Heidi M. Crane

Effect of Early versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV on Survival

BACKGROUND The optimal time for the initiation of antiretroviral therapy for asymptomatic patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is uncertain. METHODS We conducted two parallel analyses involving a total of 17,517 asymptomatic patients with HIV infection in the United States and Canada who received medical care during the period from 1996 through 2005. None of the patients had undergone previous antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we stratified the patients according to the CD4+ count (351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter or >500 cells per cubic millimeter) at the initiation of antiretroviral therapy. In each group, we compared the relative risk of death for patients who initiated therapy when the CD4+ count was above each of the two thresholds of interest (early-therapy group) with that of patients who deferred therapy until the CD4+ count fell below these thresholds (deferred-therapy group). RESULTS In the first analysis, which involved 8362 patients, 2084 (25%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of 351 to 500 cells per cubic millimeter, and 6278 (75%) deferred therapy. After adjustment for calendar year, cohort of patients, and demographic and clinical characteristics, among patients in the deferred-therapy group there was an increase in the risk of death of 69%, as compared with that in the early-therapy group (relative risk in the deferred-therapy group, 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 2.26; P<0.001). In the second analysis involving 9155 patients, 2220 (24%) initiated therapy at a CD4+ count of more than 500 cells per cubic millimeter and 6935 (76%) deferred therapy. Among patients in the deferred-therapy group, there was an increase in the risk of death of 94% (relative risk, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.79; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The early initiation of antiretroviral therapy before the CD4+ count fell below two prespecified thresholds significantly improved survival, as compared with deferred therapy.

HIV Infection and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction

IMPORTANCE Whether people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with uninfected people is not clear. Without demographically and behaviorally similar uninfected comparators and without uniformly measured clinical data on risk factors and fatal and nonfatal AMI events, any potential association between HIV status and AMI may be confounded. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether HIV is associated with an increased risk of AMI after adjustment for all standard Framingham risk factors among a large cohort of HIV-positive and demographically and behaviorally similar (ie, similar prevalence of smoking, alcohol, and cocaine use) uninfected veterans in care. DESIGN AND SETTING Participants in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Virtual Cohort from April 1, 2003, through December 31, 2009. PARTICIPANTS After eliminating those with baseline cardiovascular disease, we analyzed data on HIV status, age, sex, race/ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, hepatitis C infection, body mass index, renal disease, anemia, substance use, CD4 cell count, HIV-1 RNA, antiretroviral therapy, and incidence of AMI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS We analyzed data on 82 459 participants. During a median follow-up of 5.9 years, there were 871 AMI events. Across 3 decades of age, the mean (95% CI) AMI events per 1000 person-years was consistently and significantly higher for HIV-positive compared with uninfected veterans: for those aged 40 to 49 years, 2.0 (1.6-2.4) vs 1.5 (1.3-1.7); for those aged 50 to 59 years, 3.9 (3.3-4.5) vs 2.2 (1.9-2.5); and for those aged 60 to 69 years, 5.0 (3.8-6.7) vs 3.3 (2.6-4.2) (P < .05 for all). After adjusting for Framingham risk factors, comorbidities, and substance use, HIV-positive veterans had an increased risk of incident AMI compared with uninfected veterans (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.27-1.72). An excess risk remained among those achieving an HIV-1 RNA level less than 500 copies/mL compared with uninfected veterans in time-updated analyses (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-1.66). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Infection with HIV is associated with a 50% increased risk of AMI beyond that explained by recognized risk factors.

Early Retention in HIV Care and Viral Load Suppression: Implications for a Test and Treat Approach to HIV Prevention

BackgroundAfter HIV diagnosis and linkage to care, achieving and sustaining viral load (VL) suppression has implications for patient outcomes and secondary HIV prevention. We evaluated factors associated with expeditious VL suppression and cumulative VL burden among patients establishing outpatient HIV care. MethodsPatients initiating HIV medical care from January 2007 to October 2010 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and University of Washington were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with time to VL suppression (<50 copies/mL) and cumulative VL burden, respectively. Viremia copy-years, a novel area under the longitudinal VL curve measure, was used to estimate 2-year cumulative VL burden from clinic enrollment. ResultsAmong 676 patients, 63% achieved VL <50 copies per milliliter in a median 308 days. In multivariable analysis, patients with more time-updated “no show” visits experienced delayed VL suppression (hazard ratio = 0.84 per “no show” visit, 95% confidence interval = 0.76 to 0.92). In multivariable linear regression, visit nonadherence was independently associated with greater cumulative VL burden (log10 viremia copy-years) during the first 2 years in care (Beta coefficient = 0.11 per 10% visit nonadherence, 95% confidence interval = 0.04 to 0.17). Across increasing visit adherence categories, lower cumulative VL burden was observed (mean ± standard deviation log10 copy × years/mL); 0%–79% adherence: 4.6 ± 0.8; 80%–99% adherence: 4.3 ± 0.7; and 100% adherence: 4.1 ± 0.7 log10 copy × years/mL, respectively (P < 0.01). ConclusionsHigher rates of early retention in HIV care are associated with achieving VL suppression and lower cumulative VL burden. These findings are germane for a test and treat approach to HIV prevention.

Antiretroviral medications associated with elevated blood pressure among patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Objective:To examine the effect of antiretroviral agents and clinical factors on the development of elevated blood pressure (BP). Methods:Observational cohort study of patients initiating their first HAART regimen. We evaluated mean BP prior to HAART and while receiving HAART in relation to antiretroviral classes and individual agents, and demographic and clinical characteristics including change in body mass index (BMI) while on HAART. We used logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with elevated BP [≥ 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) or new diagnosis of hypertension]. Results:Among 444 patients who had 4592 BP readings, 95 patients developed elevated SBP (n = 83), elevated DBP (n = 33), or a new diagnosis of hypertension (n = 11) after initiating HAART. In multivariate analysis, patients on lopinavir/ritonavir had the highest risk of developing elevated BP [odds ratio (OR), 2.5; P = 0.03] compared with efavirenz-based regimens. When change in BMI was added to the model, increased BMI was significantly associated with elevated BP (OR, 1.3; P = 0.02), and the association between lopinavir/ritonavir and elevated BP was no longer present. Compared with lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens, patients receiving atazanavir (OR, 0.2; P = 0.03), efavirenz (OR, 0.4; P = 0.02), nelfinavir (OR, 0.3; P = 0.02), or indinavir (OR, 0.3; P = 0.01) had significantly lower odds of developing elevated BP. Conclusions:Treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir is significantly associated with elevated BP, an effect that appears to be mediated through an increase in BMI. Patients receiving atazanavir were least likely to develop elevated BP. The impact of antiretroviral medications on cardiovascular disease risk factors will increasingly influence treatment decisions.

Cohort profile: the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) delays disease progression and death. However, the treatments incompletely control HIV replication, only partially restore immune function, have significant shortand long-term toxicities, and eventually fail in many patients with consequent development of HIV drug resistance. Thus, there is increasing need for information to guide HIV-infected patients and their providers in making decisions regarding optimal use of antiretroviral therapies. Although clinical trials provide valuable information about efficacy and side effects of antiretroviral treatment, they have limited size, duration and power to detect effects on clinical outcomes, focusing instead on surrogate endpoints such as virologic failure, treatment discontinuation or composite outcome measures. Outside the clinical trial setting, there is tremendous heterogeneity among HIV-infected patients. The prevalence and impact of important health conditions such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection, mental illness and substance abuse likely contribute to increased toxicity and decreased clinical effectiveness of HAART regimens among the broader spectrum of patients treated in routine care. Cohorts with significant diversity in HIV disease severity, comorbidities and demographic distributions are required to provide information regarding long-term outcomes and complications of HIV infection in the modern HAART era. The Centers for AIDS Research (CFAR) Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) was created to better define the relationship between patient and treatment factors and long-term clinical outcomes among HIV-infected patients in the HAART era. The CFARs are a national network of centres of excellence for HIV care and research established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) whose mission is to support a multi-disciplinary environment for basic, clinical, epidemiologic, behavioural and translational research in the prevention, detection and treatment of HIV infection and AIDS. There are 19 CFARs located at academic and research institutions throughout the United States. The objective of the CNICS project is to integrate clinical data from the large and diverse population of HIV-infected persons receiving care at CFAR sites to investigate questions related to HIV disease management that cannot be readily addressed through traditional randomized controlled clinical trials and other cohort studies. Investigators with expertise in basic, clinical, translational and epidemiologic research, in addition to medical informatics, are collaborating on the CNICS project. The potential to build a comprehensive clinical data repository for HIV disease was greatly advanced by the work of CFAR investigators at the participating CNICS sites who had instituted point-of-care electronic medical record systems (EMRs) with the dual purpose of providing real-time clinical information to facilitate the delivery of HIV care and capturing standardized clinical data to support populationbased HIV research. The initial four CNICS sites were Case Western Reserve University, University of * Corresponding author. Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, MS 359931, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. E-mail: kitahata@u.washington.edu 1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA. 2 Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 44106, USA. 3 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 92110, USA. 4 Department of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, 02115, USA. 5 Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218, USA. 6 Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, 35209, USA. 7 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 94143, USA. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association

The effect of mental illness, substance use, and treatment for depression on the initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected individuals.

Information regarding the prevalence of mental illness and substance use among HIV-infected patients and the effect of these problems on HIV treatment is needed. We conducted an observational study of patients in the University of Washington (UW) HIV Cohort to determine prevalence rates for mental illness and substance use. Cox regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between mental illness and substance use, pharmacologic treatment for depression/anxiety, and initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) within 9 months of becoming eligible for HAART. Among 1774 patients in the UW HIV cohort during 2004, 63% had a mental illness (including mood, anxiety, psychotic, or personality disorders), 45% had a substance use disorder, and 38% had both. There were 278 patients who met criteria for HAART eligibility. After controlling for other factors, patients with depression and/or anxiety were significantly less likely to initiate HAART compared with patients without a mental illness (hazard ratio [HR] 0.4, p = 0.02). However, patients with depression/anxiety who received antidepressant/antianxiety medications were equally likely to initiate HAART as patients without a mental illness (HR 0.9, p = 0.5). We found that patients with mental illness or substance use disorders receive HAART at lower CD4+ cell counts and higher HIV-1 RNA levels than patients without these disorders. However, HAART initiation among patients who receive treatment for depression/anxiety is associated with no delay. Screening for these disorders in primary care settings and access to appropriate treatment are increasingly important components of providing care to HIV-infected patients.

Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use

Medication adherence plays an important role in optimizing the outcomes of many treatment and preventive regimens in chronic illness. Self-report is the most common method for assessing adherence behavior in research and clinical care, but there are questions about its validity and precision. The NIH Adherence Network assembled a panel of adherence research experts working across various chronic illnesses to review self-report medication adherence measures and research on their validity. Self-report medication adherence measures vary substantially in their question phrasing, recall periods, and response items. Self-reports tend to overestimate adherence behavior compared with other assessment methods and generally have high specificity but low sensitivity. Most evidence indicates that self-report adherence measures show moderate correspondence to other adherence measures and can significantly predict clinical outcomes. The quality of self-report adherence measures may be enhanced through efforts to use validated scales, assess the proper construct, improve estimation, facilitate recall, reduce social desirability bias, and employ technologic delivery. Self-report medication adherence measures can provide actionable information despite their limitations. They are preferred when speed, efficiency, and low-cost measures are required, as is often the case in clinical care.

A Structural Equation Model of HIV-Related Stigma, Depressive Symptoms, and Medication Adherence

HIV-related stigma has a damaging effect on health outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH), as studies have associated it with poor HIV medication adherence and depressive symptoms. We investigated whether depressive symptoms mediate the relationship between stigma and medication adherence. In a cross-sectional study, 720 PLWH completed instruments measuring HIV-related stigma, depressive symptoms, and HIV medication adherence. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to investigate associations among these constructs. In independent models, we found that poorer adherence was associated with higher levels of stigma and depressive symptoms. In the simultaneous model that included both stigma and depressive symptoms, depression had a direct effect on adherence, but the effect of stigma on adherence was not statistically significant. This pattern suggested that depressive symptoms at least partially mediated the association between HIV-related stigma and HIV medication adherence. These findings suggest that interconnections between several factors have important consequences for adherence.

Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy in routine care

Objective:To examine long-term effects of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on kidney function, we evaluated the incidence and risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) among ART-naive, HIV-infected adults and compared changes in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) before and after starting ART. Methods:Multicenter observational cohort study of patients with at least one serum creatinine measurement before and after initiating ART. Cox proportional hazard models, and marginal structure models examined CKD risk factors; mixed-effects linear models examined eGFR slopes. Results:Three thousand, three hundred and twenty-nine patients met entry criteria, contributing 10 099 person-years of observation on ART. ART was associated with a significantly slower rate of eGFR decline (from −2.18 to −1.37 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P = 0.02). The incidence of CKD defined by eGFR thresholds of 60, 45 and 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was 10.5, 3.4 and 1.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In adjusted analyses black race, hepatitis C coinfection, lower time-varying CD4 cell count and higher time-varying viral load on ART were associated with higher CKD risk, and the magnitude of these risks increased with more severe CKD. Tenofovir and a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (rPI) was also associated with higher CKD risk [hazard odds ratio for an eGFR threshold <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2: 3.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.40–8.02)], which developed in 5.7% of patients after 4 years of exposure to this regimen-type. Conclusion:ART was associated with reduced CKD risk in association with CD4 cell restoration and plasma viral load suppression, despite an increased CKD risk that was associated with initial regimens that included tenofovir and rPI.

Invasive cervical cancer risk among HIV-infected women: a North American multicohort collaboration prospective study.

Objective:HIV infection and low CD4+ T-cell count are associated with an increased risk of persistent oncogenic human papillomavirus infection—the major risk factor for cervical cancer. Few reported prospective cohort studies have characterized the incidence of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) in HIV-infected women. Methods:Data were obtained from HIV-infected and -uninfected female participants in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design with no history of ICC at enrollment. Participants were followed from study entry or January 1996 through ICC, loss to follow-up, or December 2010. The relationship of HIV infection and CD4+ T-cell count with risk of ICC was assessed using age-adjusted Poisson regression models and standardized incidence ratios. All cases were confirmed by cancer registry records and/or pathology reports. Cervical cytology screening history was assessed through medical record abstraction. Results:A total of 13,690 HIV-infected and 12,021 HIV-uninfected women contributed 66,249 and 70,815 person-years of observation, respectively. Incident ICC was diagnosed in 17 HIV-infected and 4 HIV-uninfected women (incidence rate of 26 and 6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). HIV-infected women with baseline CD4+ T-cells of ≥350, 200–349, and <200 cells per microliter had a 2.3, 3.0, and 7.7 times increase in ICC incidence, respectively, compared with HIV-uninfected women (Ptrend = 0.001). Of the 17 HIV-infected women, medical records for the 5 years before diagnosis showed that 6 had no documented screening, 5 had screening with low-grade or normal results, and 6 had high-grade results. Conclusions:This study found elevated incidence of ICC in HIV-infected compared with -uninfected women, and these rates increased with immunosuppression.