Hsing-Ting Yu
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hsing-Ting Yu.
American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy | 2010
Bonnie B. Dean; Hsing-Ting Yu; Jay P. Bae; Suzanne Fiske; Eric Meadows; Yan Xiong; Mf Emons
PURPOSE The pattern of clopidogrel loading in patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was studied in a retrospective analysis of clinical records. METHODS A database of deidentified electronic medical records from hospitals and hospital-affiliated outpatient facilities throughout the United States was analyzed for PCI patients with or without a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received clopidogrel loading doses of > or =300 mg between 48 hours before and 6 hours after PCI. A high dose was defined as > or =600 mg, and pretreatment was defined as more than 6 hours before PCI for 300-599 mg and 2 or more hours before PCI for > or =600 mg. RESULTS Among 6253 PCI patients who met the criteria, there were 2331 with a diagnosis of ACS (ACS-PCI) and 3922 without an ACS diagnosis (elective PCI). Of the ACS-PCI patients, 1359 had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 972 had unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A majority of ACS-PCI patients (57%) received a > or =600-mg loading dose, 34% received a 300-mg loading dose, and the rest received a loading dose between 300 and 600 mg. Loading consisted of a single bolus in 75% of patients, two doses in 21.5%, and three or more doses in 3.1%. The first dose was during or after PCI in 56% of the UA/NSTEMI group and in 71% of both the elective PCI and STEMI groups. Among the UA/NSTEMI group, only 33% met criteria for pretreatment. CONCLUSION Reported practice patterns of clopidogrel administration before PCI for UA/NSTEMI were not consistent with evidence generated from published clinical trials and guidelines. Recommended pre-treatment with clopidogrel was frequently not practiced.
Journal for Healthcare Quality | 2015
Robert C. Amland; Bonnie B. Dean; Hsing-Ting Yu; Hugh Ryan; Timothy Orsund; Jeffrey L. Hackman; Shauna R. Roberts
Abstract:Despite venous thromboembolism (VTE) policy initiatives, gaps exist between guidelines and practice. In response, hospitals implement clinical decision support (CDS) systems to improve VTE prophylaxis. To assess the impact of a VTE CDS on reducing incidence of VTE, this study used a pretest/posttest, longitudinal, cohort design incorporating electronic health record (EHR) data from one urban tertiary and level 1 trauma center, and one suburban hospital. VTE CDS was embedded into the EHR system. The study included 45,046 admissions; 171,753 patient days; and 110 VTE events. The VTE rate declined from 0.954 per 1,000 patient days to 0.434 comparing baseline to full VTE CDS. Compared to baseline, patients benefitting from VTE CDS were 35% less likely to have a VTE. VTE CDS utilization achieved 78.4% patients assessed within 24 hr from admission, 64.0% patients identified at risk, and 47.7% patients at risk for VTE with an initiated VTE interdisciplinary plan of care. CDS systems with embedded algorithms, alerts, and notification capabilities enable physicians at the point of care to utilize guidelines and make impactful decisions to prevent VTE. This study demonstrates a phased‐in implementation of VTE CDS as an effective approach toward VTE prevention. Implications for future research and quality improvement are discussed as well.
Critical Care | 2014
Marya D. Zilberberg; Hsing-Ting Yu; Paresh Chaudhari; Matthew Emons; Nikhil Khandelwal; Andrew F. Shorr
IntroductionHistorically, Candida albicans has represented the most common cause of candidemia. However, the proportion of bloodstream infections due to non-albicans Candida species has increased. Because of the risk for candidemia in intra-abdominal surgical patients, some experts advocate the use of fluconazole prophylaxis. The impact of this practice on the distribution of Candida species isolated in breakthrough fungal infections in this population is unknown. We examined the association of fluconazole prophylaxis with the distribution of Candida species in intra-abdominal surgery patients.MethodsWe retrospectively identified cases with a positive blood culture (BCx) for Candida among hospitalized adult intra-abdominal surgery patients between July 2005 and October 2012. Distribution of Candida species isolated represented our primary endpoint. Qualifying surgical cases were determined based on a review of discharge International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Patients receiving low-dose fluconazole prior to the positive BCx with a known indication for prophylaxis including neutropenia, ICU exposure or history of organ transplantation were classified as prophylaxis. Appropriateness of fungal treatment was determined by the timing and selection of antifungal agent based on fungal isolate.ResultsAmong 10,839 intra-abdominal surgery patients, 227 had candidemia. The most common Candida species isolated was C. albicans (n = 90, 39.6%) followed by C. glabrata (n = 81, 35.7%) and C. parapsilosis (n = 38, 16.7%). Non-albicans Candida accounted for 57.7% of isolates among the 194 non-prophylaxis patients and 75.8% among the 33 prophylaxis patients (P = 0.001). C. glabrata, the most common non-C. albicans species, was more prevalent than C. albicans in persons given prophylaxis, but not in those without prophylaxis. A total of 63% of those with candidemia were treated inappropriately based on the timing and selection of antifungal administration.ConclusionsSelection pressure from fluconazole prophylaxis in at-risk surgical patients may be associated with a drift toward fluconazole-resistant species in subsequent candidemia. Tools are needed to guide appropriate treatment through the prompt recognition and characterization of candidemia.
The American Journal of Medicine | 2010
Peter Zimetbaum; Amit J. Thosani; Hsing-Ting Yu; Yan Xiong; Jay Lin; Prajesh Kothawala; Mf Emons
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy | 2014
Kelly J. Ko; Rolin L. Wade; Hsing-Ting Yu; Ross M. Miller; Bruce Sherman; Jeff Goad
Critical Care Medicine | 2013
Andrew Shorr; Hsing-Ting Yu; Paresh Chaudhari; Matthew Emons; Nikhil Khandelwal; Marya D. Zilberberg
Critical Care Medicine | 2012
Rolin L. Wade; Paresh Chaudhari; Hsing-Ting Yu; Brian H. Nathanson; Harlen Hays; Jing Yi; David Horn
Critical Care Medicine | 2012
Paresh Chaudhari; Rolin Wade; Hsing-Ting Yu; Brian H. Nathanson; Harlen Hays; Jing Yi; David Horn
Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2011
Matthew F Emons; Mehul Dalal; Hsing-Ting Yu
american thoracic society international conference | 2010
Marya D. Zilberberg; James Spalding; Smita Kothari; Hsing-Ting Yu; Harlen Hays; Mf Emons