Inge Compter
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Inge Compter.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews | 2017
Philippe Lambin; Jaap D. Zindler; Ben G. L. Vanneste; Lien Van De Voorde; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Inge Compter; Kranthi Marella Panth; Jurgen Peerlings; Ruben T.H.M. Larue; Timo M. Deist; Arthur Jochems; Tim Lustberg; Johan van Soest; Evelyn E.C. de Jong; Aniek J.G. Even; Bart Reymen; Nicolle H. Rekers; Marike W. van Gisbergen; Erik Roelofs; S. Carvalho; R. Leijenaar; C.M.L. Zegers; Maria Jacobs; Janita van Timmeren; P.J.A.M. Brouwers; Jonathan A Lal; Ludwig Dubois; Ala Yaromina; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Maaike Berbee
Abstract A paradigm shift from current population based medicine to personalized and participative medicine is underway. This transition is being supported by the development of clinical decision support systems based on prediction models of treatment outcome. In radiation oncology, these models ‘learn’ using advanced and innovative information technologies (ideally in a distributed fashion — please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA) from all available/appropriate medical data (clinical, treatment, imaging, biological/genetic, etc.) to achieve the highest possible accuracy with respect to prediction of tumor response and normal tissue toxicity. In this position paper, we deliver an overview of the factors that are associated with outcome in radiation oncology and discuss the methodology behind the development of accurate prediction models, which is a multi‐faceted process. Subsequent to initial development/validation and clinical introduction, decision support systems should be constantly re‐evaluated (through quality assurance procedures) in different patient datasets in order to refine and re‐optimize the models, ensuring the continuous utility of the models. In the reasonably near future, decision support systems will be fully integrated within the clinic, with data and knowledge being shared in a standardized, dynamic, and potentially global manner enabling truly personalized and participative medicine. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Lieke in 't Ven; Erik Roelofs; Alida A. Postma; Claire Alapetite; N.G. Burnet; V. Calugaru; Inge Compter; Ida E.M. Coremans; Morton Høyer; Maarten Lambrecht; Petra Witt Nyström; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Frank Paulsen; Ana Perpar; Dirk De Ruysscher; Laurette Renard; Beate Timmermann; Pavel Vitek; Damien C. Weber; Hiske L. van der Weide; Gillian A Whitfield; Ruud Wiggenraad; E.G.C. Troost
PURPOSE To create a digital, online atlas for organs at risk (OAR) delineation in neuro-oncology based on high-quality computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS CT and 3 Tesla (3T) MR images (slice thickness 1 mm with intravenous contrast agent) were obtained from the same patient and subsequently fused. In addition, a 7T MR without intravenous contrast agent was obtained from a healthy volunteer. Based on discussion between experienced radiation oncologists, the clinically relevant organs at risk (OARs) to be included in the atlas for neuro-oncology were determined, excluding typical head and neck OARs previously published. The draft atlas was delineated by a senior radiation oncologist, 2 residents in radiation oncology, and a senior neuro-radiologist incorporating relevant available literature. The proposed atlas was then critically reviewed and discussed by European radiation oncologists until consensus was reached. RESULTS The online atlas includes one CT-scan at two different window settings and one MR scan (3T) showing the OARs in axial, coronal and sagittal view. This manuscript presents the three-dimensional descriptions of the fifteen consensus OARs for neuro-oncology. Among these is a new OAR relevant for neuro-cognition, the posterior cerebellum (illustrated on 7T MR images). CONCLUSION In order to decrease inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating OARs relevant for neuro-oncology and thus derive consistent dosimetric data, we propose this atlas to be used in photon and particle therapy. The atlas is available online at www.cancerdata.org and will be updated whenever required.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
Jaap D. Zindler; Arthur Jochems; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Rosemarijne Beumer; Esther G.C. Troost; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Inge Compter; Peter-Paul van der Toorn; Marion Essers; Bing Oei; Coen W. Hurkmans; A. Bruynzeel; Geert Bosmans; Ans Swinnen; R. Leijenaar; Philippe Lambin
INTRODUCTION Commonly used clinical models for survival prediction after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) are limited by the lack of individual risk scores and disproportionate prognostic groups. In this study, two nomograms were developed to overcome these limitations. METHODS 495 patients with BMs of NSCLC treated with SRS for a limited number of BMs in four Dutch radiation oncology centers were identified and divided in a training cohort (n=214, patients treated in one hospital) and an external validation cohort n=281, patients treated in three other hospitals). Using the training cohort, nomograms were developed for prediction of early death (<3months) and long-term survival (>12months) with prognostic factors for survival. Accuracy of prediction was defined as the area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristics analysis for prediction of early death and long term survival. The accuracy of the nomograms was also tested in the external validation cohort. RESULTS Prognostic factors for survival were: WHO performance status, presence of extracranial metastases, age, GTV largest BM, and gender. Number of brain metastases and primary tumor control were not prognostic factors for survival. In the external validation cohort, the nomogram predicted early death statistically significantly better (p<0.05) than the unfavorable groups of the RPA, DS-GPA, GGS, SIR, and Rades 2015 (AUC=0.70 versus range AUCs=0.51-0.60 respectively). With an AUC of 0.67, the other nomogram predicted 1year survival statistically significantly better (p<0.05) than the favorable groups of four models (range AUCs=0.57-0.61), except for the SIR (AUC=0.64, p=0.34). The models are available on www.predictcancer.org. CONCLUSION The nomograms predicted early death and long-term survival more accurately than commonly used prognostic scores after SRS for a limited number of BMs of NSCLC. Moreover these nomograms enable individualized probability assessment and are easy into use in routine clinical practice.
Autophagy | 2018
Barry Jutten; T.G. Keulers; H.J.M. Peeters; M.B. Schaaf; K.G. Savelkouls; Inge Compter; Linda Ackermans; J. Bussink; Guido Lammering
ABSTRACT Expression of EGFRvIII is frequently observed in glioblastoma and is associated with increased cellular proliferation, enhanced tolerance to metabolic stresses, accelerated tumor growth, therapy resistance and poor prognosis. We observed that expression of EGFRvIII elevates the activation of macroautophagy/autophagy during starvation and hypoxia and explored the underlying mechanism and consequence. Autophagy was inhibited (genetically or pharmacologically) and its consequence for tolerance to metabolic stress and its therapeutic potential in (EGFRvIII+) glioblastoma was assessed in cellular systems, (patient derived) tumor xenopgrafts and glioblastoma patients. Autophagy inhibition abrogated the enhanced proliferation and survival advantage of EGFRvIII+ cells during stress conditions, decreased tumor hypoxia and delayed tumor growth in EGFRvIII+ tumors. These effects can be attributed to the supporting role of autophagy in meeting the high metabolic demand of EGFRvIII+ cells. As hypoxic tumor cells greatly contribute to therapy resistance, autophagy inhibition revokes the radioresistant phenotype of EGFRvIII+ tumors in (patient derived) xenograft tumors. In line with these findings, retrospective analysis of glioblastoma patients indicated that chloroquine treatment improves survival of all glioblastoma patients, but patients with EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma benefited most. Our findings disclose the unique autophagy dependency of EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma as a therapeutic opportunity. Chloroquine treatment may therefore be considered as an additional treatment strategy for glioblastoma patients and can reverse the worse prognosis of patients with EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma.
Practical radiation oncology | 2015
Klaus Müller; Guido Henke; Inge Compter; André O. von Bueren; Carsten Friedrich; Geert O. Janssens; Christof M. Kramm; Thomas Hundsberger; Frank Paulsen; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Isabella Zwiener; Brigitta G. Baumert
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine | 2016
Inge Compter; Jurgen Peerlings; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Alida A. Postma; Dimo Ivanov; Christopher J. Wiggins; Pieter L. Kubben; Benno Küsters; Pieter Wesseling; Linda Ackermans; Olaf E.M.G. Schijns; Philippe Lambin; Aswin L. Hoffmann
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2016
Inge Compter; R. Leijenaar; Danielle B.P. Eekers; Jaap D. Zindler; A. Hoeben; B. Küsters; J. Beckervordersandforth; L. Ackermans; O.E.M.G. Schijns; M. Anten; Alida A. Postma; Philippe Lambin
Neuro-oncology | 2018
Inge Compter; Maikel Verduin; H C Woodruff; R. Leijenaar; Alida A. Postma; Ann Hoeben; D B P Eekers; Philippe Lambin
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
J. Peerlings; Inge Compter; F.M. Janssen; C.J. Wiggins; F.M. Mottaghy; P. Lambin; Aswin L. Hoffmann
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2016
Inge Compter; J. Peerlings; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Alida A. Postma; D. Ivanov; C.J. Wiggins; P. Kubben; B. Küsters; Pieter Wesseling; L. Ackermans; O.E.M.G. Schijns; Philippe Lambin; Aswin L. Hoffmann