Hendrik Schmidt

Tiotropium versus Salmeterol for the Prevention of Exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND Treatment guidelines recommend the use of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators to alleviate symptoms and reduce the risk of exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but do not specify whether a long-acting anticholinergic drug or a β(2)-agonist is the preferred agent. We investigated whether the anticholinergic drug tiotropium is superior to the β(2)-agonist salmeterol in preventing exacerbations of COPD. METHODS In a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial, we compared the effect of treatment with 18 μg of tiotropium once daily with that of 50 μg of salmeterol twice daily on the incidence of moderate or severe exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and a history of exacerbations in the preceding year. RESULTS A total of 7376 patients were randomly assigned to and treated with tiotropium (3707 patients) or salmeterol (3669 patients). Tiotropium, as compared with salmeterol, increased the time to the first exacerbation (187 days vs. 145 days), with a 17% reduction in risk (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.90; P<0.001). Tiotropium also increased the time to the first severe exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.85; P<0.001), reduced the annual number of moderate or severe exacerbations (0.64 vs. 0.72; rate ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.96; P=0.002), and reduced the annual number of severe exacerbations (0.09 vs. 0.13; rate ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.82; P<0.001). Overall, the incidence of serious adverse events and of adverse events leading to the discontinuation of treatment was similar in the two study groups. There were 64 deaths (1.7%) in the tiotropium group and 78 (2.1%) in the salmeterol group. CONCLUSIONS These results show that, in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, tiotropium is more effective than salmeterol in preventing exacerbations. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00563381.).

Seasonal Distribution of COPD Exacerbations in the Prevention of Exacerbations With Tiotropium in COPD Trial

BACKGROUND There is still a lack of data on the seasonality of exacerbations of COPD based on large randomized studies using COPD exacerbations as primary end points. The objective of this study was to assess the seasonal pattern of moderate and severe exacerbations and analyze the influence of associated baseline factors. We also determined the timing of second exacerbations and the potential impact of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic on exacerbations. METHODS Analyses of exacerbation rates across treatment groups were adjusted for differing times on treatment by means of descriptive statistics based on the 1-year Prevention of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in COPD (POET-COPD) trial, in which exacerbations were the primary end point. RESULTS Of the 7,376 patients who were randomized, a total of 4,411 exacerbations were reported in 2,691 patients. Mean monthly exacerbation rates during winter were 2.16-fold higher than during summer, regardless of baseline characteristics (age, sex, COPD severity, smoking status, BMI, inhaled corticosteroid use, cardiovascular comorbidity, concomitant cardiovascular medication). Second exacerbations after a previous event in October to March occurred 1 month earlier than during the warmer half of the season. The portion of exacerbation-related hospitalizations remained constant throughout the year. Most exacerbations were treated with antibiotics and reached a peak in the colder season. All-cause mortality showed a seasonal pattern similar to exacerbations. The 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic was not associated with an increase in exacerbation rates or deaths. CONCLUSIONS This analysis presented a marked impact of season on exacerbation outcomes, antibiotic treatment, timing of second exacerbations, and all-cause mortality.

Characterisation of exacerbation risk and exacerbator phenotypes in the POET-COPD trial

BackgroundData examining the characteristics of patients with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and associated hospitalisations and mortality are scarce.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of the Prevention Of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in COPD (POET-COPD) trial, targeting exacerbations as the primary endpoint. Patients were classified as non-, infrequent, and frequent exacerbators (0, 1, or ≥ 2 exacerbations during study treatment), irrespective of study treatment. A multivariate Cox regression model assessed the effect of covariates on time to first exacerbation.ResultsIn total, 7376 patients were included in the analysis: 63.5% non-exacerbators, 22.9% infrequent, 13.6% frequent exacerbators. Factors significantly associated with exacerbation risk were age, sex, body mass index, COPD duration and severity, smoking history, baseline inhaled corticosteroid use, and preceding antibiotic or systemic corticosteroid courses. Frequent exacerbators had greater severity and duration of COPD, received more pulmonary medication, and ≥ 2 systemic corticosteroid or antibiotic courses in the preceding year, and were more likely to be female and ex-smokers. The small proportion of frequent exacerbators (13.6%) accounted for 56.6% of exacerbation-related hospitalisations, which, overall, were associated with a three-fold increase in mortality.ConclusionThe frequent exacerbator phenotype was closely associated with exacerbation-related hospitalisations, and exacerbation-related hospitalisations were associated with poorer survival.Trial registrationNCT00563381; Study identifier: BI 205.389.

Effect of ADRB2 polymorphisms on the efficacy of salmeterol and tiotropium in preventing COPD exacerbations: a prespecified substudy of the POET-COPD trial

BACKGROUND The effect of β2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) polymorphisms on the treatment response to longacting bronchodilators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear. We aimed to establish whether ADRB2 polymorphisms differentially affected COPD exacerbation outcomes in response to tiotropium versus salmeterol. METHODS We did a prespecified analysis of the ADRB2 polymorphisms Arg16Gly and Gln27Glu within the 1 year randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group Prevention Of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in COPD (POET-COPD) trial, comparing the effects of treatment with tiotropium or salmeterol on exacerbations in 7376 patients with COPD. One blood sample was collected for pharmacogenetic testing from each patient who elected to participate in the substudy. Random assignment of patients to treatment groups was not stratified according to genotypes. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood specimens and samples were genotyped for the two SNPs, rs1042713 (Arg16Gly) and rs1042714 (Gln27Glu). All assays were done in technical duplicates and 10% of samples that were randomly chosen were repeated as technical duplicates in a second independent genotyping process. Our primary endpoint was the risk of a first exacerbation of COPD based on time to first exacerbation data. An exacerbation of COPD was defined as the increase or new onset of more than one symptom of COPD (cough, sputum, wheezing, dyspnoea, or chest tightness), with at least one of the symptoms lasting for 3 days or more and needing treatment with antibiotics or systemic glucocorticoids (moderate exacerbations), or admission to hospital (severe exacerbations). POET-COPD is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00563381. FINDINGS 5125 patients gave informed consent for genotyping. The distributions of ADRB2 genotypes were well matched among groups. Polymorphisms at aminoacid 27 did not affect exacerbation outcomes. In the salmeterol group, patients with Arg16Arg genotype had a significantly reduced exacerbation risk compared with patients with Arg16Gly (p=0·0130) and Gly16Gly (p=0·0018) genotypes (proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation was 32·3% in Arg16Arg, 39·8% in Arg16Gly, and 42·1% in Gly16Gly). By contrast, exacerbation risk was not modified by polymorphisms at aminoacid 16 in the tiotropium group. The effect of the Arg16Gly polymorphism on treatment response to salmeterol was dependent on the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). In patients untreated with ICS at baseline, Arg16Gly and Arg16Arg genotypes were associated with significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation compared with Gly16Gly (vs Arg16Gly p=0·0164; Arg16Arg p=0·0316; proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation was 28·3% in Arg16Arg, 31·6% in Arg16Gly, and 39·2% in Gly16Gly), whereas in patients on ICS at baseline, only the Arg16Arg genotype was associated with significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation compared with Gly16Gly (p=0·0198; not Arg16Gly p=0·64; proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation was 35·9% in Arg16Arg, 46·7% in Arg16Gly, and 44·8% in Gly16Gly). The respiratory disorders, in particular worsening of COPD, were the most common serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION Patients with the Arg16Arg genotype had better exacerbation outcomes in response to salmeterol than Gly16Gly and Arg16Gly genotypes, suggesting a potential differential Arg16Gly genotype effect on treatment response to longacting β-agonists (LABAs). However, the use of ADRB2 polymorphisms for predicting LABA treatment response is still limited and further prospective validation will be needed to advance the mechanistic understanding of β-adrenergic polymorphisms and their association with clinical features of COPD. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer.

Effect of tiotropium vs. salmeterol on exacerbations: GOLD II and maintenance therapy naïve patients

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of tiotropium compared with salmeterol on exacerbations in patients with moderate (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage II) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and those naïve to maintenance respiratory therapy in the 1-year Prevention Of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in COPD (POET-COPD(®)) trial (NCT00563381). Time to first exacerbation (primary endpoint) and rates of exacerbations were analyzed using exploratory Cox and Poisson regression (adjusting for time on treatment). Of 7376 randomized patients, 3614 were GOLD stage II (tiotropium n = 1781; salmeterol n = 1833) and 1343 were maintenance therapy naïve (tiotropium n = 672; salmeterol n = 671). Tiotropium significantly increased time to first exacerbation vs. salmeterol in GOLD stage II patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.99; p = 0.028) and maintenance therapy naïve patients (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97; p = 0.028). Annual exacerbation rates were also significantly lower with tiotropium in the maintenance naïve subgroup compared with salmeterol (rate ratio [RR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94; p = 0.012). In the GOLD stage II subgroup, the rate of hospitalized exacerbations per year was significantly lower with tiotropium than with salmeterol (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85; p < 0.001); tiotropium also significantly prolonged time to first hospitalized exacerbation versus salmeterol in this subgroup (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; p = 0.012). In conclusion, results from this prespecified subgroup analysis support the selection of tiotropium as first-choice maintenance therapy for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.

Design of the PF-ILD trial: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial of nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

600 patients aged ≥18 years will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to nintedanib or placebo. Patients with diagnosis of IPF will be excluded. The study population will be enriched with two-thirds having a usual interstitial pneumonia-like pattern on HRCT. The primary endpoint is the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity over 52 weeks. The main secondary endpoints are the absolute change from baseline in King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire total score, time to first acute interstitial lung disease exacerbation or death and time to all-cause mortality over 52 weeks. Ethics and dissemination The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Conference on Harmonisation Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Japanese GCP regulations. Trial registration number NCT02999178.

Comorbidities of patients in tiotropium clinical trials: comparison with observational studies of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background There is an ongoing debate on whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seen in real-life clinical settings are represented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COPD. It is thought that the stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria of RCTs may prevent the participation of patients with specific characteristics or risk factors. Methods We surveyed a database of patients recruited into 35 placebo-controlled tiotropium RCTs and also conducted a systematic literature review of large-scale observational studies conducted in patients with a documented diagnosis of COPD between 1990 and 2013. Patient demographics and comorbidities with a high prevalence in patients with COPD were compared between the two patient populations at baseline. Using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; v 14.0), patient comorbidities in the pooled tiotropium RCTs were classified according to system organ class, pharmacovigilance (PV) endpoints, and Standardised MedDRA Queries to enable comparison with the observational studies. Results We identified 24,555 patients in the pooled tiotropium RCTs and 61,361 patients among the 13 observational studies that met our search criteria. The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) staging of patients in the RCTs differed from that in observational studies: the proportion of patients with GOLD stages I+II disease ranged from 40.0% to 51.5% in the RCTs but 24.5% to 44.1% in the observational studies; for GOLD stage III or IV disease these ranges were 7.2%–45.8% (RCTs) and 13.7–42.1% (observational studies). The comorbidities with the highest prevalence reported in the RCTs and observational studies were: hypertension (39.4%–40.0% vs 40.1%–60.6%), other ischemic heart disease (12.3%–14.2% vs 12.5%–41.0%), diabetes (10.3%–10.9% vs 4.0%–38.9%), depression (8.5%–9.5% vs 17.0%–20.6%), and cardiac arrhythmia (7.8%–11.4% vs 11.3%–15.8%). Conclusion The clinical profile of COPD patients treated in the tiotropium trial program appears to be largely in the range of clinical characteristics, including cardiovascular comorbidities, reported for “real-life patients.” The tiotropium RCTs tended to include patients with more severe disease than the observational studies.

Safety and efficacy of the once-daily anticholinergic BEA2180 compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND To determine the safety and efficacy of BEA2180, an anticholinergic agent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS Smokers or ex-smokers ≥40 years with COPD and a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <80% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity ≤70% participated in this multinational, randomised, double-blind, parallel study. Patients received BEA2180 (50, 100 or 200 μg), tiotropium (5 μg) or placebo once daily via Respimat Soft Mist™. The primary endpoint was trough FEV1 after 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score, St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, exacerbations and adverse events. RESULTS Patients (n = 2080, 64.5% male) had a mean age of 64.2 years and a baseline FEV1 of 1.2 L. Trough FEV1 at 24 weeks with all BEA2180 doses (0.044-0.087 L) and tiotropium 5 μg (0.092 L) was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than placebo (-0.034 L) and BEA2180 (200 μg) was noninferior to tiotropium. Mean TDI focal scores were higher with BEA2180 (1.43-1.48) or tiotropium (1.46) versus placebo (0.94; p ≤ 0.01 for all). Mean SGRQ total scores also improved with BEA2180 (40.1-40.7) or tiotropium (39.5) compared with placebo (43.0, p < 0.01 for all). COPD exacerbation rates were reduced for all active treatments, reaching statistical significance for BEA2180 (50 and 200 μg) (p < 0.05, for both). CONCLUSION All study doses of BEA2180 improved lung function, reduced symptoms and exacerbations, and improved health status in COPD; all treatments were well tolerated. Clinical trial identifier: NCT00528996.

Cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus salmeterol: the POET-COPD trial

The aim of this study was to perform a 1-yr trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of tiotropium versus salmeterol followed by a 5-yr model-based CEA. The within-trial CEA, including 7,250 patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), was performed alongside the 1-yr international randomised controlled Prevention of Exacerbations with Tiotropium (POET)-COPD trial comparing tiotropium with salmeterol regarding the effect on exacerbations. Main end-points of the trial-based analysis were costs, number of exacerbations and exacerbation days. The model-based analysis was conducted to extrapolate results to 5 yrs and to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). 1-yr costs per patient from the German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective and the societal perspective were €126 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) €55–195) and €170 (95% UI €77–260) higher for tiotropium, respectively. The annual number of exacerbations was 0.064 (95% UI 0.010–0.118) lower for tiotropium, leading to a reduction in exacerbation-related costs of €87 (95% UI €19–157). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €1,961 per exacerbation avoided from the SHI perspective and €2,647 from the societal perspective. In the model-based analyses, the 5-yr costs per QALY were €3,488 from the SHI perspective and €8,141 from the societal perspective. Tiotropium reduced exacerbations and exacerbation-related costs, but increased total costs. Tiotropium can be considered cost-effective as the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios were below commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Psychometric properties of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

The St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) has been used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This analysis evaluated the psychometric properties of the SGRQ using data from 428 patients with IPF who participated in a 12-month, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial of nintedanib. Internal consistency (Cronbachs α) was 0.91 for SGRQ total and >0.70 for domain scores. Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients) was 0.77, 0.77, 0.69 and 0.66 for SGRQ total, activity, impact and symptoms scores, respectively. Construct validity of SGRQ total and domain scores was supported by weak to moderate cross-sectional correlations with the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (0.32–0.55), 6-min walk test distance (−0.25– −0.34), percentage predicted forced vital capacity (−0.11– −0.15) and measures of gas exchange (−0.26–0.03). There was some evidence that the SGRQ total score was sensitive to detecting change. The reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the SGRQ in patients with IPF suggest that this is an acceptable measure of HRQoL in patients with IPF. The SGRQ is an acceptable measure of aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with IPF http://ow.ly/jMjf305bjZ5