H. Gunnink
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by H. Gunnink.
Animal Welfare | 2012
I.C. de Jong; J. van Harn; H. Gunnink; A. Lourens; J.W. van Riel
For monitoring purposes there is a need for a protocol to measure foot-pad dermatitis (FPD) on-farm. Therefore, we studied the effect of number of birds sampled, number of locations sampled and sampling location in a broiler house on the accuracy of measurement, in order to construct a protocol that can be applied in practice. Samples were taken from eight commercial flocks (Ross 308) at up to ten locations with up to 25 birds sampled per location. Foot-pad lesions were scored in all birds for both feet using the Swedish scoring method. No significant differences in FPD score were found between the first five birds and all birds sampled at a particular location. Although locations near the walls did not differ in FPD score from locations in the central area of a house, the severity of foot-pad lesions was unevenly distributed over the house. A model was constructed showing the inaccuracy related to the number of locations sampled in the house and the number of birds sampled per location. The model shows that in situations with at least five locations differences in inaccuracy are relatively small when a total of 100 birds or more is sampled. Inaccuracy is largest in a flock with variation in foot-pad scores, as compared to flocks with little variation. The results of this experiment can be used to determine the optimal sample size in a commercial broiler house.
Archive | 2018
T.G.C.M. van Niekerk; Lr Animal Behaviour Welfare; H. Gunnink; M. Wijhe-Kiezebrink; M. Pickhard
To get more information out of the Welfare Quality assessment, three modules are developed, to get more detailed information on three aspects. These detailed scores fit on the original WQ-scores, so that the overall welfare assessment according to the WQ-methodology can be done. Two modules (keel bones and beaks) had a good repeatability and provided useful information. The module for subtle feather damage was not further developed, because this damage didn’t appear to have much relation with feather pecking and the actual causes of this damage were unclear.
Journal of Applied Poultry Research | 2014
Ingrid C. de Jong; H. Gunnink; J. van Harn
Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2014
Jorine M. Rommers; Berry Reuvekamp; H. Gunnink; Ingrid C. de Jong
Archive | 2012
I.C. de Jong; T. Perez Moya; H. Gunnink; V.A. Hindle; C.G. van Reenen
World Rabbit Science | 2014
Jorine M. Rommers; M.B.M. Bracke; Berry Reuvekamp; H. Gunnink; Ingrid C. de Jong
World Rabbit Science | 2012
Jorine M. Rommers; B. Kemp; H.W. Houwers; H. Gunnink; Ingrid C. de Jong
Proceedings of the 6th IC on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at the Farm and Group Level | 2014
H. Gunnink; I.C. de Jong; V.A. Hindle
Archive | 2014
J. van Harn; A. Lourens; H. Gunnink
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level. 08-11 Augus 2011, Guelph, Ontario, Canada | 2011
I.C. de Jong; J. van Harn; H. Gunnink; J.W. van Riel; A. Lourens