Ingo Flamme

Determination and Modulation of Prolyl‐4‐Hydroxylase Domain Oxygen Sensor Activity

The prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain (PHD) oxygen sensor proteins hydroxylate hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF)-alpha (alpha) subunits, leading to their subsequent ubiquitinylation and degradation. Since oxygen is a necessary cosubstrate, a reduction in oxygen availability (hypoxia) decreases PHD activity and, subsequently, HIF-alpha hydroxylation. Non-hydroxylated HIF-alpha cannot be bound by the ubiquitin ligase von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL), and HIF-alpha proteins thus become stabilized. HIF-alpha then heterodimerizes with HIF-beta (beta) to form the functionally active HIF transcription factor complex, which targets approximately 200 genes involved in adaptation to hypoxia. The three HIF-alpha PHDs are of a different nature compared with the prototype collagen prolyl-4-hydroxylase, which hydroxylates a mass protein rather than a rare transcription factor. Thus, novel assays had to be developed to express and purify functionally active PHDs and to measure PHD activity in vitro. A need also exists for such assays to functionally distinguish the three different PHDs in terms of substrate specificity and drug function. We provide a detailed description of the expression and purification of the PHDs as well as of an HIF-alpha-dependent and a HIF-alpha-independent PHD assay.

The impact of N-nitrosomelatonin as nitric oxide donor in cell culture experiments

Abstract:  N‐Nitrosomelatonin (NOMela) is well‐known for its capabilities of transnitrosating nucleophiles such as thiols and ascorbate, thereby generating nitric oxide (NO)‐releasing compounds. It is unknown, however, whether NOMela can be successfully applied as a precursor of NO in a complex biological environment like a cell culture system. NO donors may be useful to induce the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF‐1), which coordinates the protection of cells and tissues from the lack of oxygen (hypoxia). In this study, the effects of NOMela in an in vitro cell‐free assay [NO‐release, inhibition of prolylhydroxylase1 (PHD1)] and in living cells (upregulation of HIF‐1, reduction of HIF‐1 hydroxylation, upregulation of the HIF‐1‐target gene PHD2) were compared with those of the frequently applied NO donor S‐nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. In contrast to GSNO, NOMela released NO in a predictable manner and this release in vitro was found to be independent of the composition of the buffer system. The NOMela‐mediated effects in oxygenated cells were in all cases comparable to the hypoxic response, whereas unphysiological strong effects were observed with GSNO. Probably, because of the antioxidative power of the NOMela‐dependent formation of melatonin, cells were completely protected against the attack of reactive nitrogen oxygen species, which are generated by autoxidation of NO. In conclusion, NOMela had to be an excellent NO precursor for cells in culture and potentially tissues.