İbrahim Cemal
Adnan Menderes University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by İbrahim Cemal.
Genetics | 2006
Jennifer Rs S. Meadows; İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca; Elisha Gootwine; James W. Kijas
Archaeozoological evidence indicates that sheep were first domesticated in the Fertile Crescent. To search for DNA sequence diversity arising from previously undetected domestication events, this survey examined nine breeds of sheep from modern-day Turkey and Israel. A total of 2027 bp of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence from 197 sheep revealed a total of 85 haplotypes and a high level of genetic diversity. Six individuals carried three haplotypes, which clustered separately from the known ovine mtDNA lineages A, B, and C. Analysis of genetic distance, mismatch distribution, and comparisons with wild sheep confirmed that these represent two additional mtDNA lineages denoted D and E. The two haplogroup E sequences were found to link the previously identified groups A and C. The single haplogroup D sequence branched with the eastern mouflon (Ovis orientalis), urial (O. vignei), and argali (O. ammon) sheep. High sequence diversity (K = 1.86%, haplogroup D and O. orientalis) indicates that the wild progenitor of this domestic lineage remains unresolved. The identification in this study of evidence for additional domestication events adds to the emerging view that sheep were recruited from wild populations multiple times in the same way as for other livestock species such as goat, cattle, and pig.
Animal Genetics | 2014
Onur Yilmaz; İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca
The genetic variability of 204 sheep from nine breeds (Awassi, Çine Çaparı, Karakaş, Karya, Karayaka, Morkaraman, Norduz, Sakız and Tuj) growing in four different regions (western, northern, eastern and south-eastern Anatolia) was assessed using 18 microsatellite loci. High mean number of alleles, allelic richness and factorial correspondence analysis showed the degree of admixture between native sheep breeds of Turkey. The Karya and Çine Çaparı breeds were observed as the most distinct of the breeds, and possible introgressions were detected in other breeds. It was found that 8.9% of genetic variation resulted from the difference between the populations. The genetic variation in Turkish breeds was not much higher than that of European breeds, which might be a consequence of the recent sharp decrease in sheep numbers.
Italian Journal of Animal Science | 2017
Ameur Ameur Abdelkader; Nezih Ata; Mohammed Tahar Benyoucef; Amel Djaout; Noureddine Azzi; Onur Yilmaz; İbrahim Cemal; Semir Bechir Suheil Gaouar
Abstract Exposition of variations between breeds is very important for genetic diversity. Determination of this variation is needed to reveal population structure and relationship between populations and planning national breeding and conservation programmes. This study was carried out in 296 animals from 12 different local sheep breeds (Barbarine, Ouled Djellal, Ifilene, Srandi, Darâa, Rembi, Berbere, Taâdmit, Hamra, Sidaou, Tazegzawt and D’men) reared in different regions of Algeria. Fifteen microsatellite markers were used to determine between breed genetic diversity. The population of 12 sheep breeds studied from Algeria exhibited a high number of alleles (24.67) and polymorphic information content (0.90). Observed heterozygosity values were lower than expected for all molecular markers except INRA0123 locus. Obtained GST value from the present study indicated that 1.9% of total genetic variation resulted from the differences between the breeds. The present study supplied important information to understand between breed genetic differences. Moreover, it has provided the opportunity to discuss with previously reported results. In light of these findings, it can be said that studied microsatellite markers can be successfully used to determine genetic diversity and population structure in Algerian sheep breeds.
Animal | 2017
İbrahim Cemal; E. Karaman; M. Z. Firat; Onur Yilmaz; Nezih Ata; Orhan Karaca
Ultrasound scanning traits have been adapted in selection programs in many countries to improve carcass traits for lean meat production. As the genetic parameters of the traits interested are important for breeding programs, the estimation of these parameters was aimed at the present investigation. The estimated parameters were direct and maternal heritability as well as genetic correlations between the studied traits. The traits were backfat thickness (BFT), skin+backfat thickness (SBFT), eye muscle depth (MD) and live weights at the day of scanning (LW). The breed investigated was Kivircik, which has a high quality of meat. Six different multi-trait animal models were fitted to determine the most suitable model for the data using Bayesian approach. Based on deviance information criterion, a model that includes direct additive genetic effects, maternal additive genetic effects, direct maternal genetic covariance and maternal permanent environmental effects revealed to be the most appropriate for the data, and therefore, inferences were built on the results of that model. The direct heritability estimates for BFT, SBFT, MD and LW were 0.26, 0.26, 0.23 and 0.09, whereas the maternal heritability estimates were 0.27, 0.27, 0.24 and 0.20, respectively. Negative genetic correlations were obtained between direct and maternal effects for BFT, SBFT and MD. Both direct and maternal genetic correlations between traits were favorable, whereas BFT-MD and SBFT-MD had negligible direct genetic correlation. The highest direct and maternal genetic correlations were between BFT and SBFT (0.39) and between MD and LW (0.48), respectively. Our results, in general, indicated that maternal effects should be accounted for in estimation of genetic parameters of ultrasound scanning traits in Kivircik lambs, and SBFT can be used as a selection criterion to improve BFT.
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2013
Onur Yilmaz; İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2011
Murat Yılmaz; Tufan Altin; Orhan Karaca; İbrahim Cemal; Husnu Erbay Bardakcioglu; Onur Yilmaz; Turgay Taşkın
Journal of Biological Sciences | 2007
İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca; Tufan Altin; Özdal Gökdal; Murat Yılmaz; Onur Yilmaz
Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences | 2005
İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca; Tufan Altin; Mustafa Kaymakçi
Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences | 2014
Engin Yarali; Onur Yilmaz; İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca; Turgay Taşkin
Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences | 2015
Onur Yilmaz; Tamer Sezenler; Semih Sevim; İbrahim Cemal; Orhan Karaca; Yalçın Yaman; Orhan Karadağ