Xue Wei Ding

Prognostic nutritional index predicts postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer

AIMnTo investigate the impact of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on the postoperative complications and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy.nnnMETHODSnThe data for 386 patients with gastric cancer were extracted and analyzed between January 2003 and December 2008 in our center. The patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of the PNI: those with a PNI ≥ 46 and those with a PNI < 46. Clinicopathological features were compared between the two groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The relationship between postoperative complications and PNI was analyzed by logistic regression. The univariate and multivariate hazard ratios were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.nnnRESULTSnThe optimal cutoff value of the PNI was set at 46, and patients with a PNI ≥ 46 and those with a PNI < 46 were classified into PNI-high and PNI-low groups, respectively. Patients in the PNI-low group were more likely to have advanced tumor (T), node (N), and TNM stages than patients in the PNI-high group. The low PNI is an independent risk factor for the incidence of postoperative complications (OR = 2.223). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 54.1% and 21.1% for patients with a PNI ≥ 46 and those with a PNI < 46, respectively. The OS rates were significantly lower in the PNI-low group than in the PNI-high group among patients with stages II (P = 0.001) and III (P < 0.001) disease.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe PNI is a simple and useful marker not only to identify patients at increased risk for postoperative complications, but also to predict long-term survival after total gastrectomy. The PNI should be included in the routine assessment of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer in patients aged ≥ 70 years

AIMnTo elucidate the prognostic value of age for gastric cancer and identify the optimal treatment for elderly gastric cancer patients.nnnMETHODSnWe enrolled 920 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between January 2003 and December 2007 in our center. Patients were categorized into three groups: younger group (age < 50 years), middle-aged group (50-69 years), and elderly group (≥ 70 years). Clinicopathological features were compared among the three groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between curves. Independent prognostic factors were identified by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the impact of age on survival at each stage. Cancer-specific survival was also compared among the three groups by excluding deaths due to reasons other than gastric cancer. We analyzed the potential prognostic factors for patients aged ≥ 70 years. Finally, the impact of extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on survival for each age group was evaluated.nnnRESULTSnIn the elderly group, there was a male predominance. At the same time, cancers of the upper third of the stomach, differentiated type, and less-invasive surgery were more common than in the younger or middle-aged groups. Elderly patients were more likely to have advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and larger tumors, but less likely to have distant metastasis. Although 5-year overall survival (OS) rate specific to gastric cancer was not significantly different among the three groups, elderly patients demonstrated a significantly lower 5-year OS rate than the younger and middle-aged patients (elderly vs middle-aged vs younger patients = 22.0% vs 36.6% vs 38.0%, respectively). In the TNM-stratified analysis, the differences in OS were only observed in patients with II and III tumors. In multivariate analysis, only surgical margin status, pT4, lymph node metastasis, M1 and sex were independent prognostic factors for elderly patients. The 5-year OS rate did not differ between elderly patients undergoing D1 and D2 lymph node resection, and these patients benefited little from chemotherapy.nnnCONCLUSIONnAge ≥ 70 years was an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer after gastrectomy. D1 resection is appropriate and postoperative chemotherapy is possibly unnecessary for elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Impact of intraoperative blood loss on survival after curative resection for gastric cancer

AIMnTo elucidate the potential impact of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients after curative surgery.nnnMETHODSnA total of 845 stageu200aI-III gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2003 and December 2007 in our center were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the amount of IBL: group 1 (< 200 mL), group 2 (200-400 mL) and group 3 (> 400 mL). Clinicopathological features were compared among the three groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The Log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the impact of IBL on survival in each stage. Cancer-specific survival was also compared among the three groups by excluding deaths due to reasons other than gastric cancer. Finally, we explored the possible factors associated with IBL and identified the independent risk factors for IBL ≥ 200 mL.nnnRESULTSnOverall survival was significantly influenced by the amount of IBL. The 5-year overall survival rates were 51.2%, 39.4% and 23.4% for IBL less than 200 mL, 200 to 400 mL and more than 400 mL, respectively (< 200 mL vs 200-400 mL, P < 0.001; 200-400 mL vs > 400 mL, P = 0.003). Age, tumor size, Borrmann type, extranodal metastasis, tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, chemotherapy, extent of lymphadenectomy, IBL and postoperative complications were found to be independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Following stratified analysis, patients staged TNMu200aI-II and those with IBL less than 200 mL tended to have better survival than those with IBL not less than 200 mL, while patients staged TNM III, whose IBL was less than 400 mL had better survival. Tumor location, tumor size, TNM stage, type of gastrectomy, combined organ resection, extent of lymphadenectomy and year of surgery were found to be factors associated with the amount of IBL, while tumor location, type of gastrectomy, combined organ resection and year of surgery were independently associated with IBL ≥ 200 mL.nnnCONCLUSIONnIBL is an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer after curative resection. Reducing IBL can improve the long-term outcome of gastric cancer patients following curative gastrectomy.

Effect of complication grade on survival following curative gastrectomy for carcinoma

AIMnTo elucidate the potential impact of the grade of complications on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients after curative surgery.nnnMETHODSnA total of 751 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2002 and December 2006 in our center were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into four groups: no complications, Gradeu2005I, Grade II and Grade III complications, according to the following classification systems: T92 (Toronto 1992 or Clavien), Accordion Classification, and Revised Accordion Classification. Clinicopathological features were compared among the four groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The Log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the impact of complications of each grade on survival.nnnRESULTSnSignificant differences were found among the four groups in age, sex, other diseases (including hypertension, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), body mass index (BMI), intraoperative blood loss, tumor location, extranodal metastasis, lymph node metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was significantly influenced by the complication grade. The 5-year OS rates were 43.0%, 42.5%, 25.5% and 9.6% for no complications, and Gradeu2005I, Grade II and Grade III complications, respectively (P < 0.001). Age, tumor size, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and complication grade were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. With stratified analysis, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, and intraoperative blood loss were independent prognostic factors for Gradeu2005Iu2005complications (P < 0.001, P = 0.031, P = 0.030). Age and lymph node metastasis were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS of gastric cancer patients with Grade II complications (P = 0.034, P = 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss, TNM stage, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS of gastric cancer patients with Grade III complications (P = 0.003, P = 0.005, P < 0.001). There were significant differences among patients with Gradeu2005I, Grade II and Grade III complications in TNM stage II and III cancer (P < 0.001, P = 0.001).nnnCONCLUSIONnComplication grade may be an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer following curative resection. Treatment of complications can improve the long-term outcome of gastric cancer patients.

Pouch size influences clinical outcome of pouch construction after total gastrectomy:A meta-analysis

AIMnTo assess the clinical significance of pouch size in total gastrectomy for gastric malignancies.nnnMETHODSnWe manually searched the English-language literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and BIOSIS Previews up to October 31, 2013. Only randomized control trials comparing small pouch with large pouch in gastric reconstruction after total gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently carried out the literature search, study selection, data extraction and quality assessment of included publications. Standard mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95%CI were calculated as summary measures of effects.nnnRESULTSnFive RCTs published between 1996 and 2011 comparing small pouch formation with large pouch formation after total gastrectomy were included. Eating capacity per meal in patients with a small pouch was significantly higher than that in patients with a large pouch (SMD = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.25-1.44, I(2) = 0, P = 0.792), and the operative time spent in the small pouch group was significantly longer than that in the large pouch group [SMD = -3.87, 95%CI: -7.68-(-0.09), I (2) = 95.6%, P = 0]. There were no significant differences in body weight at 3 mo (SMD = 1.45, 95%CI: -4.24-7.15, I(2) = 97.7%, P = 0) or 12 mo (SMD = -1.34, 95%CI: -3.67-0.99, I(2) = 94.2%, P = 0) after gastrectomy, and no significant improvement of post-gastrectomy symptoms (heartburn, RR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.12-1.29, I(2) = 0, P = 0.386; dysphagia, RR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.58-1.27, I(2) = 0, P = 0.435; and vomiting, RR = 0.5, 95%CI: 0.15-1.62, I(2) = 0, P = 0.981) between the two groups.nnnCONCLUSIONnSmall pouch can significantly improve the eating capacity per meal after surgery, and may improve the post-gastrectomy symptoms, including heartburn, dysphagia and vomiting.