Iwona K. Wower

Binding and cross‐linking of tmRNA to ribosomal protein S1, on and off the Escherichia coli ribosome

UV irradiation of an in vitro translation mixture induced cross‐linking of 4‐thioU‐substituted tmRNA to Escherichia coli ribosomes by forming covalent complexes with ribosomal protein S1 and 16S rRNA. In the absence of S1, tmRNA was unable to bind and label ribosomal components. Mobility assays on native gels demonstrated that protein S1 bound to tmRNA with an apparent binding constant of 1 × 108 M−1. A mutant tmRNA, lacking the tag coding region and pseudoknots pk2, pk3 and pk4, did not compete with full‐length tmRNA, indicating that this region is required for S1 binding. This was confirmed by identification of eight cross‐linked nucleotides: U85, located before the resume codon of tmRNA; U105, in the mRNA portion of tmRNA; U172 in pK2; U198, U212, U230 and U240 in pk3; and U246, in the junction between pk3 and pk4. We concluded that ribosomal protein S1, in concert with the previously identified elongation factor EF‐Tu and protein SmpB, plays an important role in tmRNA‐mediated trans‐translation by facilitating the binding of tmRNA to ribosomes and forming complexes with free tmRNA.

The tmRDB and SRPDB resources.

Maintained at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Texas, the tmRNA database (tmRDB) is accessible at the URL with mirror sites located at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama () and the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark (). The signal recognition particle database (SRPDB) at is mirrored at and the University of Goteborg (). The databases assist in investigations of the tmRNP (a ribonucleoprotein complex which liberates stalled bacterial ribosomes) and the SRP (a particle which recognizes signal sequences and directs secretory proteins to cell membranes). The curated tmRNA and SRP RNA alignments consider base pairs supported by comparative sequence analysis. Also shown are alignments of the tmRNA-associated proteins SmpB, ribosomal protein S1, alanyl-tRNA synthetase and Elongation Factor Tu, as well as the SRP proteins SRP9, SRP14, SRP19, SRP21, SRP54 (Ffh), SRP68, SRP72, cpSRP43, Flhf, SRP receptor (alpha) and SRP receptor (beta). All alignments can be easily examined using a new exploratory browser. The databases provide links to high-resolution structures and serve as depositories for structures obtained by molecular modeling.

Visualizing the transfer‐messenger RNA as the ribosome resumes translation

Bacterial ribosomes stalled by truncated mRNAs are rescued by transfer‐messenger RNA (tmRNA), a dual‐function molecule that contains a tRNA‐like domain (TLD) and an internal open reading frame (ORF). Occupying the empty A site with its TLD, the tmRNA enters the ribosome with the help of elongation factor Tu and a protein factor called small protein B (SmpB), and switches the translation to its own ORF. In this study, using cryo‐electron microscopy, we obtained the first structure of an in vivo‐formed complex containing ribosome and the tmRNA at the point where the TLD is accommodated into the ribosomal P site. We show that tmRNA maintains a stable ‘arc and fork’ structure on the ribosome when its TLD moves to the ribosomal P site and translation resumes on its ORF. Based on the density map, we built an atomic model, which suggests that SmpB interacts with the five nucleotides immediately upstream of the resume codon, thereby determining the correct selection of the reading frame on the ORF of tmRNA.

Comparative 3-D Modeling of tmRNA

BackgroundTrans- translation releases stalled ribosomes from truncated mRNAs and tags defective proteins for proteolytic degradation using transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). This small stable RNA represents a hybrid of tRNA- and mRNA-like domains connected by a variable number of pseudoknots. Comparative sequence analysis of tmRNAs found in bacteria, plastids, and mitochondria provides considerable insights into their secondary structures. Progress toward understanding the molecular mechanism of template switching, which constitutes an essential step in trans- translation, is hampered by our limited knowledge about the three-dimensional folding of tmRNA.ResultsTo facilitate experimental testing of the molecular intricacies of trans- translation, which often require appropriately modified tmRNA derivatives, we developed a procedure for building three-dimensional models of tmRNA. Using comparative sequence analysis, phylogenetically-supported 2-D structures were obtained to serve as input for the program ERNA-3D. Motifs containing loops and turns were extracted from the known structures of other RNAs and used to improve the tmRNA models. Biologically feasible 3-D models for the entire tmRNA molecule could be obtained. The models were characterized by a functionally significant close proximity between the tRNA-like domain and the resume codon. Potential conformational changes which might lead to a more open structure of tmRNA upon binding to the ribosome are discussed. The method, described in detail for the tmRNAs of Escherichia coli, Bacillus anthracis, and Caulobacter crescentus, is applicable to every tmRNA.ConclusionImproved molecular models of biological significance were obtained. These models will guide in the design of experiments and provide a better understanding of trans- translation. The comparative procedure described here for tmRNA is easily adopted for the modeling the members of other RNA families.

Contribution of the Second OB Fold of Ribosomal Protein S1 from Escherichia coli to the Recognition of TmRNA

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 is composed of six repeating homologous oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold (OB folds). In trans-translation, S1 plays a role in delivering transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) to stalled ribosomes. The second OB fold of S1 was found to be protected from tryptic digestion in the presence of tmRNA. Truncated S1 mutant Δ2, in which the first and second OB folds were deleted, showed significantly decreased tmRNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the E. coli S1 homolog (BS1) from Bacillus subtilis, which corresponds to the four C-terminal OB folds of E. coli S1, showed no interaction with E. coli tmRNA, as judged by the results of a gel shift assay. Surface plasmon resonance analysis revealed that mutant Δ2 and BS1 had decreased association rate constants (ka, 0.59×103 M−1·S−1; and ka, 1.89×103 M−1·S−1), while they retained the respective dissociation rate constants (kd, 0.67×10−3 S−1; and kd, 0.53×10−3 S−1), in comparison with wild-type protein S1 (ka, 3.32×103 M−1·S−1; and kd, 0.56×10−3 S−1). These results suggest that the second OB fold in protein S1 is essential for the recognition of tmRNA, while the four C-terminal OB folds play a role in stabilizing the S1–tmRNA complex.

Ribosomal Protein S1: An Important Trans-Translational Factor

S1 is an essential protein in Escherichia coli. Although not present in all bacteria, its importance for the initiation and elongation stages of protein synthesis is well established. Beside its roles as a ribosomal protein, S1 promotes transcriptional cycling, regulates bacteriophage T4 gene expression, forms a complex with the phage. λ protein β involved in recombination, and is a subunit of the fr and Qβ RNA bacteriophage replicases. Protein S1 was also shown to bind to tmRNA, an essential component of trans-translation. Although the physiological significance of protein S1 for trans-translation has been debated for many years, recent studies clearly demonstrate that protein S1 constitutes an important, yet poorly understood component of trans-translation. We show that binding of protein S1 to the free tmRNA is a prerequisite for the association between tmRNA and stalled ribosome. S1 transits the ribosome together with the tmRNA as defective proteins are targeted for proteolysis. These findings establish protein S1 as an important target for pharmacological intervention.

Comparative structural studies of bovine viral diarrhea virus IRES RNA

The internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) RNA of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) has been implicated in virus propagation. To gain insight into the structure and potential function of the BVDV IRES RNA, we collected and aligned 663 of its sequences. Compensatory Watson-Crick and wobble G·U pairs were investigated to establish phylogenetically supported secondary structures for each of the BVDV IRES RNA sequences. The extensively folded BVDV IRES RNAs were composed of helices 2, 3 and 4. Helix 2 consisted of five helical sections. Helix 3 contained sections 3a to 3j as well as six helical insertions 3.1-3.6. Sections 3a and 3b together with helices 3.6 and 4 formed an RNA pseudoknot. Two highly variable regions corresponded to hairpins 3j and 3.4. Three-dimensional modeling of the BVDV-1b strain Osloss IRES RNA predicted an elongated structure with approximate dimensions of 170 Å by 65 Å by 90 Å. The model of the IRES RNA-ribosome complex suggested proximity between helix 2 of the BVDV IRES and ribosomal proteins S5 and S25.

Requirements for resuming translation in chimeric transfer-messenger RNAs of Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis

BackgroundTrans-translation is catalyzed by ribonucleprotein complexes composed of SmpB protein and transfer-messenger RNA. They release stalled ribosomes from truncated mRNAs and tag defective proteins for proteolytic degradation. Comparative sequence analysis of bacterial tmRNAs provides considerable insights into their secondary structures in which a tRNA-like domain and an mRNA-like region are connected by a variable number of pseudoknots. Progress toward understanding the molecular mechanism of trans-translation is hampered by our limited knowledge about the structure of tmRNA:SmpB complexes.ResultsComplexes consisting of M. tuberculosis tmRNA and E. coli SmpB tag truncated proteins poorly in E. coli. In contrast, the tagging activity of E. coli tmRNA is well supported by M. tuberculosis SmpB that is expressed in E. coli. To investigate this incompatibility, we constructed 12 chimeric tmRNA molecules composed of structural features derived from both E. coli and M. tuberculosis. Our studies demonstrate that replacing the hp5-pk2-pk3-pk4 segment of E. coli tmRNA with the equivalent segment of M. tuberculosis tmRNA has no significant effect on the tagging efficiency of chimeric tmRNAs in the presence of E. coli SmpB. Replacing either helices 2b-2d, the single-stranded part of the ORF, pk1, or residues 79–89 of E. coli tmRNA with the equivalent features of M. tuberculosis tmRNA yields chimeric tmRNAs that are tagged at 68 to 88 percent of what is observed with E. coli tmRNA. Exchanging segments composed of either pk1 and the single-stranded segment upstream of the ORF or helices 2b-2d and pk1 results in markedly impaired tagging activity.ConclusionOur observations demonstrate the existence of functionally important but as yet uncharacterized structural constraints in the segment of tmRNA that connects its TLD to the ORF used for resuming translation. As trans-translation is important for the survival of M. tuberculosis, our work provides a new target for pharmacological intervention against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

In silico analysis of IRES RNAs of foot-and-mouth disease virus and related picornaviruses

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) uses an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), a highly structured segment of its genomic RNA, to hijack the translational apparatus of an infected host. Computational analysis of 162 type II picornavirus IRES RNA sequences yielded secondary structures that included only base pairs supported by comparative or experimental evidence. The deduced helical sections provided the foundation for a hypothetical three-dimensional model of FMDV IRES RNA. The model was further constrained by incorporation of data derived from chemical modification and enzymatic probing of IRES RNAs as well as high-resolution information about IRES RNA-bound proteins.