M Lanthaler

Results and complications after adjustable gastric banding in a series of 250 patients

BACKGROUND Morbid obesity contributes to many health risks including physical, emotional, and social problems. The increasing prevalence of obesity is a major public health concern since obesity is associated with several chronic diseases. Morbid obesity is the biggest independent risk factor for early mortality. Various options for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity have been developed with varying results. METHODS Between January 1996 and December 1999, we operated on a series of 250 patients (200 women and 50 men) at the General Surgical Department of the University Hospital in Innsbruck. The parameters that were evaluated included age, preoperative and postoperative body mass index (BMI), type of surgery, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range 3 to 18). The average preoperative weight was 135.5 kg (BMI 46.69 kg/m(2)). The average total weight-loss was 5.5 kg per month, reaching an average total of 35 kg after one year. The excess weight loss (EWL) after 12 months was 72%. Complications requiring reoperation occurred in 8.8%. CONCLUSIONS In the first year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, weight reduction of the study population was excellent. Additionally, the complication rate was reasonable with no mortalities.

Injection port complications after gastric banding: incidence, management and prevention.

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is advocated as a minimal invasive procedure with a low risk profile and high efficacy in the treatment of morbid obesity. Nevertheless, injection port complications are occasionally reported. The aim of this study was to assess port disconnections and port dislodgement with respect to two different implantation techniques. Methods: Between January 1996 and October 1999 230 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric banding with the Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band (SAGB). In group 1 (118 patients), the injection port was implanted onto the sterno-xiphoid union. In group 2 (112 patients), an additional incision was made to suture the port onto the fascia of the lower third of the sternum. Results: There is a significant reduction in port disconnection between group 1 (9.3 %) and group 2 (0 %). Port dislodgment was observed in one patient in each group. Reoperation was performed under local anesthesia in 11 patients, and general anesthesia was used for laparoscopic tube salvage in two patients. After reconnection, two patients experienced port infection. Conclusion: Correct implantation technique of the injection port of the SAGB onto the fascia of the lower third of the sternum reduces the risk for port complications.Technical notes are discussed.

Laparoscopic Gastric Re-Banding versus Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass as a Rescue Operation for Patients with Pouch dilatation

Background:The authors assessed whether laparoscopic rebanding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the best approach for failed gastric banding after pouch dilatation. Methods: Between January 2000 and June 2005, 489 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric banding, and of these, 33 (6.7%) required rescue procedures for pouch dilatation. Each reoperated patient was contacted to obtain information about their postoperative course. Additionally, preoperative weight and BMI, weight loss at 1 year postoperatively, weight at time of pouch dilatation and the time-period between the primary operation and pouch dilatation were analyzed. Results: The most common operation for pouch dilatation was band repositioning or rebanding (16 patients). Band removal without replacement was performed in 7 patients. 8 patients underwent conversion to a LRYGBP. 1 patient underwent laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection and 1 patient received an intragastric balloon. Patients who underwent conversion to LRYGBP are very content and, although weight loss has been nearly the same as after gastric banding, they would prefer the gastric bypass operation to the gastric banding. Conclusion: Conversion to LRYGBP appears to offer significant advantages, and appears to be the rescue therapy of choice after failed laparoscopic gastric banding.

Weight Loss and Quality of Life After Gastric Band Removal or Deflation

BackgroundThe study aim was to retrospectively assess whether patients were able to maintain their weight after gastric band removal or deflation and how they felt about gastric banding.MethodsA total of 41 patients (93% female, mean age 34.1 (SD 10.5) years) were included in this study: patients who had their band removed/deflated without further surgical intervention (group 1, n = 26) and those who later underwent a second bariatric operation (group 2, n = 15). We evaluated weight gain after band removal/during the time between band removal and second bariatric operation.ResultsOf our patients, 31 (76%) suffered a complication (18 late pouch dilatations, six band infections, five band migrations, and two band leaks) requiring band removal. Ten patients wanted their band removed (six) or emptied (four). Mean time after band removal, when patients had neither a band nor a second bariatric operation, was 2.84 (SD 2.3) years. Five (12.2%) patients maintained their weight, four of whom experienced a learning effect; all others gained weight. Mean body mass index for both groups after the period without a band was 36.7 (SD 8.0) kg/m2 (vs 29.4 (SD 7.0) at removal), and excess weight loss was 33.2% (SD 39.2; vs 69.8% (SD 32.9) at removal). Of our patients, 73% would not agree to gastric banding again. According to the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system, long-term outcome of patients following band removal was a “failure” in 66% of patients.ConclusionsLong-term outcome following band removal is unsatisfactory in many patients. Nevertheless, a minority of patients was able to maintain its weight loss.

Disappointing mid-term results after laparoscopic gastric banding in young patients

BACKGROUND When gastric banding was introduced as a bariatric operation about 12 years previously, its early results were promising, with a low complication rate. Only a few long-term studies on this subject have been published. This study was performed to assess our results with laparoscopic gastric banding in young patients after<or=10 years of follow-up. METHODS From January 1996 to December 2000, a total of 41 patients (83% female, 17% male)<25 years old underwent laparoscopic gastric banding at our institution. The patient data were derived from the electronic patient data system, paper charts, and a telephone interview. Psychosocial changes were analyzed using the Moorehead-Ardelt/Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System questionnaire. RESULTS The mean preoperative body mass index was 44.26+/-6.53 kg/m2, with a mean excess weight of 65.22+/-20.48 kg. The body mass index after 1, 5, and 7 years was 31.50+/-7.38 kg/m2, 31.12+/-7.10 kg/m2, and 32.88+/-5.68 kg/m2, respectively. The mean excess weight loss after 1 year was 60.07%+/-25.33%, and after 5 and 7 years, it was 64.84%+/-27.45% and 57.48%+/-28.07%, respectively. An improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities was observed in nearly all patients. Of our patients, 52% had complications requiring reoperation (27% pouch dilation, 10% band leakage, 5% intragastral band migration, 5% perforation of either the esophagus or the stomach, and 5% port disconnection). According to Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System, the long-term outcome was regarded as a failure in 40%, fair in 4%, good in 28%, very good in 20%, and excellent in 8% of patients. CONCLUSION Our mid-term results were disappointing, with a high complication rate and many dissatisfied patients.

Is a Routine Liquid Contrast Swallow Following Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Mandatory

Background: The authors assess the value of liquid contrast medium swallow as a method to detect postoperative complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) for the treatment of morbid obesity. Methods: From January 1996 to January 2001, 350 morbidly obese patients (295 women, 55 men) underwent a LAGB operation. All data were prospectively collected in a computerized databank. All patients underwent a jopomidol swallow (JS) study in the early postoperative phase to exclude perforation of the esophagus or stomach, which is one of the most serious complications occurring after the LAGB operation. Furthermore, the JS was performed to confirm band position and to exclude early pouch dilatation. Results: Out of the 350 LAGB operations, 6(1.8%) early pouch dilatations and 4(1.2%) stomach perforations occurred. All early pouch dilatations were recognized on postoperative JS and immediately repaired laparoscopically. Of the perforations, one was recognized intraoperatively, and the other three were diagnosed postoperatively, either by contrast media extravasation on the JS (two patients) or by computer tomography. Conclusion: Presently,all patients undergo routine postoperative JS, which exposes them to radiation, causes patient discomfort, and entails additional costs of approximately 100 US

Long-term outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity

per patient. Of the last 250 patients in our series, there have not been any cases of early pouch dilatation and since 1998 only one case of perforation has occurred, which could be easily suspected clinically. Therefore, we believe that in experienced centers, it is not necessary to perform routine postoperative contrast media studies and recommend JS only in cases of complicated postoperative courses.

Aberrant Left Hepatic Artery in Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

ABSTRACTThis study was performed to determine the long-term consequences of laparoscopic gastric banding on weight loss, body image, and life quality in morbidly obese patients. After a minimum follow-up of 9 years (mean follow-up 10 years; range 9–12 years) several questionnaires concerning weight loss, body image, and life quality were mailed to 180 morbidly obese patients following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. One hundred and twelve (62%) patients (92 females, 20 males) completed and returned the questionnaires. Of the entire sample, 73 (64.9%) patients still had the first band, 17 (15.3%) a second band, and in 22 (19.8%) probands the band had been removed for various reasons. Average weight loss, calculated as change in body mass index, was 13.9 kg/m2. Average excess weight loss (EWL) was 30.6%. A total of 10% patients accounted for >50% of EWL. Half of the probands were completely satisfied with their weight loss and about half had reached their planned weight. Lowest post-operative weight was reached at different times, in nearly half of the probands after 2 years, in one-fourth after 4–5 years, and in about 20% at a later time. More than 90% of the probands experienced longer interruptions in weight loss; about half knew why. The findings indicate that overall quality of life was rated good to excellent by two-thirds of the probands, and fair to poor by one-third. A close correlation was seen between extent of weight loss and quality of life and body image. Despite some limitations, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an effective and safe long-term surgical treatment for a majority of morbidly obese individuals, resulting in long-term weight loss and health-related quality of life. However, there is also a minority of morbidly obese subjects who do not benefit enough from this kind of bariatric surgery. Future research should investigate what kind of bariatric surgery is best for the particular obese individual in order to minimize unsatisfying post-operative results.

A Study of Pain after Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Background:The aberrant left hepatic artery (ALHA) is an anatomic variation which may be an obstacle in the laparoscopic gastric banding operation. Based on our experience, our mission was to answer the questions: How frequently is an ALHA encountered? Is division necessary? Are there any additional complications in cases where the ALHA is preserved? Methods: In a prospectively collected database of 270 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding in our unit, information including presence of an ALHA, clinical data, diagnostic work-up, operative reports, laboratory data, and follow-up data were collected. Results: In 48 patients (17.7%) (39 women, 9 men, mean age 39.2 years) an ALHA was observed. Hiatal dissection was not impaired in any of these patients, and none required division of the ALHA. In all but two cases, the band was placed above the ALHA, offering additional stability to the band positioning. In 2 patients (4.1%), the artery was injured during dissection and was divided due to ongoing bleeding. Twenty-two (45.8%) of the ALHAs were of intermediate or large size. Neither pouch dilatation nor band slippage occurred in the above-mentioned group. The two patients with divided hepatic arteries had no postoperative symptoms related to impaired liver function. Conclusions: ALHA is not an uncommon finding during laparoscopic gastric banding and may be found in approximately 18% of patients. Division can nearly always be avoided and may be required only in selected cases due to bleeding. Patients do not experience clinical complications after division, although liver enzymes may be temporarily elevated, and no monitoring is necessary.

Mechanical Resistance of Gastric Bands – Comparison Between New Bands and Bands within the Patient for at Least Two Years

Background: The introduction of the laparoscopic approach to bariatric surgery has brought similar advantages as those seen in general surgery.There have been no trials assessing postoperative pain after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB). We compared prospectively postoperative pain and outcome in LASGB and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), to determine if morbidly obese patients can expect the same benefits from a laparoscopic approach in gastric banding as those which are known for LC in non-obese and obese patients. Methods: In a prospectively collected database of 80 patients undergoing LASGB, information including a survey assessing the postoperative pain, the amount of analgetic drugs used, operative reports, laboratory data, and follow-up data was collected. This was compared to an equal number of patients undergoing LC. Postoperatively,all patients received standardized pain medication of 150 mg tramadol per day. Pain was assessed twice on postoperative days 1-3 using a patient questionnaire. Results: Patient characteristics and duration of hospital stay were similar in the two groups. Although there was no significant difference in type and intensity of pain experienced by the patients in either group, the gastric banding patients reported less postoperative pain overall than those in the LC group. Conclusion: The analyzed data show that LASGB offers the same advantages as other laparoscopic operations, in that it induces less pain and enables the patient to return quickly to normal activity and work. The advantage over the compared LC group may be due to higher patient motivation, but was not statistically significant.