I. M. Bronner

Polymyositis - An overdiagnosed entity

Background: According to widely used criteria (Bohan and Peter criteria, 1975), dermatomyositis (DM) is differentiated from polymyositis (PM) only by skin changes. More recent criteria also include histopathologic characteristics enabling the distinction between PM and DM and the differentiation of sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM) from PM. The authors investigated the applicability of diagnostic features for diagnosing PM and DM. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective follow-up study of 165 patients with 1) a previous diagnosis of myositis; 2) subacute onset of symmetric, proximal weakness; and 3) an evaluation between 1977 and 1998 excluding other neuromuscular disorders. Results: The diagnoses at initial evaluation based on clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic criteria were PM, 9 (5%); DM, 59 (36%; 54 isolated, 3 with associated connective tissue disease [CTD], 2 with associated malignancy); unspecified myositis (perimysial/perivascular infiltrates, no PM or DM), 65 (39%; 38 isolated myositis, 26 with associated CTD, 1 with malignancy); and possible myositis (necrotizing myopathy, no inflammatory infiltrates), 32 (19%; 29 isolated myositis, 3 with associated CTD). At follow-up evaluation, five of the nine patients with PM had typical s-IBM features. None of the remaining four patients complied with the assumed typical signs of PM. Ten of the 38 patients with isolated unspecified myositis had been diagnosed with a CTD. Conclusions: Polymyositis is an overdiagnosed entity. At evaluation, more than half the patients with autoimmune myositis cannot be specifically diagnosed with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. A quarter of patients with isolated unspecified myositis subsequently developed connective tissue disease.Background According to widely used criteria (Bohan and Peter criteria, 1975), dermatomyositis (DM) is differentiated from polymyositis (PM) only by skin changes. More recent criteria also include histopathologic characteristics enabling the distinction between PM and DM and the differentiation of sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM) from PM. The authors investigated the applicability of diagnostic features for diagnosing PM and DM. Methods The authors performed a retrospective follow-up study of 165 patients with 1) a previous diagnosis of myositis; 2) subacute onset of symmetric, proximal weakness; and 3) an evaluation between 1977 and 1998 excluding other neuromuscular disorders. Results The diagnoses at initial evaluation based on clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic criteria were PM, 9 (5%); DM, 59 (36%; 54 isolated, 3 with associated connective tissue disease [CTD], 2 with associated malignancy); unspecified myositis (perimysial/perivascular infiltrates, no PM or DM), 65 (39%; 38 isolated myositis, 26 with associated CTD, 1 with malignancy); and possible myositis (necrotizing myopathy, no inflammatory infiltrates), 32 (19%; 29 isolated myositis, 3 with associated CTD). At follow-up evaluation, five of the nine patients with PM had typical s-IBM features. None of the remaining four patients complied with the assumed typical signs of PM. Ten of the 38 patients with isolated unspecified myositis had been diagnosed with a CTD. Conclusions Polymyositis is an overdiagnosed entity. At evaluation, more than half the patients with autoimmune myositis cannot be specifically diagnosed with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. A quarter of patients with isolated unspecified myositis subsequently developed connective tissue disease.

Long-term outcome in polymyositis and dermatomyositis

Background: Although polymyositis and dermatomyositis are regarded as treatable disorders, prognosis is not well known, as in the literature long-term outcome and prognostic factors vary widely. Aim: To analyse the prognostic outcome factors in polymyositis and adult dermatomyositis. Methods: We determined mortality, clinical outcome (muscle strength, disability, persistent use of drugs and quality of life) and disease course and analysed prognostic outcome factors. Results: Disease-related death occurred in at least 10% of the patients, mainly because of associated cancer and pulmonary complications. Re-examination of 110 patients after a median follow-up of 5 years showed that 20% remained in remission and were off drugs, whereas 80% had a polycyclic or chronic continuous course. The cumulative risk of incident connective tissue disorder in patients with myositis was significantly increased. 65% of the patients had normal strength at follow-up, 34% had no or slight disability, and 16% had normal physical sickness impact profile scores. Muscle weakness was associated with higher age (odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 10.3). Disability was associated with male sex (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 7.9). 41% of the patients with a favourable clinical outcome were still using drugs. Jo-1 antibodies predicted the persistent use of drugs (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 15.0). Conclusions: Dermatomyositis and polymyositis are serious diseases with a disease-related mortality of at least 10%. In the long term, myositis has a major effect on perceived disability and quality of life, despite the regained muscle strength.

Necrotising myopathy, an unusual presentation of a steroid-responsive myopathy

Abstract.Objective: To evaluate the clinical features, muscle pathology and response to treatment in patients with a necrotising myopathy, without mononuclear cell infiltrates. Background: Mononuclear cell infiltrates in the muscle biopsy specimen are the diagnostic hallmark of the immune-mediated idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). In patients with the typical clinical features of IIM, absence of these infiltrates in the muscle biopsy specimen casts doubt on the diagnosis and leads to uncertainty about therapeutical strategies. Methods: A detailed description is given of the clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features of eight patients suspected of having an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, in whom mononuclear cell infiltrates in their muscle biopsy specimens were lacking. Results: Eight patients (five men, three women, age range 40–69 years) had severe, symmetrical proximal weakness with a subacute onset. There were no skin abnormalities suggesting dermatomyositis. Serum creatine kinase activity was more than 10 times elevated. Repeated muscle biopsy specimens, taken from a symptomatic muscle prior to immunosuppressive treatment showed widespread necrosis, regeneration, and atrophy of muscle fibres, but no mononuclear cell infiltrates. Known causes of necrotising myopathy were excluded. Three patients had a malignancy. Adequately dosed and sustained immunosuppressive treatment eventually resulted in normal or near normal muscle strength in seven patients. One patient showed marked improvement. Conclusion: Occasionally, patients who clinically present as an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy may lack mononuclear cell infiltrates in their muscle biopsy specimens. This subacute-onset progressive necrotising myopathy should not deter the clinician from timely and appropriate treatment as we consider this myopathy to be steroid-responsive with a possible immune-mediated pathogenesis.

Tubuloreticular structures in different types of myositis: implications for pathogenesis

In dermatomyositis (DM) there is strong histopathological evidence of a microvascular pathogenesis, including endothelial microtubular inclusions. In nonspecific myositis, perimysial and perivascular infiltrates in the muscle biopsy similar to DM are found. Microtubular inclusions in endothelial cells were systematically searched for and found in 4 of the 20 muscle biopsies of nonspecific myositis patients (20%). Three had a CTD (SLE, scleroderma, and Sjögren syndrome). Ten patients with DM and 5 patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis served as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Association of the leukocyte immunoglobulin G (Fcgamma) receptor IIIa-158V/F polymorphism with inflammatory myopathies in Dutch patients

Leukocytes are involved in the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) receptors (FcgammaR) link the specificity of IgG to the effector functions of leukocytes. Several FcgammaR subclasses display functional polymorphisms that determine in part the vigour of the inflammatory response. FcgammaRIIIa genotypes were differentially distributed among 100 IIM patients compared with 514 healthy controls with a significant increase of the homozygous FcgammaRIIIa-V-158 genotype (3 x 2 contingency table, chi(2) = 6.3, P = 0.04). Odds ratios (ORs) increased at the addition of each FcgammaRIIIa-V-158 allele, in particular among patients with non-specific myositis and dermatomyositis {OR 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.3] and 2.7 (95% CI 1.1-6.4) for FcgammaRIIIa-V/F158 and FcgammaRIIIa-V/V158 genotypes, respectively, using FcgammaRIIIa-F/F158 as a reference group}. These data suggest that the FcgammaRIIIa-V-158 allele may constitute a genetic risk marker for IIM.