H. Bryan Brewer

Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines

The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued an evidence-based set of guidelines on cholesterol management in 2001. Since the publication of ATP III, 5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with clinical end points have been published. These trials addressed issues that were not examined in previous clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The present document reviews the results of these recent trials and assesses their implications for cholesterol management. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain an essential modality in clinical management. The trials confirm the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy in high-risk patients and support the ATP III treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. They support the inclusion of patients with diabetes in the high-risk category and confirm the benefits of LDL-lowering therapy in these patients. They further confirm that older persons benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL-C. The major recommendations for modifications to footnote the ATP III treatment algorithm are the following. In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option, ie, a reasonable clinical strategy, on the basis of available clinical trial evidence. This therapeutic option extends also to patients at very high risk who have a baseline LDL-C <100 mg/dL. Moreover, when a high-risk patient has high triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), consideration can be given to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid with an LDL-lowering drug. For moderately high-risk persons (2+ risk factors and 10-year risk 10% to 20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option on the basis of recent trial evidence. The latter option extends also to moderately high-risk persons with a baseline LDL-C of 100 to 129 mg/dL. When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. Moreover, any person at high risk or moderately high risk who has lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless of LDL-C level. Finally, for people in lower-risk categories, recent clinical trials do not modify the goals and cutpoints of therapy.

Definition of Metabolic Syndrome Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association Conference on Scientific Issues Related to Definition

The National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III report (ATP III)1 identified the metabolic syndrome as a multiplex risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) that is deserving of more clinical attention. The cardiovascular community has responded with heightened awareness and interest. ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome differ somewhat from those of other organizations. Consequently, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, in collaboration with the American Heart Association, convened a conference to examine scientific issues related to definition of the metabolic syndrome. The scientific evidence related to definition was reviewed and considered from several perspectives: (1) major clinical outcomes, (2) metabolic components, (3) pathogenesis, (4) clinical criteria for diagnosis, (5) risk for clinical outcomes, and (6) therapeutic interventions. ATP III viewed CVD as the primary clinical outcome of metabolic syndrome. Most individuals who develop CVD have multiple risk factors. In 1988, Reaven2 noted that several risk factors (eg, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia) commonly cluster together. This clustering he called Syndrome X , and he recognized it as a multiplex risk factor for CVD. Reaven and subsequently others postulated that insulin resistance underlies Syndrome X (hence the commonly used term insulin resistance syndrome ). Other researchers use the term metabolic syndrome for this clustering of metabolic risk factors. ATP III used this alternative term. It avoids the implication that insulin resistance is the primary or only cause of associated risk factors. Although ATP III identified CVD as the primary clinical outcome of the metabolic syndrome, most people with this syndrome have insulin resistance, which confers increased risk for type 2 diabetes. When diabetes becomes clinically apparent, CVD risk rises sharply. Beyond CVD and type 2 diabetes, individuals with metabolic syndrome seemingly are susceptible to other conditions, notably polycystic ovary syndrome, fatty liver, cholesterol gallstones, asthma, sleep disturbances, and some …

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein A Novel Target for Raising HDL and Inhibiting Atherosclerosis

Abstract—Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) promotes the transfer of cholesteryl esters from antiatherogenic HDLs to proatherogenic apolipoprotein B (apoB)–containing lipoproteins, including VLDLs, VLDL remnants, IDLs, and LDLs. A deficiency of CETP is associated with increased HDL levels and decreased LDL levels, a profile that is typically antiatherogenic. Studies in rabbits, a species with naturally high levels of CETP, support the therapeutic potential of CETP inhibition as an approach to retarding atherogenesis. Studies in mice, a species that lacks CETP activity, have provided mixed results. Human subjects with heterozygous CETP deficiency and an HDL cholesterol level >60 mg/dL have a reduced risk of coronary heart disease. Evidence that atherosclerosis may be increased in CETP-deficient subjects whose HDL levels are not increased is difficult to interpret and may reflect confounding or bias. Small-molecule inhibitors of CETP have now been tested in human subjects and shown to increase the concentration of HDL cholesterol while decreasing that of LDL cholesterol and apoB. Thus, it seems important and timely to test the hypothesis in randomized trials of humans that pharmacological inhibition of CETP retards the development of atherosclerosis.

Cholesterol Efflux and Atheroprotection Advancing the Concept of Reverse Cholesterol Transport

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has been proposed to have several antiatherosclerotic properties, including the ability to mediate macrophage cholesterol efflux, antioxidant capacity, antiinflammatory properties, nitric oxide–promoting activity, and ability to transport proteins with their own intrinsic biological activities.1 HDL particles are critical acceptors of cholesterol from lipid-laden macrophages and thereby participate in the maintenance of net cholesterol balance in the arterial wall and in the reduction of proinflammatory responses by arterial cholesterol-loaded macrophages. The pathways that regulate HDL-mediated macrophage cholesterol efflux and disposition of cholesterol involve cell membrane–bound transporters, plasma lipid acceptors, plasma proteins and enzymes, and hepatic cellular receptors (Figure 1). From the earliest proposed concept for HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux,2,3 the concentration of the cholesterol content in HDL particles has been considered a surrogate measurement for the efficiency of the “reverse cholesterol transport” (RCT) process; however, macrophage-derived cholesterol represents a minor component of the cholesterol transported by HDL particles.4–7 One important pathway for cholesterol-mediated efflux from macrophage foam cells involves interaction between the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and cholesterol-deficient and phospholipid-depleted apolipoprotein (apo) A-I complexes (pre-β migrating HDL or very small HDL [HDL-VS]; Figure 2).1,8 Subsequently, the ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) mediates macrophage cholesterol efflux through interactions (Figure 3) with spherical, cholesterol-containing α-HDL particles (small HDL [HDL-S], medium HDL [HDL-M], large HDL [HDL-L], and very large (HDL-VL).1 In contrast, the scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) is a multifunctional receptor that mediates bidirectional lipid transport in the macrophage, which is dependent on the content of cholesterol in lipid-laden macrophages. A more established role for SR-BI in cholesterol trafficking involves selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from mature HDL by the liver. Recent studies suggest that polymorphisms in SR-BI contribute to the functional capacity of this cholesterol …

A pilot study of ex vivo gene therapy for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

The outcome of the first pilot study of liver-directed gene therapy is reported here. Five patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) ranging in age from 7 to 41 years were enrolled; each patient tolerated the procedure well without significant complications. Transgene expression was detected in a limited number of hepatocytes of liver tissue harvested four months after gene transfer from all five patients. Significant and prolonged reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were demonstrated in three of five patients; in vivo LDL catabolism was increased 53% following gene therapy in a receptor negative patient, who realized a reduction in serum LDL equal to ∼150 mg dl−1. This study demonstrates the feasibility of engrafting limited numbers of retrovirus-transduced hepatocytes without morbidity and achieving persistent gene expression lasting at least four months after gene therapy. The variable metabolic responses observed following low-level genetic reconstitution in the five patients studied precludes a broader application of liver-directed gene therapy without modifications that consistently effect substantially greater gene transfer.

Effects of the CETP Inhibitor Evacetrapib Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Statins on HDL and LDL Cholesterol: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Interest remains high in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors as cardioprotective agents. Few studies have documented the efficacy and safety of CETP inhibitors in combination with commonly used statins. OBJECTIVE To examine the biochemical effects, safety, and tolerability of evacetrapib, as monotherapy and in combination with statins, in patients with dyslipidemia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized controlled trial conducted among 398 patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels from April 2010 to January 2011 at community and academic centers in the United States and Europe. INTERVENTIONS Following dietary lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 38); evacetrapib monotherapy, 30 mg/d (n = 40), 100 mg/d (n = 39), or 500 mg/d (n = 42); or statin therapy (n = 239) (simvastatin, 40 mg/d; atorvastatin, 20 mg/d; or rosuvastatin, 10 mg/d) with or without evacetrapib, 100 mg/d, for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The co-primary end points were percentage changes from baseline in HDL-C and LDL-C after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS The mean baseline HDL-C level was 55.1 (SD, 15.3) mg/dL and the mean baseline LDL-C level was 144.3 (SD, 26.6) mg/dL. As monotherapy, evacetrapib produced dose-dependent increases in HDL-C of 30.0 to 66.0 mg/dL (53.6% to 128.8%) compared with a decrease with placebo of -0.7 mg/dL (-3.0%; P < .001 for all compared with placebo) and decreases in LDL-C of -20.5 to -51.4 mg/dL (-13.6% to -35.9%) compared with an increase with placebo of 7.2 mg/dL (3.9%; P < .001 for all compared with placebo). In combination with statin therapy, evacetrapib, 100 mg/d, produced increases in HDL-C of 42.1 to 50.5 mg/dL (78.5% to 88.5%; P < .001 for all compared with statin monotherapy) and decreases in LDL-C of -67.1 to -75.8 mg/dL (-11.2% to -13.9%; P < .001 for all compared with statin monotherapy). Compared with evacetrapib monotherapy, the combination of statins and evacetrapib resulted in greater reductions in LDL-C (P <.001) but no greater increase in HDL-C (P =.39). Although the study was underpowered, no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo or statin monotherapy, evacetrapib as monotherapy or in combination with statins increased HDL-C levels and decreased LDL-C levels. The effects on cardiovascular outcomes require further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105975.

Conditional Disruption of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Gene in Mice Results in Lowered Expression of ABCA1, ABCG1, and apoE in Macrophages and Reduced Cholesterol Efflux

ABSTRACT Disruption of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) gene causes embryonic lethality due to placental dysfunction. To circumvent this, a PPARγ conditional gene knockout mouse was produced by using the Cre-loxP system. The targeted allele, containing loxP sites flanking exon 2 of the PPARγ gene, was crossed into a transgenic mouse line expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the alpha/beta interferon-inducible (MX) promoter. Induction of the MX promoter by pIpC resulted in nearly complete deletion of the targeted exon, a corresponding loss of full-length PPARγ mRNA transcript and protein, and marked reductions in basal and troglitazone-stimulated expression of the genes encoding lipoprotein lipase, CD36, LXRα, and ABCG1 in thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages. Reductions in the basal levels of apolipoprotein E (apoE) mRNA in macrophages and apoE protein in total plasma and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were also observed in pIpC-treated PPARγ-MXCre+ mice. Basal cholesterol efflux from cholesterol-loaded macrophages to HDL was significantly reduced after disruption of the PPARγ gene. Troglitazone selectively inhibited ABCA1 expression (while rosiglitazone, ciglitazone, and pioglitazone had little effect) and cholesterol efflux in both PPARγ-deficient and control macrophages, indicating that this drug can exert paradoxical effects on cholesterol homeostasis that are independent of PPARγ. Together, these data indicate that PPARγ plays a critical role in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis by controlling the expression of a network of genes that mediate cholesterol efflux from cells and its transport in plasma.

HDL Measures, Particle Heterogeneity, Proposed Nomenclature, and Relation to Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events

BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence from epidemiological data, animal studies, and clinical trials supports HDL as the next target to reduce residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated, high-risk patients. For more than 3 decades, HDL cholesterol has been employed as the principal clinical measure of HDL and cardiovascular risk associated with low HDL-cholesterol concentrations. The physicochemical and functional heterogeneity of HDL present important challenges to investigators in the cardiovascular field who are seeking to identify more effective laboratory and clinical methods to develop a measurement method to quantify HDL that has predictive value in assessing cardiovascular risk. CONTENT In this report, we critically evaluate the diverse physical and chemical methods that have been employed to characterize plasma HDL. To facilitate future characterization of HDL subfractions, we propose the development of a new nomenclature based on physical properties for the subfractions of HDL that includes very large HDL particles (VL-HDL), large HDL particles (L-HDL), medium HDL particles (M-HDL), small HDL particles (S-HDL), and very-small HDL particles (VS-HDL). This nomenclature also includes an entry for the pre-β-1 HDL subclass that participates in macrophage cholesterol efflux. SUMMARY We anticipate that adoption of a uniform nomenclature system for HDL subfractions that integrates terminology from several methods will enhance our ability not only to compare findings with different approaches for HDL fractionation, but also to assess the clinical effects of different agents that modulate HDL particle structure, metabolism, and function, and in turn, cardiovascular risk prediction within these HDL subfractions.

Levels of lipoprotein Lp(a) decline with neomycin and niacin treatment

Total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration reduction in patients with markedly increased levels of these substances, leads to a decline in the incidence of myocardial infarction and death. A unique cholesterol-rich lipoprotein, lipoprotein Lp(a), has been identified which not only can be confused with low density lipoproteins, but has also been associated with premature cardiovascular disease. Using the cholesterol-lowering drugs neomycin and niacin in 14 type II hyperlipoproteinemic subjects, we determined the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on lipoprotein Lp(a) concentrations. Neomycin (2g/day) reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein Lp(a) concentrations by 23% and 24%, respectively. Combination therapy with neomycin (2 g/day) and niacin (3 g/day) induced a 48% decline in low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and a 45% reduction in the concentration of lipoprotein Lp(a). These changes in lipoprotein Lp(a) levels were associated with a striking decline in the intensity of the slow pre-beta-lipoprotein fraction determined Lp(a) by lipoprotein electrophoresis. This slow pre-beta-lipoprotein fraction contained Lp(a) determined by immunofixation. These observations indicate that lipoprotein Lp(a) concentrations can be altered pharmacologically and that the progression of cardiovascular disease may be altered through changes in lipoprotein (a) levels.

The Plasma Lipoproteins

Publisher Summary Plasma lipoproteins are the macromolecular complexes with reproducible lipid-protein ratios and stability in aqueous solutions. This chapter describes the classification of the plasma lipoproteins, molecular properties of apolipoproteins, molecular organization of lipoprotein particles, and lipoprotein metabolism. The chapter focuses critically on the recent advances in the field of lipoprotein structure and metabolism. Significant advances about the knowledge of the primary structure and molecular properties of several of the apolipoproteins have been observed. The realization that a number of apolipoproteins undergo self-association provides important, as well as fascinating, insight into the molecular properties of this unique group of proteins. Studies on the synthesis, catabolism, and metabolic interrelationships of plasma lipoproteins provide a number of insights into lipoprotein metabolism, including the precursor-product relationship of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL)-low density lipoproteins (LDL), the peripheral metabolism of lipoprotein particles, as well as the metabolic and molecular defect(s) in patients with disorders of lipid metabolism. Current information on plasma lipoproteins, despite rapid advances in the field, must be regarded as preliminary. However, the availability of current techniques and knowledge of lipoprotein structure and metabolism will undoubtedly provide the necessary background required for the major progress in the knowledge of plasma lipoproteins.