Irene Gullo

Histopathological, Molecular, and Genetic Profile of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: Current Knowledge and Challenges for the Future

Familial clustering is seen in 10u2009% of gastric cancer cases and approximately 1-3u2009% of gastric cancer arises in the setting of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). In families with HDGC, gastric cancer presents at young age. HDGC is predominantly caused by germline mutations in CDH1 and in a minority by mutations in other genes, including CTNNA1. Early stage HDGC is characterized by a few, up to dozens of intramucosal foci of signet ring cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions. These include in situ signet ring cell carcinoma and pagetoid spread of signet ring cells. Advanced HDGC presents as poorly cohesive/diffuse type carcinoma, normally with very few typical signet ring cells, and has a poor prognosis. Currently, it is unknown which factors drive the progression towards aggressive disease, but it is clear that most intramucosal lesions will not have such progression.Immunohistochemical profile of early and advanced HDGC is often characterized by abnormal E-cadherin immunoexpression, including absent or reduced membranous expression, as well as dotted or cytoplasmic expression. However, membranous expression of E-cadherin does not exclude HDGC. Intramucosal HDGC (pT1a) presents with an indolent phenotype, characterized by typical signet ring cells without immunoexpression of Ki-67 and p53, while advanced carcinomas (pTu2009>u20091) display an aggressive phenotype with pleomorphic cells, that are immunoreactive for Ki-67 and p53. These features show that the IHC profile is different between intramucosal and more advanced HDGC, providing evidence of phenotypic heterogeneity, and may help to define predictive biomarkers of progression from indolent to aggressive, widely invasive carcinomas.

Epithelial dysplasia of the stomach with gastric immunophenotype shows features of biological aggressiveness.

BackgroundGastric dysplasia is classified as adenomatous/type I (intestinal phenotype) and foveolar or pyloric/type II (gastric phenotype) according to morphological (architectural and cytological) features. The immunophenotypic classification of dysplasia, based on the expression of the mucins, CD10 and CDX2, recognizes the following immunophenotypes: intestinal (MUC2, CD10, and CDX2); gastric (MUC5AC and/or MUC6, absence of CD10, and absent or low expression of CDX2); hybrid (gastric and intestinal markers); and null.MethodsSixty-six cases of nonpolypoid epithelial dysplasia of the stomach were classified according to morphological features (histotype and grade) and immunophenotype. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CD10, CDX2, chromogranin, synaptophysin, Ki-67, and TP53. HER2 alterations were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization.ResultsBy conventional histology, dysplasia was classified as adenomatous/intestinal (nxa0=xa042; 64xa0%) and foveolar or pyloric/gastric (nxa0=xa024; 36xa0%) and graded as low grade (nxa0=xa037; 56xa0%) or high grade (nxa0=xa029; 44xa0%). Immunophenotypic classification showed intestinal (nxa0=xa022; 33.3xa0%), gastric (nxa0=xa025; 37.9xa0%), hybrid (nxa0=xa017; 25.8xa0%), or null (nxa0=xa02; 3.0xa0%) phenotypes. In 20 cases a coexistent intramucosal carcinoma was identified. The intestinal immunophenotype was shown to be significantly associated with low-grade dysplasia (pxa0=xa00.001), high expression of CDX2 (pxa0=xa00.015), TP53 (pxa0=xa00.034), synaptophysin (pxa0=xa00.003), and chromogranin (pxa0<xa00.0001); the gastric immunophenotype was significantly associated with high-grade dysplasia (pxa0=xa00.001), high Ki-67 proliferative index (pxa0=xa00.05), and coexistence of intramucosal carcinoma (pxa0=xa00.013). HER2 amplification was observed in 3 cases, typed as gastric or hybrid.ConclusionsEpithelial nonpolypoid dysplasia of the stomach with gastric immunophenotype shows features of biological aggressiveness and may represent the putative precursor lesion in a pathway of gastric carcinogenesis originated de novo from the native gastric mucosa, leading to gastric-type adenocarcinoma.

Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: From Pure Morphology to Molecular Classifications.

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a global health concern. Despite advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, GC is still the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with more than 720,000 estimated deaths in 2012. Overall survival for advanced disease is about 1 year, a dismal prognosis that is partly due to the high levels of biological heterogeneity found in GC. Indeed, GC is a highly heterogeneous disease from morphological and molecular standpoints. The numerous histological and molecular classifications currently available reflect such heterogeneity. Although recent high-throughput studies cluster the molecular data obtained into subgroups with clinical relevance, we still need a practical, prognostic, and predictive classification system, integrating morphological and molecular features, towards the identification of novel therapeutic targets. It is noteworthy that GC heterogeneity encompasses not only interpatient variability (intertumour heterogeneity), but also variations within the same tumour (intratumour heterogeneity). The latter encompasses spatial heterogeneity (in different tumour areas) and temporal heterogeneity (along progression from primary to recurrent and/or metastatic disease). In this review, we analyse the morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular heterogeneity in GC as the basis for a better understanding of the disease, and discuss the practical implications for diagnostic pathology, prognostic evaluation, and precision therapy.

KRAS mutations in microsatellite instable gastric tumours: impact of targeted treatment and intratumoural heterogeneity.

In gastric cancer (GC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression associates with poor prognosis. Addition of a chimeric monoclonal antibody against EGFR (cetuximab) to first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal tumours improved outcomes of patients (stratified for KRAS wild-type cancers), whereas GC patients did not benefit from this approach. In GC, however, stratification based on KRAS mutations was not performed, and the 30xa0% KRAS mutation frequency in microsatellite instable cancers (MSI), which represents ∼4xa0% of total GC, was disregarded. Further, intratumoural heterogeneity regarding KRAS mutant subpopulations might also contribute to anti-EGFR therapy failure. We assessed the mutational status of the entire KRAS coding sequence in 19 MSI-GC cases by multiplex PCR/sequencing and used peak height ratio determined from electropherograms from KRAS heterozygous mutants and histopathological evaluation to infer tumour heterogeneity in GC. Using 2 multiplex reactions per sample, we found that 26xa0% (5/19) of MSI-GC cases harboured KRAS mutations (2 G12D, 2 G13D, 1 G12V). No mutations were found outside the codon 12 and 13 hotspots. Our analysis supported the co-existence of KRAS-positive and KRAS-negative tumour populations in 4/5 MSI-GC cases. In conclusion, the method developed stands as a cost-effective and practical way for mutation screening of the entire KRAS coding sequence. KRAS mutations are frequent in our series of MSI cases and are often found in a subpopulation of the tumour and not in the whole tumour. Further studies are needed to access the implications of this heterogeneity in KRAS mutant and wild-type tumour clones in anti-EGFR therapy response.

The Transcriptomic Landscape of Gastric Cancer: Insights into Epstein-Barr Virus Infected and Microsatellite Unstable Tumors

Background: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) positive and microsatellite unstable (MSI-high) gastric cancer (GC) are molecular subgroups with distinctive molecular profiles. We explored the transcriptomic differences between EBV+ and MSI-high GCs, and the expression of current GC immunotherapy targets such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4 and Dies1/VISTA. Methods: Using Nanostring Technology and comparative bioinformatics, we analyzed the expression of 499 genes in 46 GCs, classified either as EBV positive (EBER in situ hybridization) or MSI-high (PCR/fragment analysis). PD-L1 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: From the 46 GCs, 27 tested MSI-high/EBV−, 15 tested MSS/EBV+ and four tested MSS/EBV−. The Nanostring CodeSet could segregate GCs according to MSI and, to a lesser extent, EBV status. Functional annotation of differentially expressed genes associated MSI-high/EBV− GCs with mitotic activity and MSS/EBV+ GCs with immune response. PD-L1 protein expression, evaluated in stromal immune cells, was lower in MSI-high/EBV− GCs. High mRNA expression of PD-1, CTLA4 and Dies1/VISTA and distinctive PD-1/PD-L1 co-expression patterns (PD-1high/PD-L1low, PD-1high/PDL1high) were associated with MSS/EBV+ molecular subtype and gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) morphological features. Conclusions: EBV+ and MSI-high GCs present distinct transcriptomic profiles. GCLS/EBV+ cases frequently present co-expression of multiple immunotherapy targets, a finding with putative therapeutic implications.

Phenotypic heterogeneity of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: report of a family with early-onset disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMSnThe time course for the development of clinically significant hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is unpredictable. Little is known about the progression from preclinical, indolent lesions to widely invasive, aggressive phenotypes. Gastroendoscopy often fails to detect early lesions, and risk-reducing/prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) is the only curative approach. We present an HDGC family with early-onset disease in which clinical and histologic findings provided insight into the understanding of different HDGC phenotypes.nnnMETHODSnThe proband was diagnosed at age 18 years with widely invasive, metastatic DGC. CDH1 genetic testing identified a pathogenic, germline CDH1 variant (c.1901C>T, p.Ala634Val). Thirty family members were tested, and 15 CDH1 carriers were identified.nnnRESULTSnSix family members had PTG, with negative preoperative workup. The probands 14-year-old sister is the youngest patient, reported to date, to have PTG after negative preoperative biopsy sampling. Intramucosal HDGC foci were detected in all PTG specimens (1-33). In contrast to the indolent phenotype of these foci, the aggressive DGC from the proband showed pleomorphic cells, absent E-cadherin expression, increased proliferation (Ki-67 index), and activation of oncogenic events (p53, pSrc and pStat3 overexpression). All family members had Helicobacterxa0pylori gastritis. Cag-A-positive strains were detected in all specimens, except in the probands sister.nnnCONCLUSIONSnHDGC is a heterogeneous disease regarding clinical behavior, endoscopic findings, histopathologic features, and immunophenotypic/molecular profile. The presence of bizarre, pleomorphic cells in endoscopic biopsy specimens is suggestive of advanced disease and should prompt clinical intervention. The involvement of a full multidisciplinary team is essential for the management of these patients.

Hereditary gastrointestinal carcinomas and their precursors: An algorithm for genetic testing

Recognition of hereditary forms of gastrointestinal cancer is of great importance for patients and their families and pathologists play a crucial role in this. This review recapitulates the clinical, pathological and molecular aspects of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Proximal Polyposis of the Stomach, as well as hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes (including Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and Juvenile Polyposis syndrome). Histopathological clues to recognize hereditary forms of gastrointestinal cancer and possible ancillary studies that can support an underlying syndrome and guide genetic testing are discussed.

New insights into the inflamed tumor immune microenvironment of gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma: from morphology and digital analysis to gene expression

BackgroundGastric cancer with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) is characterized by prominent stromal infiltration of T-lymphocytes. The aim of this study was to investigate GCLS biology through analysis of clinicopathological features, EBV infection, microsatellite instability (MSI), immune gene-expression profiling and PD-L1 status in neoplastic cells and tumor immune microenvironment.MethodsTwenty-four GCLSs were analyzed by RNA in situ hybridization for EBV (EBER), PCR/fragment analysis for MSI, immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, cytokeratin, CD3, CD8), co-immunofluorescence (CK/PD-L1, CD68/PD-L1), NanoString gene-expression assay for immune-related genes and PD-L1 copy number alterations. CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were calculated by digital analysis. Fifty-four non-GCLSs were used as control group.ResultsGCLSs displayed distinctive clinicopathological features, such as lower pTNM stage (pu2009=u20090.02) and better overall survival (pu2009=u20090.01). EBV+ or MSI-high phenotype was found in 66.7 and 16.7% cases, respectively. GCLSs harbored a cytotoxic T-cell-inflamed profile, particularly at the invasive front of tumors (pu2009<u20090.01) and in EBV+ cases (pu2009=u20090.01). EBV+ GCLSs, when compared to EBV− GCLSs, showed higher mRNA expression of genes related to Th1/cytotoxic and immunosuppressive biomarkers. PD-L1 protein expression, observed in neoplastic and immune stromal cells (33.3 and 91.7%, respectively), and PD-L1 amplification (18.8%) were restricted to EBV+/MSI-high tumors and correlated with high values of PD-L1 mRNA expression.ConclusionsThis study shows that GCLS has a distinctive clinico-pathological and molecular profile. Furthermore, through an in-depth study of tumor immune microenvironment—by digital analysis and mRNA expression profiling—it highlights the role of EBV infection in promoting an inflamed tumor microenvironment, with putative therapeutic implications.

The Curious Case of Pseudocysts in Breast Cancer Specimens: An Alteration Associated With Hydrogel-Based Breast Biopsy Markers:

Communication between pathologists and clinicians is of the utmost importance for an adequate interpretation of histopathological findings. In early 2018, we started to observe, in breast cancer specimens of patients submitted to neoadjuvant treatment or with small or mammographic detected lesions, an unusual pathological finding. It consisted of pseudocystic lesions, lined by epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleate foreign body giant cells (Figure 1). The pseudocyst contained a basophilic substance, resembling mucinous material. The wall had minimal fibrosis and histiocytic infiltrate, sometimes with abundant hemosiderin pigment (Figure 1). It was common to find such lesions in close proximity to neoplastic lesions (carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma) or lymph nodes (Figure 2). Due to these unusual findings, we discussed with a surgeon of our multidisciplinary team what type of material was being used, that could be related to those alterations. Together, and after literature research, we came to the conclusion that such pseudocysts corresponded to a foreign body reaction to hydrogel-based, detectable breast biopsy markers. The histological pseudomucinous content, observed within the pseudocysts, correlates to the hydrogel component. These sonographically detectable devices, used to mark the lesion(s) for resection, have been recently introduced at our hospital. They are composed of a biodegradable hydrogel polymer and a central permanent metal marker, which accurately mark the breast lesion (HydroMark; Figure 3). The very small dimension of the device might be the reason for the failure of macroscopic detection in most cases. 769377 IJSXXX10.1177/1066896918769377International Journal of Surgical PathologyMarques et al research-article2018

Pathological features of total gastrectomy specimens from asymptomatic hereditary diffuse gastric cancer patients and implications for clinical management

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterised by multigenerational diffuse gastric cancer, and is mainly caused by germline alterations in the CDH1 gene. Currently, endoscopy has limited diagnostic accuracy, and total gastrectomy (TG) is the treatment of choice for asymptomatic CDH1 carriers. In this study, we aimed to obtain a better understanding of HDGC syndrome by exploring the histopathological findings of TG specimens from asymptomatic HDGC patients. A comprehensive literature review was carried out, searching for TGs performed in asymptomatic HDGC patients. Fourteen unpublished cases, analysed in our institution, were also included. The series encompassed 174 CDH1 carriers. Preoperative endoscopic biopsies were positive in 28.3%. A macroscopic lesion was apparent in 11.7% of TGs. Histopathological analysis revealed intraepithelial lesions and/or intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma in 87.9% of TGs. When we explored the type of protocol used for handling the specimens, we found that microscopic cancer foci were detected in 95.3% of TGs when a total‐embedding protocol (assessment of the totality of gastric mucosa) was applied, and only in 62.5% when no specific protocol was used (P < 0.001). Helicobacter pylori infection was found in 23.4% cases. In conclusion, a thorough histopathological examination of gastric mucosa remains the gold standard for detection of cancer foci in HDGC gastrectomy specimens, requiring experienced pathologists for an accurate diagnosis. A better understanding of the natural history of HDGC will enable better clinical management of HDGC patients, particularly regarding the optimal timing for the performance of TG.