Samuel Bruls

18F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Aortitis.

Background Aortitis is a generic term defined as an inflammatory condition involving the aortic wall, of infectious or noninfectious origin. This inflammatory process may deteriorate the aortic wall, resulting in potentially life-threatening vascular complications. Therefore, it is important to establish a diagnosis as early as possible. Patients and Methods During a 4-year period, 428 consecutive patients referred to our department for aortic diseases underwent FDG PET/CT examinations. Among these, 18 patients (4.2%) were suspected to have aortitis. All of them had an initial positive FDG PET/CT uptake occurring in the aorta and major branches as evaluated by visual analysis of images and assessed with the final diagnosis of aortitis. During follow-up, after surgery and/or upon immunosuppressive treatment, each of these patients underwent a second PET/CT that was compared with the initial evaluation. In all cases, normalization of FDG uptake was correlated with clinical improvement. Conclusions Our study aimed to illustrate the potential clinical value of functional monitoring with PET/CT in the management of aortitis. FDG PET/CT constitutes a valuable imaging modality to establish an early diagnosis, monitor disease progression and treatment, and evaluate vascular complication and relapse. We highlight the importance of an early detection of inflammatory large-vessel pathology, which may represent a major threat.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).

Abstract Objectives : The study objective was to describe and evaluate our single center (University Hospital Liège) experience with totally laparoscopic bypass surgery compared with conventional open surgery to treat aortoiliac occlusive disease. Material and methods : A retrospective database review of all patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease in our center, between 2003 and 2009, was performed. During this period, a total of 251 consecutive patients were identified. Among these patients, 95 underwent totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (group I) and 156 conventional open surgery (group II). Demographic data, operative data, postoperative recovery data, complications, two-year follow-up, morbidity and mortality were analysed according to the laparoscopic and conventional open group. Results : Patients included 160 men and 91 women. The mean age was 61 years (range, 40 to 88 years) in both groups. Indications for surgery were invalidating claudication in 87%, rest pain in 7%, trophic disorders in 5%, impotence in 1.6% and digestive claudication in 1.2%. Prior to bypass surgery, 11 (11.6%) for the group I and 41 (26.3%) for the group II had undergone one or more abdominal surgical procedures. A transperitoneal and retrocolic approach was preferred in all laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) required an operative time of 242 minutes (range, 129 to 465) and open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF), 200 minutes (range, 105 to 430). The mean aortic cross clamping time was 62 minutes in group I and 33 minutes in group II. Mean blood loss was more important in group II (1010 ml) than in group I (682 ml). The average length of hospital stay was 8.1 days for LABF compared with an average of 12 days for OABF. In 21 cases (20%) conversion to open surgery was necessary in the laparoscopic group. Systemic morbidity was significantly higher in the OABF group. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 2% for group II. There was no hospital mortality in the laparoscopic group. Twenty nine patients were lost to follow-up and the mean follow-up was 23.5 months. Conclusion : Analysis of the results shows that laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease is a safe procedure. The statistically significant advantages observed in the majority of our patients were decreased blood loss, faster post-operative recovery and shorter hospital stay. In the two groups, late morbidity attributable to the bypass prosthesis was minimal compared with other causes.

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy : a Comprehensive Review

Abstract Some controversy exists on the best moment to treat symptomatic carotid artery disease. This controversy concerns mainly neurologically unstable patients and patients who suffered a minor stroke. The authors discuss recent literature data on the feasibility and the safety of performing urgent (within 24 to 72 hours) carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients presenting repetitive transient ischaemic attacks or progressing stroke. Neurologically unstable patients, suffering ischemic brain deficit caused by carotid artery stenosis, are defined according to the following criteria: two or more transient ischaemic attacks (crescendo TIAs) or a fluctuating neurological deficit evolving no longer than 24 hours (progressing stroke), no impairment of consciousness, cerebral infarct of limited size on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more on the appropriate side. In the past, these patients were often considered at too high risk to undergo immediate carotid surgery. Many neurologists remain reluctant to confine these neurologically unstable patients for urgent carotid endarterectomy and prefer to stabilise the neurological status, arguing the increased stroke morbidity in the urgent setting. Nevertheless, the natural history of stroke-in-evolution or repetitive transient ischemic attacks is far from benign, exposing the patient to a high risk of subsequent spontaneous stroke, even under best medical treatment. Another controversy exists on the timing of surgery in patients who suffered a minor, non-disabling stroke. Is a waiting period of 6 weeks safe ? Once more, the operative risk should be balanced against the anticipated natural history. Published series, and sub-analysis of the recent carotid surgery trials (NASCET, ECST) plaid for carotid surgery within two weeks of a minor stroke. Conclusions : Contemporary literature argues that neurologically unstable patients, presenting repetitive transient ischaemic attacks or progressing stroke, should be managed by urgent (within 24 to 72 hours) carotid endarterectomy, even if the peri-operative stroke-death rate is slightly higher than in the elective setting. Despite an inherent increased operative morbidity-mortality, urgent carotid endarterectomy seems to us justified by the fact that waiting for the surgery may lead to the development of a more profound stroke in these neurologically unstable patients. Their only chance for neurological recovery (partial or complete) is in the early phase (12 to 60 hours after the acute onset of the neurological syndrome of crescendo-TIAs or stroke-in-evolution). For patients presenting a minor stroke, with limited brain infarction, carotid endarterectomy should preferentially be done in a semi-urgent fashion, within two weeks.

Increased Metabolic Activity Highlighted by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Wall of the Dissected Ascending Aorta in a Patient With Horton Disease

Horton disease or giant-cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic systemic vasculitis involving typically medium and large arteries. Giant-cell arteritis is a panarteritis characterized by a granulomatous inflammation, with lymphocytes, macrophages, and multinucleated giant cells related to autoimmune T-cell reactivity.1 Compared with conventional imaging tools (ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), MRI, and contrast angiography) that provide anatomic and morphological information, recent available imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET)/CT provide metabolic assessment of the arterial wall. During the early 2000s, Sakalihasan et al2 observed a close correlation between clinically unstable abdominal aortic aneurysms and increased uptake of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) in the aneurysmal wall. A few years later, Hautzel et al3 studied the assessment of giant-cell arteritis with PET/CT. We describe a case of Horton disease involving the thoracic aorta and complicated with acute aortic dissection in a woman with a previous diagnosis of thoracic aortic aneurysm. In July 2011, a 66-year-old woman was referred to a cardiology center for evaluation of a recent mild hypertension related to use of high doses of corticosteroids. In December 2010, she had developed severe headache, rapid loss of weight, and elevation of sedimentation rate as high as 120 mm. Horton disease was diagnosed in April 2011 on temporal artery biopsy. During the first cardiologic examination, …

Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Acute Neurological Symptoms: The Results of a Single Center Prospective Nonrandomized Study.

BACKGROUND To evaluate the feasibility and the safety of performing urgent (within 24 hours) carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis presenting with repetitive transient ischemic attacks or progressing stroke. METHODS Thirty consecutive patients underwent urgent carotid endarterectomy for repetitive transient ischemic attacks (N = 12) or progressing stroke (N = 18) according to the following criteria: two or more transient ischemic attacks or a fluctuating neurological deficit over a period of less than 24 hours (progressing stroke), no impairment of consciousness, no cerebral infarct larger than 1.5 cm in diameter on computed tomography and a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more on the appropriate side, diagnosed by echodoppler ultrasonography and/or arteriography. Patients with cerebral hemorrhage were excluded. All patients were examined pre- and postoperatively by the same neurologist and surgery was performed by the same vascular surgeon. All the patients underwent a cerebral CT scan within 5 days after surgery. RESULTS There were 19 men and 11 women. The mean age was 71 ± 7.6 years. The time delay of surgery after the onset of transient ischemic attacks or progressing stroke averaged 19.4 ± 11.5 hours. For patients suffering progressive stroke, one developed a fatal ischemic stroke 24 hours after surgery, five showed no improvement of their neurological status after surgery, but none worsened. Twelve patients experienced significant improvement of their neurological status with an European Stroke Scale of 77.9 ± 25.2 at admission and 95.8 ± 4.6 at discharge, and all but one of those patients had a Barthels index value over 85/100 at discharge. The 12 patients with repetitive transient ischemic attacks had an uneventful postoperative outcome. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.4 ± 1.2 years. No patient developed another transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The results of our series documented the feasibility and the safety of performing urgent (within 24 hours) carotid endarterectomy in patients presenting with repetitive transient ischemic attacks or progressing stroke. This procedure seems to us to be justified by the fact that waiting for surgery may lead to the development of a more profound deficit or another stroke in these neurologically unstable patients whose only chance for neurological recovery is in the early phase.

IgG4-related disease causing rapid evolution of a severe aortic valvular stenosis

Immunoglobulin G4-related systemic disease (IgG4-RSD) is a recognized emerging entity characterized by chronic fibroinflammation that can affect every organ but rarely affects the cardiovascular system. We report a rare case of IgG4-RSD involving an aortic valve that resulted in rapid progression of an aortic valvular stenosis and was successfully treated by aortic valve replacement and corticosteroids.

Surgical treatment of cardiovascular complications in patients with Marfan syndrome: a report of two cases and literature review.

Abstract Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Marfan syndrome. The most life threatening complication is aortic root aneurysms leading to aortic dissection or rupture. It can be prevented by regular aortic follow-up and prophylactic aortic surgery. Modern aortic surgery has led to a substantial increase in the life expectancy of these patients. We report two cases of Marfan syndrome with cardiovascular complications. Their management is discussed according to the most recent literature.

Noncomplicated large complex tear in an aneurysmal Marfan ascending aorta.

1 24-year-old man in New York Heart Association functional class 4 with proven Marfan syndrome (family istory) was scheduled for cardiac transplantation because of nd-stage biventricular failure on long-standing massive aoric regurgitation. A preoperative contrast enhanced computed omographic scan revealed a dilatation of the aortic root and a iameter of the proximal ascending aorta of 65 mm without igns of chronic or acute dissection (Fig 1). Cardiac transplantation was carried out 4 months later. In he meantime, the patient did not experience any chest ain. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established between he left femoral artery and the right atrium. After induced brillation, the cross clamp was placed tangentially at the evel of the emergence of the brachiocephalic trunk. Cardiectomy and resection of the whole ascending aorta as performed. Examination disclosed a large (27 mm) comlex tear in the right anterolateral concavity of the ascending orta, starting just above the noncoronary sinus (Fig 2). There as no associated sign of dissection or fissuration of the scending aorta recognizable by external inspection or after