Hong gen Liu
Tianjin Medical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hong gen Liu.
Biomarkers | 2014
Nan Jiang; Jing Yu Deng; Yong Liu; Bin Ke; Hong gen Liu; Han Liang
Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the postoperative complication and long-term outcomes in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A total of 377 patients who underwent curative resection for GC were enrolled. In logistic analysis, PLR (p = 0.09) was independently associated with the incidence of postoperative complication. The results of multivariate survival analysis showed the NLR and PLR were introduced as prognostic factors for operable GC, the NLR may represent a useful prognostic index for the prediction of overall survival (OS) in advanced GC (p = 0.021).
World Journal of Gastroenterology | 2014
Nan Jiang; Jing Yu Deng; Xue Wei Ding; Li Zhang; Hong gen Liu; Yue xiang Liang; Han Liang
AIM To elucidate the potential impact of the grade of complications on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients after curative surgery. METHODS A total of 751 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2002 and December 2006 in our center were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into four groups: no complications, Grade I, Grade II and Grade III complications, according to the following classification systems: T92 (Toronto 1992 or Clavien), Accordion Classification, and Revised Accordion Classification. Clinicopathological features were compared among the four groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The Log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the impact of complications of each grade on survival. RESULTS Significant differences were found among the four groups in age, sex, other diseases (including hypertension, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), body mass index (BMI), intraoperative blood loss, tumor location, extranodal metastasis, lymph node metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was significantly influenced by the complication grade. The 5-year OS rates were 43.0%, 42.5%, 25.5% and 9.6% for no complications, and Grade I, Grade II and Grade III complications, respectively (P < 0.001). Age, tumor size, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and complication grade were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. With stratified analysis, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, and intraoperative blood loss were independent prognostic factors for Grade I complications (P < 0.001, P = 0.031, P = 0.030). Age and lymph node metastasis were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS of gastric cancer patients with Grade II complications (P = 0.034, P = 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss, TNM stage, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS of gastric cancer patients with Grade III complications (P = 0.003, P = 0.005, P < 0.001). There were significant differences among patients with Grade I, Grade II and Grade III complications in TNM stage II and III cancer (P < 0.001, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Complication grade may be an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer following curative resection. Treatment of complications can improve the long-term outcome of gastric cancer patients.
World Journal of Gastroenterology | 2014
Xu guang Jiao; Jing Yu Deng; Ru peng Zhang; Liang liang Wu; L. Wang; Hong gen Liu; Xi Shan Hao; Han Liang
AIM To elucidate the potential impact of examined lymph nodes (eLNs) on long-term survival of node-negative gastric cancer patients after curative surgery. METHODS A total of 497 node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2008 in our center were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to eLNs through cut-point analysis. Clinicopathological features were compared between ≤ 15 eLNs group and > 15 eLNs group and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The Log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was performed to investigate the impact of eLNs on patient survival in each stage. Overall survival was also compared among the four groups. Finally, we explored the recurrent sites associated with eLNs. RESULTS Patients with eLNs > 15 had a better survival compared with those with eLNs ≤ 15 for the entire cohort. By the multivariate survival analysis, we found that the depth of invasion and the number of eLNs were the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) of patients with node-negative gastric cancer. According to the cut-point analysis, T2-T4 patients with 11-15 eLNs had a significantly longer mean OS than those with 4-10 eLNs or 1-3 eLNs. Patients with ≤ 15 eLNs were more likely to experience locoregional and peritoneal recurrence than those with > 15 eLNs. CONCLUSION Number of eLNs could predict the prognosis of node-negative gastric cancer, and dissection of > 15 eLNs is recommended during lymphadenectomy so as to improve the long-term survival.
Tumor Biology | 2014
Nan Jiang; Jing Yu Deng; Yong Liu; Bin Ke; Hong gen Liu; Han Liang
Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery | 2013
L. Wang; Han Liang; Xiao na Wang; Liang liang Wu; Xue Wei Ding; Hong gen Liu
Chinese journal of surgery | 2013
Xu guang Jiao; Han Liang; Jing Yu Deng; L. Wang; Hong gen Liu; Yue xiang Liang
Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery | 2013
Yue xiang Liang; Han Liang; Xue Wei Ding; Xiao na Wang; Liang liang Wu; Hong gen Liu; Xu guang Jiao
Chinese journal of surgery | 2013
Hong gen Liu; Han Liang; Jing Yu Deng; L. Wang; Yue xiang Liang; Xu guang Jiao
Chinese journal of surgery | 2013
Yue xiang Liang; Han Liang; Xue Wei Ding; Xiao na Wang; Li Zhang; Liang liang Wu; Hong gen Liu; Xu guang Jiao
Chinese journal of surgery | 2013
Hong gen Liu; Han Liang; Jing Yu Deng; L. Wang; Yue xiang Liang; Xu guang Jiao