Hugh D. Hindman
Appalachian State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hugh D. Hindman.
Journal of Business Ethics | 1999
Hugh D. Hindman; Charles G. Smith
This paper examines the issue of global child labor. The treatment is grounded in the classical economics of Adam smith and the more recent writings of human capital theorists. Using this framework, the universal problem of child labor in newly industrializing countries is investigated. Child labor is placed in its historical context with a brief review of practices in the United States and Great Britain at the time those countries were industrializing. Then, child labor is examined in its contemporary global context. We argue that, as countries industrialize, they tend to follow predictable patterns of development – including use of and eventual abandonment of child labor. We argue that this convergence under the logic of industrial capitalism supports a universalist approach to human rights (that would condemn child labor) over a more tolerant cultural relativist approach.
Journal of Labor Research | 1993
Hugh D. Hindman; Charles G. Smith
Correlates of membership and joining intentions in the federal sector, where union representation is broadly available but membership is relatively low, are examined. Key independent variables — attitude toward joining, normative influence, perceived instrumentality of joining, union activism, and satisfaction with the union — are all positively correlated with both membership and joining intentions. In regression analyses, attitude toward joining predicted both membership and intentions. Union satisfaction and activism predicted membership, but normative influence and instrumentality did not; and normative influence and instrumentality predicted joining intentions, but union satisfaction and activism did not. Other important variables include: general attitude toward unions, which predicted both membership and intentions; membership in the previous union, which predicted intentions, but not membership; race, which predicted intentions, but not membership; satisfaction with pay, which predicted (negatively) joining intentions, but not membership; and satisfaction with fellow workers, which predicted membership, but not intentions. We attempt to explain why determinants of membership might differ from determinants of joining intentions.
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal | 1993
Jeremy B. Fox; Hugh D. Hindman
Recently, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws completed a drafting of the Model Employment Termination Act (META). The goal of this suggested state legislation is to end the patchwork of state-defined protections offered to employees who are terminated in at-will work environments. If META provisions are adopted there will be a substantial change in both the protection offered employees and the litigation of wrongful discharge claims within the adopting state. This article presents the changes proposed by META and discusses these changes and their potential implications for employers and employees.
Labor History | 2012
Hugh D. Hindman
employment. Indeed, Phillips creates the image of a rancho workforce composed exclusively of free laborers. Omitted entirely is any discussion of Indian workers bound to the rancheros as debt peons or enslaved captives. This glaring oversight extends to Phillips’ portrayal of rancho labor following the American conquest. For the next 20 years, white–Native labor relations on the ranchos took shape in accordance with the 1850 Act for the Government and Protection of Indians. Remarkably, Phillips provides only brief and scattered references to this key statute, which effectively legalized the binding of Native Americans as indentured servants, debt peons, and leased convicts. Without a careful accounting of these callously exploited workers, the story of Indian labor in Southern California remains misleadingly incomplete.
Archive | 2002
Hugh D. Hindman
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration | 2009
Charles G. Smith; Hugh D. Hindman; Stephen J. Havlovic
Journal of Labor Research | 2004
Richard W. Pouder; Hugh D. Hindman; R. Stephen Cantrell
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal | 2014
Grant E. Buckner; Hugh D. Hindman; Timothy J. Huelsman; Jacqueline Z. Bergman
Industrial Relations | 1994
Hugh D. Hindman; David B. Patton
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal | 2006
Hugh D. Hindman