Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hannes Planatscher is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hannes Planatscher.


Drug Discovery Today | 2011

A generic operational strategy to qualify translational safety biomarkers

Katja Matheis; David Laurie; Christiane Andriamandroso; Nadir Arber; Lina Badimon; Xavier Benain; Kaïdre Bendjama; Isabelle Clavier; Peter Colman; Hüseyin Firat; Jens C. Goepfert; Steve Hall; Thomas O. Joos; Sarah Kraus; Axel Kretschmer; Michael Merz; Teresa Padró; Hannes Planatscher; Annamaria Rossi; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Peter Thomann; Jean-Marc Vidal; Béatrice Molac

The importance of using translational safety biomarkers that can predict, detect and monitor drug-induced toxicity during human trials is becoming increasingly recognized. However, suitable processes to qualify biomarkers in clinical studies have not yet been established. There is a need to define clear scientific guidelines to link biomarkers to clinical processes and clinical endpoints. To help define the operational approach for the qualification of safety biomarkers the IMI SAFE-T consortium has established a generic qualification strategy for new translational safety biomarkers that will allow early identification, assessment and management of drug-induced injuries throughout R&D.


BMC Systems Biology | 2009

Modeling metabolic networks in C. glutamicum : a comparison of rate laws in combination with various parameter optimization strategies

Andreas Dräger; Marcel Kronfeld; Michael J. Ziller; Jochen Supper; Hannes Planatscher; Jørgen Barsett Magnus; Marco Oldiges; Oliver Kohlbacher; Andreas Zell

BackgroundTo understand the dynamic behavior of cellular systems, mathematical modeling is often necessary and comprises three steps: (1) experimental measurement of participating molecules, (2) assignment of rate laws to each reaction, and (3) parameter calibration with respect to the measurements. In each of these steps the modeler is confronted with a plethora of alternative approaches, e. g., the selection of approximative rate laws in step two as specific equations are often unknown, or the choice of an estimation procedure with its specific settings in step three. This overall process with its numerous choices and the mutual influence between them makes it hard to single out the best modeling approach for a given problem.ResultsWe investigate the modeling process using multiple kinetic equations together with various parameter optimization methods for a well-characterized example network, the biosynthesis of valine and leucine in C. glutamicum. For this purpose, we derive seven dynamic models based on generalized mass action, Michaelis-Menten and convenience kinetics as well as the stochastic Langevin equation. In addition, we introduce two modeling approaches for feedback inhibition to the mass action kinetics. The parameters of each model are estimated using eight optimization strategies. To determine the most promising modeling approaches together with the best optimization algorithms, we carry out a two-step benchmark: (1) coarse-grained comparison of the algorithms on all models and (2) fine-grained tuning of the best optimization algorithms and models. To analyze the space of the best parameters found for each model, we apply clustering, variance, and correlation analysis.ConclusionA mixed model based on the convenience rate law and the Michaelis-Menten equation, in which all reactions are assumed to be reversible, is the most suitable deterministic modeling approach followed by a reversible generalized mass action kinetics model. A Langevin model is advisable to take stochastic effects into account. To estimate the model parameters, three algorithms are particularly useful: For first attempts the settings-free Tribes algorithm yields valuable results. Particle swarm optimization and differential evolution provide significantly better results with appropriate settings.


learning and intelligent optimization | 2010

The EvA2 optimization framework

Marcel Kronfeld; Hannes Planatscher; Andreas Zell

We present EvA2, a comprehensive metaheuristic optimization framework with emphasis on Evolutionary Algorithms. It presents a modular structure of interfaces and abstract classes for the implementation of both optimization problems and solvers. End users may choose among several layers of abstraction for an entrance point meeting their requirements on ease of use and access to extensive functionality. The EvA2 framework has been applied successfully in several academic as well as industrial cooperations and is extended continuously. It is freely available under an open source license (LGPL).


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2011

Targeting Peptide Termini, a Novel Immunoaffinity Approach to Reduce Complexity in Mass Spectrometric Protein Identification

Sibylle Hoeppe; Thomas D. Schreiber; Hannes Planatscher; Andreas Zell; Markus F. Templin; Dieter Stoll; Thomas O. Joos; Oliver Poetz

Mass spectrometry and peptide-centric approaches are powerful techniques for the identification of differentially expressed proteins. Despite enormous improvements in MS technologies, sample preparation and efficient fractionation of target analytes are still major bottlenecks in MS-based protein analysis. The complexity of tryptically digested whole proteomes needs to be considerably reduced before low abundance proteins can be effectively analyzed using MS/MS. Sample preparation strategies that use peptide-specific antibodies are able to reduce the complexity of tryptic digests and lead to a substantial increase in throughput and sensitivity; however, the number of peptide-specific capture reagents is low, and consequently immunoaffinity-based approaches are only capable of detecting small sets of protein-derived peptides. In this proof-of-principle study, special anti-peptide antibodies were used to enrich peptides from a complex mixture. These antibodies recognize short amino acid sequences that are found directly at the termini of the peptides. The recognized epitopes consist of three or four amino acids only and include the terminally charged group of the peptide. Because of its limited length, antibodies recognizing the epitope will enrich not only one peptide but a whole class of peptides that share this terminal epitope. In this study, β-catenin-derived peptides were used to demonstrate that it is possible (i) to effectively generate antibodies that recognize short C-terminal peptide epitopes and (ii) to enrich and identify peptide classes from a complex mixture using these antibodies in an immunoaffinity MS approach. The expected β-catenin peptides and a set of 38 epitope-containing peptides were identified from trypsin-digested cell lysates. This might be a first step in the development of proteomics applications that are based on the use of peptide class-specific antibodies.


genetic and evolutionary computation conference | 2004

Comparing Genetic Programming and Evolution Strategies on Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks

Felix Streichert; Hannes Planatscher; Christian Spieth; Holger Ulmer; Andreas Zell

In recent years several strategies for inferring gene regulatory networks from observed time series data of gene expression have been suggested based on Evolutionary Algorithms. But often only few problem instances are investigated and the proposed strategies are rarely compared to alternative strategies. In this paper we compare Evolution Strategies and Genetic Programming with respect to their performance on multiple problem instances with varying parameters. We show that single problem instances are not sufficient to prove the effectiveness of a given strategy and that the Genetic Programming approach is less prone to varying instances than the Evolution Strategy.


Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2014

Catch and measure–mass spectrometry‐based immunoassays in biomarker research

Frederik Weiß; Bart H.J. van den Berg; Hannes Planatscher; Christopher J. Pynn; Thomas O. Joos; Oliver Poetz

Mass spectrometry-based (MS) methods are effective tools for discovering protein biomarker candidates that can differentiate between physiological and pathophysiological states. Promising candidates are validated in studies comprising large patient cohorts. Here, targeted protein analytics are used to increase sample throughput. Methods involving antibodies, such as sandwich immunoassays or Western blots, are commonly applied at this stage. Highly-specific and sensitive mass spectrometry-based immunoassays that have been established in recent years offer a suitable alternative to sandwich immunoassays for quantifying proteins. Mass Spectrometric ImmunoAssays (MSIA) and Stable Isotope Standards and Capture by Anti-Peptide Antibodies (SISCAPA/iMALDI) are two prominent types of MS-based immunoassays in which the capture is done either at the protein or the peptide level. We present an overview of these emerging types of immunoassays and discuss their suitability for the discovery and validation of protein biomarkers. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Biomarkers: A Proteomic Challenge.


BMC Systems Biology | 2009

BowTieBuilder: modeling signal transduction pathways

Jochen Supper; Lucía Spangenberg; Hannes Planatscher; Andreas Dräger; Adrian Schröder; Andreas Zell

BackgroundSensory proteins react to changing environmental conditions by transducing signals into the cell. These signals are integrated into core proteins that activate downstream target proteins such as transcription factors (TFs). This structure is referred to as a bow tie, and allows cells to respond appropriately to complex environmental conditions. Understanding this cellular processing of information, from sensory proteins (e.g., cell-surface proteins) to target proteins (e.g., TFs) is important, yet for many processes the signaling pathways remain unknown.ResultsHere, we present BowTieBuilder for inferring signal transduction pathways from multiple source and target proteins. Given protein-protein interaction (PPI) data signaling pathways are assembled without knowledge of the intermediate signaling proteins while maximizing the overall probability of the pathway. To assess the inference quality, BowTieBuilder and three alternative heuristics are applied to several pathways, and the resulting pathways are compared to reference pathways taken from KEGG. In addition, BowTieBuilder is used to infer a signaling pathway of the innate immune response in humans and a signaling pathway that potentially regulates an underlying gene regulatory network.ConclusionWe show that BowTieBuilder, given multiple source and/or target proteins, infers pathways with satisfactory recall and precision rates and detects the core proteins of each pathway.


Algorithms for Molecular Biology | 2010

Optimal selection of epitopes for TXP-immunoaffinity mass spectrometry

Hannes Planatscher; Jochen Supper; Oliver Poetz; Dieter Stoll; Thomas O. Joos; Markus F. Templin; Andreas Zell

BackgroundMass spectrometry (MS) based protein profiling has become one of the key technologies in biomedical research and biomarker discovery. One bottleneck in MS-based protein analysis is sample preparation and an efficient fractionation step to reduce the complexity of the biological samples, which are too complex to be analyzed directly with MS. Sample preparation strategies that reduce the complexity of tryptic digests by using immunoaffinity based methods have shown to lead to a substantial increase in throughput and sensitivity in the proteomic mass spectrometry approach. The limitation of using such immunoaffinity-based approaches is the availability of the appropriate peptide specific capture antibodies. Recent developments in these approaches, where subsets of peptides with short identical terminal sequences can be enriched using antibodies directed against short terminal epitopes, promise a significant gain in efficiency.ResultsWe show that the minimal set of terminal epitopes for the coverage of a target protein list can be found by the formulation as a set cover problem, preceded by a filtering pipeline for the exclusion of peptides and target epitopes with undesirable properties.ConclusionsFor small datasets (a few hundred proteins) it is possible to solve the problem to optimality with moderate computational effort using commercial or free solvers. Larger datasets, like full proteomes require the use of heuristics.


Proteomics | 2013

From spots to beads—PTM‐peptide bead arrays for the characterization of anti‐histone antibodies

Yvonne Heubach; Hannes Planatscher; Cornelia Sommersdorf; Daniel Maisch; Julia Maier; Thomas O. Joos; Markus F. Templin; Oliver Poetz

Antibodies that recognize PTMs of histones play a central role in epigenetic proteomic research. Modification‐specific antibodies are employed in chromatin immunoprecipitation, for Western blotting and during the immunoprecipitation steps for MS‐based global proteomic analyses. Knowledge about the antibodies’ off‐target binding is essential for the interpretation of experimental data. To address this challenge we developed a fast and cost efficient system for generating peptide bead arrays. We employed this method to establish a bead‐based peptide array containing 384 peptides displaying phosphorylated, acetylated, methylated, and citrullinated N‐terminal regions of histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 and controls. We profiled the binding of 40 PTM‐specific antibodies important for epigenetic proteomic research.


Scientific Reports | 2015

Indirect protein quantification of drug-transforming enzymes using peptide group-specific immunoaffinity enrichment and mass spectrometry

Frederik Weiß; Anke Schnabel; Hannes Planatscher; Bart H.J. van den Berg; Bettina Serschnitzki; Andreas K. Nuessler; Wolfgang E. Thasler; Thomas Weiss; Matthias Reuss; Dieter Stoll; Markus F. Templin; Thomas O. Joos; Katrin Marcus; Oliver Poetz

Immunoaffinity enrichment of proteotypic peptides, coupled with selected reaction monitoring, enables indirect protein quantification. However the lack of suitable antibodies limits its widespread application. We developed a method in which multi-specific antibodies are used to enrich groups of peptides, thus facilitating multiplexed quantitative protein assays. We tested this strategy in a pharmacokinetic experiment by targeting a group of homologous drug transforming proteins in human hepatocytes. Our results indicate the generic applicability of this method to any biological system.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hannes Planatscher's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oliver Poetz

University of Tübingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Zell

University of Tübingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dieter Stoll

University of Tübingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Eisen

University of Tübingen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge