I. David Kaye
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by I. David Kaye.
Spinal cord series and cases | 2018
I. David Kaye; Alexander R. Vaccaro
Spinal cord injury can be a life-altering trauma for patients and can be costly to patients and society alike. Generally recognized as biphasic, these injuries have both primary and secondary drivers. Although the primary insult is largely unavoidable, prevention of secondary injury mechanisms—and the resultant cascade—has been a target of substantial research. Continued spinal cord compression has been recognized as one of several deleterious secondary mechanisms, and decompressive and stabilization surgery has been routinely used for neuroprotection in this setting. Numerous biomechanical and animal studies have confirmed its potential utility. More recently, several high-quality randomized trials have concluded that early surgery for spinal cord injury improves rates of recovery when compared with delayed or nonoperative management. Herein, we argue that early surgery for spinal cord injury with continued cord compression offers significant benefit and should be undertaken when not contraindicated.
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2017
I. David Kaye; Alan S. Hilibrand
Purpose of reviewThe precise etiology of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery is controversial. Theories for development include inevitable changes secondary to the natural progression of the degenerative cascade and changes secondary to altered biomechanics of the fused cervical spine. Motion preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasties (CDA), have been introduced with the hopes of reducing the rates of adjacent segment pathology. Recently, 7-year data from the investigational device exemption (IDE) studies have been published. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on cervical adjacent segment disease incorporating this emerging data into the analysis.Recent findingsAlthough the 7-year data for CDA has confirmed continued success, specifically regarding improved neck pain and reduced re-operation rates, the influence of CDA on reducing rates of adjacent segment pathology remains questionable. Although some studies have found more radiographic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared to CDA, an association between these findings and clinical symptoms has not been established.SummaryCervical disc arthroplasty continues to outperform cervical disc fusion regarding some patient specific parameters, however, whether CDA reduces rates of radiographic and clinical adjacent segment pathology remains unknown. Without studies developed specifically to address this question, the answer remains elusive.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery | 2018
I. David Kaye; Scott C. Wagner; Joseph S. Butler; Arjun Sebastian; Patrick B. Morrissey; Christopher K. Kepler
ABSTRACT Background: To determine the incidence and risk factors for adverse cardiac events after lumbar spine fusion. Methods: A total of 50 495 patients were identified through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database who underwent lumbar spine fusion between 2005 and 2015. The 30-day postoperative data were analyzed to assess for the incidence of adverse cardiac events including cardiac arrest or myocardial infarction. Of those who experienced an event, patient- and surgery-specific parameters were evaluated to assess for risk factors. Results: A total of 240 cardiac events occurred in the studied cohort (4.76 events/1000 patients). Factors that were associated with an increased cardiac risk were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.039, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.05, P < .001), male sex (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.17, 1.94, P = .001), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.29, 2.6, P = .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3 (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.00, 3.65, P = .048), absolute hematocrit different from 45 (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.10, P < .001), and smoking (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.90, P = .04). The impact of sustaining a cardiac event in the setting of single-level lumbar fusion is catastrophic as the 30-day postoperative mortality rate for those sustaining an event was 24.6% (59/240 patients), compared to 0.2% (87/50 255) for those not sustaining an event (P < .001). Conclusions: Cardiac events after lumbar fusion are a rare but devastating series of complications. Several risk factors were identified, including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, smoking, advanced age, male sex, ASA score of >3, and anemia/polycythemia. Considering the severity of these consequences, appropriate risk stratification is imperative, and optimization of modifiable risk factors may mitigate this risk.
American Journal of Medical Quality | 2018
Gregory D. Schroeder; James McKenzie; David S. Casper; Seth Stake; Joseph Buchholz; Christopher K. Kepler; Jeffery A. Rihn; Barret I. Woods; Kris E. Radcliff; I. David Kaye; Kristen Nicholson; D. Greg Anderson; Alan S. Hilibrand; Alexander R. Vaccaro; Safdar N. Khan; Mark F. Kurd
Patients with spine-associated symptoms are transferred regularly to higher levels of care for operative intervention. It is unclear what factors lead to the transfer of patients with spine pathology to level I care facilities, and which transfers are indicated. All patients with isolated spinal pathology who were transferred from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients were divided into urgent transfers, defined as anyone who required operative intervention, and nonurgent transfers. Two hundred twenty-seven patients were transferred for isolated spinal pathology over 51 months; 109 (48.0%) patients required urgent intervention and 118 (52.0%) patients required nonurgent care. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of private insurance, age, sex, race, or Charlson comorbidity index. The urgent group was less likely to have a traumatic chief complaint (57.8% vs 78.0%, P = .001). More than half of all spine patients who were transferred to a tertiary care center required minimal intervention.
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2017
I. David Kaye; Alan S. Hilibrand
This article was published and transmitted with the lead author’s name listed incorrectly in the citation. The correct citation is, in full: Kaye, I.D. & Hilibrand, A.S. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2017) 10: 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9396-5.
Clinical spine surgery | 2017
Joseph S. Butler; I. David Kaye; Arjun S. Sebastian; Scott C. Wagner; Patrick B. Morrissey; Gregory D. Schroeder; Christopher K. Kepler; Alexander R. Vaccaro
Clinical spine surgery | 2017
Joseph S. Butler; Arjun S. Sebastian; I. David Kaye; Scott C. Wagner; Patrick B. Morrissey; Gregory D. Schroeder; Christopher K. Kepler; Alexander R. Vaccaro
Seminars in Spine Surgery | 2018
I. David Kaye; Karim Shafi; Alexander R. Vaccaro
Seminars in Spine Surgery | 2018
I. David Kaye; Scott C. Wagner; Mark F. Kurd
Contemporary Spine Surgery | 2018
I. David Kaye; Evan J. Lynn; Mark F. Kurd; Alexander R. Vaccaro