Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Igor Kostić.
Vojnosanitetski Pregled | 2014
Igor Kostić; M Milan Mitkovic; Milorad Mitkovic
UNLABELLED BACGROUND/AIM. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur are the third most common fractures among all bone fractures. Today in everyday orthopedic practice a number of different methods of treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur are applied. Despite the improvement in the development of new implants, the percentage of serious complications of the treatment of these fractures remains very high, varying from 10% to 20%. One of the most serious complications of internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is nonunion of fractures due to the lack of additional axial dynamisation of implants. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of double dynamisation in stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures treatment using the self dynamisable internal fixator. METHODS During the period from 2000 to 2009 we analyzed the use of selfdynamisable internal fixator (SIF implant) in the treatment of 247 patients with stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Fracture types were classified according to the AO Fracture Classification/Orthopaedic Trauma Association Scheme. Salvati and Wilson scoring systems were used for functional assessment considering pain, walking ability and hip movements of operated patients. RESULTS Of the total number of treated patients, 134 were males and 113 females, aged 19 to 90 (average 49.6) years. More than a half of the patients were older than 50 years. Monitoring of the patients after the operation was carried out clinically and radiographically for a period of three to six months in all the patients, whereas a 2-year follow-up was conducted in 176 (71.2%) patients. The average duration of surgery was 47 min, the average blood loss 145 mL, and the average fluoroscopy time was 16 sec (8-97 sec). The average time for union was 3.7 months (3-6.6 months). Double dynamisation (dynamisation along the neck and shaft of the femur) was observed in 85 (34.4%) patients, and was on average 4.3 mm (1.5-8 mm). All fractures managed with dynamisation implants healed completely within no later than six months after the surgery. In 17 cases there was a cut-out phenomenon of implant, while in seven cases there was mechanical implant failure. Complications were detected within 3 to 6 weeks after surgery, and treated by the method of intramedullary fixation. During the study, there were no cases of infection and thromboembolic complications detected. CONCLUSION The concept of double dynamisation improves the fracture healing in the stable and unstable intertrochangeric fractures using the selfdynamisable internal fixator. This biological method of fixation provides healing of intertrochanteric fracture in the optimum period of time, significantly reducing the risk for mechanical failure.
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis | 2017
Milan Mitkovic; Sasa Milenkovic; Ivan Micic; Predrag Stojiljkovic; Igor Kostić; Slobodan Milenković; Dražen Jelača; Milorad Mitkovic
Summary The aim of this study was to present the results of one original method application in internal fixation of long bones. The series of 27 patients with unilateral fractures of femoral shaft was analyzed. According to AO classification, 21 fractures were classified as 32A, five as 32B, and one as 32C type. Original diaphyseal self-dynamisable internal fixator (model 1) was used as a fixation implant, consisting of three components: specially designed extramedullary bar, clamps and screws. The main feature of this implant is a possibility to become dynamic in the axial direction spontaneously if there is no sufficient fracture healing. Because of that, this implant is known as an „intelligent implant“. Surgical method included a standard surgical approach and minimally invasive surgical approach. Minimally invasive technique of application required less blood transfusion and shorter surgery time when compared to the standard surgical approach. The duration of used intraoperative fluoroscopy control was 7(3-18) seconds. The average healing time was 4.3 (3.5-9.5) months. There were neither intra operative nor postoperative complications. In comparison to intramedullary nails, self-dynamisable internal fixator provides a similar treatment results, while in comparison to plates it provides fewer mechanical complications. Self-dynamisable internal fixator method preserves periosteal and intramedullary blood circulation, and it is the first fixation implant with a possibility of spontaneous axial dynamising activation when needed. This implant has been proven as suitable for routine use in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica | 2015
Igor Kostić; M Milan Mitkovic; Milorad B. Mitrović
High energy pilon fractures present a unique challenge to the patient and orthopaedic surgeon. Care for the soft tissue envelope is as important as management of this articular fracture. This article present long term results of patients suffered type C pilon fractures treated with the method of external fixation with minimal invasive approach,. We observe a total of fifty five patients, between August 2008 and January 2015, underwent external fixation of type C pilon fractures with minimal invasive approach at Clinic of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Clinical center Nis, Serbia. Infectious complications secondary to wound healing problems are a major concern after open surgery for pilon fracture. Therefore, soft-tissue management is critical for successful operative treatment of these fractures. According to our long term results in the present study, it seems that external fixation represent a rational approach to obtain and maintain alignment of the distal tibia through ligamentotaxis, thereby avoiding formal open reduction for treatment of the patient with severe pilon fracture.
Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo | 2011
Zoran Golubovic; Zoran Vukasinovic; Vojkan Stanic; Saša Stojanović; Predrag Stojiljkovic; Danilo Stojiljković; Ivan Golubović; Micić I; Zoran Radovanovic; Igor Kostić; Aleksandar Višnjić; Stevo Najman
Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica | 2013
Milorad Mitkovic; Marko Bumbasirevic; Sasa Milenkovic; Ivan Micic; Predrag Stojiljkovic; Igor Kostić; Sasa Karalejic; Sonja Stamenic; Predrag Pavlovic; Milos Stanojlovic; Vladimir Jovanovic; Tamara Ciric; Katarina Kutlesic-Stojanovic; Milan Mitkovic
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma | 2017
Igor Kostić; Milan Mitkovic; Milorad Mitkovic
Acta Medica Medianae | 2015
Igor Kostić; Ivan Golubović; Biljana Kocić; Miroslav Stojanović
Acta Medica Medianae | 2013
Ivan Golubović; Predrag Stojiljkovic; Zoran Golubovic; Goran Stevanovic; Aleksandar Višnjić; Milan Trenkić; Danilo Stojiljković; Stevo Najman; Dragan Mihailovic; Igor Kostić; Miroslav Trajanović
Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica | 2013
Igor Kostić; M Milan Mitkovic; Milorad Mitkovic
Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica | 2013
Milan Mitkovic; Sasa Milenkovic; Ivan Micic; Djordje Gajdobranski; Mile Radenkovic; Sasa Karaleic; Predrag Pavlovic; Predrag Stojiljkovic; Igor Kostić; Marko Bumbasirevic; Goran Vidic; Miodrag Stanojkovic; Milos Stanojlovic; Zoran Radovanovic; Sonja Stamenic; Katarina Kutlesic-Stojanovic; Tamara Ciric; Vladimir Jovanovic; Milorad Mitkovic