I. E. Smith

Early clinical studies with cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum II

Summarycis-Diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum II (CBDCA, JM8), an analogue of cisplatin showing reduced toxicity in preclinical studies, was evaluated in 60 patients. Doses were given initially every 3 weeks and escalated from 20 to 520 mg/m2. Following this, doses were given every 4 weeks and escalated from 300 to 500 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity, thrombocytopoenia, occurred in four-fifths of patients treated at 520 mg/m2, with the nadir occurring 3 weeks after treatment. Leucopoenia and anaemia also occurred but were less severe. Vomiting occurred in all patients receiving over 120 mg/m2 but seldom persisted beyond 24 h. Serial measurements of 51Cr-EDTA clearances, urinary N-acetylglucosaminidase, urinary leucine aminopeptidase, and β2-microglobulin did not reveal significant evidence of nephrotoxicity. Detriment to the audiogram has not been seen in the first 13 patients studied. Pharmacological studies showed that most of the dose of platinum was excreted in the urine, and that impairment of renal function may be associated with drug retention and an increased risk of myelosuppression. The previous therapy and age of the patient also affected the tolerance of the drug. Clinical responses were seen in patients with ovarian carcinoma receiving >120 mg/m2.A further dose escalation was performed on a 4-week schedule in patients under 65 with good renal function. The maximum dose it was possible to administer repeatedly without incurring myelosuppression was in the range 400–500 mg/m2.JM8 is not significantly nephrotoxic and is less emetic than cisplatin. It has antitumour activity in man and deserves wider evaluation, along with the other analogues under study in various centres, as an alternative to cisplatin.

Chemotherapy and survival in advanced breast cancer: the inclusion of doxorubicin in Cooper type regimens

The value of the inclusion of doxorubicin hydrochloride (dox) in Cooper type regimens in advanced breast cancer was assessed by performing an overview employing summary statistics derived from published papers of randomised clinical trials comparing Cooper type regimens that contain dox with regimens in which dox was replaced by one or more compounds. Trials were selected which published data on survival, time to treatment failure and response rate. This study suggests that dox confers advantages on all of these endpoints and that the size of such benefits needs to be taken into account when deciding whether to use dox.

High complete remission rates with primary neoadjuvant infusional chemotherapy for large early breast cancer.

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of continuous infusion fluorouracil (5FU) with every-3-week epirubicin and cisplatin (ECF) as primary chemotherapy instead of immediate mastectomy for patients with large, potentially operable, breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with large operable breast cancer, median tumor diameter 6 cm (range, 3 to 12), were treated with 5FU 200 mg/m2/d via a Hickman line using an ambulatory pump for 6 months with epirubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for eight courses. Subsequent surgery and/or radiotherapy was determined by clinical response. RESULTS Forty-nine patients achieved an overall response (98%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94% to 100%), including 33 complete clinical remissions (CRs) (66%; 95% CI, 53% to 79%). Only three patients (6%) still required mastectomy. Tumor cellularity was markedly reduced on repeat needle biopsy following 3 weeks of treatment in 81% of patients versus only 36% in similar patients after conventional chemotherapy (P < .002). Severe (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3 to 4) toxicity was rare, with nausea/vomiting being the most common, occurring in 20% of patients. CONCLUSION Primary infusional ECF appears to be more active on clinical and histopathologic grounds than conventional chemotherapy for large operable breast cancer and is well tolerated. This approach now merits randomized comparison to determine if high CR rates may translate into improved survival.

Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The role of chemotherapy in the palliation of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have carried out a chemotherapy study emphasising symptom relief, a topic not normally discussed in previous similar studies. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a moderate-dose palliative chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (alternate courses), vinblastine 6 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Thirty-eight of 118 assessable patients (32%) achieved an objective response. Patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) had a significantly better response rate (52%) than those with metastatic disease (25%) (P < 0.01). In 76 out of 110 (69%) patients, with tumour-related symptoms including 24 out of 31 patients (78%) with locally advanced disease, symptoms completely disappeared or substantially improved. In only 15 patients (14%) did symptoms progress during treatment. Symptomatic improvement was achieved after one course of chemotherapy in 61% and after two courses in 96% of responding patients. The schedule was well tolerated. Only 19% developed WHO grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, and only 3% developed significant alopecia. Other toxicities were minimal. MVP is a pragmatic inexpensive chemotherapy regimen that offers useful symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC and merits a 1-2 course therapeutic trial in such patients. The schedule should also be assessed as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC in a randomised trial.

Tamoxifen versus aminoglutethimide in advanced breast carcinoma: a randomized cross-over trial.

Altogether 117 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with either tamoxifen 10 mg by mouth twice daily or aminoglutethimide 250 mg by mouth four times daily with hydrocortisone 20 mg twice daily in a randomised cross-over trial in which patients who failed to respond to the first treatment or relapsed while receiving it were switched to the other. Eighteen (30%) out of 60 patients initially treated with tamoxifen achieved an objective response and 11 (18%) showed stable disease. Seventeen (30%) out of 57 patients treated initially with aminoglutethimide achieved an objective response and 13 (23%) achieved stable disease. Objective responses in bone metastases were achieved more commonly with aminoglutethimide (11 patients (35%)) than with tamoxifen (five (17%)). The predicted median duration of response for tamoxifen was 15 months and for aminoglutethimide over 15 months (no significant difference). Five (15%) out of 34 patients who failed to respond to tamoxifen and four out of six patients who relapsed after responding to tamoxifen subsequently responded to aminoglutethimide. In contrast, only two (6%) out of 31 patients who failed to respond to aminoglutethimide and none out of four patients who relapsed while receiving aminoglutethimide subsequently responded to tamoxifen. The main side effects occurring in the 97 patients who received aminoglutethimide as first- or second-line treatment were lethargy and drowsiness (36 patients) and rash (29); seven patients had to stop treatment because of side effects. In contrast, side effects were rare and mild with tamoxifen and no patient had to stop treatment because of them. Both tamoxifen and aminoglutethimide appeared from this study to be equally effective in the medical endocrine treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Reduced apoptosis and proliferation and increased Bcl-2 in residual breast cancer following preoperative chemotherapy.

Experimental laboratory data suggest that tumour growth is a balance between apoptosis and proliferation and that suppression of drug-induced apoptosis by oncogenes such as bcl-2 may be an important cause of intrinsic chemoresistance. The aims of this study were to assess the in vivo relationship of apoptosis to proliferation and Bcl-2 protein in human breast tumours both prior to chemotherapy and in the residual resistant cell population at the completion of treatment. We examined apoptotic index (AI), Ki67 and Bcl-2 protein expression in the tissue of 40 patients with operable breast cancer immediately before ECF preoperative chemotherapy, and in 20 of these patients with residual tumour, at the completion of treatment. There was a significant positive association between AI and Ki67 both before and after chemotherapy, and in their percentage change with treatment. In the residual specimens AI and Ki67 were significantly reduced compared with pre-treatment biopsies, while Bcl-2 expression showed a significant increase. No differences were seen in the pre-treatment levels of any of the variables measured between patients obtaining pathological complete response and those who did not, although numbers were small. These data suggest that apoptosis and proliferation are closely related in vivo. It is possible that the phenotype of reduced apoptosis and proliferation, and increased Bcl-2 may be associated with breast cancer cells resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, although this can only be proven by assessing larger numbers of patients in relation to pathological response.

FAILURE OF CHEMOTHERAPY TO PROLONG SURVIVAL IN A GROUP OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past ten years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastases. Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy. Chemotherapy probably does prolong survival in some patients, and further studies should be undertaken to identify these patients in advance.

PREVENTION OF ISOPHOSPHAMIDE-INDUCED UROTHELIAL TOXICITY WITH 2-MERCAPTOETHANE SULPHONATE SODIUM (MESNUM) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CARCINOMA

In 8 patients receiving intravenous isophosphamide 2 g/m2 at 2-week intervals for advanced bronchogenic carcinoma the protective effect of 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate sodium (mesnum) against isophosphamide-induced urothelial toxicity was tested in a single-blind crossover trial. With isophosphamide alone, 7 of the 8 patients developed either haematuria or symptoms of bladder irritation; when mesnum was given in addition, only 1 patient had microhaematuria and frequency, and this was in association with a urinary-tract infection. 5 patients then received fifteen courses of isophosphamide in increasing doses of 4 to 8 g/m2 i.v. with mesnum. In contrast to previous experience with isophosphamide at this high dosage, frank haematuria was never seen, microhaematuria was seen after only three courses, and mild dysuria after only one course. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that mesnum did not interfere with the metabolism of isophosphoramide or its active anti-tumour metabolite, isophosphoramide mustard. Mesnum therefore enhances the therapeutic ratio of isophosphamide and may thereby increase its clinical efficacy.

Marrow autotransplantation accelerates haematological recovery in patients with malignant melanoma treated with high-dose melphalan.

In a Phase I study, melphalan 140 mg/m2 was administered to 8 patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. Marrow was removed from the patients immediately before melphalan administration and returned i.v. 8 h later. Studies on marrow culture and melphalan pharmacokinetics predicted that this was a safe time to administer non-cryopreserved marrow. Four patients received lower doses of i.v. melphalan without autologous marrow. In the group receiving autologous marrow the time for recovery of peripheral-blood granulocytes to 800/mm2 or greater was significantly less (P = 0.01) than in those not receiving marrow. In 7 patients the tumour showed evidence of response to the drug and there was 1 complete remission. This treatment deserves investigation in patients with tumours more sensitive to drugs than melanoma.

Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE This study aimed to identify clinical factors that are of prognostic significance or that predict for subsequent treatment outcome in patients with large operable breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy (PCT) at our institution. METHODS One hundred eighty-five patients received the following regimens: CMF or MMM (76 patients), ECF (75 patients), AC or FEC (34 patients), followed by surgery, with radiotherapy (RT) given to those with breast conservation. A number of common clinical variables were assessed in relation to local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Clinical responders had improved DFS (P = .009) and OS (P = .08) compared with nonresponders. There was no association between clinical or pathologic complete remission (CR) and survival. Pretreatment clinical axillary node positivity was a significant predictor of worsened DFS (P = .0001), OS (P = .0001), and LRFS (P = .03). Patients remaining clinically node-positive postchemotherapy had an inferior outcome compared with those becoming node-negative (DFS, P = .03; OS, P = .03) but pathologic axillary node status was not shown to predict for survival. Twenty-nine patients in clinical CR following PCT who electively did not have surgery and were treated with RT alone had significantly increased local recurrence rate compared with partial responders having surgery and RT (P = .02). There were no differences in DFS or OS between these groups. On multivariate analysis, clinical axillary node status was the only independent predictor of OS and DFS, and LRFS. CONCLUSION Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical axillary node status is a major predictor of outcome following PCT. Complete clinical response does not define a more favorable subgroup compared with those not obtaining CR.