Hartmut Land

Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c-myc protein

Although Rat-1 fibroblasts expressing c-myc constitutively are unable to arrest growth in low serum, their numbers do not increase in culture because of substantial cell death. We show this cell death to be dependent upon expression of c-myc protein and to occur by apoptosis. Regions of the c-myc protein required for induction of apoptosis overlap with regions necessary for cotransformation, autoregulation, and inhibition of differentiation, suggesting that the apoptotic function of c-myc protein is related to its other functions. Moreover, cells with higher levels of c-myc protein are more prone to cell death upon serum deprivation. Finally, we demonstrate that deregulated c-myc expression induces apoptosis in cells growth arrested by a variety of means and at various points in the cell cycle.

High-intensity Raf signal causes cell cycle arrest mediated by p21Cip1.

Activated Raf has been linked to such opposing cellular responses as the induction of DNA synthesis and the inhibition of proliferation. However, it remains unclear how such a switch in signal specificity is regulated. We have addressed this question with a regulatable Raf-androgen receptor fusion protein in murine fibroblasts. We show that Raf can cause a G1-specific cell cycle arrest through induction of p21Cip1. This in turn leads to inhibition of cyclin D- and cyclin E-dependent kinases and an accumulation of hypophosphorylated Rb. Importantly, this behavior can be observed only in response to a strong Raf signal. In contrast, moderate Raf activity induces DNA synthesis and is sufficient to induce cyclin D expression. Therefore, Raf signal specificity can be determined by modulation of signal strength presumably through the induction of distinct protein expression patterns. Similar to induction of Raf, a strong induction of activated Ras via a tetracycline-dependent promoter also causes inhibition of proliferation and p21Cip1 induction at high expression levels. Thus, p21Cip1 plays a key role in determining cellular responses to Ras and Raf signalling. As predicted by this finding we show that Ras and loss of p21 cooperate to confer a proliferative advantage to mouse embryo fibroblasts.

Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max

c-Myc (Myc) and Max proteins dimerize and bind DNA through basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper motifs (b-HLH-LZ). Using a genetic approach, we demonstrate that binding to Max is essential for Myc transforming activity and that Myc homodimers are inactive. Mutants of Myc and Max that bind efficiently to each other but not to their wild-type partners were generated by either exchanging the HLH-LZ domains or reciprocally modifying LZ dimerization specificities. While transformation defective on their own, complementary mutants restore Myc transforming activity when coexpressed in cells. The HLH-LZ exchange mutants also have dominant negative activity on wild-type Myc function. In addition, wild-type max antagonizes myc function in a dose-dependent manner, presumably through competition of Max-Max and Myc-Max dimers for common target DNA sites. Therefore, Max can function as both suppressor and activator of Myc. A general model for the role of Myc and Max in growth control is discussed.

The c-Myc protein induces cell cycle progression and apoptosis through dimerization with Max.

The c‐Myc protein (Myc) is involved in cellular transformation and mitogenesis, but is also a potent inducer of programmed cell death, or apoptosis. Whether these apparently opposite functions are mediated through common or distinct molecular mechanisms remains unclear. Myc and its partner protein, Max, dimerize and bind DNA in vitro and in vivo through basic/helix‐loop‐helix/leucine zipper motifs (bHLH‐LZ). By using complementary leucine zipper mutants (termed MycEG and MaxEG), which dimerize efficiently with each other but not with their wild‐type partners, we demonstrate that both cell cycle progression and apoptosis in nontransformed rodent fibroblasts are induced by Myc‐Max dimers. MycEG or MaxEG alone are inactive, but co‐expression restores ability to prevent withdrawal from the cell cycle and to induce cell death upon removal of growth factors. Thus, Myc can control two alternative cell fates through dimerization with a single partner, Max.

Multistage carcinogenesis induced by ras and myc oncogenes in a reconstituted organ

ras and myc oncogenes were able to induce distinct phenotypic alterations, resembling different types of premalignant lesions, when introduced into approximately 0.1% of the cells used to reconstitute the mouse prostate gland. While ras induced dysplasia in combination with angiogenesis, myc induced a hyperplasia of the otherwise normally developed organ. ras and myc together induced primarily carcinomas. However, tumor progression was also associated with additional genetic alterations involving gene amplification. Our data indicate that specific types of benign premalignant lesions may reflect the activation of different single oncogenes, and that the consecutive activation of multiple oncogenes could be a causal event in the step-like progression of tumorigenesis.

Cyclins D1 and D2 mediate Myc‐induced proliferation via sequestration of p27Kip1 and p21Cip1

Cyclin E–Cdk2 kinase activation is an essential step in Myc‐induced proliferation. It is presumed that this requires sequestration of G1 cell cycle inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 (Ckis) via a Myc‐induced protein. We provide biochemical and genetic evidence to show that this sequestration is mediated via induction of cyclin D1 and/or cyclin D2 protein synthesis rates. Consistent with this conclusion, primary cells from cyclin D1−/− and cyclin D2−/− mouse embryos, unlike wild‐type controls, do not respond to Myc with increased proliferation, although they undergo accelerated cell death in the absence of serum. Myc sensitivity of cyclin D1−/− cells can be restored by retroviruses expressing either cyclins D1, D2 or a cyclin D1 mutant forming kinase‐defective, Cki‐binding cyclin–cdk complexes. The sequestration function of D cyclins thus appears essential for Myc‐induced cell cycle progression but dispensable for apoptosis.

Myc-Max-Mad: a transcription factor network controlling cell cycle progression, differentiation and death.

The Myc oncoprotein dimerizes with its partner, Max, to bind DNA, activate transcription, and promote cell proliferation, as well as programmed cell death. Max also forms homodimers or heterodimers with its alternative partners, Mad and Mxi-1. These complexes behave as antagonists of Myc/Max through competition for common DNA targets, and perhaps permit cellular differentiation.

Myc activation of cyclin E/Cdk2 kinase involves induction of cyclin E gene transcription and inhibition of p27 Kip1 binding to newly formed complexes

Induction of the Myc-oestrogen receptor fusion protein (MycER) by 4-OH-tamoxifen (OHT) leads to the activation of Cyclin E/Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CycE/Cdk2) complexes followed by the induction of DNA synthesis. As CycE/Cdk2 activity is essential for G1/S transition, we have investigated the mechanism by which Myc can activiate CycE/Cdk2. Our results suggest that this activation may involve at least two Myc-dependent steps: the induction of cyclin E gene transcription followed by accumulation of cyclin E mRNA in a protein synthesis-independent manner and the inhibition of p27Kip1 association with CycE/Cdk2 complexes containing newly synthesised CycE. As a consequence phosphorylation of CycE-bound Cdk2 by cyclin activating kinase (CAK) is accelerated. We propose a model in which the active newly synthesised CycE/Cdk2 complexes trigger a positive feed-back mechanism to activate preexisting complexes through phosphorylation-dependent p27Kip1 release.

Behavior of myc and ras oncogenes in transformation of rat embryo fibroblasts.

The requirements for transformation of rat embryo fibroblasts (REFs) by transfected ras and myc oncogenes were explored. Under conditions of dense monolayer culture, neither oncogene was able to transform REFs on its own. However, the introduction of a ras oncogene together with a selectable neomycin resistance marker into REFs allowed killing of the normal nontransfected cells and the outgrowth of colonies of ras transformants, 10% of which survived crisis and became tumorigenic. These cells expressed greater than 10-fold-higher levels of ras p21 than tumorigenic cells cotransfected with ras and myc oncogenes. The myc oncogene similarly was unable to induce tumorigenic conversion of REFs unless especially refractile colonies of oncogene-bearing cells, produced by use of a cotransfected selectable marker, were picked and subcultured. Tumorigenic conversion of REFs by single transfected oncogenes appears to require special culture conditions and high levels of gene expression.

Ras-mediated cell cycle arrest is altered by nuclear oncogenes to induce Schwann cell transformation.

The cellular responses to ras and nuclear oncogenes were investigated in purified populations of rat Schwann cells. v‐Ha‐ras and SV40 large T cooperate to transform Schwann cells, inducing growth in soft agar and allowing proliferation in the absence of added mitogens. Expression of large T alone reduces their growth factor requirements but is insufficient to induce full transformation. In contrast, expression of v‐Ha‐ras leads to proliferation arrest in Schwann cells expressing a temperature‐sensitive mutant of large T at the restrictive temperature. Cells arrest in either the G1 or G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and can re‐enter cell division at the permissive temperature even after prolonged periods at the restrictive conditions. Oncogenic ras proteins also inhibit DNA synthesis when microinjected into Schwann cells. Adenovirus E1a and c‐myc oncogenes behave similarly to SV40 large T. They cooperate with Ha‐ras oncogenes to transform Schwann cells, and prevent ras‐induced growth arrest. Thus nuclear oncogenes fundamentally alter the response of Schwann cells to a ras oncogene from cell cycle arrest to transformation.