Henning Rüden

Compliance With Antiseptic Hand Rub Use in Intensive Care Units: The Hawthorne Effect

OBJECTIVE To determine the influence the Hawthorne effect has on compliance with antiseptic hand rub (AHR) use among healthcare personnel. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Five intensive care units of a university hospital in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS Medical personnel were monitored in 2 periods regarding compliance with AHR use when there were indications for AHR use. In the first period, the personnel had no knowledge of being observed. The second observation period was announced to the staff of the intensive care units in advance and information about what the observer would be monitoring was provided. Potential confounders of compliance with AHR use included occupational groups (nurses, physicians, and other healthcare workers), intensive care units, and indications for AHR use before or after any procedure. RESULTS Data were collected from 2,808 indications for AHR use. The overall rate of compliance was 29% (95% confidence interval, 26%-32%) in the first period and 45% (95% confidence interval, 43%-47%) in the second period. A logistic regression analysis with potential confounders revealed a significant odds ratio for the comparison between period 2 and period 1. The differences in compliance with AHR use were statistically significant (P<.001) between the occupational groups (nurses had the highest compliance and physicians had middle compliance) and between indication for AHR use before procedures and indication for AHR use after procedures. CONCLUSIONS The Hawthorne effect has a marked influence on compliance with AHR use, with a 55% increase of compliance with overt observation. This result is consistent throughout subgroups. The rate of compliance with AHR use may in fact be lower than we thought because of results from studies that did not take the Hawthorne effect into account. The results of this study underline the necessity for infection control teams to be on wards as often as possible.

Prevalence of nosocomial infections in representative German hospitals

The nosocomial infection (NI) rate in German hospitals was studied in order to create reference data for comparison in hospitals where ongoing surveillance is impossible. The study was designed as a one-day prevalence study. Patients in 72 selected hospitals (inclusion criteria: acute care hospitals with departments for general medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynaecology) were examined by four external investigators (physicians trained and validated in the diagnosis of NI). A total of 14,996 patients were studied. The overall prevalence rate was 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) with a variation of 0-8.9% between hospitals. The commonest NI were: urinary tract infection (42.1%), lower respiratory tract infection (20.6%), surgical site infections (15.8%) and primary sepsis (8.3%). The highest prevalence rate (15.3%) was found in intensive care ward patients, followed by surgery (3.8%), general medicine (3.0%) and gynaecology/obstetrics (1.4%). The infection rate varied significantly with hospital size. A microbiology laboratory report was only available for 56.5% of patients thought to have an NI, and there were remarkable differences between hospitals with and without an on-site microbiology laboratory. Because of this and other methodological reasons the NI prevalence rates reported here may represent the absolute minimum of nosocomially infected patients in Germany.

Operating Room Ventilation With Laminar Airflow Shows No Protective Effect on the Surgical Site Infection Rate in Orthopedic and Abdominal Surgery

Objective:To evaluate whether operating room (OR) ventilation with (vertical) laminar airflow impacts on surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Design:Retrospective cohort-study based on routine surveillance data. Patients and Methods:Sixty-three surgical departments participating voluntarily in the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system “KISS” were included (a total of 99,230 operations). Active SSI surveillance was performed according to the methods and definitions given by the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system. Surgical departments were stratified according to type of OR ventilation used: (1) turbulent ventilation with high-efficiency particulate air-filtered air, and (2) HEPA-filtered (vertical) laminar airflow ventilation. Multivariate analyses were performed by the generalized estimating equations method to control for the following variables as possible confounders: (a) Patient-based: wound contamination class, ASA score, operation duration, patients’ age and gender, endoscopic operation; (b) Hospital-based: the number of beds in the hospital, its academic status, operation frequency, and long-term participation in KISS. Results:The risk for severe SSI after hip prosthesis implantation was significantly higher using laminar airflow OR ventilation (1.63 < 1.06; 2.52>), as compared with turbulent ventilation. The adjusted odds ratios for the other operative procedures analyzed were: knee prosthesis 1.76 < 0.80, 3.85>; appendectomy 1.52 < 0.91, 2.53>; cholecystectomy 1.37 < 0.63, 2.97>; colon surgery 0.85 < 0.49, 1.49>; and herniorrhaphy 1.48 < 0.67; 3.25>. Conclusions:Unexpectedly, in this analysis, which controlled for many patient and hospital-based confounders, OR ventilation with laminar airflow showed no benefit and was even associated with a significantly higher risk for severe SSI after hip prosthesis.

How many infections are caused by patient-to-patient transmission in intensive care units?*

Objective:The proportion of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections that are a consequence of nosocomial cross-transmission between patients in tertiary ICUs is unknown. Such information would be useful for the implementation of appropriate infection control measures. Design:A prospective cohort study during 18 months. Setting:Five ICUs from two university hospitals. Patients:All patients admitted for ≥48 hrs. Measurement:ICU-acquired infections were ascertained during daily bedside patient and chart reviews. Episodes of potential cross-transmission were identified by highly discriminating genetic typing of all clinical and surveillance isolates of the ten bacterial species most frequently associated with nosocomial infections in ICUs. Isolation of indistinguishable isolates in two or more patients defined potential transmission episodes. Main Results:During 28,498 patient days, 431 ICU-acquired infections and 141 episodes of nosocomial transmissions were identified. A total of 278 infections were caused by the ten species that were genotyped, and 41 of these (14.5%) could be associated with transmissions between patients. Conclusion:Infections acquired during treatment in modern tertiary ICUs are common, but a causative role of direct patient-to-patient transmission can only be ascertained for a minority of these infections on the basis of routine microbiological investigations.

Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Infections in Germany. Summary of the Results of the First National Prevalence Study (NIDEP)

SummaryThe first German national study on the prevalence of nosocomial and community-acquired infections was performed in 1994 in medical, surgical, gynaecological/obstetrical and intensive care departments. 14,966 patients in 72 German hospitals representatively selected according to size were investigated by outside physicians. These were trained in the use of CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, and their diagnoses validated. Community-acquired infections were recorded according to the assessment of the hospital physicians. For the diagnosis of nosocomial infections, only the opinion of the outside investigators was decisive. A prevalence of 3.5% was found for nosocomial infections and 10.0% for community-acquired infections. The use of antibiotics was documented in 17.7% of all patients on the prevalence day. Of the patients undergoing antibiotic therapy, 16.9% had a nosocomial infection, 47.9% a community-acquired one. In the remaining 35.1% neither a nosocomial nor a community-acquired infection was confirmed.

Surveillance of nosocomial infections in a neurology intensive care unit

Abstract To identify overall and site-specific nosocomial infection (NI) rates in patients receiving neurological intensive care therapy, a prospective study was started in 1997 in the ten-bed neurological intensive-care unit (NICU) of the University Hospital of Freiburg, Germany. Case records and microbiology reports were reviewed twice a week, and ward staff were consulted. NI were defined according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria and were categorised by specific infection site. Within 30 months, 505 patients with a total of 4,873 patient days were studied (mean length of stay: 9.6 days). 122 NI were identified in 96 patients (74 patients with one, 18 with two and 4 with three infections. An incidence of 24.2/100 patients and incidence density of 25.0/1,000 patient days of NI in the neurological ICU were documented. Site-specific incidence rates and incidence densities were: 1.4 bloodstream infections per 100 patients (1.9 central line-associated BSIs per 1,000 central line-days), 11.7 pneumonias per 100 patients (20.4 ventilator-associated pneumonias per 1,000 ventilator-days), 8.7 urinary tract infections per 100 patients (10.0 urinary catheter-associated urinary track infections (UTIs) per 1,000 urinary catheter-days). Additionally, 0.4 cases of meningitis, 0.8 ventriculitis, and 1.2 other infections (catheter-related local infection, diarrhea) were documented per 1,000 patient days. 15 % of nosocomial pathogens were A. baumannii (due to a outbreak of an nosocomial pneumonia with A. baumannii ), 13 % S. aureus, 10 % E. coli, 7 % CNS, 7 % Bacteroides spp., 7% Enterobacter spp., 6, 5% Klebsiella spp., 5.9 % enterococci, 5.9 % streptococci, and 4.7 % Pseudomonas spp. In eight cases of NI no pathogen could be isolated. In future, data on NI in NICUs should be assessed in greater detail, both to improve the quality of care and serve as a basis for identification and implementation of the most effective measures by which to prevent these infections in patients receiving intensive neurological care.

How often do asymptomatic healthcare workers cause methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreaks? A systematic evaluation

A systematic search was performed to identify outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and colonization caused by healthcare workers (HCWs). Of 191 outbreaks identified, 11 had strong epidemiological evidence that HCWs were the source. In 3 of these outbreaks, asymptomatic carriers were the cause. The frequent practice of screening asymptomatic HCWs should be reconsidered.

To isolate or not to isolate? Analysis of data from the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System regarding the placement of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in private rooms in intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether isolating patients with MRSA in private rooms in ICUs (or cohorting) is a protective factor for nosocomial MRSA infection. DESIGN Association between nosocomial MRSA infection rates and ICU structure and process parameters in the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (KISS). SETTING Two hundred twelve ICUs participating in KISS in 2001. METHODS In June 2001, a structured questionnaire was sent to the participating ICUs regarding their preventive measures, their type and size, their patient-to-personnel ratios, and routine cultures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for nosocomial MRSA infection. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 164 (77.4%) of the ICUs. These ICUs had 325 nosocomial MRSA infections in a 5-year period (1997 to 2001). The mean incidence density of nosocomial MRSA infections was 0.3/1,000 patient-days. Ninety-one ICUs (55.5%) did not register any nosocomial MRSA infections during the observation period. Forty-two ICUs had an incidence density of at least 0.3/1,000 patient-days (75th percentile). Surgical ICUs were found to be a risk factor for a nosocomial MRSA infection rate above this threshold. Multivariate analysis found surgical ICUs to be an independent predictor and isolation in private rooms (or cohorts) to be a protective factor (OR, 0.36; CI95, 0.17-0.79). CONCLUSION Many (34.4%) of the German ICUs have not isolated MRSA patients in private rooms or cohorts, a procedure associated with lower MRSA infection rates in this study.

Reducing central venous catheter-associated primary bloodstream infections in intensive care units is possible: Data from the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (KISS) began in 1997 as a nationwide surveillance project for voluntary registration of nosocomial infections in intensive care units (ICUs). This study investigates trends in the rates of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) in ICUs since participation in KISS. METHODS Eighty-four ICUs that had participated in KISS for at least 24 months were considered for more detailed analysis. Monthly rates of primary BSI for the 84 ICUs were pooled for the 24 months. The best model for describing the curve of reduction was sought. Additionally, incidence densities were compared using the z test. RESULTS For the 212 ICUs participating, a relative 25.7% decrease (from 2.1 to 1.6 primary BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days) was observed from January 1997 to June 2001. The 84 ICUs that participated in KISS for a minimum of 24 months accumulated 552,359 patient-days and 404,897 CVC-days during their 24 months. A linear regression model was selected to explain the curve of primary BSI reduction in the 84 ICUs. It showed a decrease from 2.1 to 1.5 primary BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days, meaning an overall relative reduction of 28.6% during the 2-year observation period. These results were significant (Students t test for the monthly reduction coefficient; P = .04). The reduction of primary BSIs was shown for both clinical sepsis and laboratory-confirmed, CVC-associated primary BSIs. CONCLUSION Performing surveillance with KISS was associated with a reduction of the rates of CVC-associated primary BSIs in ICU patients.

An outbreak of pyodermas among neonates caused by ultrasound gel contaminated with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVE To investigate an outbreak of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections in a neonatal clinic. DESIGN Prospective chart review, environmental sampling, and genotyping by two independent methods: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). A case-control study was performed with 31 controls from the same clinic. SETTING A German 1,350-bed tertiary-care teaching university hospital. RESULTS There was a significant increase in the incidence of pyodermas with MSSA; 10 neonates in good physical condition with no infection immediately after birth developed pyodermas. A shared spatula and ultrasound gel were the only identified infection sources. The gel contained MSSA and was used for hip joint sonographies in all neonates. PFGE and RAPD-PCR patterns from 6 neonates and from the gel were indistinguishable and thus genetically related clones. The case-control study revealed no significant risk factor with the exception of cesarean section (P=.006). The attack rate by days of hip-joint sonography between April 15 and April 27, 1994, was 11.8% to 40%. CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate hygienic measures in connection with lubricants during routine ultrasound scanning may lead to nosocomial S. aureus infections of the skin. To our knowledge this source of S. aureus infections has not previously been described.