H. Tost
University of Mainz
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by H. Tost.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2011
C. Brühl; J. Lelieveld; Paul J. Crutzen; H. Tost
Globally, carbonyl sulphide (COS) is the most abundant sulphur gas in the atmosphere. Our chemistryclimate model (CCM) of the lower and middle atmosphere with aerosol module realistically simulates the background stratospheric sulphur cycle, as observed by satellites in volcanically quiescent periods. The model results indicate that upward transport of COS from the troposphere largely controls the sulphur budget and the aerosol loading of the background stratosphere. This differs from most previous studies which indicated that short-lived sulphur gases are also important. The model realistically simulates the modulation of the particulate and gaseous sulphur abundance in the stratosphere by the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). In the lowermost stratosphere organic carbon aerosol contributes significantly to extinction. Further, using a chemical radiative convective model and recent spectra, we compute that the direct radiative forcing efficiency by 1 kg of COS is 724 times that of 1 kg CO2. Considering an anthropogenic fraction of 30 % (derived from ice core data), this translates into an overall direct radiative forcing by COS of 0.003 W m −2. The direct global warming potentials of COS over time horizons of 20 and 100 yr are GWP(20 yr) = 97 and GWP(100 yr) = 27, respectively (by mass). Furthermore, stratospheric aerosol particles produced by the photolysis of COS (chemical feedback) contribute to a negative direct solar radiative forcing, which in the CCM amounts to−0.007 W m−2 at the top of the atmosphere for the anthropogenic fraction, more than two times the direct warming forcing of COS. Considering that the lifetime of COS is twice that of stratospheric aerosols the warming and cooling tendencies approximately cancel.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
C. Brühl; J. Lelieveld; H. Tost; M. Höpfner; N. Glatthor
Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO2, the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and other SO2 sources, including strong anthropogenic emissions in China, are found to play a minor role except in the lowermost stratosphere. Estimates of volcanic SO2 emissions are based on satellite observations using Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer and Ozone Monitoring Instrument for total injected mass and Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat or Stratospheric Aerosol and Gases Experiment for the spatial distribution. The 10 year SO2 and COS data set of MIPAS is also used for model evaluation. The calculated radiative forcing of stratospheric background aerosol including sulfate from COS and small contributions by DMS oxidation, and organic aerosol from biomass burning, is about 0.07W/m2. For stratospheric sulfate aerosol from medium and small volcanic eruptions between 2005 and 2011 a global radiative forcing up to 0.2W/m2 is calculated, moderating climate warming, while for the major Pinatubo eruption the simulated forcing reaches 5W/m2, leading to temporary climate cooling. The Pinatubo simulation demonstrates the importance of radiative feedback on dynamics, e.g., enhanced tropical upwelling, for large volcanic eruptions.
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2018
J. Christopher Kaiser; Johannes Hendricks; Mattia Righi; Patrick Jöckel; H. Tost; Konrad Kandler; Bernadett Weinzierl; Daniel Sauer; Katharina Heimerl; Joshua P. Schwarz; A. E. Perring; Thomas Popp
Recently, the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 (Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe, adapted for global applications, third generation) was introduced as a successor to MADE and MADE-in. It includes nine aerosol species and nine lognormal modes to represent aerosol particles of three different mixing states throughout the aerosol size spectrum. Here, we describe the implementation of the most recent version of MADE3 into the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model, including a detailed evaluation of a 10year aerosol simulation with MADE3 as part of EMAC. We compare simulation output to station network measurements of near-surface aerosol component mass concentrations, to airborne measurements of aerosol mass mixing ratio and number concentration vertical profiles, to groundbased and airborne measurements of particle size distributions, and to station network and satellite measurements of aerosol optical depth. Furthermore, we describe and apply a new evaluation method, which allows a comparison of model output to size-resolved electron microscopy measurements of particle composition. Although there are indications that fine-mode particle deposition may be underestimated by the model, we obtained satisfactory agreement with the observations. Remaining deviations are of similar size to those identified in other global aerosol model studies. Thus, MADE3 can be considered ready for application within EMAC. Due to its detailed representation of aerosol mixing state, it is especially useful for simulating wet and dry removal of aerosol particles, aerosol-induced formation of cloud droplets and ice crystals as well as aerosol–radiation interactions. Besides studies on these fundamental processes, we also plan to use MADE3 for a reassessment of the climate effects of anthropogenic aerosol perturbations.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2006
Patrick Jöckel; H. Tost; Andrea Pozzer; C. Brühl; J. Buchholz; Laurens Ganzeveld; P. Hoor; Astrid Kerkweg; M. G. Lawrence; R. Sander; B. Steil; G. P. Stiller; M. Tanarhte; D. Taraborrelli; J. van Aardenne; J. Lelieveld
Geoscientific Model Development | 2010
Patrick Jöckel; Astrid Kerkweg; Andrea Pozzer; R. Sander; H. Tost; Hella Riede; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Sergey Gromov; Bastian Kern
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2004
Patrick Jöckel; R. Sander; Astrid Kerkweg; H. Tost; J. Lelieveld
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
Kostas Tsigaridis; Nikos Daskalakis; M. Kanakidou; Peter J. Adams; Paulo Artaxo; Ranjit Bahadur; Y. Balkanski; Susanne E. Bauer; Nicolas Bellouin; Angela Benedetti; T. Bergman; Terje K. Berntsen; Johan P. Beukes; Huisheng Bian; Kenneth S. Carslaw; Mian Chin; Gabriele Curci; Thomas Diehl; Richard C. Easter; Steven J. Ghan; S. L. Gong; Alma Hodzic; C. R. Hoyle; Trond Iversen; Shantanu H. Jathar; Jose L. Jimenez; Johannes W. Kaiser; A. Kirkevåg; D. Koch; H. Kokkola
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2009
Susannah M. Burrows; T. Butler; Patrick Jöckel; H. Tost; Astrid Kerkweg; Ulrich Pöschl; M. G. Lawrence
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2005
H. Tost; Patrick Jöckel; Astrid Kerkweg; R. Sander; J. Lelieveld
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
K. J. Pringle; H. Tost; Andrea Pozzer; Ulrich Pöschl; J. Lelieveld