Indrani Nandy

The Effects of Combination Therapy with Dutasteride and Tamsulosin on Clinical Outcomes in Men with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results from the CombAT Study

BACKGROUND Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin provides significantly greater benefit than either monotherapy for various patient-reported outcomes in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic enlargement. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether combination therapy is more effective than either monotherapy in reducing the relative risk for acute urinary retention (AUR), BPH-related surgery, and BPH clinical progression over 4 yr in men at increased risk of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study was a 4-yr, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study in 4844 men > or =50 yr of age with a clinical diagnosis of BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score > or =12, prostate volume > or =30 cm(3), prostate-specific antigen 1.5-10 ng/ml, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) >5 and < or =15 ml/s with minimum voided volume > or =125 ml. INTERVENTION Oral daily tamsulosin, 0.4 mg; dutasteride, 0.5 mg; or a combination of both. MEASUREMENTS The 4-yr primary end point was time to first AUR or BPH-related surgery. Secondary end points included BPH clinical progression, symptoms, Q(max), prostate volume, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Combination therapy was significantly superior to tamsulosin monotherapy but not dutasteride monotherapy at reducing the relative risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery. Combination therapy was also significantly superior to both monotherapies at reducing the relative risk of BPH clinical progression. Combination therapy provided significantly greater symptom benefit than either monotherapy at 4 yr. Safety and tolerability of combination therapy was consistent with previous experience with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapies, with the exception of an imbalance in the composite term of cardiac failure among the three study arms. The lack of placebo control is a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS The 4-yr CombAT data provide support for the long-term use of dutasteride and tamsulosin combination therapy in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH and prostatic enlargement. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00090103 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00090103).

Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of dutasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor, on prostate cancer progression in men with low-risk disease who chose to be followed up with active surveillance. METHODS In our 3 year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, undertaken at 65 academic medical centres or outpatient clinics in North America, we enrolled men aged 48-82 years who had low-volume, Gleason score 5-6 prostate cancer and had chosen to be followed up with active surveillance. We randomly allocated participants in a one-to-one ratio, stratified by site and in block sizes of four, to receive once-daily dutasteride 0·5 mg or matching placebo. Participants were followed up for 3 years, with 12-core prostate biopsy samples obtained after 18 months and 3 years. The primary endpoint was time to prostate cancer progression, defined as the number of days between the start of study treatment and the earlier of either pathological progression (in patients with ≥1 biopsy assessment after baseline) or therapeutic progression (start of medical therapy). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00363311. FINDINGS Between Aug 10, 2006, and March 26, 2007, we randomly allocated 302 participants, of whom 289 (96%) had at least one biopsy procedure after baseline and were included in the primary analysis. By 3 years, 54 (38%) of 144 men in the dutasteride group and 70 (48%) of 145 controls had prostate cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic; hazard ratio 0·62, 95% CI 0·43-0·89; p=0·009). Incidence of adverse events was much the same between treatment groups. 35 (24%) men in the dutasteride group and 23 (15%) controls had sexual adverse events or breast enlargement or tenderness. Eight (5%) men in the dutasteride group and seven (5%) controls had cardiovascular adverse events, but there were no prostate cancer-related deaths or instances of metastatic disease. INTERPRETATION Dutasteride could provide a beneficial adjunct to active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline.

Dutasteride Treatment Over 2 Years Delays Prostate-specific Antigen Progression in Patients with Biochemical Failure After Radical Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from the Randomised, Placebo-controlled Avodart After Radical Therapy for Prostate Cancer Study (ARTS)

BACKGROUND Rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical therapy are indicative of recurrent or residual prostate cancer (PCa). This biochemical recurrence typically predates clinically detectable metastatic disease by several years. Management of patients with biochemical recurrence is controversial. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of dutasteride on progression of PCa in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 294 men from 64 centres across 9 European countries. INTERVENTION The 5α-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary end point was time to PSA doubling from start of randomised treatment, analysed by log-rank test stratified by previous therapy and investigative-site cluster. Secondary end points included time to disease progression and the proportion of subjects with disease progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 294 subjects randomised (147 in each treatment group), 187 (64%) completed 24 mo of treatment and 107 discontinued treatment prematurely (71 [48%] of the placebo group, 36 [24%] of the dutasteride group). Dutasteride significantly delayed the time to PSA doubling compared with placebo after 24 mo of treatment (p<0.001); the relative risk (RR) reduction was 66.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.35-76.90) for the overall study period. Dutasteride also significantly delayed disease progression (which included PSA- and non-PSA-related outcomes) compared with placebo (p<0.001); the overall RR reduction in favour of dutasteride was 59% (95% CI, 32.53-75.09). The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to study withdrawal were similar between the treatment groups. A limitation was that investigators were not blinded to PSA levels during the study. CONCLUSIONS Dutasteride delayed the biochemical progression of PCa in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy for clinically localised disease. The safety and tolerability of dutasteride were generally consistent with previous experience. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00558363.

Corrigendum to “The Effects of Combination Therapy with Dutasteride and Tamsulosin on Clinical Outcomes in Men with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results from the CombAT Study” [Eur Urol 2010;57:123–31]

Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA Deaconess Clinic, Evansville, Indiana, USA Department of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Urology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA Department of Urology, Universita Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder: Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Large Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abstract Objective: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent, chronic condition that can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). Treatment goals are to improve symptoms and HRQL. We assessed the efficacy of solifenacin in OAB patients using several patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, with a focus on urgency severity. Results for the primary endpoint, reductions in daily urgency episodes, and other bladder-diary variables have been recently reported. Materials and Methods: In this 12-week multicenter trial, 739 patients (aged ⩾ 18 years) were randomized to flexibly dosed solifenacin (5/10 mg) or placebo. Prespecified secondary PRO measures included the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q). Appropriate statistical tests compared treatment-group differences in continuous and categorical data. Results: In the full analysis set, patients who received solifenacin (n = 357) versus placebo (n = 350) showed significant improvements on the IUSS and UPS; treatment-group differences were 0.4 (P < 0.0001) and 0.2 (P = 0.0018), respectively. On the PPBC, significantly more patients taking solifenacin (66%) than placebo (48%) perceived fewer bladder-related problems (P < 0.0001) by week 12. On the OAB-q, solifenacin was superior to placebo for the Symptom Bother and total HRQL scales and for 3 of the 4 HRQL domains at study end (P < 0.01). Overall, these findings were consistent with those reported previously for bladder-diary-documented urgency and other OAB symptoms. Conclusion: Flexibly dosed, once-daily solifenacin was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in urgency and other symptom-specific bother and HRQL compared with placebo.

Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.

PURPOSE We identify risk factors for pathological progression among men on active surveillance in the REDEEM (REduction by Dutasteride of clinical progression Events in Expectant Management trial). MATERIALS AND METHODS REDEEM was a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study of patients in 65 North American academic centers. Eligible men were 48 to 82 years old, with low risk prostate cancer (T1c-T2a), Gleason score 6 or less, 3 or fewer cores positive, tumor less than 50% of any 1 core, serum prostate specific antigen 11 ng/ml or less, life expectancy greater than 5 years and undergoing active surveillance. Entry biopsies (10 cores or more) were required. The analysis included 276 patients with 1 biopsy or more after the start of study treatment. Patients received dutasteride 0.5 mg per day or placebo for 3 years. Time to pathological progression (volume [4 or more cores positive or 50% or greater of 1 core] or grade progression [Gleason score 7 or greater]) in a post-baseline biopsy (not preceded by therapeutic intervention), and baseline variables were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS In total 94 of 276 patients with a post-baseline biopsy (34.1%) had pathological progression, 54 (19.6%) had volume progression only, 19 (6.9%) had grade progression only and 21 (7.6%) had both types of progression. Older age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p=0.009) and higher prostate specific antigen density (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09, p<0.001) were associated with pathological progression. Post-baseline prostate specific antigen identified grade, but not volume progression in patients treated with placebo and dutasteride. CONCLUSIONS Older age and higher prostate specific antigen density were independent predictors of pathological progression. Post-baseline measurements as predictors of pathological progression could not be established. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of dutasteride and establish better markers of pathological progression in active surveillance.

Can dutasteride delay or prevent the progression of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy? Rationale and design of the Avodart after Radical Therapy for Prostate Cancer Study

To describe the Avodart after Radical Therapy for prostate cancer Study (ARTS), investigating the use of dutasteride (a dual 5α‐reductase inhibitor that suppresses intraprostatic dihydrotestosterone, reduces tumour volume and improves other markers of tumour regression in prostate cancer) to prevent or delay disease progression in patients with biochemical recurrence after therapy with curative intent.