H Nehoda

Results and Complications after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in Super-obese Patients, using the Swedish Band

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is effective in inducing weight loss, as well as being minimally invasive, totally reversible, and adjustable to the patients needs. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adjustable gastric banding with the Swedish band (SAGB) in super-obese patients. Patients and Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2003, 682 patients (570 women, 112 men) underwent SABG implantation. In these patients, there were 60 super-obese patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. Two groups of patients were analyzed: Group 50 (n = 30 patients) with a BMI 50-54 kg/m2 and Group 55 (n = 30 patients) with a BMI ≥ 55 kg/m2. 13 different surgeons (9 general and 4 bariatric surgeons) performed the SAGB. All data (demographic and morphologic data, operative data, and follow-up data) were prospectively collected in a computerized data bank. Results: 60 patients (8.8%) out of 682 were super-obese and entered the study. Mean %EWL was 39.2 at 1 year and 60.4 at 4 years, BMI fell from 55.5 to 34.7 at 4 years. The complication rate was 26.7% (16/60). General surgeons 12/60 (20%) had more complications than bariatric surgeons 4/60 (6.7%). In Group 50, mean %EWL was 42.1 at 1 year, 55.9 at 2 years, 61.5 at 3 years and 59.9 at 4 years. BMI fell from 51.8 to 33.2 at 4 years. Postoperative complications occurred in 6/30 patients (20%): pouch dilatation (n=2), band migration (n=2) and band leakage (n=2). In Group 55, mean %EWL was 36.8 at 1 year, 55.3 at 2 years, 55.8 at 3 years, and 59.4 at 4 years. BMI fell from 59.1 to 36.4 at 4 years. Postoperative complications occurred in 10/30 patients (33.3%): pouch dilatation (n=2), band migration (n=3) and band leakage (n=5). There was no mortality. Conclusion: SAGB is an effective procedure for the surgical treatment of super-obesity. Because of the high complication rate, super-obese patients should only be treated by experienced bariatric surgeons.

Laparoscopic Gastric Re-Banding versus Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass as a Rescue Operation for Patients with Pouch dilatation

Background:The authors assessed whether laparoscopic rebanding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the best approach for failed gastric banding after pouch dilatation. Methods: Between January 2000 and June 2005, 489 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric banding, and of these, 33 (6.7%) required rescue procedures for pouch dilatation. Each reoperated patient was contacted to obtain information about their postoperative course. Additionally, preoperative weight and BMI, weight loss at 1 year postoperatively, weight at time of pouch dilatation and the time-period between the primary operation and pouch dilatation were analyzed. Results: The most common operation for pouch dilatation was band repositioning or rebanding (16 patients). Band removal without replacement was performed in 7 patients. 8 patients underwent conversion to a LRYGBP. 1 patient underwent laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection and 1 patient received an intragastric balloon. Patients who underwent conversion to LRYGBP are very content and, although weight loss has been nearly the same as after gastric banding, they would prefer the gastric bypass operation to the gastric banding. Conclusion: Conversion to LRYGBP appears to offer significant advantages, and appears to be the rescue therapy of choice after failed laparoscopic gastric banding.

Weight Loss and Quality of Life After Gastric Band Removal or Deflation

BackgroundThe study aim was to retrospectively assess whether patients were able to maintain their weight after gastric band removal or deflation and how they felt about gastric banding.MethodsA total of 41 patients (93% female, mean age 34.1 (SD 10.5) years) were included in this study: patients who had their band removed/deflated without further surgical intervention (group 1, n = 26) and those who later underwent a second bariatric operation (group 2, n = 15). We evaluated weight gain after band removal/during the time between band removal and second bariatric operation.ResultsOf our patients, 31 (76%) suffered a complication (18 late pouch dilatations, six band infections, five band migrations, and two band leaks) requiring band removal. Ten patients wanted their band removed (six) or emptied (four). Mean time after band removal, when patients had neither a band nor a second bariatric operation, was 2.84 (SD 2.3) years. Five (12.2%) patients maintained their weight, four of whom experienced a learning effect; all others gained weight. Mean body mass index for both groups after the period without a band was 36.7 (SD 8.0) kg/m2 (vs 29.4 (SD 7.0) at removal), and excess weight loss was 33.2% (SD 39.2; vs 69.8% (SD 32.9) at removal). Of our patients, 73% would not agree to gastric banding again. According to the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system, long-term outcome of patients following band removal was a “failure” in 66% of patients.ConclusionsLong-term outcome following band removal is unsatisfactory in many patients. Nevertheless, a minority of patients was able to maintain its weight loss.

Disappointing mid-term results after laparoscopic gastric banding in young patients

BACKGROUND When gastric banding was introduced as a bariatric operation about 12 years previously, its early results were promising, with a low complication rate. Only a few long-term studies on this subject have been published. This study was performed to assess our results with laparoscopic gastric banding in young patients after<or=10 years of follow-up. METHODS From January 1996 to December 2000, a total of 41 patients (83% female, 17% male)<25 years old underwent laparoscopic gastric banding at our institution. The patient data were derived from the electronic patient data system, paper charts, and a telephone interview. Psychosocial changes were analyzed using the Moorehead-Ardelt/Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System questionnaire. RESULTS The mean preoperative body mass index was 44.26+/-6.53 kg/m2, with a mean excess weight of 65.22+/-20.48 kg. The body mass index after 1, 5, and 7 years was 31.50+/-7.38 kg/m2, 31.12+/-7.10 kg/m2, and 32.88+/-5.68 kg/m2, respectively. The mean excess weight loss after 1 year was 60.07%+/-25.33%, and after 5 and 7 years, it was 64.84%+/-27.45% and 57.48%+/-28.07%, respectively. An improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities was observed in nearly all patients. Of our patients, 52% had complications requiring reoperation (27% pouch dilation, 10% band leakage, 5% intragastral band migration, 5% perforation of either the esophagus or the stomach, and 5% port disconnection). According to Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System, the long-term outcome was regarded as a failure in 40%, fair in 4%, good in 28%, very good in 20%, and excellent in 8% of patients. CONCLUSION Our mid-term results were disappointing, with a high complication rate and many dissatisfied patients.

Is a Routine Liquid Contrast Swallow Following Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Mandatory

Background: The authors assess the value of liquid contrast medium swallow as a method to detect postoperative complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) for the treatment of morbid obesity. Methods: From January 1996 to January 2001, 350 morbidly obese patients (295 women, 55 men) underwent a LAGB operation. All data were prospectively collected in a computerized databank. All patients underwent a jopomidol swallow (JS) study in the early postoperative phase to exclude perforation of the esophagus or stomach, which is one of the most serious complications occurring after the LAGB operation. Furthermore, the JS was performed to confirm band position and to exclude early pouch dilatation. Results: Out of the 350 LAGB operations, 6(1.8%) early pouch dilatations and 4(1.2%) stomach perforations occurred. All early pouch dilatations were recognized on postoperative JS and immediately repaired laparoscopically. Of the perforations, one was recognized intraoperatively, and the other three were diagnosed postoperatively, either by contrast media extravasation on the JS (two patients) or by computer tomography. Conclusion: Presently,all patients undergo routine postoperative JS, which exposes them to radiation, causes patient discomfort, and entails additional costs of approximately 100 US

Effects of Adjustable Gastric Banding on Altered Gut Neuropeptide Levels in Morbidly Obese Patients

per patient. Of the last 250 patients in our series, there have not been any cases of early pouch dilatation and since 1998 only one case of perforation has occurred, which could be easily suspected clinically. Therefore, we believe that in experienced centers, it is not necessary to perform routine postoperative contrast media studies and recommend JS only in cases of complicated postoperative courses.

Aberrant Left Hepatic Artery in Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Background: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have alterations of gut neuropeptides, such as neurotensin (N) and motilin (M), which are resolved following antireflux surgery. Obesity is associated with GERD. Since the adjustable gastric band prevents gastroesophageal reflux in morbidly obese patients, this study was performed to investigate plasma levels of N and M before and after adjustable gastric banding (AGB). Methods: 47 morbidly obese patients were operated laparoscopically using the Swedish AGB. Preand postoperatively basal plasma levels of N and M were investigated. Symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia were documented, and esophageal manometry as well as 24-hour pH-monitoring were performed pre- and postoperatively. 11 non-obese, asymptomatic, age-matched volunteers served as controls. Results: After a median postoperative follow-up period of 268 days, a significant weight reduction was observed. Preoperatively, 14 patients suffered from reflux symptoms. An insufficient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was found in 8 patients, and 2 patients had impaired esophageal body motility. Pathologic pH-testing was found in 6 patients. Postoperatively, reflux symptoms were present in 4 patients; LES findings and pH-testing were normalized in all patients. However, there was significant impairment of esophageal peristalsis. Preoperatively, levels of N were significantly decreased and levels of M increased compared with control subjects. Postoperatively, there was a significant increase of N and levels of M were normalized. Alterations in gut neuropeptides did not correlate with reflux symptoms, impaired gastroesophageal motility, age, gender or BMI. Conclusion: Morbid obesity alters gut neuropeparetides, which are resolved by AGB. This may be caused by reduction of hypercaloric nutrition post-operatively rather than by improvement of gastroesophageal reflux.

A Study of Pain after Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Background:The aberrant left hepatic artery (ALHA) is an anatomic variation which may be an obstacle in the laparoscopic gastric banding operation. Based on our experience, our mission was to answer the questions: How frequently is an ALHA encountered? Is division necessary? Are there any additional complications in cases where the ALHA is preserved? Methods: In a prospectively collected database of 270 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding in our unit, information including presence of an ALHA, clinical data, diagnostic work-up, operative reports, laboratory data, and follow-up data were collected. Results: In 48 patients (17.7%) (39 women, 9 men, mean age 39.2 years) an ALHA was observed. Hiatal dissection was not impaired in any of these patients, and none required division of the ALHA. In all but two cases, the band was placed above the ALHA, offering additional stability to the band positioning. In 2 patients (4.1%), the artery was injured during dissection and was divided due to ongoing bleeding. Twenty-two (45.8%) of the ALHAs were of intermediate or large size. Neither pouch dilatation nor band slippage occurred in the above-mentioned group. The two patients with divided hepatic arteries had no postoperative symptoms related to impaired liver function. Conclusions: ALHA is not an uncommon finding during laparoscopic gastric banding and may be found in approximately 18% of patients. Division can nearly always be avoided and may be required only in selected cases due to bleeding. Patients do not experience clinical complications after division, although liver enzymes may be temporarily elevated, and no monitoring is necessary.

Mechanical Resistance of Gastric Bands – Comparison Between New Bands and Bands within the Patient for at Least Two Years

Background: The introduction of the laparoscopic approach to bariatric surgery has brought similar advantages as those seen in general surgery.There have been no trials assessing postoperative pain after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB). We compared prospectively postoperative pain and outcome in LASGB and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), to determine if morbidly obese patients can expect the same benefits from a laparoscopic approach in gastric banding as those which are known for LC in non-obese and obese patients. Methods: In a prospectively collected database of 80 patients undergoing LASGB, information including a survey assessing the postoperative pain, the amount of analgetic drugs used, operative reports, laboratory data, and follow-up data was collected. This was compared to an equal number of patients undergoing LC. Postoperatively,all patients received standardized pain medication of 150 mg tramadol per day. Pain was assessed twice on postoperative days 1-3 using a patient questionnaire. Results: Patient characteristics and duration of hospital stay were similar in the two groups. Although there was no significant difference in type and intensity of pain experienced by the patients in either group, the gastric banding patients reported less postoperative pain overall than those in the LC group. Conclusion: The analyzed data show that LASGB offers the same advantages as other laparoscopic operations, in that it induces less pain and enables the patient to return quickly to normal activity and work. The advantage over the compared LC group may be due to higher patient motivation, but was not statistically significant.

Recurrence after Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic and Noncirrhotic Patients

Background: Morbid obesity is a rapidly increasing health risk in industrialized countries, and is associated with serious co-morbidities. Since conservative medical therapies fail to sustain significant weight loss, adjustable gastric banding (AGB) has become an established therapy for morbid obesity. To our knowledge there have been no trials assessing whether gastric bands implanted in the patient for some time can withstand the same mechanical stress as a new band. Methods:The mechanical resistance of unused and used gastric bands was tested through the Tensile Test, to evaluate if a material is strong and rigid enough to withstand the loads experienced in use. 9 bands were tested, 2 of which were unused. Results: The tested new Swedish AGB (SAGB) resisted 361 Newtons (N, 36.8 kg) until tearing, and the new LAGB (Inamed) 157 N (16 kg). The 7 SAGB which had been in a patient for at least 2 years, pulled apart at a mechanical stress of 250.6 N (25.54 kg). Conclusion: The new SAGB had a higher mechanical tensile strength than any of the used bands placed in the body for 2 years.