Y. Jojima

Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (graceptor) in stable kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND Graceptor is a new modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with an efficacy and safety profile similar to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf), as identified by clinical trials, offering a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Graceptor in stable kidney transplant recipients. METHODS We switched 33 Japanese patients who had undergone kidney transplantation ≥1 years before from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Graceptor. The dose conversion ratio between Prograf and Graceptor was 1:1. We compared the following parameters: minimum tacrolimus concentration (C(min)); concentration dose per weight (CDW); serum creatinine (sCr); blood urea nitrogen (BUN); total cholesterol (TC); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); uric acid (UA); fasting blood sugar (FBS). Time points for measurements were 1 month before study start and 1 and 2 months afterward. RESULTS The mean age of the subjects in this study was 46.5 ± 13.1 years. Mean C(min) decreased from 4.55 ± 1.79 to 3.20 ± 1.22 ng/dL. The mean CDW also decreased, from 99.8 ± 69.5 to 75.0 ± 55.1 mg/dL/kg over the 2 months. There were no significant changes in sCR, BUN, UA, and FBS. Mean TC increased from 187.5 ± 51.4 to 194.3 ± 43.4 mg/dL, and mean HDL-C changed from 53.7 ± 12.0 to 56.1 ± 11 mg/dL. There were no episodes of rejection or infection. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that switching from Prograf to Graceptor is safe and has the advantage of improving adherence. It could also have a beneficial effect in controlling glycemic levels and the adverse effects of tacrolimus. In many cases (25%-30%), the minimum concentration of tacrolimus decreased after changing tablets. With Graceptor, the ratio of area under trough level to area under the curve (AUC) is low compared with Prograf, resulting in low C(min) values of 1-2 ng/mL, and the AUC for Graceptor is very similar to that for Prograf.

Early Steroid Withdrawal in Adult Kidney Transplantation at a Single Center

BACKGROUND Beneficial effects of protocols using minimal steroid exposure have been recently reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients who received immunosuppression protocols with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) at our center. METHODS We retrospectively studied 84 kidney transplant recipients who had received ESW immunosuppressive protocols at our center from March 2005 to December 2010. The immunosuppressive regimen was a combination of calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus/cyclosporine), methylprednisolone, which was tapered and discontinued within 2 months, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab (postoperative days 0 and 4). We compared the outcomes of our ESW recipients with those of a historical control group (February 2003 to January 2005; n = 18). RESULTS Clinical acute rejection episodes were observed in 15 (17.9%) and 5 (27.8%) cases in the ESW and control groups, respectively. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 12 (14.3%) and 5 (27.8%) cases in the ESW and control groups, respectively. The creatinine levels at 1 year after transplantation were 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL and 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL in the ESW and control groups, respectively. In the ESW group of 84 recipients, actuarial patient survival at 1 year was 94.0%. In the historical group of 18 recipients, the actuarial patient survival at 1 year was 100% (P = .76). In the ESW group the graft survival rate at 1 year was 95.2%. In the historical group, graft survival rate at 1 year was 100% (P = .65). There were no significant differences in the parameters between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes from this study were considered to be acceptable; however, the possibility of improving the protocols exists.

ABO-Incompatible Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers timely transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If ABO-incompatible LDLT is feasible, the need for pretransplantation treatment may be eliminated, which may reduce overall morbidity. In this article, we have described 8 adult HCC patients who successfully underwent LDLT from ABO-incompatible donors. Antirejection therapy included multiple preoperative plasmaphereses, splenectomy, and an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of the ABO-identical cases. In addition, we also performed intrahepatic arterial infusion of prostaglandin E1. In 5 patients, we administered a single dose of rituximab, a chimeric CD20 monoclonal antibody. As a result of this treatment, 6/8 patients are still alive. Our experience has shown that it is possible to control antibody-mediated humoral rejection and other complications in adult ABO-incompatible LDLT.

How Can We Increase Living Related Donor Renal Transplantations

BACKGROUND In Japan, living donor renal transplantation has gained momentum due to an increased number of patients with end-stage renal disease. Living donation not only provides better outcomes, but also the recipients usually need less medications, thereby increasing the quality of life and reducing the potential side effects of immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the past 25 years, our center had performed 140 open donor nephrectomy (OPNx) renal transplantations. Since July 2003, we changed our procurement operation to living hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALNx) in 49 cases. Our operative technique consisted of two 12-mm ports placed in the midaxillary line at the superior and inferior levels of the umbilicus. Next, a 5-cm incision was made in the midline periumbilicus and the hand port system fitted through a midline abdominal incision. RESULTS In 49 cases, HALNx was completed successfully; no patient required conversion to laparotomy. The estimated blood loss was 33.0 +/- 43.4 g and no patient required blood transfusion. In comparison, in OPNx the blood loss was 426.5 +/- 247.6 g (P < .001). The mean operative times were 167.4 +/- 39.7 minutes for HALNx and 228.4 +/- 35.7 minutes for OPNx (P < .001). The postoperative hospital stays were 9.1 +/- 3.8 days for HALNx and 13.0 +/- 1.9 days for OPNx (P < .001). For 3 years prior to introduction of HALNx, we had performed only 10 living donor renal transplantations. Since the introduction of HALNx in 2003, the number of living donors has tripled during the following 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Herein we have reported that HALNx was superior in terms of less operative time and blood loss, postoperative pain and recovery, and shorter hospital stay. Overall donor patient satisfaction was also better in the HALNx group. HALNx is a safe procedure that makes kidney donation more appealing to potential live donors and has increased the living donor pool at our center.

Long-term follow-up ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients.

Abstract:  ABO‐incompatible liver transplantation is usually contraindicated. The presence in the recipient of preformed anti‐A/B antibodies located on endothelial cells raises the risk of antibody‐mediated humoral rejection of the graft. We describe four successful cases of steroid withdrawal in adult patients who had living‐donor liver transplantation from ABO‐incompatible donors. Antirejection therapy included multiple perioperative plasmapheresis, splenectomy, and a triple immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone (MPSL), and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of ABO‐identical cases. After transplantation, intrahepatic arterial infusion therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PG E1) was used. As a result, all four patients were able to achieve long‐term graft survival without steroid use. They all have good liver function and are leading normal lifestyles. Our experience with these four patients suggests the feasibility of controlling humoral rejection and other complications in adult ABO‐incompatible living donor liver transplantations with intrahepatic arterial infusion of PGE1, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis with a regular base of immunosuppression protocol to prevent antibody‐mediated humoral rejection.

Long-Term Recurrence-Free Survival After Liver Transplantation from an ABO-Incompatible Living Donor for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding Milano Criteria in a Patient With Hepatitis B Virus Cirrhosis: A Case Report

The early results of liver transplantations (OLT) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were poor because of frequent tumor recurrence. However, OLT has significant, theoretical advantage that it removes both the tumor and the organ that is at a risk of malignancy. The Japanese law on organ transplantation limited the availability of cadaveric liver donors until its revision on July 17, 2011. ABO-incompatible OLT was formerly contraindicated because performed anti-A/B antibodies on recipient endothelial cells raised the risk of antibody-mediated humoral graft rejection. We have herein described four successful cases of steroid withdrawal among adult patients who underwent living donor OLT from ABO-incompatible donors. In addition, we transplanted a liver from a living donor into an ABO-incompatible recipient on August 9, 2004. The 55-year-old man with HCC due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) a cirrhosis had a Child-Pugh score of C, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of 22. Two tumors greater than 5 cm, exceeded the Milan criteria. His des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level was 6 mAu/mL, and alpha-fetoprotein, 18.78 ng/mL. Antirejection therapy included multiple perioperative plasmaphereses and splenectomy; with an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. The maintenance dose of immunosuppression did not differ from that of ABO-identical cases. After transplantation, we used intrahepatic arterial infusion therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PG E1). The patient had complications of portal vein thrombosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, and acute myocardial infarction, which were treated by interventional radiology in the posttransplantation period. We controlled the HBsAb titer by administering hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine (200 IU/L doses) for 1 year after OLT and 100 IU/L doses thereafter. As a result, the patient achieved long-term, disease-free graft survival without steroids. He currently has good liver function and leads a normal lifestyle. Our results suggested the feasibility of controlling antibody-mediated humoral rejection and other complications in living donor liver transplantations into ABO-incompatible adults via intrahepatic arterial PG E1 infusion splenectomy, and plasmapheresis with regular immunosuppression. Withdrawal of steroids, HBV vaccination, and lamivudine, an nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor, have achieved long-term (7 years) survival without recurrent HBV infection or tumor.