Hendrik Van Damme

Blowout of Carotid Venous Patch Angioplasty

Two cases of vein patch blowout were observed five and seven days after carotid bifurcation endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. Both patients died in spite of emergency reoperation. One patient developed respiratory failure with subsequent fatal cardiac arrest seven days after reoperation; the other died of extensive hemispheric infarction on the fifth postoperative day. At reoperation both ruptures were found to be located in the middle of the patch whereas the suture lines were intact. Both patients were hypertensive. In the first case, an accessory saphenous vein retrieved from the calf had been the only venous material available for the patch, while the other patient had varicose veins in the contralateral leg. Pathology revealed central transmural tissue necrosis in one of the disrupted patches. A review of the literature regarding morphologic alterations of free vein grafts placed within the arterial circulation as well as hemodynamics in patched arterial segments may provide additional insight as to the inherent benefits and risks of vein patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy. When considering vein patch angioplasty, particular attention should be directed to the gross aspect of the vein to be used as well as to any antecedent history of phlebitis.

Association of abdominal aortic aneurysm, horseshoe kidneys, and left-sided inferior vena cava: Report of two cases

Surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm may be challenging when rare renal or venous anomalies are present. This article reports two similar cases of aortic abdominal aneurysm associated with horseshoe kidney and left-sided inferior vena cava treated with a transperitoneal approach. Preoperative knowledge of the anatomic situation enabled appropriate aneurysm repair. Operative strategy is discussed. This report describes an uncommon venous vascular malformation complex and stresses the importance of computed tomography imaging not only in assessing the characteristics of the aneurysmal disease but also in detecting variations in pertinent vascular or parenchymal anatomy.

Femoral anastomotic aneurysms: pathogenic factors, clinical presentations and treatment. A study of 142 cases

In this study, the files of 112 patients with a total of 142 femoral anastomotic aneurysms were reviewed. Eighty-five patients (76%) were initially operated upon for obstructive aorto-iliac disease, while the remaining 27 (24%) had abdominal aortic aneurysms repaired. The majority of the patients (104/112) were male and their mean age was 64.5 years (range 45-88). Ninety-three per cent of the subjects were smokers prior to the first operation and 43% continued to smoke at the time of their femoral anastomotic aneurysms operation. The mean delay between the initial surgery and the repair of the femoral anastomotic aneurysms was 74.5 months (range 1-228). The diagnosis was made because of a painless pulsatile mass (91/142), acute leg ischaemia (27/142), a painful pulsatile mass (12/142), haemorrhage (10/142), pseudo-post-phlebitic oedema (1/142) and microemboli of the toes (1/142). The operative mortality was 2.7% (3/112) of which two-thirds were patients with infected grafts. Two subgroups were distinguished: 10 patients with an infected femoral anastomotic aneurysm and 12 patients with recurrent femoral anastomotic aneurysms, 11 with a single recurrence and one with a double recurrence. In the infected group, the time to development of anastomotic aneurysm was shorter than for the group with non-infected femoral anastomotic aneurysms (41 versus 74.5 months) and the operative mortality was 20% (2/10). One patient developed a recurrent femoral anastomotic aneurysm and another was lost to follow-up. Two subsequent deaths occurred, which were unrelated to the femoral anastomotic aneurysms. In the group of recurrent femoral anastomotic aneurysms one patient was lost to follow-up and two patients died, but not as a result of recurrent femoral anastomotic aneurysms. A total of 122 cases underwent interposition of a new prosthetic segment between the proximal prosthesis and the distal artery (89 at the common femoral, 21 at the femoral profundis, eight at the superficial femoral and four at an existing femoro-popliteal graft).

Factors promoting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abstract The risk for rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is widely believed to be related to its maximum diameter. Rupture occurs at the site of maximum wall stress, when it exceeds the tensile strength of the aortic wall. Basic research confirmed that peak wall stress and aortic wall biodegradation contribute to the mechanism of aneurysm rupture. In order to highlight the role of loss in wall strength and increase in focal peak stress, the authors reviewed recent literature. The clinical relevance of these recent insights in the etiopathogenesis of aneurysm rupture is analysed.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).

Abstract Objectives : The study objective was to describe and evaluate our single center (University Hospital Liège) experience with totally laparoscopic bypass surgery compared with conventional open surgery to treat aortoiliac occlusive disease. Material and methods : A retrospective database review of all patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease in our center, between 2003 and 2009, was performed. During this period, a total of 251 consecutive patients were identified. Among these patients, 95 underwent totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (group I) and 156 conventional open surgery (group II). Demographic data, operative data, postoperative recovery data, complications, two-year follow-up, morbidity and mortality were analysed according to the laparoscopic and conventional open group. Results : Patients included 160 men and 91 women. The mean age was 61 years (range, 40 to 88 years) in both groups. Indications for surgery were invalidating claudication in 87%, rest pain in 7%, trophic disorders in 5%, impotence in 1.6% and digestive claudication in 1.2%. Prior to bypass surgery, 11 (11.6%) for the group I and 41 (26.3%) for the group II had undergone one or more abdominal surgical procedures. A transperitoneal and retrocolic approach was preferred in all laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) required an operative time of 242 minutes (range, 129 to 465) and open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF), 200 minutes (range, 105 to 430). The mean aortic cross clamping time was 62 minutes in group I and 33 minutes in group II. Mean blood loss was more important in group II (1010 ml) than in group I (682 ml). The average length of hospital stay was 8.1 days for LABF compared with an average of 12 days for OABF. In 21 cases (20%) conversion to open surgery was necessary in the laparoscopic group. Systemic morbidity was significantly higher in the OABF group. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 2% for group II. There was no hospital mortality in the laparoscopic group. Twenty nine patients were lost to follow-up and the mean follow-up was 23.5 months. Conclusion : Analysis of the results shows that laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease is a safe procedure. The statistically significant advantages observed in the majority of our patients were decreased blood loss, faster post-operative recovery and shorter hospital stay. In the two groups, late morbidity attributable to the bypass prosthesis was minimal compared with other causes.

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy : a Comprehensive Review

Abstract Some controversy exists on the best moment to treat symptomatic carotid artery disease. This controversy concerns mainly neurologically unstable patients and patients who suffered a minor stroke. The authors discuss recent literature data on the feasibility and the safety of performing urgent (within 24 to 72 hours) carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients presenting repetitive transient ischaemic attacks or progressing stroke. Neurologically unstable patients, suffering ischemic brain deficit caused by carotid artery stenosis, are defined according to the following criteria: two or more transient ischaemic attacks (crescendo TIAs) or a fluctuating neurological deficit evolving no longer than 24 hours (progressing stroke), no impairment of consciousness, cerebral infarct of limited size on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more on the appropriate side. In the past, these patients were often considered at too high risk to undergo immediate carotid surgery. Many neurologists remain reluctant to confine these neurologically unstable patients for urgent carotid endarterectomy and prefer to stabilise the neurological status, arguing the increased stroke morbidity in the urgent setting. Nevertheless, the natural history of stroke-in-evolution or repetitive transient ischemic attacks is far from benign, exposing the patient to a high risk of subsequent spontaneous stroke, even under best medical treatment. Another controversy exists on the timing of surgery in patients who suffered a minor, non-disabling stroke. Is a waiting period of 6 weeks safe ? Once more, the operative risk should be balanced against the anticipated natural history. Published series, and sub-analysis of the recent carotid surgery trials (NASCET, ECST) plaid for carotid surgery within two weeks of a minor stroke. Conclusions : Contemporary literature argues that neurologically unstable patients, presenting repetitive transient ischaemic attacks or progressing stroke, should be managed by urgent (within 24 to 72 hours) carotid endarterectomy, even if the peri-operative stroke-death rate is slightly higher than in the elective setting. Despite an inherent increased operative morbidity-mortality, urgent carotid endarterectomy seems to us justified by the fact that waiting for the surgery may lead to the development of a more profound stroke in these neurologically unstable patients. Their only chance for neurological recovery (partial or complete) is in the early phase (12 to 60 hours after the acute onset of the neurological syndrome of crescendo-TIAs or stroke-in-evolution). For patients presenting a minor stroke, with limited brain infarction, carotid endarterectomy should preferentially be done in a semi-urgent fashion, within two weeks.

Open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm or aorto-iliac occlusive disease--clinical and ultrasonographic long-term results.

Abstract Objective: To determine postoperative and long-term outcome and assess the relevance of abdominal ultrasound (US) after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Methods: Records of 1704 consecutive patients having graft implantation from 1988 to 2000, either for AAA (n = 1144) or for AIOD (n = 560), were reviewed. In 2006, follow-up was 9180 patients-years for the AAA group and 5450 patients-years for the AIOD group. Among 1006 alive patients, 377 were invited randomly for US and clinical examination. Results: Hospital death occurred in 99 patients (8.6%) of the AAA group (53% in ruptured and 2% in elective AAA), and in 18 patients of the AIOD group (3.2%). There were 581 late deaths, including eight due to prosthesis infection, one to pseudo-aneurysm rupture, and one to graft thrombosis (0.6% graft-related mortality). Prosthesis thrombosis occurred in 32 patients (26 in AIOD group, p < 0.001), and graft infection in 26 (17 in AAA group, p < 0.01). Pseudo-aneurysms developed in 90 patients (68 in AIOD group, p < 0.001), including eight at the proximal aortic, one at the distal aortic, two at the iliac and 79 at the femoral anastomosis. In the AAA group only, surgery was required for a new thoraco-abdominal and pararenal aneurysm in eight and four patients, respectively, while US evidenced a 26–35 and a 36–50 mm supraanastomotic aortic dilatation in 65 (32%) and in 14 (7%) patients, at a mean follow-up of 10.5 and 9.3 years, respectively. Conclusion: Long-term results are good after open surgery for AAA or AIOD. Prosthesis infection and anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm are the main causes of graft-related mortality and morbidity, respectively. Because of high incidence of asymptomatic supraanastomotic aortic dilatation, all patients with a history of AAA repair should have regular abdominal US.

Lessons learnt from carotid artery trials

Abstract The objective of the authors is to assess the natural history of carotid artery disease and the role of carotid intervention in preventing ipsilateral stroke. The development of endovascular techniques for correction of carotid artery stenoses made this less invasive technique very popular, with an inherent risk of unregulated overuse by a variety of medical specialists, who are not always well informed on the natural history of carotid artery disease. It re-opened the discussion on the value of carotid endarterectomy for stroke prophylaxis. This ongoing debate offers the opportunity to distil evidence-based guidelines for the management of extracranial carotid artery stenoses. In recent papers, some authors expressed doubts on the validity and general applicability of the results of the pivotal randomised trials of carotid endarterectomy. The excellent results in terms of operative outcome and long term stroke prevention would, according to certain comments, not be attainable in routine practice. Another criticism of carotid endarterectomy is its higher operative morbidity in terms of cranial nerve lesions and myocardial infarctions, compared to endovascular procedures. This consideration is, for some authors, the main reason to espouse carotid artery stenting as a better alternative to carotid endarterectomy. Any evidence supporting this point of view is missing. The supposed equivalence or non-inferiority of carotid artery stenting is purely speculative. The aim of this review paper is to summarize the crude data of carotid surgery trials. The authors aim to answer four questions. For which lesions is carotid endarterectomy most beneficial ? Are the results of randomised carotid surgery trials biased by the selection of patients ? Is operative morbidity, other than stroke, under-estimated ? Is carotid artery stenting safe and efficacious ? An in-depth review with a critical analysis is made of recently published and on-going trials, comparing carotid surgery with percutaneous carotid angioplasty.

Thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts: is it worthwhile?

Abstract Background: Thrombosis of an infra-inguinal bypass graft often results in a limb-threatening ischemia. There is no consensus on the optimal management strategy. Aim of the study: To analyse safety and efficacy of catheter-guided intra-arterial thrombolysis to re-open thrombosed infra-inguinal bypass grafts and to identify factors that influence graft patency and limb salvage rate after thrombolytic procedures. Methods: A continuous cohort-study of 106 thrombolytic procedures between 1993 to 2008. Results: Despite a high initial success rate (76%), the mid-term results are less convincing, with a 58% re-occlusion rate at 45 months follow-up. Thrombosed vein grafts, old (2 weeks or more) occlusions, poor run-off and failure to identify or rectify an underlying causative stenosis are determinant for a poor long-term outcome of thrombolytic procedures. Comments: The outcome results of author’s experience are consistent with literature reports. Thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts should be limited to selective cases (recent occlusion, prosthetic or vein graft in place since 1 year or more, critical limb ischemia). Despite its obvious advantages, the long-term outcome of thrombolytic procedures is deceiving. The inherent risk of hemorrhagic complications should also be taken in account at the decision making of treatment strategy. The question wether, in general, catheter-guided selective intra-arterial thrombolysis offers a significant advantage over operative revascularisation (thrombectomy or new bypass) remains unanswered. A more selective approach seems to favour thrombolysis as most appropriate strategy in the management of recent (< 2 weeks) thromboses of grafts in place since at least 1 year.

Chronic False Aneurysm after a Healed Rupture of the Aortic Isthmus: TEVAR, Hybrid Surgery, or Open Arch Repair?

We report a case of post-traumatic chronic false aneurysm of the aortic isthmus in a 34-year-old man who had been involved in a car accident 10 years earlier. An initial chest X-ray demonstrated a calcified mass in the upper mediastinum and computed tomography scan revealed a false aneurysm of the aortic isthmus arising above the left subclavian artery. Partial covered rupture of the aorta is not always easy to diagnose and can remain clinically silent in a polytrauma patient. The duration from rupture to false aneurysm formation may extend over many years. This chronic lesion can be managed by surgery, by an endovascular procedure, or by a combined procedure. This case report highlights the current therapeutic approach. A debranching procedure was done in view of a secondary exclusion of the huge false aneurysm by a stent graft. Unfortunately, the false aneurysm ruptured during the procedure and a replacement of the aortic arch and the isthmus under total circulatory arrest was successfully done. The patient was doing well at 9-month follow-up.