Hannah E. Carter
University of Sydney
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hannah E. Carter.
International Journal of Obesity | 2014
Nicholas R. Fuller; Hannah E. Carter; Deborah Schofield; Hans Hauner; Susan A. Jebb; Stephen Colagiuri; Ian D. Caterson
Background:Because of the high prevalence of overweight and obesity, there is a need to identify cost-effective approaches for weight loss in primary care and community settings.Objective:To evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of a commercial weight loss programme (Weight Watchers) (CP) compared with standard care (SC), as defined by national guidelines.Methods:A Markov model was developed to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over the lifetime. The probabilities and quality-of-life utilities of outcomes were extrapolated from trial data using estimates from the published literature. A health sector perspective was adopted.Results:Over a patient’s lifetime, the CP resulted in an incremental cost saving of AUD 70 per patient, and an incremental 0.03 QALYs gained per patient. As such, the CP was found to be the dominant treatment, being more effective and less costly than SC (95% confidence interval: dominant to 6225 per QALY). Despite the CP delaying the onset of diabetes by ∼10 months, there was no significant difference in the incidence of type 2 diabetes, with the CP achieving <0.1% fewer cases than SC over the lifetime.Conclusion:The modelled results suggest that referral to community-based interventions may provide a highly cost-effective approach for those at high risk of weight-related comorbidities.
European Journal of Cancer | 2014
Hannah E. Carter; Diana Zannino; R. John Simes; Deborah Schofield; Kirsten Howard; John Zalcberg; Timothy Jay Price; Niall C. Tebbutt
BACKGROUND Based on the clinical data, bevacizumab has been approved in Australia and globally for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, limited evidence exists for its cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to capecitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, using data from the prospective economic evaluation conducted alongside the MAX trial. METHODS Individual patient level data on resource use and progression free survival were prospectively collected in the phase III MAX trial. Resource use data were collected for the period between randomisation and disease progression, and unit costs were assigned from the perspective of the Australian health care funder. Effectiveness was measured in quality adjusted progression free survival years, with utility scores obtained from both the community valued EQ-5D questionnaire and the patient valued UBQ-C questionnaire. Progression free survival was used as a secondary effectiveness measure. RESULTS The addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine monotherapy cost approximately
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2014
Hannah E. Carter; Andrew J. Martin; Deborah Schofield; Gillian Duchesne; Annette Haworth; Colin Hornby; Mark Sidhom; Michael Jackson
192,156 (95% confidence interval [CI],
BMJ Open | 2017
Hannah E. Carter; Sarah Winch; Adrian G. Barnett; Malcolm Parker; Cindy Gallois; Lindy Willmott; Ben White; Mary Anne Patton; L. Burridge; Gayle Salkield; Eliana Close; Leonie K. Callaway; Nicholas Graves
135,619 to
PLOS ONE | 2016
Hannah E. Carter; Deborah Schofield; Rupendra Shrestha
326,894) per quality adjusted progression free survival year gained when using publicly listed pharmaceutical prices and utility values from the EQ-5D questionnaire. This decreased to
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2015
Gillian Duchesne; Mel Grand; Tomas Kron; Annette Haworth; June Corry; Michael Jackson; Michael Ng; Deidre Besuijen; Hannah E. Carter; Andrew J. Martin; Deborah Schofield; Val Gebski; Joan Torony; Olga Kovacev; Rowena Amin; Bryan Burmeister
149,455 (95% CI,
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2016
Gillian Duchesne; Annette Haworth; Eric Bone; Hannah E. Carter; Martin A. Ebert; Frank Gagliardi; Adrian Gibbs; Colin Hornby; Andrew J. Martin; Mark Sidhom; Maree Wood; Michael Jackson
100,356 to
Faculty of Health; School of Public Health & Social Work | 2014
Hannah E. Carter; Deborah Schofield; Rupendra Shrestha
245,910) when values from the UBQ-C questionnaire were applied. The incremental cost per progression free survival year was
Faculty of Health | 2018
Thuy T. Frakking; John Waugh; Hsien-Jin Teoh; Doug Shelton; Susan Moloney; Donna Ward; Michael David; Matthew Barber; Hannah E. Carter; Sharon Mickan; Kelly Weir
145,059 (95% CI,
BMC Pediatrics | 2018
Thuy T. Frakking; John Waugh; Hsien-Jin Teoh; Doug Shelton; Susan Moloney; Donna Ward; Michael David; Matthew Barber; Hannah E. Carter; Sharon Mickan; Kelly Weir
106,703 to