.17 mg kg(-1), respectively, following three applications of flubendiamide 480SC @ 48 and 96 g a.i. ha(-1) at 7d intervals. Half-life of flubendiamide on chickpea pods was observed to be 1.39 and 1.44 d, respectively, at single and double dosages whereas with respect to chickpea leaves, these values were found to be 0.77 and 0.86 d. Desiodo flubendiamide was not detected at 0.05 mg kg(-1) level on chickpea samples collected at different intervals. Theoretical maximum residue contribution (TMRC) for flubendiamide was calculated and found to be well below the maximum permissible intake (MPI) on chickpea pods and leaves at 0-day (1 h after spraying) for the both dosages. Thus, the application of flubendiamide at the recommended dose on chickpea presents no human health risks and is safe to the consumers.
Journal of Forestry Research | 2012
Gurmail Singh; K. S. Sangha
We evaluated ten poplar clones (G-3, G-48, L-50/88, L-154/84, L-156/89, S7C8, S7C15, WSL-22, WSL-29 and Uday) for ovipositional preference and larval performance of Clostera restitura. Female moths did not show any preference with respect to clones for oviposition. Significant differences were observed for number of eggs laid on different plant parts. C. restitura laid eggs in clusters, preferably on upper surface of leaf and size of the egg cluster varied from 15 to 167 eggs. Clones varied for their relative resistance and susceptibility to C. restitura. L-50/88; L-156/89 were identified as most resistant clone based on minimum leaf consumption, whereas S7C15 was found to be most susceptible clone to C. restitura. In multiple choice experiments, no feeding preference by C. restitura larvae was detected amongst different poplar clones. After initial settlement of larvae on a particular clone, the larvae remained confined to that clone and negligible inter-clonal movement was noticed subsequently. The fresh pupal weight was correlated negatively (r = −0.37) with percentage surface leaf area eaten and positively (r = 0.47) with length of larval period, measured on different clones. Relationship between percentage leaf area eaten and length of larval period was negative (r = −0.23). Owing to relative resistance of L-50/88 and L-156/89 against C. restitura, these clones can be recommended for plantation in defoliator prone areas in north-western India.
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology | 2007
Gurmail Singh; Balwinder Singh; R. S. Battu; Gagan Jyot; B.S. Joia
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2012
Reenu Takkar; Sanjay Kumar Sahoo; Gurmail Singh; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2013
Sanjay Kumar Sahoo; Kousik Mandal; Gurmail Singh; Rajinder Kumar; G. S. Chahil; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh
American Journal of Environmental Protection | 2014
Gurmail Singh; Balwinder Singh
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology | 2013
Gurmail Singh; G. S. Chahil; Gagan Jyot; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh
American Journal of Analytical Chemistry | 2011
Reenu Takkar; Suban K. Sahoo; Gurmail Singh; Kousik Mandal; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh
Orbital: The Electronic Journal of Chemistry | 2011
G. S. Chahil; Gurmail Singh; Urvashi Bhardwaj; Reenu Takkar; R. S. Battu; Balwinder Singh
Pesticide Research Journal | 2016
Jawala Jindal; Ravinder Kumar; Gurmail Singh