Iain Thomson

Impact of postoperative morbidity on long‐term survival after oesophagectomy

Oesophageal malignancy is a disease with a poor prognosis. Oesophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment but associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although mortality rates have improved, the incidence of perioperative morbidity remains high. This study assessed the impact of postoperative morbidity on long‐term outcomes.

Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence.

Objective:The authors report the recurrence pattern of esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy (TAE), comparing it to the recurrence pattern after open surgery and identify prognostic factors for recurrence. Summary of Background Data:To improve long-term survival for esophageal cancer radical surgery has been proposed increasingly, however, recurrent disease remains a problem. Opinion is divided as to the adequacy of resection possible using minimally invasive techniques with concerns that there may be an increased incidence in locoregional recurrence. Methods:A total of 221 patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Princess Alexandra Hospital without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were identified from a prospective database. Patients were followed up for the detection of symptomatic recurrence for a median of 59 months. Results:Within this group 165 patients underwent TAE and 56 an open transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). The 5-year overall recurrence rate was 133/221 (60%). The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TAE was 4%, 9%, and 47% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TTE was 5%, 18%, and 55% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. Operative approach was not a prognostic factor for any type of recurrence. Independent prognostic factors associated with locoregional recurrence were positive margins and number of positive nodes. Distant recurrence was associated with T stage, differentiation, tumor length >6 cm, and number of positive nodes. Conclusion:Distant recurrence remains a significant problem in esophageal cancer. TAE achieved adequate locoregional control and compared favorably with open TTE.

Australian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma

Barretts esophagus (BE), a common condition, is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There is uncertainty about the best way to manage BE as most people with BE never develop EAC and most patients diagnosed with EAC have no preceding diagnosis of BE. Moreover, there have been recent advances in knowledge and practice about the management of BE and early EAC. To aid clinical decision making in this rapidly moving field, Cancer Council Australia convened an expert working party to identify pertinent clinical questions. The questions covered a wide range of topics including endoscopic and histological definitions of BE and early EAC; prevalence, incidence, natural history, and risk factors for BE; and methods for managing BE and early EAC. The latter considered modification of lifestyle factors; screening and surveillance strategies; and medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. To answer each question, the working party systematically reviewed the literature and developed a set of recommendations through consensus. Evidence underpinning each recommendation was rated according to quality and applicability.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

In patients with operable esophageal cancer, there is evidence supporting the use of preoperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiation. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy seems more relevant for the more locally advanced cancers. There is a need to examine in trials more modern chemotherapy combinations with and without concurrent radiation and for research into assessing methods for predicting outcomes from neoadjuvant therapy as part of the paradigm of therapy for this disease.

Long-Term Health-related Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Nonrandomized Comparison of Thoracoscopically Assisted and Open Surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients after thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. Summary of Background Data: Trials comparing minimally invasive with open transthoracic esophagectomy have shown improved short-term outcomes; however, long-term HRQL data are lacking. This prospective nonrandomized study compared HRQL and survival after thoracoscopically assisted McKeown esophagectomy (TAMK) and open transthoracic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (TTIL) for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Methods: Patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer selected for TAMK or TTIL completed baseline and follow-up HRQL assessments for up to 24 months using the EORTC generic and disease-specific measures, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18. Baseline clinical variables were examined between the treatment groups and changes in mean HRQL scores over time estimated and tested using generalised estimating equations with propensity score (generated by boosted regression) adjustment. Results: Of the 487 patients, 377 underwent TAMK and 110 underwent TTIL. Most clinical variables were similar in the 2 groups; however, there were significantly more patients with AJCC stage 3 disease who underwent TTIL than TAMK (54% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and this was reflected in the survival data. Mean symptom scores for pain were significantly higher in the TTIL group than in TAMK for 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.036). In addition, mean constipation scores were significantly higher for the TTIL group, with a 15-point difference in mean score at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.037). Conclusions: This large comprehensive nonrandomized analysis of longitudinal HRQL shows that TTIL is associated with more pain and constipation than TAMK.

An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy

PurposeEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been effectively expanded to various surgical specialities including oesophagectomy. Despite nutrition being a key component, actual nutrition outcomes and specific guidelines are lacking. This cohort comparison study aims to compare nutritional status and adherence during implementation of a standardised post-operative nutritional support protocol, as part of ERAS, compared to those who received usual care.MethodsTwo groups of patients undergoing resection of oesophageal cancer were studied. Group 1 (n = 17) underwent oesophagectomy between Oct 2014 and Nov 2016 during implementation of an ERAS protocol. Patients in group 2 (n = 16) underwent oesophagectomy between Jan 2011 and Dec 2012 prior to the implementation of ERAS. Demographic, nutritional status, dietary intake and adherence data were collected. Ordinal data was analysed using independent t tests, and categorical data using chi-square tests.ResultsThere was no significant difference in nutrition status, dietary intake or length of stay following implementation of an ERAS protocol. Malnutrition remained prevalent in both groups at day 42 post surgery (n = 10, 83% usual care; and n = 9, 60% ERAS). A significant difference was demonstrated in adherence with earlier initiation of oral free fluids (p <0.008), transition to soft diet (p <0.004) and continuation of jejunostomy feeds on discharge (p <0.000) for the ERAS group.ConclusionA standardised post-operative nutrition protocol, within an ERAS framework, results in earlier transition to oral intake; however, malnutrition remains prevalent post surgery. Further large-scale studies are warranted to examine individualised decision-making regarding nutrition support within an ERAS protocol.

Ablation for Patients With Barrett or Dysplasia

Abstract The evidence now supports endoscopic therapy as the gold standard in patients with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett esophagus. The combination of endoscopic mucosal resection of visible abnormalities and associated ablation of the residual intestinal metaplasia with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers low morbidity with the most efficient and durable short- and long-term outcomes. Other ablative techniques include photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, and cryotherapy, but these may have higher morbidity and higher recurrence rates of intestinal metaplasia and higher rates of buried Barrett compared with RFA. The use of mucosal ablation for low-grade dysplasia can be considered under strict pathologic and clinical guidelines but should not be used in patients with nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia. All patients who have had endoscopic therapy for Barrett dysplasia require long-term acid suppression therapy and careful endoscopic follow-up.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains undetermined. This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for EAC.

Neoadjuvant therapy reduces cardiopulmunary function in patients undegoing oesophagectomy

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for oesophageal cancer may reduce cardiopulmonary function, assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPEX). Impaired cardiopulmonary function is associated with mortality following esophagectomy. We sought to assess the impact of NAT on cardiopulmonary function using CPEX and assessing the clinical relevance of any change in particular if changes were associated with post-operative morbidity. This was a prospective, cohort study of 40 patients in whom CPEX was performed before and after NAT. Thirty-eight patients underwent surgery and follow-up with perioperative outcomes measured. The primary variables derived from CPEX were the anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak). There were significant reductions in the AT (pre-NAT: 12.4 ± 3.0 vs. post-NAT 10.6 ± 2.0 mL kg-1.min-1; p = 0.001). This reduction was also evident for V˙O2peak (pre-NAT: 16.6 ± 3.6 vs. post-NAT 14.9 ± 3.7 mL kg-1.min-1; p = 0.004). The relative reduction in V˙O2peak was greater in chemotherapy patients who developed any peri-operative morbidity (p = 0.04). For patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy, there was a significantly greater relative reduction in AT (p = 0.03) for those who encountered a respiratory complication. Cardiopulmonary function significantly declined as a result of NAT prior to oesophagectomy. The reduction in AT and V˙O2peak was similar in both the chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups.