I. Akashi

Application of machine perfusion preservation as a viability test for marginal kidney graft.

Background. This study evaluated the usefulness of machine perfusion preservation parameters as indicators of kidney graft viability. Methods. Eighty-eight cadaveric kidneys were analyzed in this study. Of these, 74 kidneys (84.1%) were procured from nonheartbeating donors. The criteria for an acceptable kidney for transplantation were a perfusion flow of more than 0.4 mL/min/g with a concurrent decreasing perfusion pressure. The average perfusion pressure was 30–50 mmHg. We divided the kidneys into three groups: group 1 (n=35), 0.45–0.65 mL/min/g machine perfusion flow (MPF); group 2 (n=30), 0.65–0.90 mL/min/g MPF; and group 3 (n=23), more than 0.9 mL/min/g MPF. Results. A higher rate of primary nonfunction (PNF; 25.7%) was found in group 1, compared with 6.7% in group 2 and 0% in group 3. A higher rate of 30.4% immediate function was found in group 3, compared with 16.7% in group and 8.6% in group 1. However, a longer period of acute tubular necrosis (ATN; 12.0 days) was found in group 1 compared with 8.6 days in group 2 and 8.7 days in group 3. PNF was detected in 7 (77.8%) cases with more than 16 hr of total ischemic time (TIT) in group 1. In contrast, all of nine cases with more than 16 hr of TIT in group 3 were functional. Conclusions. MPF is a reliable indicator of graft viability based on the rate of PNF and immediate renal allograft function, especially in marginal donors.

ABO-Incompatible Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers timely transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If ABO-incompatible LDLT is feasible, the need for pretransplantation treatment may be eliminated, which may reduce overall morbidity. In this article, we have described 8 adult HCC patients who successfully underwent LDLT from ABO-incompatible donors. Antirejection therapy included multiple preoperative plasmaphereses, splenectomy, and an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of the ABO-identical cases. In addition, we also performed intrahepatic arterial infusion of prostaglandin E1. In 5 patients, we administered a single dose of rituximab, a chimeric CD20 monoclonal antibody. As a result of this treatment, 6/8 patients are still alive. Our experience has shown that it is possible to control antibody-mediated humoral rejection and other complications in adult ABO-incompatible LDLT.

How Can We Increase Living Related Donor Renal Transplantations

BACKGROUND In Japan, living donor renal transplantation has gained momentum due to an increased number of patients with end-stage renal disease. Living donation not only provides better outcomes, but also the recipients usually need less medications, thereby increasing the quality of life and reducing the potential side effects of immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the past 25 years, our center had performed 140 open donor nephrectomy (OPNx) renal transplantations. Since July 2003, we changed our procurement operation to living hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALNx) in 49 cases. Our operative technique consisted of two 12-mm ports placed in the midaxillary line at the superior and inferior levels of the umbilicus. Next, a 5-cm incision was made in the midline periumbilicus and the hand port system fitted through a midline abdominal incision. RESULTS In 49 cases, HALNx was completed successfully; no patient required conversion to laparotomy. The estimated blood loss was 33.0 +/- 43.4 g and no patient required blood transfusion. In comparison, in OPNx the blood loss was 426.5 +/- 247.6 g (P < .001). The mean operative times were 167.4 +/- 39.7 minutes for HALNx and 228.4 +/- 35.7 minutes for OPNx (P < .001). The postoperative hospital stays were 9.1 +/- 3.8 days for HALNx and 13.0 +/- 1.9 days for OPNx (P < .001). For 3 years prior to introduction of HALNx, we had performed only 10 living donor renal transplantations. Since the introduction of HALNx in 2003, the number of living donors has tripled during the following 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Herein we have reported that HALNx was superior in terms of less operative time and blood loss, postoperative pain and recovery, and shorter hospital stay. Overall donor patient satisfaction was also better in the HALNx group. HALNx is a safe procedure that makes kidney donation more appealing to potential live donors and has increased the living donor pool at our center.

Long-term follow-up ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients.

Abstract:  ABO‐incompatible liver transplantation is usually contraindicated. The presence in the recipient of preformed anti‐A/B antibodies located on endothelial cells raises the risk of antibody‐mediated humoral rejection of the graft. We describe four successful cases of steroid withdrawal in adult patients who had living‐donor liver transplantation from ABO‐incompatible donors. Antirejection therapy included multiple perioperative plasmapheresis, splenectomy, and a triple immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone (MPSL), and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of ABO‐identical cases. After transplantation, intrahepatic arterial infusion therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PG E1) was used. As a result, all four patients were able to achieve long‐term graft survival without steroid use. They all have good liver function and are leading normal lifestyles. Our experience with these four patients suggests the feasibility of controlling humoral rejection and other complications in adult ABO‐incompatible living donor liver transplantations with intrahepatic arterial infusion of PGE1, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis with a regular base of immunosuppression protocol to prevent antibody‐mediated humoral rejection.

RADIAL FLOW BIOREACTOR FOR THE CREATION OF BIOARTIFICIAL LIVER AND KIDNEY

A radial flow bioreactor (RFB) is used for a three-dimensional perfusion culture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and renal cells, to create a bioartificial liver and kidney. The cylindrical reactor is filled with porous cellulose microcarrier. RFB can be characterized as a system in which the medium flows from the periphery toward the center of the reactor, thereby delivering an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients to cells at the center as well as at the periphery. HCC cells incubated in the RFB system at high density maintained viability for long periods of time. Proximal tubular cells (LLC-PK1) as well as HCC cells, but not human immortalized mesangial cells (HMC) were cultured in the RFB for more than 14 days. The mRNA expression of some enzymes involved in the urea cycle, cytochrome P450s in HCC cells, and the 1-alpha-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) in LLC-PK1 cells was higher than that in monolayer cultures. These results suggest that the RFB system composed of HCC cells or renal cells may be useful for a bioartificial liver and kidney.