Harshad S. Ladha

The symptom burden of primary brain tumors: evidence for a core set of tumor- and treatment-related symptoms

BACKGROUND A set of symptoms common across cancers has been proposed to enhance quality of care and clinical research in solid tumor patients. Using data from several clinical studies, this study evaluated these symptoms in primary brain tumor patients. METHODS Symptom report data using the MD Anderson Symptom Instrument -Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) from 621 patients enrolled in 8 clinical studies was used. The prevalence and severity of symptoms were reported as they relate to tumor grade, treatment stage and KPS. RESULTS The sample was primarily white (82.5%) males (59%) with high-grade gliomas (75%). More than 50% of patients reported at least 10 concurrent symptoms, and 40% of patients reporting having at least 3 moderate-to-severe symptoms. Fatigue, drowsiness, difficulty remembering, disturbed sleep, and distress were the most severe symptoms reported by all tumor grades. Functional interference of symptoms with ability to work, perform activities, walk, and enjoy life was reported by more than 25% of patients. CONCLUSIONS These results support a core set of symptoms, common in other solid tumor patients, that may impact clinical care and assessment of treatment benefit. Although only 5 of the Center for Medical Technology Policy list of proposed core symptoms met criteria for inclusion in this sample, 5 of the other proposed core symptoms were also reported in similar frequency as reported in the other cancer populations. This primary brain tumor population differed from other solid tumor patients in that other symptoms, which could be disease related, were more prevalent and thus should also be collected for these patients.

Diagnostic Differentiation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor From Other Neoplastic Solid Pancreatic Lesions During Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.

Objectives To identify factors differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from non-PNET neoplastic solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) and assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Methods This is a retrospective study at a tertiary center of consecutive patients referred for EUS from 2004 to 2011. The main outcomes were pretest predictors and accuracy of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of PNET. Results Among a total of 1108 EUS-FNAs for pancreatic lesions, 672 patients (PNET = 91, non-PNET neoplastic-SPLs = 581) had neoplastic-SPLs. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of PNETs were 98.9%, 100%, and 99.9%, respectively. The mean needle-passes were 3.0/patient. The EUS volume (mean/year per endosonographer) in preceding 3 years significantly correlated with fewer needle passes (rs: [−0.26]; P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with PNET when compared to non-PNET neoplastic-SPLs were younger (odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19–9.09; P = 0.001), have 2 or more pancreatic lesions (OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 1.74–18.2; P = 0.005), and lower CA 19-9 values (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 3.13–33.3; P = 0.001). Further, PNETs were less likely to have weight loss (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17–0.90; P = 0.03), current smoking (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–0.98; P < 0.05), pancreatic ductal dilation (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13–0.60; P = 0.002), or imaging evidence of arterial invasion (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07–0.71; P = 0.01). Conclusions Although pre-FNA findings can reliably characterize, EUS-FNA is highly accurate for the diagnosis of PNETs.

Pretest prediction and diagnosis of metastatic lesions to the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration

Early diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) enables prompt treatment. The study aims to identify factors differentiating metastatic lesion to the pancreas (PMET) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

MRI may be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with extra-abdominal desmoid tumours

OBJECTIVE To determine the association of MRI features of extra-abdominal desmoid tumours (DTs) with prognosis. METHODS MRIs for 90 patients with DT were retrospectively reviewed for imaging features associated with biological behaviour. The primary end point was progression (for lesions managed with chemotherapy, radiation therapy and observation) or recurrence (following surgery). Time to event was studied using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models when accounting for demographic, clinicopathological and imaging variables. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate event-free rate (EFR). RESULTS Univariate analysis revealed a significant relationship between EFR and treatment, location and compartment of origin [subcutaneous (SC), superficial fascial, intramuscular (IM) and deep fascial/intermuscular]. None of the imaging features commonly associated with biological behaviour of DTs (e.g., shape, enhancement, T2 signal etc.) or surgical margins (in surgical cases) was associated with EFR. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality and compartment of origin were independent predictors of EFR. Superficial and deep fascial lesions had a significantly worse EFR as a group [hazard ratio: 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.83-8.32; p = 0.0004] than did the SC and IM lesions as a group. 5-year EFR for the fascial lesions was 18% (95% CI: 6-36%), compared with 57% (95% CI: 25-79%) for the SC and IM groups. CONCLUSION Intramuscular or SC DTs may be associated with improved prognosis. If validated on multireader and prospective studies, these results can provide for rapid risk stratification at the time of initial MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This work has shown that imaging features commonly associated with biological activity of desmoid tumours (e.g. shape, T2 signal and enhancement) do not appear to be associated with prognosis in patients undergoing a variety of treatment modalities. The compartment of origin of the lesion, which can be determined on pre-operative MRI, was shown to be associated with prognosis and can allow for risk stratification in patients with DTs.

Staging, surveillance, and evaluation of response to therapy in renal cell carcinoma: role of MDCT

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant renal tumor in the adults. Significant advances have been made in the management of localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma. Surgery is the standard of care and accurate pre-operative staging based on imaging is critical in guiding appropriate patient management. Besides staging, imaging plays a key role in the post-operative surveillance and evaluation of response to systemic therapies. Both CT and MR are useful in the staging and follow up of renal cell carcinoma, but CT is more commonly used due to its lower costs and wider availability. In this article, we discuss and illustrate the role of multi-detector CT in pre-operative staging, post-operative surveillance, and evaluation of response to systemic therapy in renal cell carcinoma.