Hu D

Assessment of Autofluorescence to Detect the Remineralization Capabilities of Sodium Fluoride, Monofluorophosphate and Non-Fluoride Dentifrices

The purpose of the study was to determine if longitudinal measurements of enamel autofluorescence (quantitative light-induced fluorescence, QLF) could detect differences in remineralization of early enamel caries on buccal surfaces of anterior teeth following supervised daily brushing with either sodium fluoride (NaF; 1,450 ppm F), sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP; 1,450 ppm F) dentifrices or a herbal, non-fluoride placebo dentifrice. The study was a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with schools as the unit of randomization. Twenty-one schools in Chengdu, China, comprised the clusters; 296 children with at least 1 visible white-spot lesion were examined using QLF at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Each of the 21 clusters was randomly assigned 1 of the 3 dentifrices, and the childrenbrushed under supervision once per day for 2 min. The primary outcome measure was ΔQ (product of fluorescence loss and area) at a 5% threshold after 6 months of product use. A multi-level model was fitted to the data at the site level, taking into account the hierarchical structure with baseline ΔQ, age and sex as covariates. After 3 months there was a significant difference between the MFP group and placebo (p = 0.02) and after 6 months between the NaF group (p = 0.002), MFP group (p < 0.001) and the placebo. QLF methodology could detect, within 3- and 6-month periods of supervised brushing, a difference in remineralization between fluoride-containing and non-fluoride-containing dentifrices. Typically lesions in all 3 treatment groups demonstrated improvement. Groups receiving fluoride experienced a more rapid and more substantial remineralization than those in the placebo group.

The anti-caries efficacy of a dentifrice containing 1.5% arginine and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate assessed using Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF).

OBJECTIVEnTo compare the efficacy of a new dentifrice containing 1.5% arginine, an insoluble calcium compound and 1450 ppm fluoride to arrest and reverse naturally occurring buccal caries lesions in children relative to a positive control dentifrice containing 1450 ppm fluoride alone.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnParticipants from Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China tested three dentifrices: a new dentifrice containing 1.5% arginine, an insoluble calcium compound, and 1450 ppm fluoride, as sodium monofluorophosphate, a positive control dentifrice containing 1450 ppm fluoride, as sodium fluoride, in a silica base, and a matched negative control dentifrice without arginine and fluoride. Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF) was used to assess buccal caries lesions at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of product use.nnnRESULTSn438 participants (initial age 9-13 years (mean 11.1±0.78) and 48.6% female) completed the study. No adverse events attributable to the products were reported during the course of the study. The subject mean ΔQ (mm(2)%), representing lesion volume, was 27.26 at baseline. After 6 months of product use, the ΔQ values for the arginine-containing, positive and negative control dentifrices were 13.46, 17.99 and 23.70 representing improvements from baseline of 50.6%, 34.0% and 13.1%. After 6 months product use, the differences between the pair wise comparisons for all three groups were statistically significant (p<0.01). The arginine-containing dentifrice demonstrated an improvement after only 3 months that was almost identical to that achieved by the conventional 1450 ppm fluoride dentifrice after 6 months.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe new dentifrice containing 1.5% arginine, an insoluble calcium compound, and 1450 ppm fluoride provides statistically significantly superior efficacy in arresting and reversing buccal caries lesions to a conventional dentifrice containing 1450 ppm fluoride alone.

A randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the antimicrobial effects of a cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse on dental plaque bacteria.

BACKGROUNDnStudies with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinses that range from 1 use to 6 months of use have documented the clinical efficacy of these formulations on supragingival plaque and gingivitis.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe objective of the present study was to compare the effects of a commercially available mouth rinse containing 0.05% CPC versus a fluoride mouth rinse on the anaerobic bacteria found in dental plaque. Antimicrobial effects on the organisms of the supragingival plaque, a natural biofilm, were determined after 1 use and after 14 days of use of each mouth rinse.nnnMETHODSnAfter enrollment, adult subjects from China completed a 1-week washout period and provided baseline samples of supragingival plaque for analysis of anaerobic bacteria. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a commercially available mouth rinse formulated with 0.05% CPC or a fluoride mouth rinse. Subjects were assigned to each group according to a computer-generated randomization sequence. They were instructed to rinse with 20 mL of either the CPC or the fluoride mouth rinse for 30 seconds. Microbiologic analyses of dental plaque samples were conducted 12 hours after the first use of assigned mouth rinse. Subjects were instructed to continue twice-daily rinsing with their assigned mouth rinse for the next 14 days in addition to brushing their teeth with a commercial fluoride toothpaste. Dental plaque samples for microbiologic analyses were collected on day 15; this was done 12 hours after the final use of the assigned mouth rinses. A dentist conducted oral examinations before each sample collection to evaluate hard and soft tissue health over the course of the study.nnnRESULTSnThe study included 117 adults (62 females, mean age, 28.70 years; 55 males, mean age, 30.41 years). Subjects rinsing with the CPC mouthwash (n = 58; mean age, 29.41 years) reported significant reductions in anaerobic bacteria versus those issued the fluoride rinse (n = 59; mean age, 29.61 years) 12 hours after 1 use and 12 hours after 14 days of use (P < 0.001). The mean percent reduction in anaerobic bacteria between the CPC mouth rinse and the fluoride mouth rinse was 29.98% after 1 use and 57.90% after 14 days of use. All enrolled subjects completed the study without any adverse events.nnnCONCLUSIONnUse of the CPC mouth rinse was associated with significant reductions in the anaerobic bacteria of supragingival plaque compared with fluoride mouth rinse use in these adult subjects.

Efficacy of a Commercial Dentifrice Containing 2% Strontium Chloride and 5% Potassium Nitrate for Dentin Hypersensitivity: A 3-Day Clinical Study in Adults in China

BACKGROUNDnStudies of dentifrices containing strontium chloride or potassium nitrate have documented the clinical efficacy of these formulations for dentin hypersensitivity (DH), but few studies have evaluated dentifrices containing both active ingredients.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe objective of this study was to compare the effects on DH of a dentifrice containing 2% strontium chloride and 5% potassium nitrate in a silica base (experimental dentifrice) with those of a dentifrice containing the same silica base without any active ingredient (control dentifrice).nnnMETHODSnMale and female patients aged 20 to 65 years with DH were eligible to participate in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in China. Patients were assigned to receive the experimental or control dentifrice. At baseline, immediately after topical dentifrice use, and after 3 days, patients received an oral examination of their hard and soft tissues, followed by an evaluation of DH that used the Yeaple Probe to measure tactile hypersensitivity and the Schiff Cold Air Scale to measure the perception of pain from an air blast stimulus. Adverse events (in particular, discomfort while brushing or alteration in taste) in the oral hard or soft tissues were monitored throughout the study.nnnRESULTSnA total of 81 patients were enrolled (40 in the experimental group; 41 in the control group), of whom 79 (55 women; 24 men) completed the study. After topical use, the experimental group had a significantly higher mean (SD) tactile hypersensitivity score (19.47 [14.69] vs 14.27 [5.76]; P = 0.047) and a significantly lower mean air blast hypersensitivity score (1.93 [0.51] vs 2.22 [0.60]; P = 0.026) than did the control group. After 3 days, the experimental group had a significantly higher mean tactile hypersensitivity score (19.87 [14.95] vs 14.51 [6.00]; P = 0.045) and a significantly lower air blast hypersensitivity score (1.80 [0.56] and 2.13 [0.60]; P = 0.014) than the control group. After topical use and after 3 days, the experimental group had increases from baseline in tactile scores of 54.04% and 56.67%, respectively (both, P = 0.001) and reductions from baseline in air blast scores of 18.51% and 24.21% (both, P < 0.001); the control group had increases in tactile scores of 21.14% and 21.54% (P = 0.022 and P = 0.007) and reductions in air blast scores of 10.24% and 13.41% (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). No adverse events were reported throughout the study.nnnCONCLUSIONnIn these patients with DH in China, the dentifrice containing 2% strontium chloride and 5% potassium nitrate was efficacious in reducing DH when used instantly after topical dentifrice use and after 3 days of use.

Efficacy of a mouthwash containing 0.8% arginine, PVM/MA copolymer, pyrophosphates, and 0.05% sodium fluoride compared to a negative control mouthwash on dentin hypersensitivity reduction. A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVEnThe objective of this eight week, single-center, two-cell, double-blind, and randomized clinical study was to evaluate the dentin hypersensitivity reduction efficacy of a mouthwash using Pro-Argin™ Mouthwash Technology containing 0.8% arginine, PVM/MA copolymer, pyrophosphates, and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an alcohol-free base (Arginine Mouthwash) compared to an ordinary mouthwash without any active ingredients (Negative Control).nnnMETHODSnQualifying subjects who presented two hypersensitive teeth with a tactile hypersensitivity score between 10 and 50 g of force, and an air blast hypersensitivity score of 2 or 3 participated in this study and were randomized into one of two treatment groups. Subjects brushed with the toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste provided and then rinsed with 20 mL of their assigned mouthwash for 30s twice daily. Subjects refrained from eating or drinking for 30 min after rinsing. Dentin hypersensitivity assessments, as well as examinations of oral hard and soft tissues, were conducted at the baseline visit and again after two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks of product use.nnnRESULTSnNinety (90) subjects entered and completed the eight week study. After two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks of product use, subjects in the Arginine Mouthwash group exhibited statistically significant (p<0.05) improvements in mean tactile and air blast hypersensitivity scores as compared to the Negative Control Mouthwash.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe results of this study support the conclusion that the Arginine Mouthwash provides a significant reduction in dentin hypersensitivity after eight weeks of product use as compared to a Negative Control mouthwash.

The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in the general population in China.

Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is a common condition that is frequently encountered in dental practice. The aim of this multi-centre and cross-sectional study was to establish the prevalence of DH in the general population in China. A total of 6843 subjects were questioned and examined using a triple syringe with a blast of cold air to confirm the diagnosis of DH. The sensitive surface, loss of attachment and gingival recession of sensitive teeth were measured and recorded. Of the 2932 subjects reporting hypersensitive symptoms, 2363 subjects were further diagnosed as DH, giving an overall prevalence of 34·5%. The greatest number of subjects with DH were within the 50-59 years age group (P < 0·01). The most commonly affected teeth were the premolars and the most provoking factor was the presence of a cold stimulus. The prevalence of DH in a representative sample of the general population in China was 34·5%, indicating that DH is a common oral problem. Therefore, the recognition of the condition and subsequent treatment by the dentist is therefore essential if the condition is to be managed correctly.

Reliability of Quantitative Laser Fluorescence Analysis of Smooth Surface Lesions Adjacent to the Gingival Tissues

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of analysis patch border inclusion or exclusion on the reliability of quantitative laser fluorescence (QLF) analyses of lesions close to the gingival margin. Ninety-three lesions on the maxillary anterior teeth were imaged using a fluorescent capturing system. All the lesions were located on the gingival third of the teeth. One examiner undertook two analyses of the images 1 week apart and another examiner undertook a single analysis. Analyses were undertaken using QLF 2.00 g with four patch borders. Each border was assessed as active or inactive. QLF metrics ΔF, ΔQ and area were exported. Kappa statistics were used to measure the agreement of border inclusion between all three analyses, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the QLF metrics. Agreement on border exclusion was poor; with intra-examiner kappa of 0.48 and inter-examiner at 0.20. However, despite the inconsistencies in border exclusions the ICCs for each QLF metric were high; intra-examiner ΔQ 0.91, ΔF 0.80 and area 0.92; inter-examiner ΔQ 0.86, ΔF 0.68, area 0.88. Lesions adjacent to the gingival margin will often require a patch analysis border to be excluded in order to ensure a satisfactory reconstruction and thus accurate analysis. The decision to include or exclude a border and, if excluded, which border to select appears to be highly variable between examiners. Nevertheless, the QLF metrics appear to be robust as demonstrated by the high ICCs noted in this study.

WITHDRAWN: Evaluación de la Eficacia Anti-Caries de un Dentífrico con Arginina al 1.5% y 1450 ppm de Fluoruro como Monofluorofosfato de Sodio, Usando Fluorescencia Cuantitativa Inducida por Luz (QLF)

W. Yin , D.Y. Hu , X. Li , X. Fan , Y.P. Zhang , I.A. Pretty , L.R. Mateo , D. Cummins , R.P. Ellwood * a State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Colgate-Palmolive Technology Center, River Road, Piscataway, NJ, USA Dental Health Unit, Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, UK d LRM Statistical Consulting, Hoboken, NJ, USA j o u r n a l o f d e n t i s t r y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x – x x x