Igor Langer

Morbidity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLN) Alone Versus SLN and Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Breast Cancer Surgery A Prospective Swiss Multicenter Study on 659 Patients

Objective:To assess the morbidity after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compared with SLN and completion level I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in a prospective multicenter study. Summary Background Data:ALND after breast cancer surgery is associated with considerable morbidity. We hypothesized: 1) that the morbidity in patients undergoing SLN biopsy only is significantly lower compared with those after SLN and completion ALND level I and II; and 2) that SLN biopsy can be performed with similar intermediate term morbidity in academic and nonacademic centers. Methods:Patients with early stage breast cancer (pT1 and pT2 ≤ 3 cm, cN0) were included between January 2000 and December 2003 in this prospective Swiss multicenter study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy. In all patients with SLN macrometastases and most patients with SLN micrometastases (43 of 68) or isolated tumor cells (11 of 19), a completion ALND was performed. Postoperative morbidity was assessed based on a standardized protocol. Results:SLN biopsy alone was performed in 449 patients, whereas 210 patients underwent SLN and completion ALND. The median follow-ups were 31.0 and 29.5 months for the SLN and SLN and completion ALND groups, respectively. Intermediate-term follow-up information was available from 635 of 659 patients (96.4%) of enrolled patients. The following results were found in the SLN versus SLN and completion ALND group: presence of lymphedema (3.5% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001), impaired shoulder range of motion (3.5% vs. 11.3%, P < 0.0001), shoulder/arm pain (8.1% vs. 21.1%, P < 0.0001), and numbness (10.9% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.0001). No significant differences regarding postoperative morbidity after SLN biopsy were noticed between academic and nonacademic hospitals (P = 0.921). Conclusions:The morbidity after SLN biopsy alone is not negligible but significantly lower compared with level I and II ALND. SLN biopsy can be performed with similar short- and intermediate-term morbidity in academic and nonacademic centers.

Axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases: prospective analysis of 150 patients after SLN biopsy.

Objective:To assess the axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases (>0.2 mm to ≤2.0 mm) after breast surgery and SLN procedure without formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Summary Background Data:Under controlled study conditions, the SLN procedure proved to be a reliable method for the evaluation of the axillary nodal status in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Axillary dissection of levels I and II can thus be omitted if the SLN is free of macrometastases. The prognostic value and potential therapeutic consequences of SLN micrometastases, however, remain a matter of great debate. We present the follow-up data of our prospective SLN study, particularly focusing on the axillary recurrence rate in patients with negative SLN and SLN micrometastases. Methods:In this prospective study, 236 SLN procedures were performed in 234 patients with early-stage breast cancer between April 1998 and September 2002. The SLN were marked and identified with 99m technetium-labeled colloid and blue dye (Isosulfanblue 1%). The excised SLNs were examined by step sectioning and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry (cytokeratin antibodies Lu-5 or CK 22). Only patients with SLN macrometastases received formal ALND of levels I and II, while patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not undergo further axillary surgery. Results:The SLN identification rate was 95% (224/236). SLN macrometastases were found in 33% (74/224) and micrometastases (>0.2 mm to ≤2 mm) in 12% (27/224) of patients. Adjuvant therapy did not differ between the group of SLN-negative patients and those with SLN micrometastases. After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 12–64 months), 99% (222/224) of evaluable patients were reassessed. While 1 patient with a negative SLN developed axillary recurrence (0.7%, 1/122), all 27 patients with SLN micrometastases were disease-free at the last follow-up control. Conclusions:Axillary recurrences in patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not occur more frequently after SLN biopsy alone compared with results from the recent literature regarding breast cancer patients undergoing formal ALND. Based on a median follow-up of 42 months—one of the longest so far in the literature—the present investigation does not provide evidence that the presence of SLN micrometastases leads to axillary recurrence or distant disease and supports the theory that formal ALND may be omitted in these patients.

Selective axillary surgery in breast cancer patients based on positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: not yet!

We prospectively evaluated 31 patients with invasive breast cancer. Preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) for detection of axillary lymph node metastases was compared with the histopathologic status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Sensitivity of PET imaging was 43%, specificity and negative predictive value were 94 and 67%, respectively. The smallest metastasis detected by PET measured 3 mm in diameter. The results of this study suggest that detection of small axillary lymph node metastases is limited by the currently achievable spatial resolution of PET imaging. Selective axillary surgery in breast cancer patients based on 18F-FDG PET is yet not possible.

Molecular investigation of lymph nodes in colon cancer patients using one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA): a new road to better staging?

A new diagnostic system, called one‐step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA), has recently been designed to detect cytokeratin 19 mRNA as a surrogate for lymph node metastases. The objective of this prospective investigation was to compare the performance of OSNA with both standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) analysis and intensive histopathology in the detection of colon cancer lymph node metastases.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved survival compared to level I & II axillary lymph node dissection in node negative breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE The few long-term follow-up data for sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative breast cancer patients demonstrate a 5-year disease-free survival of 96-98%. It remains to be elucidated whether the more accurate SLN staging defines a more selective node negative patient group and whether this is associated with better overall and disease-free survival compared with level I & II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS Three-hundred and fifty-five consecutive node negative patients with early stage breast cancer (pT1 and pT2< or =3 cm, pN0/pN(SN)0) were assessed from our prospective database. Patients underwent either ALND (n=178) in 1990-1997 or SLN biopsy (n=177) in 1998-2004. All SLN were examined by step sectioning, stained with H&E and immunohistochemistry. Lymph nodes from ALND specimens were examined by standard H&E only. Neither immunohistochemistry nor step sections were performed in the analysis of ALND specimen. RESULTS The median follow-up was 49 months in the SLN and 133 months in the ALND group. Patients in the SLN group had a significantly better disease-free (p=0.008) and overall survival (p=0.034). After adjusting for other prognostic factors in Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, SLN procedure was an independent predictor for improved disease-free (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.73, p=0.009) and overall survival (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.84, p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS This is the first prospective analysis providing evidence that early stage breast cancer patients with a negative SLN have an improved disease-free and overall survival compared with node negative ALND patients. This is most likely due to a more accurate axillary staging in the SLN group.

Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection: a prospective analysis of 52 patients.

SummaryBackground. Reports on long-term outcomes after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) of breast cancer patients are still lacking in the medical literature. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the oncological and functional outcomes in breast cancer patients after endoscopic ALND. Methods. Fifty-five breast cancer patients were prospectively enrolled, of whom 52 were available for follow-up with a median of 71.9 months (range 11–96). The following oncological and functional endpoints were evaluated during follow-up at several time points: occurrence of local, axillary and distant metastases, seroma or infection, shoulder mobility (range of motion), numbness, pain, presence of lymphoedema as well as restriction in activities of daily living. Results. In 52 patients endoscopic ALND of level I and II was successfully performed. Two port-site metastases (2/52, 4%) occurred, one of which in a patient with negative axillary lymph nodes. The same patient suffered from the only axillary recurrence (1/52, 2%). Three patients (3/52, 6%) developed lymphoedema. No other functional adverse events (shoulder mobility, pain, numbness, hypertrophic scar) were noticed at the end of the observation period. Conclusion. The present investigation with long-term follow-up after endoscopic ALND – the first one in the literature – reveals minor morbidity, good functional and cosmetic results. In contrary to conventional surgery, the endoscopic procedure is associated with the occurrence of port-site metastases, not seen in the open approach. Axillary recurrences do not appear more frequently when compared with results after conventional ALND. In the meantime the less invasive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the established standard technique in evaluating the axillary lymph node status.

Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation for the evaluation of impalpable lesions: a reliable diagnostic tool with little therapeutic potential

OBJECTIVE To assess the potential of advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI) to clarify the diagnosis of impalpable mammographic lesions and to remove the entire malignant lesions with clear margins. DESIGN Prospective assessment in a consecutive series of patients. SETTING University hospital, Basel, Switzerland. SUBJECTS 139 patients presenting with 144 impalpable microcalcifications or solid nodular densities evident on screening and follow-up mammograms that were suspicious of malignancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility, sensitivity, efficiency in obtaining definitive diagnoses in an outpatient clinic under local anaesthesia, feasibility of complete removal of a primary malignancy, and intervention-related morbidity. RESULTS The ABBI procedure was successful in 135/144 (94%); an accurate diagnosis was made in 129/130 patients followed up (99%), sensitivity for malignant lesions was 31/32 (97%) and there were 2 complications (2%). Margins of the biopsy cylinder contained a malignant lesion in 26/31 (84%). CONCLUSIONS Excisional biopsy using the ABBI system is a reliable diagnostic tool with a low morbidity. As in other published series margins were often not clear of tumour and therefore the therapeutic use of the ABBI procedure is limited.

Prognostic impact and therapeutic implications of sentinel lymph node micro‐metastases in early‐stage breast cancer patients

The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) micro‐metastases and the question whether patients with SLN micro‐metastases should undergo axillary lymph node dissection remain a matter of great debate. Based on the current literature and on our own data, we provide suggestive evidence that SLN micro‐metastases in early stage breast cancer patients appear to have prognostic value and should impact the decision‐making regarding adjuvant therapy, however, do not necessarily require further surgical treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011;103:531–533.

Mammotome: Less Invasive than ABBI with Similar Accuracy for Early Breast Cancer Detection

We performed a prospective analysis of two consecutive biopsy cohorts investigated by the same team to compare the Mammotome system with the ABBI procedure. From April 1997 to August 2003 a series of 413 nonpalpable mammographic lesions in 387 women (median age 56 years, range 30–84 years) were stereotactically biopsied in the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland. Until October 1999 the ABBI system was applied exclusively, it was subsequently superseded by the Mammotome device in our clinic. Main outcome measures were accuracy, technical demand, and morbidity. Sensitivity (97.3%/96.8%), negative predictive value (99.2%/98.7%), and diagnostic accuracy (99.4%/99.1%) regarding the detection of malignancy were excellent for both techniques (ABBI/Mammotome). The Mammotome procedure was faster and less invasive, thus causing significantly less morbidity. The larger specimen obtained by the ABBI procedure resulted in more detailed histology. In conclusion, recommend the Mammotome system as the method of choice for detecting nonpalpable early breast cancer.

A new approach in breast cancer with non-inflammatory skin involvement

The widely accepted image of breast cancer with non-inflammatory skin involvement (T4b) is determined by the tenet that all these tumors are locally advanced (Stage IIIB). The study addresses the question whether this view is justified. Data from 453 non-metastatic breast cancer patients were collected retrospectively. Eighty-one patients had T4b disease. To assess the malignant potential of tumors independent of the feature skin involvement, a reclassification only considering tumor size was undertaken. We compared the clinical course of three study groups (A: Stage II; B: Stage IIIA; C: Stage IIIC) with control groups of 372 patients without skin involvement. In the study groups, we found a broad distribution among the stages (A:36.2%; B:33.7%; and C:27.7%) with significant differences in disease-specific survival (DSS) (A/B: p = 0.032; B/C: p = 0.048). There were no significant differences in DSS between the study and the corresponding control group. In multivariate analysis, skin involvement was not a significant predictor of DSS. Heterogeneity of the T4b category and a lack of prognostic significance expand the widely accepted image of breast cancer with non-inflammatory skin involvement. The highest T category, or Stage III, is not the appropriate classification for a considerable number of patients having this clinicopathologic entity.