Hans-Joachim Doering

Multi-shaped beam proof of lithography

In this paper a full package high throughput multi electron-beam approach, called Multi Shaped Beam (MSB), for applications in mask making as well as direct write will be presented including complex proof-of-lithography results. The basic concept enables a significant exposure shot count reduction for advanced patterns compared to standard Variable Shaped Beam (VSB) systems and allows full pattern flexibility by concurrently using MSB, VSB and Cell Projection (CP). Proof of lithography results will be presented, which have been performed using a fully operational electron-beam lithography system including data path and substrate scanning by x/y-stage movement.

Optimization of MSB for future technology nodes

In the ITRS roadmap [1] increasingly long mask write and cycle time is explicitly addressed as a difficult challenge in mask fabrication for the 16nm technology node and beyond. Write time reduction demands have to be seen in relation to corresponding performance parameters like Line Width Roughness (LWR), resolution, placement as well as CD Uniformity. The previously presented Multi Shaped Beam (MSB) approach [2, 3] is considered a potential solution for high throughput mask write application. In order to fully adapt the MSB concept to future industrys requirements specific optimizations are planned. The key element for achieving write time reduction is a higher probe current at the target, which can be obtained by increasing the number of beamlets as well as applying a higher current density. In the present paper the approach of a 256 beamlet MSB design will be discussed. For a given image field size along with a beamlet number increase both beamlet pitch and size have to be optimized. Out of previous investigations, one finding was that by changing the demagnification after the beam forming section of the MSB column the overall performance can be optimized. Based on first electron-optical simulations for a new final lens a larger demagnification turned out to be advantageous. Stochastic beam blur simulation results for the MSB reduction optics will be presented. During the exposure of a pattern layout the number of used beams, their shape and their distribution within the image field varies, which can lead to space charge distortion effects. In regard to this MSB simulation results obtained for an image field of approximately 10x10ìm² will be presented. For the 256 beamlet MSB design and resist sensitivities of 20μC/cm2, 40μC/cm2 and 100μC/cm2 write time and LWR simulations have been performed. For MSB pattern data fracturing an optimized algorithm has been used, which increased the beamlet utilization factor (indicates the mean number of beamlets which are used per multi-shot). Finally an update with regard to the required changes of the data path architecture for the 256 beamlet MSB approach will be given. Data integrity as an important aspect of the production worthiness of such a systems will be discussed specifically.

Coulomb Blur Advantage of a Multi Shaped Beam Lithography Approach

This paper describes a new multi beam approach in electron beam lithography called Multi Shaped Beam (MSB). Based on the well known Variable Shaped Beam (VSB) principle, the single shaped beam arrangement is extended and complemented by an array of individually controlled shaped beams. The positive effect of the MSB approach on resolution limiting stochastic beam blur due to Coulomb interactions will be highlighted applying detailed electron-optical Monte-Carlo simulations. To verify the feasibility of the above-mentioned new approach, there is also depicted a proof-of-lithography test stand based on a complete e-beam-lithography system containing MSB-specific hardware and software components.

Multi-shaped beam: development status and update on lithography results

According to the ITRS [1] photo mask is a significant challenge for the 22nm technology node requirements and beyond. Mask making capability and cost escalation continue to be critical for future lithography progress. On the technological side mask specifications and complexity have increased more quickly than the half-pitch requirements on the wafer designated by the roadmap due to advanced optical proximity correction and double patterning demands. From the economical perspective mask costs have significantly increased each generation, in which mask writing represents a major portion. The availability of a multi-electron-beam lithography system for mask write application is considered a potential solution to overcome these challenges [2, 3]. In this paper an update of the development status of a full-package high-throughput multi electron-beam writer, called Multi Shaped Beam (MSB), will be presented. Lithography performance results, which are most relevant for mask writing applications, will be disclosed. The MSB technology is an evolutionary development of the matured single Variable Shaped Beam (VSB) technology. An arrangement of Multi Deflection Arrays (MDA) allows operation with multiple shaped beams of variable size, which can be deflected and controlled individually [4]. This evolutionary MSB approach is associated with a lower level of risk and a relatively short time to implementation compared to the known revolutionary concepts [3, 5, 6]. Lithography performance is demonstrated through exposed pattern. Further details of the substrate positioning platform performance will be disclosed. It will become apparent that the MSB operational mode enables lithography on the same and higher performance level compared to single VSB and that there are no specific additional lithography challenges existing beside those which have already been addressed [1].

Multi-Shaped E-Beam Technology for Mask Writing

Photomask lithography for the 22nm technology node and beyond requires new approaches in equipment as well as mask design. Multi Shaped Beam technology (MSB) for photomask patterning using a matrix of small beamlets instead of just one shaped beam, is a very effective and evolutionary enhancement of the well established Variable Shaped Beam (VSB) technique. Its technical feasibility has been successfully demonstrated [2]. One advantage of MSB is the productivity gain over VSB with decreasing critical dimensions (CDs) and increasing levels of optical proximity correction (OPC) or for inverse lithography technology (ILT) and source mask optimization (SMO) solutions. This makes MSB an attractive alternative to VSB for photomask lithography at future technology nodes. The present paper describes in detail the working principles and advantages of MSB over VSB for photomask applications. MSB integrates the electron optical column, x/y stage and data path into an operational electron beam lithography system. Multi e-beam mask writer specific requirements concerning the computational lithography and their implementation are outlined here. Data preparation of aggressive OPC layouts, shot count reductions over VSB, data path architecture, write time simulation and several aspects of the exposure process sequence are also discussed. Analysis results of both the MSB processing and the write time of full 32nm and 22nm node critical layer mask layouts are presented as an example.

Electron beam direct write: shaped beam overcomes resolution concerns

In semiconductor industry time to market is one of the key success factors. Therefore fast prototyping and low-volume production will become extremely important for developing process technologies that are well ahead of the current technological level. Electron Beam Lithography has been launched for industrial use as a direct write technology for these types of applications. However, limited throughput rates and high tool complexity have been seen as the major concerns restricting the industrial use of this technology. Nowadays this begins to change. Variable Shaped Beam (VSB) writers have been established in Electron Beam Direct Write (EBDW) on Si or GaAs. In the paper semiconductor industry requirements to EBDW will be outlined. Behind this background the Vistec SB3050 lithography system will be reviewed. The achieved resolution enhancement of the VSB system down to the 22nm node exposure capability will be discussed in detail; application examples will be given. Combining EBDW in a Mix and Match technology with optical lithography is one way to utilize the high flexibility advantage of this technology and to overcome existing throughput concerns. However, to some extend a common Single Electron Beam Technology (SBT) will always be limited in throughput. Therefore Vistecs approach of a system that is based on the massive parallelisation of beams (MBT), which was initially pursued in a European Project, will also be discussed.

Production data from a Leica ZBA31H+ shaped e-beam mask writer located at the Photronics facility, Manchester, England

The ZBA31H+) is a variable shaped spot, vector scan e- beam lithography system operating at 20 keV. The specified performance is designed to produce reticles to 250 nanometer design rules, and beyond. In November 98 the acceptance results of a newly installed Leica ZBA31H+), at Photonic Manchester, were presented in a paper at the VDE/VDI 15th European Conference on Mask Technology. This paper is a continuation of that work and presents data from a capability study carried out, on 4000 angstrom EBR9 HS31 resist. Analysis of: mean to target, uniformity, X/Y bias, isolated vs. dense linewidths, linearity, and registration performance of the tool is presented, and the effects of re- iterative develop on process capability compared. Theoretically, a shaped beam system has advantages over raster scan in terms of write time and edge definition capabilities. In this paper, comparative write times against an Etec Mebes 4500 system are included. The ZBA31H+) has to write very small polygons in order to image non-axial or non-45 degree features. The resulting effect on image quality and write time is investigated. In order to improve the fidelity of small OPC structures, Leica have investigated alternative writing strategies, and their results to data are presented here.

MSB for ILT masks

Multi Shaped Beam (MSB) throughput simulation results have already been published in the past. An IC mask set of a 32nm node logic device was one of the applications that had been analyzed in more detail. In this paper we want to highlight results of shot count and write time evaluations done for Inverse Lithography Technology (ILT) masks targeting the 22nm technology node. The test pattern data we used for these practice-oriented analyses was designed by DNP / Japan and created by Luminescent Technologies, Inc. / USA. To achieve reliable evaluation results, the influence of different MSB configurations on shot count and mask write time has been taken into account and will be discussed here. Exposure results of pattern details are presented and compared with the fracturing result. The MSB engineering tool we used for our investigations covers such major components like an electron-optical column, a precision x/y stage and the MSB data path.

Mask-writing system architecture and toolkit approach for 1G DRAM and beyond

The continued device scaling in the semiconductor industry has resulted in an acceleration of the respective technology roadmaps worldwide, which in turn is reflected in the constant pull-in of the lithography roadmaps. From the lithography toolmaker point of view this situation had to be answered with a consistent integrated equipment development roadmap. The general toolkit philosophy of the Leica ZBA300 family of E- beam systems incorporates such features and results in a harmonization of the development and usage of e-beam tools over a wide range of device generations. The theoretical advantages of shaped beam systems over raster scan in terms of edge definition as well as in terms of writing times become especially obvious when advanced masks with the emerging reticle enhancements like OPC are taken into account. It is the successful application of such techniques that will make the production of reticles for the 0.18 micron generation and below a commercially feasible enterprise.