Ingolf E. Blasig

Formation of tight junction: determinants of homophilic interaction between classic claudins

Claudins are the critical transmembrane proteins in tight junctions. Claudin‐5, for instance, prevents paracellular permeation of small molecules. However, the molecular interaction mechanism is unknown. Hence, the claudin‐claudin interaction and tight junction strand formation were investigated using systematic single mutations. Claudin‐5 mutants trans‐fected into tight junction‐free cells demonstrated that the extracellular loop 2 is involved in strand formation via trans‐interaction, but not via polymerization, along the plasma membrane of one cell. Three phenotypes were obtained: the tight junction type (wild‐type‐like trans‐ and cis‐interaction; the disjunction type (blocked trans‐interaction); the intracellular type (disturbed folding). Combining site‐directed mutagenesis, live‐cell imaging‐, electron microscopy‐, and molecular modeling data led to an antiparallel homodimer homology model of the loop. These data for the first time explain how two claudins hold onto each other and constrict the paracellular space. The intermolecular interface includes aromatic (F147, Y148, Y158) and hydrophilic (Q156, E159) residues. The aromatic residues form a strong binding core between two loops from opposing cells. Since nearly all these residues are conserved in most claudins, our findings are of general relevance for all classical claudins. On the basis of the data we have established a novel molecular concept for tight junction formation.— Piontek, J., Winkler, L., Wolburg, H., Müller, S. L., Zuleger, N., Piehl, C., Wiesner, B., Krause, G., Blasig, I. E. Formation of tight junction: determinants of homophilic interaction between classic clau‐dins. FASEB J. 22, 146–158 (2008)

Reactive oxygen species alter brain endothelial tight junction dynamics via RhoA, PI3 kinase, and PKB signaling

The blood‐brain barrier (BBB) prevents the entrance of circulating molecules and immune cells into the central nervous system. The barrier is formed by specialized brain endothelial cells that are interconnected by tight junctions (TJ). A defective function of the BBB has been described for a variety of neuroinflammatory diseases, indicating that proper regulation is essential for maintaining brain homeostasis. Under pathological conditions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) significantly contribute to BBB dysfunction and inflammation in the brain by enhancing cellular migration. However, a detailed study about the molecular mechanism by which ROS alter BBB integrity has been lacking. Here we demonstrate that ROS alter BBB integrity, which is paralleled by cytoskel‐eton rearrangements and redistribution and disappearance of TJ proteins claudin‐5 and occludin. Specific signaling pathways, including RhoA and PI3 kinase, mediated observed processes and specific inhibitors of these pathways prevented ROS‐induced monocyte migration across an in vitro model of the BBB. Interestingly, these processes were also mediated by protein kinase B (PKB/ Akt), a previously unknown player in cytoskeleton and TJ dynamics that acted downstream of RhoA and PI3 kinase. Our study reveals new insights into molecular mechanisms underlying BBB regulation and provides novel opportunities for the treatment of neuroinflammatory diseases.—Schreibelt, G., Kooij, G., Reijerkerk, A., van Doorn, R., Gringhuis, S. I., van der Pol, S., Weksler, B. B., Romero, I. A., Couraud, P.‐O., Piontek, J., Blasig, I. E., Dijkstra, C. D., Ronken, E., de Vries, H. E. Reactive oxygen species alter brain endothelial tight junction dynamics via RhoA, PI3 kinase and PKB signaling. FASEB J. 21, 3666–3676 (2007)

In search of the astrocytic factor(s) modulating blood-brain barrier functions in brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro.

Summary1. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is formed by brain capillary endothelial cells (ECs). There are various cell types, in particular astrocytes, but also pericytes and neurons, located in close vicinity to the capillary ECs which may influence formation and function of the BBB. Based on this consideration, this paper discusses various aspects of the influence of the surrounding cells on brain capillary ECs with special focus on the role of astrocytes.2. Based on the morphology of the BBB, important aspects of brain EC functions are summarized, such as transport functions and maintenance of low paracellular permeability. Moreover, various facets are discussed with respect to the influence of astrocytes, pericytes, microglia, and neurons on the BBB. Data on the role of glial cells in the ontogenesis of the BBB are presented subsequently. The knowledge on this subject is far from being complete, however, these data imply that the neural/neuronal environment rather than glial cells may be of importance in the maturation of the barrier.3. The role of glial cells in the induction and maintenance of the BBB is discussed under physiological as well as pathological conditions. Although the literature presents manifold evidence for a great variety of effects induced by astroglia, there are also many controversies, which may result from different cellular models and experimental conditions used in the respective studies. Numerous factors secreted by astrocytes have been shown to induce a BBB phenotype. On the molecular level, increased expression of barrier-relevant proteins (e.g., tight junction proteins) is documented in the presence of astrocyte-derived factors, and many studies demonstrate the improvement of physiological parameters, such as increased transendothelial resistance and decreased paracellular permeability, in different in vitro models of the BBB. Moreover, one has to take into account that the interaction of brain ECs and astrocytes is bi-directional, and that the other cell types surrounding the brain microvasculature also contribute to BBB function or dysfunction, respectively.4. In conclusion, it is expected that the present and future research focused on molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways will produce new and exciting insights into the complex network of BBB regulation: the cornerstone is laid.

On the self-association potential of transmembrane tight junction proteins

Abstract.Tight junctions seal intercellular clefts via membrane-related strands, hence, maintaining important organ functions. We investigated the self-association of strand-forming transmembrane tight junction proteins. The regulatory tight junction protein occludin was differently tagged and cotransfected in eucaryotic cells. These occludins colocalized within the plasma membrane of the same cell, coprecipitated and exhibited fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Differently tagged strand-forming claudin-5 also colocalized in the plasma membrane of the same cell and showed fluorescence resonance energy transfer. This demonstrates self-association in intact cells both of occludin and claudin-5 in one plasma membrane. In search of dimerizing regions of occludin, dimerization of its cytosolic C-terminal coiledcoil domain was identified. In claudin-5, the second extracellular loop was detected as a dimer. Since the transmembrane junctional adhesion molecule also is known to dimerize, the assumption that homodimerization of transmembrane tight junction proteins may serve as a common structural feature in tight junction assembly is supported.

Transmembrane proteins of the tight junctions at the blood-brain barrier: structural and functional aspects.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by microvascular endothelial cells sealed by tetraspanning tight junction (TJ) proteins, such as claudins and TAMPs (TJ-associated marvel proteins, occludin and tricellulin). Claudins are the major components of the TJs. At the BBB, claudin-5 dominates the TJs by preventing the paracellular permeation of small molecules. On the other hand, TAMPs regulate the structure and function of the TJs; tricellulin may tighten the barrier for large molecules. This review aims at integrating and summarizing the most relevant and recent work on how the BBB is influenced by claudin-1, -3, -5, -12 and the TAMPs occludin and tricellulin, all of which are four-transmembrane TJ proteins. The exact functions of claudin-1, -3, -12 and TAMPs at this barrier still need to be elucidated.

Serum markers support disease-specific glial pathology in major depression

BACKGROUND Recently, it was shown by histopathological studies that mood disorders are characterized by disease-specific glial pathology. METHODS To validate this hypothesis in vivo we measured weekly and simultaneously serum levels of the neuronal marker neuron-specific enolase and S100B, a protein expressed in astro- and oligodendroglia in the human brain, in 10 patients with major depressive disorder and 10 age- and gender-matched control subjects. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic, quantitative meta-analysis of all published studies on S100B involving 193 patients suffering from mood disorders and 132 healthy control subjects by calculating effect sizes. RESULTS S100B was elevated at admission and discharge in our patients with major depression compared with control subjects, whereas there were no significant differences for neuron-specific enolase. During treatment S100B decreased slightly, although this effect was not significant. It had no significant impact on neuron-specific enolase. The meta-analysis revealed that serum levels of S100B are consistently elevated in mood disorders during acute major depressive or manic episodes. Additionally, it demonstrated that serum S100B decreases during antidepressive treatment reliably if clinical improvement is sufficient. LIMITATIONS As the study measured only serum S100B, future (cell culture) studies have to elucidate molecular mechanisms of this protein in mood disorders. Moreover, results have to be replicated in a larger patient group. CONCLUSIONS S100B may represent a biomarker for mood disorders, particularly major depression, and their treatment. Together with unaltered levels of neuron-specific enolase, our results support in vivo the histopathologically generated hypothesis of disease-specific glial pathology in mood disorders.

Molecular determinants of the interaction between clostridium perfringens enterotoxin fragments and claudin-3

Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) binds to the extracellular loop 2 of a subset of claudins, e.g. claudin-3. Here, the molecular mechanism of the CPE-claudin interaction was analyzed. Using peptide arrays, recombinant CPE-(116–319) bound to loop 2 peptides of mouse claudin-3, -6, -7, -9, and -14 but not of 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10–13, 15, 16, 18–20, and 22. Substitution peptide mapping identified the central motif 148NPL150VP, supposed to represent a turn region in the loop 2, as essential for the interaction between CPE and murine claudin-3 peptides. CPE-binding assays with claudin-3 mutant-transfected HEK293 cells or lysates thereof demonstrated the involvement of Asn148 and Leu150 of full-length claudin-3 in the binding. CPE-(116–319) and CPE-(194–319) bound to HEK293 cells expressing claudin-3, whereas CPE-(116–319) bound to claudin-5-expressing HEK293 cells, also. This binding was inhibited by substitutions T151A and Q156E in claudin-5. In contrast, removal of the aromatic side chains in the loop 2 of claudin-3 and -5, involved in trans-interaction between claudins, increased the amount of CPE-(116–319) bound. These findings and molecular modeling indicate different molecular mechanisms of claudin-claudin trans-interaction and claudin-CPE interaction. Confocal microscopy showed that CPE-(116–319) and CPE-(194–319) bind to claudin-3 at the plasma membrane, outside cell-cell contacts. Together, these findings demonstrate that CPE binds to the hydrophobic turn and flanking polar residues in the loop 2 of claudin-3 outside tight junctions. The data can be used for the specific design of CPE-based modulators of tight junctions, to improve drug delivery, and as chemotherapeutics for tumors overexpressing claudins.

S100B is increased in mood disorders and may be reduced by antidepressive treatment

Previous studies have reported alterations of glial cells and particularly astrocytes in mood disorders. Therefore, serum concentration of the astrocytic marker S100B was ascertained with an immunoluminometric assay in 20 patients with mood disorder and 12 healthy age-matched controls. Serum S100B was elevated in major depression (median after admission 410 ng/l, at discharge < 100 ng/l) and mania (130, 160 ng/l), when compared with controls (< 100 ng/l; p < 0.01). Antidepressive treatment reduced S100B in conjunction with severity of depressive symptoms (p < 0.01). The severity of depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) was positively correlated with S100B (rs = 0.51, p < 0.005). Elevated serum S100B during depressive and manic episodes of mood disorders may indicate alterations of astrocytes, which are reversed by antidepressive treatment.

Nitric oxide protects blood-brain barrier in vitro from hypoxia/reoxygenation-mediated injury.

A cell culture model of blood‐brain barrier (BBB, coculture of rat brain endothelial cells with rat astrocytes) was used to investigate the effect of nitric oxide (⋅NO) on the damage of the BBB induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R). Permeability coefficient of fluorescein across the endothelium was used as a marker of BBB tightness. The permeability coefficient increased 5.2 times after H/R indicating strong disruption of the BBB. The presence of the ⋅NO donor S‐nitroso‐N‐acetylpenicillamine (SNAP, 30 μM), authentic ⋅NO (6 μM) or superoxide dismutase (50 units/ml) during H/R attenuated H/R‐induced increase in permeability. 30 μM SNAP or 6 μM ⋅NO did not influence the function of BBB during normoxia, however, severe disruption was observed using 150 μM of SNAP and more than 24 μM of ⋅NO. After H/R of endothelial cells, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) increased 2.3 times indicating radical‐induced peroxidation of membrane lipids. 30 μM SNAP or 6 μM authentic ⋅NO completely prevented MDA formation. The results show that ⋅NO may effectively scavenge reactive oxygen species formed during H/R of brain capillary endothelial cells, affording protection of BBB at the molecular and functional level.

Astrocytes enhance radical defence in capillary endothelial cells constituting the blood-brain barrier.

Astrocytes (AC) induce blood‐brain barrier (BBB) properties in brain endothelial cells (EC). As antioxidative activity (AOA) is assumed to be a BBB characteristic, we tested whether AC improve AOA of EC. Monocultivated AC showed higher AOA [manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (Cat), glutathione peroxidase (GPx)] than EC. Cocultivation elevated AOA in EC (MnSOD, CuZnSOD, Cat, GPx), and AC (MnSOD, CuZnSOD, GPx). Hypoxia increased radical‐induced membrane lipid peroxidation in monocultivated, but not in cocultivated EC. Thus, EC/AC cocultivation intensifies AOA in both cell types, protects the EC, and therefore, the BBB against oxidative stress. The high AOA is regarded as an essential property of the BBB, which is induced by AC.