H. River Gates
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by H. River Gates.
Nature | 2016
Martin Bulla; Mihai Valcu; Adriaan M. Dokter; Alexei G. Dondua; András Kosztolányi; Anne L. Rutten; Barbara Helm; Brett K. Sandercock; Bruce Casler; Bruno J. Ens; Caleb S. Spiegel; Chris J. Hassell; Clemens Küpper; Clive Minton; Daniel Burgas; David B. Lank; David C. Payer; Egor Y. Loktionov; Erica Nol; Eunbi Kwon; Fletcher M. Smith; H. River Gates; Hana Vitnerová; Hanna Prüter; James A. Johnson; James J. H. St Clair; Jean-François Lamarre; Jennie Rausch; Jeroen Reneerkens; Jesse R. Conklin
The behavioural rhythms of organisms are thought to be under strong selection, influenced by the rhythmicity of the environment. Such behavioural rhythms are well studied in isolated individuals under laboratory conditions, but free-living individuals have to temporally synchronize their activities with those of others, including potential mates, competitors, prey and predators. Individuals can temporally segregate their daily activities (for example, prey avoiding predators, subordinates avoiding dominants) or synchronize their activities (for example, group foraging, communal defence, pairs reproducing or caring for offspring). The behavioural rhythms that emerge from such social synchronization and the underlying evolutionary and ecological drivers that shape them remain poorly understood. Here we investigate these rhythms in the context of biparental care, a particularly sensitive phase of social synchronization where pair members potentially compromise their individual rhythms. Using data from 729 nests of 91 populations of 32 biparentally incubating shorebird species, where parents synchronize to achieve continuous coverage of developing eggs, we report remarkable within- and between-species diversity in incubation rhythms. Between species, the median length of one parent’s incubation bout varied from 1–19 h, whereas period length—the time in which a parent’s probability to incubate cycles once between its highest and lowest value—varied from 6–43 h. The length of incubation bouts was unrelated to variables reflecting energetic demands, but species relying on crypsis (the ability to avoid detection by other animals) had longer incubation bouts than those that are readily visible or who actively protect their nest against predators. Rhythms entrainable to the 24-h light–dark cycle were less prevalent at high latitudes and absent in 18 species. Our results indicate that even under similar environmental conditions and despite 24-h environmental cues, social synchronization can generate far more diverse behavioural rhythms than expected from studies of individuals in captivity. The risk of predation, not the risk of starvation, may be a key factor underlying the diversity in these rhythms.
The Condor | 2016
Marie Perkins; Lisa Ferguson; Richard B. Lanctot; Iain J. Stenhouse; Steve Kendall; Stephen Brown; H. River Gates; Jeffery O. Hall; Kevin Regan; David C. Evers
ABSTRACT Mercury contamination has become a major concern in the Arctic, where elevated mercury deposition has led to large increases in mercury exposure for some Arctic wildlife over the past century. Chronic mercury exposure in birds is known to reduce reproductive success, which may ultimately result in population declines. Many species of Arctic-breeding shorebirds are declining, and exposure to environmental contaminants, such as mercury, may be an important factor. We quantified mercury exposure in 10 shorebird species breeding and staging in Alaska. We analyzed 229 blood and 73 feather samples collected in 2008–2009 for total mercury concentrations. Mercury in blood represents local exposure, whereas mercury in feathers reflects exposure during feather development. Concentrations of mercury ranged from 0.03 to 2.20 μg g−1 in shorebird blood and from 0.16 to 3.66 μg g−1 in shorebird feathers. Most shorebirds sampled during staging had relatively low blood mercury, but some breeding species had sufficiently high concentrations for potential adverse effects. Overall, blood mercury concentrations of breeding shorebirds differed by moisture content of their predominant foraging habitat, with the highest concentrations found in species using wet to aquatic habitats. We also found variation in mercury concentrations by age class and sex for some species, with females showing lower concentrations than males, but we found no relationship between the amount of mercury in feathers and in blood. The degree of mercury exposure seen in Arctic-breeding shorebirds may be of particular concern when combined with other ecological stressors, such as habitat loss, predation, disturbance, and climate change.
The Auk | 2018
Emily L. Weiser; Richard B. Lanctot; Stephen Brown; H. River Gates; Rebecca L. Bentzen; Joël Bêty; Megan L. Boldenow; Willow B. English; Samantha E. Franks; Laura Koloski; Eunbi Kwon; Jean-François Lamarre; David B. Lank; Joseph R. Liebezeit; Laura McKinnon; Erica Nol; Jennie Rausch; Sarah T. Saalfeld; Nathan R. Senner; David Ward; Paul F. Woodard; Brett K. Sandercock
ABSTRACT Many Arctic shorebird populations are declining, and quantifying adult survival and the effects of anthropogenic factors is a crucial step toward a better understanding of population dynamics. We used a recently developed, spatially explicit Cormack–Jolly–Seber model in a Bayesian framework to obtain broad-scale estimates of true annual survival rates for 6 species of shorebirds at 9 breeding sites across the North American Arctic in 2010–2014. We tested for effects of environmental and ecological variables, study site, nest fate, and sex on annual survival rates of each species in the spatially explicit framework, which allowed us to distinguish between effects of variables on site fidelity versus true survival. Our spatially explicit analysis produced estimates of true survival rates that were substantially higher than previously published estimates of apparent survival for most species, ranging from S = 0.72 to 0.98 across 5 species. However, survival was lower for the arcticola subspecies of Dunlin (Calidris alpina arcticola; S = 0.54), our only study taxon that migrates through the East Asian–Australasian Flyway. Like other species that use that flyway, arcticola Dunlin could be experiencing unsustainably low survival rates as a result of loss of migratory stopover habitat. Survival rates of our study species were not affected by timing of snowmelt or summer temperature, and only 2 species showed minor variation among study sites. Furthermore, although previous reproductive success, predator abundance, and the availability of alternative prey each affected survival of one species, no factors broadly affected survival across species. Overall, our findings of few effects of environmental or ecological variables suggest that annual survival rates of adult shorebirds are generally robust to conditions at Arctic breeding sites. Instead, conditions at migratory stopovers or overwintering sites might be driving adult survival rates and should be the focus of future studies.
Movement ecology | 2016
Emily L. Weiser; Richard B. Lanctot; Stephen Brown; José A. Alves; Phil F. Battley; Rebecca L. Bentzen; Joël Bêty; Mary Anne Bishop; Megan L. Boldenow; Loïc Bollache; Bruce Casler; Maureen Christie; Jonathan Coleman; Jesse R. Conklin; Willow B. English; H. River Gates; Olivier Gilg; Marie-Andrée Giroux; Ken Gosbell; Chris J. Hassell; Jim Helmericks; Andrew D. Johnson; Borgny Katrinardottir; Kari Koivula; Eunbi Kwon; Jean-François Lamarre; Johannes Lang; David B. Lank; Nicolas Lecomte; Joseph R. Liebezeit
Journal of Avian Biology | 2012
Samantha E. Franks; D. Ryan Norris; T. Kurt Kyser; Guillermo Fernández; Birgit Schwarz; Roberto Carmona; Mark A. Colwell; Jorge Correa Sandoval; Alexey Dondua; H. River Gates; Ben Haase; David J. Hodkinson; Ariam Jiménez; Richard B. Lanctot; Brent Ortego; Brett K. Sandercock; Felicia J. Sanders; John Y. Takekawa; Ronald C. Ydenberg; David B. Lank
The Auk | 2013
H. River Gates; Richard B. Lanctot; Abby N. Powell
Waterbirds | 2012
Paul A. Smith; Cheri L. Gratto-Trevor; Brian T. Collins; Suzanne D. Fellows; Richard B. Lanctot; Joe Liebezeit; Brian J. McCaffery; Diane M. Tracy; Jennie Rausch; Steve Kendall; Steve Zack; H. River Gates
Journal of Field Ornithology | 2013
H. River Gates; Stephen Yezerinac; Abby N. Powell; Pavel S. Tomkovich; Olga P. Valchuk; Richard B. Lanctot
Journal of Avian Biology | 2018
Emily L. Weiser; Stephen Brown; Richard B. Lanctot; H. River Gates; Kenneth F. Abraham; Rebecca L. Bentzen; Joël Bêty; Megan L. Boldenow; Rodney W. Brook; Tyrone F. Donnelly; Willow B. English; Scott A. Flemming; Samantha E. Franks; H. Grant Gilchrist; Marie-Andrée Giroux; Andrew D. Johnson; Lisa V. Kennedy; Laura Koloski; Eunbi Kwon; Jean-François Lamarre; David B. Lank; Nicolas Lecomte; Joseph R. Liebezeit; Laura McKinnon; Erica Nol; Johanna Perz; Jennie Rausch; Martin D. Robards; Sarah T. Saalfeld; Nathan R. Senner
Ibis | 2018
Emily L. Weiser; Stephen Brown; Richard B. Lanctot; H. River Gates; Kenneth F. Abraham; Rebecca L. Bentzen; Joël Bêty; Megan L. Boldenow; Rodney W. Brook; Tyrone F. Donnelly; Willow B. English; Scott A. Flemming; Samantha E. Franks; H. Grant Gilchrist; Marie-Andrée Giroux; Andrew D. Johnson; Steve Kendall; Lisa V. Kennedy; Laura Koloski; Eunbi Kwon; Jean-François Lamarre; David B. Lank; Christopher J. Latty; Nicolas Lecomte; Joseph R. Liebezeit; Laura McKinnon; Erica Nol; Johanna Perz; Jennie Rausch; Martin D. Robards