Herbert B. Lindsley

Concomitant Leflunomide Therapy in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Stable Doses of Methotrexate: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Context Several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) slow disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Many experts prefer methotrexate, although trials do not uniformly show that it is superior to other DMARDs. It is not known whether combining methotrexate with a second DMARD is better than prescribing methotrexate alone. Contribution This 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial shows that leflunomide added to ongoing stable-dose methotrexate therapy in patients with persistently active rheumatoid arthritis improves clinical outcomes compared with methotrexate alone. Cautions Some adverse effects, such as diarrhea, were more common with combination therapy. All patients receiving DMARD therapy need close monitoring for toxicities. The Editors Rheumatoid arthritis has considerable societal costs (1-5). Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis become disabled within a few years of disease onset (4, 5). Methotrexate is the standard treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. During the past several years, investigators have found that some disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs can increase the efficacy of methotrexate monotherapy (6-9). Methotrexate is an antimetabolite and immunomodulator that affects many intracellular metabolic pathways of purine metabolism (10). The precise intracellular biochemical pathway responsible for the observed clinical benefits of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is still the subject of some debate (11), but methotrexate is thought to act primarily on purine pathways of cellular metabolism (10). Leflunomide (Arava, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, New Jersey) also has antimetabolic effects, inhibiting pyrimidine intracellular pathways (12). Leflunomide has been shown to be effective for rheumatoid arthritis in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (13, 14). Given the diverse intracellular pathways affected by both drugs, the combination of leflunomide and methotrexate has the potential for biochemical synergy. The possibility of increased benefits should be weighed against the possible toxicities of this combination. Abnormal aminotransferase levels have been seen with both methotrexate (15) and leflunomide (14) monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In a small open study, we previously observed that the combination of methotrexate and leflunomide led to considerable clinical improvements and reversible elevations in aminotransferase levels (16). We therefore sought to determine whether similar results could be achieved in a large, double-blind investigation of the combination of these two antimetabolic agents. Methods Patients The study sample consisted of 263 patients who had rheumatoid arthritis as defined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (17). Patients were 18 to 75 years of age and were receiving stable dosages of methotrexate (15 to 20 mg/wk, or 10 to 15 mg/wk if this was the maximum tolerated dose). Patients were recruited from active outpatient practice centers, and study participants were approached without a particular schema. Eligible patients had active rheumatoid arthritis despite at least 6 months of methotrexate therapy, including stable dosage for at least 8 weeks. Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were defined as meeting three of the following criteria on two different evaluations, 7 to 21 days apart: at least nine tender joints, at least six swollen joints, at least 45 minutes of morning stiffness, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of at least 28 mm/h. Previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, not including ongoing methotrexate, had failed in 11 patients. Patients receiving corticosteroids were required to have been taking a stable daily dose of 10 mg or less for at least 30 days before study drug administration, and the corticosteroid dose was required to remain constant throughout the study. Complete exclusion criteria are listed in Appendix Table 1. Study Design The 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with evaluations occurring at 4-week intervals (Figure 1), was conducted in 20 centers in the United States and Canada between September 1998 and June 2000. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding leflunomide or placebo to stable methotrexate therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. All participants provided written consent, and the institutional review board at each center approved the protocol. Figure 1. Patient eligibility, randomization, assignment, and discontinuation. Include no wish to continue in study, poor adherence to treatment, protocol violation, and moving away from the study area. A randomization schedule, generated by and stored with Quintiles, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri, was used to assign sequential numbers to randomly allocated treatment codes. Randomization was done by using the Aventis standard random-code generator. Investigators allocated numbers to patients, beginning with the lowest available number. Quintiles, Inc., packaged and labeled the study medication. The randomization code used was concealed from investigators and patients throughout the study. Randomization was stratified by center. A set of 500 random numbers was generated, with treatment groups randomly assigned in a balanced manner (1:1 ratio) within each block of four consecutive random numbers (block size, 4). A set of these blocks was then sent to each investigative center. This method is identical to stratification by center because centers are balanced with respect to treatment assignment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive leflunomide, 100 mg/d, for 2 days followed by 10 mg/d or matching placebo. If substantial adverse events occurred, this dose could be reduced to 10 mg every other day. If 10 mg/d was tolerated but active disease, as defined earlier, was still present at week 8 or thereafter, an increase to 20 mg of leflunomide or matching placebo per day was required. If substantial adverse events occurred while the patient was taking 20 mg of the study drug per day, a one-time dose reduction to 10 mg/d was allowed at the discretion of the investigator. At least 1 mg of folate supplementation per day was mandated by the protocol. Adherence to study medication, assessed at each visit by tablet counts (actual number of tablets returned compared with number expected to be returned), was similar in the two groups. The mean adherence for all patients in the intention-to-treat sample was 98.0% (98.5% for those receiving placebo and 97.4% for those receiving leflunomide). In the placebo group and leflunomide group, respectively, 90.2% (120 of 133 patients) and 87.7% (114 of 130 patients) had adherence rates of 80% to 120%. Measurement of Efficacy The primary efficacy variable was the rate at which the intention-to-treat sample achieved 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at the end of the study. To be classified as having achieved ACR20, patients were required to complete 24 weeks of treatment and meet ACR20 response criteria at end of the study (13). The ACR20 criteria were developed to define improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (18). Clinical improvement is indicated by 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, pain intensity, physical function or disability measure, and level of acute-phase reactant (19). All ACR assessments were performed by the investigators, and the same assessor performed all analyses throughout the study whenever possible to increase the reliability of the assessment. Patients who discontinued therapy before the end of week 24 or for whom data were insufficient to assess ACR20 response at week 24 were classified as nonresponders for the primary analysis. Count of tender joints was based on 68 joint assessments, and count of swollen joints was based on 66 joint assessments. Percentage changes in tender joint and swollen joint counts were based on the number of evaluable joints at a visit. Joints that had been replaced or had been injected with corticosteroids within 4 weeks before the assessment were considered nonevaluable. Secondary outcomes included ACR50 and ACR70 responder rates at week 24 (analyses of responders at study end for the nonprimary efficacy measures). The ACR50 and ACR70 were defined as at least 50% and 70% improvement, respectively, in the same criteria used to calculate ACR20 response. Secondary efficacy variables also included change from baseline to end point in each of the individual components of the ACR response criteria and change from baseline to week 24 in levels of rheumatoid factor. Mean changes from baseline in individual efficacy measures are shown in Appendix Table 2. Measurement of Safety Safety was evaluated by adverse event reports; laboratory assays for changes in hematologic characteristics, blood chemistry, urinalysis, and liver function; and physical examination. Potential adverse events were assessed by using open-ended questions at each study visit. The assessor was blinded to reported toxicities and to any additional information obtained at the visit. The study protocol provided recommendations for dosage change and discontinuation of drug therapy, without unblinding, when patients were found to have alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values greater than two times the upper limit of normal. Investigators decreased the dose of the study medication if, on repeated analysis at 72 hours, test values remained greater than two times but less than or equal to five times the upper limit of normal; only one dose adjustment was allowed before discontinuation of therapy with the study drug. Therapy with the study drug was also discontinued in patients with persistent elevations of aminotransferase enzyme levels to more than two times the upper limit of normal on repeated te

Effects of exercise on fatigue, aerobic fitness, and disease activity measures in persons with rheumatoid arthritis

The effects of 12 weeks of low-impact aerobic exercise on fatigue, aerobic fitness, and disease activity were examined in a quasi-experimental time series study of 25 adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Measures were obtained preintervention, midtreatment (after 6 weeks of exercise), end of treatment (after 12 weeks of exercise), and at a 15-week follow-up. ANOVAS for repeated measures showed that those subjects who participated more frequently reported decreased fatigue, while those who participated less frequently reported an increase in fatigue. All subjects, on average, showed increased aerobic fitness and increased right and left hand grip strength, decreased pain, and decreased walk time. There were no significant increases in joint count or sedimentation rate. Significant improvements in measures at the 15-week follow-up also were found. Findings indicate that persons with RA who participate in appropriate exercises may lessen fatigue levels and experience other positive effects without worsening their arthritis.

Dose-loading with hydroxychloroquine improves the rate of response in early, active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind six-week trial with eighteen-week extension.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the usefulness of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose-loading to increase the percentage of responders or rate of response in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Two hundred twelve patients with early RA (mean duration 1.5 years) were enrolled in a 24-week trial. Patients were stabilized with 1,000 mg naproxen/day and then began a 6-week, double-blind trial comparing treatment with HCQ at 400 mg/day (n = 71), 800 mg/day (n = 71), and 1,200 mg/day (n = 66), followed by 18 weeks of open-label HCQ treatment at 400 mg/day. RESULTS All patients had mild, active disease at the time of initiation of HCQ treatment (31-43% rheumatoid factor positive; no previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; mean swollen joint count 8.6-10.4). Based on the Paulus criteria, response during the 6-week double-blind portion of the study was 47.97%, 57.7%, and 63.6% in the 400 mg/day, 800 mg/day, and 1,200 mg/day groups, respectively (P = 0.052). Discontinuations for adverse events were dose related (3 in the 400 mg/day group, 5 in the 800 mg/day group, 6 in the 1,200 mg/day group). Most involved the gastrointestinal (GI) system, with the background naproxen treatment possibly contributing. Ocular abnormalities occurred in 17 of 212 patients (8%) but were not dose related. CONCLUSION Dose-loading with HCQ increased the degree of response at 6 weeks in this group of patients with early, predominantly seronegative RA. Adverse GI events were dose related, while adverse ocular events were not.

Plasmapheresis in active systemic lupus erythematosus: Effects on clinical, serum, and cellular abnormalities. Case report

Abstract The effects of repeated plasmapheresis followed by low-dose prednisone and cyclophosphamide were assessed in one patient with active systemic lupus erythematosus who had life-threatening central nervous system disease and pancytopenia. Plasmapheresis resulted in disappearance of high fever, improved central nervous system symptoms, reversal of pancytopenia, reduction or disappearance of selected auto-antibodies (antiprecursor cell, antinative DNA, antisingle stranded DNA, antisuppressor cell), and improvement of suppressor cell function. Plasmapheresis may be useful in selected patients who have life-threatening disease associated with undesired circulating antibodies and who are not responsive to conventional doses of corticosteroid or cytotoxic drug therapy.

Mast cell granules potentiate endotoxin-induced interleukin-6 production by endothelial cells.

Mast cells are constituent cells of vascular tissue and their numbers are increased in atherosclerotic vessels. To gain insight into the role of mast cells in vascular inflammation, the effect of mast cell granules (MCG) on endothelial cell production of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) was examined. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the presence or absence of rat peritoneal MCG and IL‐6 production was assayed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. The interaction of MCG with HUVEC in culture was examined by electron microscopy (EM). The EM studies revealed that MCG are internalized by HUVEC and appear intact even after 24 h in culture. Unactivated HUVEC produced little or no IL‐6 either in the presence or absence of MCG. Treatment of HUVEC with LPS stimulated IL‐6 production in a dose‐ and time‐dependent fashion. Addition of MCG to LPS‐activated HUVEC resulted in the potentiation of IL‐6 production at all LPS doses. MCG‐induced enhancement of IL‐6 production was evident even at a mast cell‐to‐endothelial cell ratio of 1:32. The enhancement of IL‐6 production by MCG was also seen when tumor necrosis factor α was used as an activator. Although potentiation was evident when MCG were added 6 h before or after LPS stimulation, the maximum effect was noted when MCG and LPS were added simultaneously. MCG‐mediated enhancement of IL‐6 production was abrogated by pretreating MCG with protease inhibitors. Although MCG proteases potentiate IL‐6 production by HUVEC, they do not degrade secreted IL‐6. These results demonstrate that MCG interact with endothelial cells and modulate the production of an important inflammatory cytokine. J. Leukoc. Biol. 62: 210–216; 1997.

Regulation of the expression of adhesion molecules by human synoviocytes

The capacity of synoviocytes to participate in inflammatory responses may be altered by the cytokine-enhanced expression of adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). To examine this possibility, the ability of selected cytokines to enhance ICAM-1 expression was examined. The data indicated that each of these cytokines (interleukin-1 beta greater than tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma much greater than interleukin-6) can up-regulate synoviocyte ICAM-1 expression. This can potentially increase the ability of these cells to interact with infiltrating inflammatory cells, thereby propagating immunologically mediated inflammation such as occurs in rheumatoid synovitis.