H. A. Sedgwick

Local and non-local effects on surface-mediated stereoscopic depth

The magnitude and precision of stereoscopic depth between two probes is often determined by the disparity each has to a common background. If stereoscopic slant of the background is underestimated, a bias is introduced in the PSE of the probes (G. Mitchison & G. Westheimer, 1984). Using random dot stimuli, we show here how more remote surfaces can influence probe PSE via their influence on perceived background surface slant. The bias was reduced when frontal flanking surfaces were placed above and below the background surface, increasing its perceived slant. In a similar experiment, the flankers were slanted and the central background surface was frontal. For flankers alone, probe bias did not diminish up to a 4.4° separation of flankers and probes. When the central surface was present, the effect of the flankers on probe bias was mediated by this surface and diminished with flanker separation, presumably because of the diminishing contrast slant of the background surface. Stereoscopic depth between probes is thus influenced by a common background surface, by neighboring surfaces acting (contiguously or non-contiguously) on the background surface, and by distant surfaces acting directly on the probes.

Spatial compression produced by a stationary low-vision telescope.

Purpose. Geometrical analysis of the monocular information for visual space perception predicts that the magnification produced by a low-vision telescope will compress the depth dimension of space. To test this prediction we measured the compression in depth of perceived shape while looking through a stationary telescope. To control for the other aspects of telescopic viewing, apart from magnification, we also measured perception while looking through a plain tube having the same field of view. Methods. A 2.75× Keplarian telescope was mounted 40 cm above a tabletop patterned with receding stripes. The 11.6° field of view was centered on a series of rectangular stimulus cards lying flat on the table at a distance of 100 cm. Participants monocularly viewed each card through the telescope, or through a tube having the same field of view, and verbally judged the card’s perceived length (in depth) relative to its width (in the frontal plane). Results. Perceptual compression of shape was calculated by dividing the perceived proportion (length/width) by the actual proportion. The telescope and the tube both produced significant perceptual compression, but perception was significantly more compressed through the telescope (0.43) than through the tube (0.52). Conclusions. The magnification produced by a stationary low-vision telescope can result in a compression of perceived depth. In addition, other aspects of telescopic viewing, such as monocular vision, restricted head movements, and a restricted field of view, can together contribute substantially to such compression. Further research is needed to assess the clinical implications of these results.