Iva Bruhova
McMaster University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Iva Bruhova.
Molecular Pharmacology | 2007
Christian Lerche; Iva Bruhova; Holger Lerche; Klaus Steinmeyer; Aguan D. Wei; Nathalie Strutz-Seebohm; Florian Lang; Andreas E. Busch; Boris S. Zhorov; Guiscard Seebohm
The chromanol 293B (293B, trans-6-cyano-4-(N-ethylsulfonyl-N-methylamino)-3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-chroman) is a lead compound of potential class III antiarrhythmics that inhibit cardiac IKs potassium channels. These channels are formed by the coassembly of KCNQ1 (Kv7.1, KvLQT1) and KCNE1 subunits. Although homomeric KCNQ1 channels are the principal molecular targets, entry of KCNE1 to the channel complex enhances the chromanol block. Because closely related neuronal KCNQ2 potassium channels are insensitive to the drug, we used KCNQ1/KCNQ2 chimeras to identify the binding site of the inhibitor. We localized the putative drug receptor to the H5 selectivity filter and the S6 transmembrane segment. Single residues affecting 293B inhibition were subsequently identified through systematic exchange of amino acids that were either different in KCNQ1 and KCNQ2 or predicted by a docking model of 293B in the open and closed conformation of KCNQ1. Mutant channel proteins T312S, I337V, and F340Y displayed dramatically lowered sensitivity to chromanol block. The predicted drug binding receptor lies in the inner pore vestibule containing the lower part of the selectivity filter, and the S6 transmembrane domain also reported to be important for binding of benzodiazepines. We propose that the block of the ion permeation pathway involves hydrophobic interactions with the S6 transmembrane residues Ile337 and Phe340, and stabilization of chromanol 293B binding through electrostatic interactions of its oxygen atoms with the most internal potassium ion within the selectivity filter.
Molecular Pharmacology | 2008
Iva Bruhova; Denis B. Tikhonov; Boris S. Zhorov
Local anesthetics (LAs) are known to bind Na+ channels in the closed, open, and inactivated states and reach their binding sites via extracellular and intracellular access pathways. Despite intensive studies, no atomic-scale theory is available to explain the diverse experimental data on the LA actions. Here we attempt to contribute to this theory by simulating access and binding of LAs in the KcsA-based homology model of the closed Na+ channel. We used Monte Carlo minimizations to model the channel with representative local anesthetics N-(2,6-dimethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl)triethylammonium (QX-314), cocaine, and tetracaine. We found the nucleophilic central cavity to be a common binding region for the ammonium group of LAs, whose aromatic group can extend either along the pore axis (vertical binding mode) or to the III/IV domain interface (horizontal binding mode). The vertical mode was earlier predicted for the open channel, but only the horizontal mode is consistent with mutational data on the closed-channel block. To explore hypothetical access pathways of the permanently charged QX-314, we pulled the ligand via the selectivity filter, the closed activation gate, and the III/IV domain interface. Only the last pathway, which leads to the horizontal binding mode, did not impose steric obstacles. The LA ammonium group mobility within the central cavity was more restricted in the vertical mode than in the horizontal mode. Therefore, occupation of the selectivity-filter DEKA locus by a Na+ ion destabilizes the vertical mode, thus favoring the horizontal mode. LA binding in the closed channel requires the resident Na+ ion to leave the nucleophilic central cavity through the selectivity filter, whereas the LA egress should be coupled with reoccupation of the cavity by Na+. This hypothesis on the coupled movement of Na+ and LA in the closed channel explains seemingly contradictory data on how the outer-pore mutations as well as tetrodotoxin and μ-conotoxin binding affect the ingress and egress of LAs.
FEBS Letters | 2006
Denis B. Tikhonov; Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
Molecular modeling predicts that a local anesthetic (LA) lidocaine binds to the resting and open Nav1.5 in different modes, interacting with LA‐sensing residues known from experiments. Besides the major pathway via the open activation gate, LAs can reach the inner pore via a “sidewalk” between D3S6, D4S6, and D3P. The ammonium group of a cationic LA binds in the focus of the pore‐helices macrodipoles, which also stabilize a Na+ ion chelated by two benzocaine molecules. The LAs cationic group and a Na+ ion in the selectivity filter repel each other suggesting that the Na+ depletion upon slow inactivation would stabilize a LA, while a LA would stabilize slow‐inactivated states.
BMC Structural Biology | 2007
Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
BackgroundCorreolide, a nortriterpene isolated from the Costa Rican tree Spachea correa, is a novel immunosuppressant, which blocks Kv1.3 channels in human T lymphocytes. Earlier mutational studies suggest that correolide binds in the channel pore. Correolide has several nucleophilic groups, but the pore-lining helices in Kv1.3 are predominantly hydrophobic raising questions about the nature of correolide-channel interactions.ResultsWe employed the method of Monte Carlo (MC) with energy minimization to search for optimal complexes of correolide in Kv1.2-based models of the open Kv1.3 with potassium binding sites 2/4 or 1/3/5 loaded with K+ ions. The energy was MC-minimized from many randomly generated starting positions and orientations of the ligand. In all the predicted low-energy complexes, oxygen atoms of correolide chelate a K+ ion. Correolide-sensing residues known from mutational analysis along with the ligand-bound K+ ion provide major contributions to the ligand-binding energy. Deficiency of K+ ions in the selectivity filter of C-type inactivated Kv1.3 would stabilize K+-bound correolide in the inner pore.ConclusionOur study explains the paradox that cationic and nucleophilic ligands bind to the same region in the inner pore of K+ channels and suggests that a K+ ion is an important determinant of the correolide receptor and possibly receptors of other nucleophilic blockers of the inner pore of K+ channels.
The Journal of General Physiology | 2010
Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
In the absence of x-ray structures of calcium channels, their homology models are used to rationalize experimental data and design new experiments. The modeling relies on sequence alignments between calcium and potassium channels. Zhen et al. (2005. J. Gen. Physiol. doi:10.1085/jgp.200509292) used the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) to identify pore-lining residues in the Cav2.1 channel and concluded that their data are inconsistent with the symmetric architecture of the pore domain and published sequence alignments between calcium and potassium channels. Here, we have built Kv1.2-based models of the Cav2.1 channel with 2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSET)-modified engineered cysteines and used Monte Carlo energy minimizations to predict their energetically optimal orientations. We found that depending on the position of an engineered cysteine in S6 and S5 helices, the ammonium group in the long flexible MTSET-modified side chain can orient into the inner pore, an interface between domains (repeats), or an interface between S5 and S6 helices. Different local environments of equivalent positions in the four repeats can lead to different SCAM results. The reported current inhibition by MTSET generally decreases with the predicted distances between the ammonium nitrogen and the pore axis. A possible explanation for outliers of this correlation is suggested. Our calculations rationalize the SCAM data, validate one of several published sequence alignments between calcium and potassium channels, and suggest similar spatial dispositions of S5 and S6 helices in voltage-gated potassium and calcium channels.
Biophysical Journal | 2005
Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
Biophysical Journal | 2013
Denis B. Tikhonov; Iva Bruhova; Daniel P. Garden; Boris S. Zhorov
Biophysical Journal | 2010
Daniel P. Garden; Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
Biophysical Journal | 2009
Iva Bruhova; Boris S. Zhorov
Biophysical Journal | 2011
Snehal V. Jadey; Prasad Purohit; Iva Bruhova; Timothy M. Gregg; Anthony Auerbach