Huub M. Toussaint

Biomechanics of Competitive Front Crawl Swimming

SummaryEssential performance-determining factors in front crawl swimming can be analysed within a biomechanical framework, in reference to the physiological basis of performance. These factors include: active drag forces, effective propulsive forces, propelling efficiency and power output.The success of a swimmer is determined by the ability to generate propulsive force, while reducing the resistance to forward motion. Although for a given competitive stroke a range of optimal stroking styles may be expected across a sample of swimmers, a common element of technique related to a high performance level is the use of complex sculling motions of the hands to generate especially lift forces. By changing the orientation of the hand the propulsive force acting on the hand is aimed successfully in the direction of motion. Furthermore, the swimming velocity (v) is related to drag (A), power input (Pi, the rate of energy liberation via the aerobic/ anaerobic metabolism), the gross efficiency (eg), propelling efficiency (ep), and power output (Po) according to: Based on the research available at present it is concluded that: (a) drag in groups of elite swimmers homogeneous with respect to swimming technique is determined by anthropometric dimensions; (b) total mechanical power output (Po) is important since improvement in performance is related to increased Po. Furthermore, it shows dramatic changes with training and possibly reflects the size of the ‘swimming engine’; (c) propelling efficiency seems to be important since it is much higher in elite swimmers (61%) than in triathletes (44%); and (d) distance per stroke gives a fairly good indication of propelling efficiency and may be used to evaluate individual progress in technical ability.

Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model

Abstract In studies related to human movement, linked segment models (LSMs) are often used to quantify forces and torques, generated in body joints. Some LSMs represent only a few body segments. Others, for instance used in studies on the control of whole body movements, include all body segments. As a consequence of the complexity of 3-dimensional (3-D) analyses, most LSMs are restricted to one plane of motion. However, in asymmetric movements this may result in a loss of relevant information. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a 3-D LSM including all body segments. Braces with markers, attached to all body segments, were used to record the body movements. The validation of the model was accomplished by comparing the measured with the estimated ground reaction force and by comparing the torques at the lumbo-sacral joint that resulted from a bottom-up and a top-down mechanical analysis. For both comparisons, reasonable to good agreement was found. Sources of error that could not be analysed this way, were subjected to an additional sensitivity analysis. It was concluded that the internal validity of the current model is quite satisfactory.

Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers

Propulsive arm forces of 32 male and 9 female swimmers were measured during front crawl swimming using arms only, in a velocity range between 1.0 m s-1 and 1.8 m s-1. At constant velocity, the measured mean propulsive force Fp equals the mean active drag force (Fd). It was found that Fd is related to the swimming velocity v raised to the power 2.12 +/- 0.20 (males) or 2.28 +/- 0.35 (females). Although many subjects showed rather constant values of Fd/v2, 12 subjects gave significantly (p less than 0.01) stronger or weaker quadratic relationships. Differences in drag force and coefficient of drag between males and females (drag: 28.9 +/- 5.1 N, 20.4 +/- 1.9 N, drag coefficient: 0.64 +/- 0.09, 0.54 +/- 0.07 respectively) are especially apparent at the lowest swimming velocity (1 m s-1), which become less at higher swimming velocities. Possible explanations for the deviation of the power of the velocity from the ideal quadratic dependency are discussed.

Differences in propelling efficiency between competitive and triathlon swimmers

Two highly trained groups, competitive swimmers (N = 6) and triathletes (N = 5), were compared to evaluate the significance of the propelling efficiency as a performance determining factor in swimming. Using regression equations, the groups were compared at equal power input (1000 W). The groups did not differ in gross efficiency, stroke frequency, and work per stroke. There was a difference in distance per stroke (1.23 m vs 0.92 m) and mean swimming velocity (1.17 m.s-1) vs 0.95 m.s-1). The difference in swimming speed between the two groups can be explained by the fact that the competitive swimmers used a much higher proportion of their power output to overcome drag (49 W vs 35 W). At the same time, the competitive swimmers expended less power in moving water backwards (32 W vs 45 W). This difference in apportionment of the power output was characterized as the propelling efficiency (power used to overcome drag/total power output). Mean (+/- SD) propelling efficiency for the competitive swimmers was 61 +/- 6% but was only 44 +/- 3% for the triathletes. The results suggest that on average the better swimmer distinguishes himself from the poorer one by a greater distance per stroke rather than a higher stroke frequency. It is concluded that triathletes should focus their attention on their swimming technique rather than their ability to do work. The distance per stroke might be a simple criterion to evaluate the improvement in skill.

Measurement of active drag during crawl arm stroke swimming

In order to measure active drag during front crawl swimming a system has been designed, built and tested. A tube (23 m long) with grips is fixed under the water surface and the swimmer crawls on this. At one end of the tube, a force transducer is attached to the wall of the swimming pool. It measures the momentary effective propulsive forces of the hands. During the measurements the subjects legs are fixed together and supported by a buoy. After filtering and digitizing the electrical force signal, the mean propulsive force over one lane at constant speeds (ranging from about 1 to 2 m s-1) was calculated. The regression equation of the force on the speed turned out to be almost quadratic. At a mean speed of 1.55 m s-1 the mean force was 66.3 N. The accuracy of this force measured on one subject at different days was 4.1 N. The observed force, which is equal to the mean drag force, fits remarkably well with passive drag force values as well as with values calculated for propulsive forces during actual swimming reported in the literature. The use of the system does not interfere to any large extent with normal front crawl swimming; this conclusion is based on results of observations of film by skilled swim coaches. It was concluded that the system provides a good method of studying active drag and its relation to anthropometric variables and swimming technique.

Coordination of the leg muscles in backlift and leglift

Net joint moments are often used to quantify the loading of structures (e.g. the intervertebral disc at L5S1) during lifting. This quantification method is also used to evaluate the loading of the knee, for instance, to determine the effect of backlifting as opposed to leglifting. However, the true loading of the joint as derived from net joint moments can be obscured by a possible co-contraction of antagonists. To unravel the mechanisms that determine the net joint moments in the knee, the leglift was compared to the backlift. Although a completely different net knee moment curve was found when comparing the two lifting techniques, it appeared to be closely related to the ground reaction force vector and its orientation with respect to the joint centre of rotation (R > 0.995). This close relation was established by co-contraction of both flexors and extensors of the knee. Furthermore, a close relation appeared to exist between the joint moment difference between hip and knee and the activity difference between rectus femoris muscle and hamstring (R = 0.72 and 0.83 in leglift and backlift, respectively). The knee-ankle joint moment difference and the activity of the gastrocnemius showed a close relation as well (R = -0.89 and 0.96 in leglift and backlift, respectively). These relations can be interpreted as a mechanism to distribute net moments across joints. It is concluded that during lifting tasks the intermuscular coordination is aimed at coupling of joint moments, such that the ground reaction force points in a direction that provides balance during the movement. The use of net joint moments as direct indicators for joint loading (e.g. knee) seems, therefore, questionable.

Pumped-up propulsion during front crawl swimming.

PURPOSEnIt is currently held that propulsion in human front crawl swimming is achieved by lift and drag forces predominantly generated by the hands. Calculation of these propulsive forces relies on the quasi-steady assumption that the fluid dynamic behavior of a hand model in a flow channel (constant velocity and orientation) is similar to that of a hand of a real swimmer. However, both experimental and theoretical analyses suggest that this assumption is questionable and that unsteady and rotational propulsion mechanisms play a significant role. Theoretical considerations suggest that arm rotation could lead to a proximodistal pressure gradient, which would induce significant axial flow along the arm toward the hand.nnnMETHODSnTo gain insight into such mechanisms, we used tufts to study the flow directions around the arm and hand during the front crawl, which consists of a glide, an insweep, and an outsweep phase. In a second experiment, we measured pressure during the stroke at various points along the arm and hand.nnnRESULTSnIt was observed that 1) the flow during insweep and part of the outsweep was highly unsteady; 2) the arm movements were largely rotational; 3) a clear axial flow component, not in the direction of the arm movement, was observed during insweep and outsweep; and 4) both the V-shaped contracting arrangement of the tufts during the outsweep and pressure recordings point to a pressure gradient along the direction of the arm during the outsweep, as predicted on theoretical grounds.nnnCONCLUSIONnOur results demonstrate the reality of the predicted rotational and unsteady effects during front crawl swimming. We hypothesize that the axial flow observed during the outsweep has a propulsion-enhancing effect by increasing the pressure difference over the hand. Further investigation is required to establish more accurately the role of axial flow on propulsion.

Effect of a triathlon wet suit on drag during swimming

The effect of a triathlon wet suit on drag was studied in 12 subjects (eight male, four female) swimming at different velocities (1.10, 1.25 and 1.50 m.s-1). The active drag force was directly measured during front crawl swimming using a system of underwater push off pads instrumented with a force transducer (M.A.D. system: 6). Measurements were made when swimming over the system with and without a wet suit. A 14% reduction in drag (from 48.7 to 41.8 Newtons) is found at a swimming velocity of 1.25 m.s-1, which is a typical swimming speed for triathlon distances. At 1.50 m.s-1 a reduction in drag of 12% was observed, which suggests that the wearing of such a suit might be beneficial in conventional swimming events. The reduction in drag can explain the higher swimming velocities observed in triathletes using a wet suit. The effect of the reduction is probably largely due to an increased buoyancy inducing less frontal resistance. However, since the effect of the suit on the lighter female swimmers was not different from the effect on the heavier male swimmers, a reduction in friction drag and drag coefficient may also be significant.

Respiratory valve for oxygen uptake measurements during swimming.

SummaryA detailed description of a respiratory valve to measure oxygen uptake while swimming is given. The effect on body drag of the addition of this equipment was measured in four subjects swimming over a range of speeds (0.9–1.9 m s−1).The respiratory valve has a low airflow resistance (29 Pa at an airflow of 81 · s−1) and a small deadspace (30 ml). Total body drag when swimming while wearing the respiratory equipment did not differ significantly from that when swimming without the equipment. It is concluded that this respiratory valve is ideal for making valid and reliable measurements of oxygen uptake during swimming.

The electro-mechanical delay of the erector spinae muscle: influence of rate of force development, fatigue and electrode location

SummaryElectro-mechanical delay (EMD) values of the erector spinae muscle were obtained using a technique based on the cross-correlation between the force and the electromyogram (EMG). Seven subjects performed a series of 20 submaximal dynamic isometric contractions in a seated position at two frequencies (0.5 Hz and 1 Hz) to study the influence of the rate of force development on EMD. Mean EMD values of 125.7 (SD 28.1) ms (1 Hz) and 136.8 (SD 28.6) ms (0.5 Hz) were shown to differ significantly (P=0.02). This finding supports the hypothesis that EMD is inversely related to the rate of force development and implies that the time to stretch the series elastic component is an important factor determining EMD. After performing a series of fatiguing contractions EMD did not differ significantly from the control value. Multiple regression analysis showed that maximal voluntary contraction force (MVC) and endurance time of the fatiguing exercise correlated significantly with EMD. The site from which the EMG signal was recorded had no significant influence on EMD. However, the coefficient of correlation between force and the EMG-signal differed significantly between electrode positions. The magnitude of the EMD values found emphasized the need to account for this delay when interpreting temporal patterns of activation of the muscles in, for example, lifting tasks.