Hildo H. Offenberg

The gene encoding a major component of the lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes of the rat is related to X-linked lymphocyte-regulated genes.

The lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes (SCs) of the rat contain major components with relative electrophoretic mobilities (M(r)S) of 30,000 and 33,000. After one-dimensional separation of SC proteins on polyacrylamide-sodium dodecyl sulfate gels, these components show up as two broad bands. These bands contain closely related proteins, as judged from their peptide maps and immunological reactivity. Using affinity-purified polyclonal anti-30,000- and anti-33,000-M(r) component antibodies, we isolated a cDNA encoding at least one of the 30,000- or 33,000-M(r) SC components. The protein predicted from the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA, called SCP3 (for synaptonemal complex protein 3), has a molecular mass of 29.7 kDa and a pI value of 9.4. It has a potential nucleotide binding site and contains stretches that are predicted to be capable of forming coiled-coil structures. In the male rat, the gene encoding SCP3 is transcribed exclusively in the testis. SCP3 has significant amino acid similarity to the pM1 protein, which is one of the predicted products of an X-linked lymphocyte-regulated gene family of the mouse: there are 63% amino acid sequence similarity and 35% amino acid identity between the SCP3 and pM1 proteins. However, SCP3 differs from pM1 in several respects, and whether the proteins fulfill related functions is still an open question.

Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3

In meiotic prophase, the sister chromatids of each chromosome develop a common axial element (AE) that is integrated into the synaptonemal complex (SC). We analyzed the incorporation of sister chromatid cohesion proteins (cohesins) and other AE components into AEs. Meiotic cohesin REC8 appeared shortly before premeiotic S phase in the nucleus and formed AE-like structures (REC8-AEs) from premeiotic S phase on. Subsequently, meiotic cohesin SMC1β, cohesin SMC3, and AE proteins SCP2 and SCP3 formed dots along REC8-AEs, which extended and fused until they lined REC8-AEs along their length. In metaphase I, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 disappeared from the chromosome arms and accumulated around the centromeres, where they stayed until anaphase II. In striking contrast, REC8 persisted along the chromosome arms until anaphase I and near the centromeres until anaphase II. We propose that REC8 provides a basis for AE formation and that the first steps in AE assembly do not require SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3. Furthermore, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 cannot provide arm cohesion during metaphase I. We propose that REC8 then provides cohesion. RAD51 and/or DMC1 coimmunoprecipitates with REC8, suggesting that REC8 may also provide a basis for assembly of recombination complexes.

Mre11 and Ku70 interact in somatic cells, but are differentially expressed in early meiosis

Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) pose a major threat to living cells, and several mechanisms for repairing these lesions have evolved. Eukaryotes can process DSBs by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ connects DNA ends irrespective of their sequence, and it predominates in mitotic cells, particularly during G1 ( ref. 3). HR requires interaction of the broken DNA molecule with an intact homologous copy, and allows restoration of the original DNA sequence. HR is active during G2 of the mitotic cycle and predominates during meiosis, when the cell creates DSBs (ref. 4), which must be repaired by HR to ensure proper chromosome segregation. How the cell controls the choice between the two repair pathways is not understood. We demonstrate here a physical interaction between mammalian Ku70, which is essential for NHEJ (ref. 5), and Mre11, which functions both in NHEJ and meiotic HR (Refs 2,6). Moreover, we show that irradiated cells deficient for Ku70 are incapable of targeting Mre11 to subnuclear foci that may represent DNA-repair complexes. Nevertheless, Ku70 and Mre11 were differentially expressed during meiosis. In the mouse testis, Mre11 and Ku70 co-localized in nuclei of somatic cells and in the XY bivalent. In early meiotic prophase, however, when meiotic recombination is most probably initiated, Mre11 was abundant, whereas Ku70 was not detectable. We propose that Ku70 acts as a switch between the two DSB repair pathways. When present, Ku70 destines DSBs for NHEJ by binding to DNA ends and attracting other factors for NHEJ, including Mre11; when absent, it allows participation of DNA ends and Mre11 in the meiotic HR pathway.

Localization of SCP2 and SCP3 protein molecules within synaptonemal complexes of the rat

Abstract. SCP2 and SCP3 are major protein components of the lateral elements (LEs) of synaptonemal complexes (SCs) of the rat, with Mrs of 173,000 and 30,000. We performed a detailed immunocytochemical comparison of the localization of SCP2 and SCP3 within SCs at the electron microscopic level. The ultrastructural localization of SCP2 and SCP3 was analyzed by immunogold labeling of two types of preparations, namely surface-spread spermatocytes and ultrathin sections of Lowicryl-embedded testicular tissue of the rat. For each of the antisera used, the distribution of immunogold label over SCs in surface-spread spermatocytes differed significantly from the distribution of label on sections. We attributed this difference to artifacts caused by the surface-spreading technique, and therefore we relied on sections for the precise localization of epitopes. On sections, the distribution of label obtained with two antisera against nonoverlapping, widely separated fragments of SCP2 did not differ significantly. There was a small but significant difference between the labeling pattern obtained with an anti-SCP3 serum and the pattern obtained with either of the two antisera against fragments of SCP2; although for all three antisera the peak of the immunogold label coincided with the center of the LE, the distributions of label obtained with the antisera against fragments of SCP2 were asymmetrical, with a shoulder at the inner side of the LE, whereas the distribution of label obtained with anti-SCP3 serum was symmetrical. Furthermore, we observed fuzzy connections between the LEs that were labeled by anti-SCP2 but not anti-SCP3 antibodies. It is possible that labeling of these fuzzy bridges caused the shoulder in the gold label distributions obtained with anti-SCP2 antibodies.

The Mismatch Repair Protein MLH1 Marks a Subset of Strongly Interfering Crossovers in Tomato

In most eukaryotes, the prospective chromosomal positions of meiotic crossovers are marked during meiotic prophase by protein complexes called late recombination nodules (LNs). In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a cytological recombination map has been constructed based on LN positions. We demonstrate that the mismatch repair protein MLH1 occurs in LNs. We determined the positions of MLH1 foci along the 12 tomato chromosome pairs (bivalents) during meiotic prophase and compared the map of MLH1 focus positions with that of LN positions. On all 12 bivalents, the number of MLH1 foci was ∼70% of the number of LNs. Bivalents with zero MLH1 foci were rare, which argues against random failure of detecting MLH1 in the LNs. We inferred that there are two types of LNs, MLH1-positive and MLH1-negative LNs, and that each bivalent gets an obligate MLH1-positive LN. The two LN types are differently distributed along the bivalents. Furthermore, cytological interference among MLH1 foci was much stronger than interference among LNs, implying that MLH1 marks the positions of a subset of strongly interfering crossovers. Based on the distances between MLH1 foci or LNs, we propose that MLH1-positive and MLH1-negative LNs stem from the same population of weakly interfering precursors.

Tissue distribution of two major components of synaptonemal complexes of the rat

In this paper we describe an analysis of the tissue distribution of two recently identified components of synaptonemal complexes (SCs), an Mr 125000 and an Mr 190000 protein, in the male rat by immunoblot analysis and immunocytochemical techniques. We compared the tissue distribution of these antigens with that of two earlier identified SC components, an Mr 30000 and an Mr 33000 polypeptide. For this purpose we used monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) that react exlusively with SCs in lysed spermatocytes, and that recognize the above mentioned antigens specifically in immunoblots of SC proteins or of nuclear proteins from spermatocytes: these were Mab IX9D5 (anti-190000), Mab IX5B2 (anti-125000), Mab II52F10 (anti-30000+33000), and Mab IX8G9 (anti-30000+33000). In the immunoblot experiments, we could detect the Mr 190000 and 125000 antigens exclusively in blots of SC proteins or nuclear proteins from spermatocytes; these antigens were not detectable in blots of nuclear proteins from liver, brain, spermatogonia or spermatids or in blots of proteins from mitotic chromosomes or nuclear laminae. With the anti-30000+33000 Mabs we obtained essentially the same result, except that Mab IX8G9, but not II52F10, recognizes a small amount of Mr 30000 antigen in blots of nuclear proteins from spermatids and spermatogonia. Although this might be ascribed to contamination of the isolated spermatids and spermatogonia, we cannot exclude that a small amount of Mr 30000 antigen is present in these cells. In the immunofluorescence analysis, the testis was the only tissue that reacted detectably with the above antibodies. Within the testis, spermatocytes and some early spermatids were the only cell types that contained detectable amounts of antigen. The Mr 125000 antigen was exclusively observed in nuclei of spermatocytes, from zygotene up to and including diplotene, in paired segments of SCs. The Mr 30000+33000 and 190000 antigens were present in paired as well as unpaired segments of SCs in nuclei of permatocytes, from zygotene up to and including diplotene and in the nuclei of some early spermatids in presumed remnants of SCs. We conclude that SCs consist largely of meiosisspecific proteins.

Localisation of RAD50 and MRE11 in spermatocyte nuclei of mouse and rat

Abstract.Synaptonemal complexes (SCs) are zipperlike structures that are assembled between homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase. They consist of two axial elements (AEs) (one along each of the two homologous chromosomes), which, in mature SCs, are connected by numerous transverse filaments along their length. Several proteins involved in the later steps of meiotic recombination most probably function in close association with the AEs of SCs, because the proteins involved in these steps have all been localised along AEs or SCs by immunocytochemical methods. It is not known at which step in meiotic recombination this association with the AEs is established. In order to shed some light on this issue, we analysed the localisation of two proteins that are involved in early steps of meiotic recombination, RAD50 and MRE11, relative to AEs and SCs by immunofluorescence labelling of paraffin sections of the mouse testis, using affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies against RAD50 and MRE11, and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against SC components. The localisation patterns of MRE11 and RAD50 within spermatocytes were very similar. MRE11 and RAD50 appeared in high abundance in preleptotene spermatocytes, just before SC components could be detected. From preleptotene until early zygotene they were present throughout the nucleus. In mid and late zygotene, MRE11 and RAD50 concentrated in distinct areas; in early pachytene the two proteins had almost disappeared from the nucleus, except from the sex vesicle (the chromatin of the XY bivalent), where they persisted in high abundance until diplotene. We propose that MRE11 and RAD50, together with other proteins, prepare chromatin throughout the early meiotic prophase nucleus for the initiation of meiotic recombination. Possibly, only a small fraction of the RAD50- and MRE11-containing (pre)recombination complexes associates transiently with AEs, where further steps in meiotic recombination can take place.

A change in the phosphorylation pattern of the 30000-33000 M-r synaptonemal complex proteins of the rat between early and mid-pachytene

The lateral elements (LEs) of synaptonemal complexes (SCs) of the rat contain major components with relative electrophoretic mobilities (Mr, s) of 30000–33000, which are the products of a single gene. After one-dimensional separation of SC proteins on polyacrylamide-SDS gels, these components show up as two major bands, whereas upon two-dimensional electrophoresis they are resolved in at least 24 spots, which focus at pH 6.5 to 9.5. In this paper we show that these spots represent phosphorylation variants. For the analysis of the phosphorylation of the 30000-to 33000-Mr SC components during progression through meiotic prophase, we developed a procedure for isolation of fractions of testicular cells of the rat that are enriched in separate stages of meiotic prophase. Analysis of the 30000-to 33000-Mr SC components in these fractions by two-dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting showed that phosphorylated variants of the 30000-to 33000-Mr SC proteins occur throughout meiotic prophase. However, the extent of phosphorylation changes between early and mid-pachytene, when one phosphate group is probably added to each of the variants.

Cytological analysis of MRE11 protein during early meiotic prophase I in Arabidopsis and tomato

Early recombination nodules (ENs) are multiprotein complexes that are thought to be involved in synapsis and recombination, but little is known about their components or how they may be involved in these events. In this study, we describe the cytological behavior of a possible EN component, MRE11, a protein that is important for the repair of the numerous, programmed deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand breaks (DSBs) that occur early in the meiotic prophase. By immunofluorescence, many MRE11 foci were associated with chromosomal axes during early prophase I in both wild-type Arabidopsis and tomato primary microsporocytes. Similar patterns of MRE11 foci were observed in two Arabidopsis mutants (Atspo11-1 and Atprd1) that are defective in DSB formation and synapsis. In tomato chromosomes, MRE11 foci were more common in distal euchromatin than in proximal heterochromatin, consistent with known EN patterns. However, electron microscopic immunogold localization demonstrated that only about 10% of ENs were labeled, and most MRE11 label was associated with synaptonemal complex components. Thus, in plants, MRE11 foci are not dependent on DSB formation, and most MRE11 foci do not correspond to ENs. More generally, our results show that the simple presence of large numbers of fluorescent foci associated with synapsing chromosomes is insufficient evidence to equate these foci with ENs.

Altered distribution of MLH1 foci is associated with changes in cohesins and chromosome axis compaction in an asynaptic mutant of tomato

In most multicellular eukaryotes, synapsis [synaptonemal complex (SC) formation] between pairs of homologous chromosomes during prophase I of meiosis is closely linked with crossing over. Asynaptic mutants in plants have reduced synapsis and increased univalent frequency, often resulting in genetically unbalanced gametes and reduced fertility. Surprisingly, some asynaptic mutants (like as1 in tomato) have wild-type or increased levels of crossing over. To investigate, we examined SC spreads from as1/as1 microsporocytes using both light and electron microscopic immunolocalization. We observed increased numbers of MLH1 foci (a crossover marker) per unit length of SC in as1 mutants compared to wild-type. These changes are associated with reduced levels of detectable cohesin proteins in the axial and lateral elements (AE/LEs) of SCs, and the AE/LEs of as1 mutants are also significantly longer than those of wild-type or another asynaptic mutant. These results indicate that chromosome axis structure, synapsis, and crossover control are all closely linked in plants.