J. Berille

A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

This was an open-label randomized Phase III study of 207 patients with either unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with docetaxel plus best supportive care (BSC) or best supportive care alone. Patients in the chemotherapy arm of the study received docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1 h intravenous infusion every 21 days until they showed evidence of progressive disease, or estimated maximum benefit obtained or unacceptable side effects. Patients who received docetaxel were pretreated with oral dexamethasone. Patients in the BSC arm should not receive chemotherapy or anticancer therapy except for palliative radiotherapy. Overall survival obtained in the docetaxel arm was significantly longer than in the BSC arm (P=0.026). Two-year survival in the docetaxel arm was 12%, whereas none of the BSC patients survived after 20 months. The response rate was 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5-18.8%). There was a significantly longer time to progression in the docetaxel versus the BSC arm (P<0.001), and statistically significant improvement of clinical symptoms with docetaxel compared to BSC. The quality-of-life descriptors were in favor of docetaxel, and the difference was significant for pain, dyspnea and emotional functioning. The safety profile of docetaxel for this study was similar to that already reported in this patient population.

Phase II study of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine daily practice

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first- and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under routine clinical conditions. Two hundred and three patients with advanced NSCLC received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks, with oral corticosteroid pre-medication, of whom 173 were eligible. Median age was 60 (29-78) years and median Karnofsky performance status was 80% (60-100). A total of 77% of patients had metastatic disease, 33% had bone metastases and 18% had liver metastases. The treatment was second-line or more for 72 patients (35%). Overall response rates in the eligible population were 19.7% [95% CI, 12.5-23.0] for both treatments, 22.6% for first-line treatment and 13.8% for second-line treatment. Median survival was 8.3 months and 1-year survival was 35% for the overall population (8.7 months and 38%, respectively, for patients receiving first-line treatment and 7.2 months and 27%, respectively, for patients receiving second-line treatment). Neutropenia, grade 3 and 4, occurred in 57% of the cycles and 5% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Alopecia (62% of patients), neuro-sensory symptoms (32%), asthenia (28%), diarrhea (22%), nausea (22%) and nail disorders (20%) were the most common non-hematological adverse effects. A total of 33% of patients suffered fluid retention, despite the use of corticosteroid pre-medication, but this was only severe in 1.5% of patients. It was possible to confirm the efficacy of docetaxel as a single agent for first- and second-line chemotherapy in a large patient population treated in a community setting.

Phase II study of nitrosourea fotemustine as single-drug chemotherapy in poor-prognosis non-small-cell lung cancer.

A phase II study was designed to evaluate objective response rate and toxicity of fotemustine as single-drug chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Eighty-seven patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer took part in the study. Seventy-seven were evaluable for response. Of these, 60% had received prior chemotherapy and 74% had metastatic disease. Moreover, 22 patients had central nervous system metastases (of whom 12 were evaluable for this site). Treatment consisted of fotemustine 100 mg m-2 administered on days 1 and 8 followed by a 5 week rest period. Afterwards, responding or stabilised patients received fotemustine 100 mg m-2 every 3 weeks as a maintenance therapy. Toxicity and quality of life were recorded during therapy. Thirteen patients (17%; 95% CI 9-25%) had an objective response (11% for pretreated, 26% for non-pretreated) with a median duration of 22 weeks (range 7-41 weeks). Two objective responses were observed among the 12 patients with evaluable brain metastases. No response was observed among the 14 patients with adenocarcinoma. Haematological, gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal toxicities were mild to moderate and manageable. The most frequent biological adverse reactions were delayed thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Quality of life did not significantly decrease during the first 6 treatment weeks. Moreover, it remained stable during the study period in patients with response or stabilisation, whereas it significantly decreased in patients who experienced progression of the disease. Fotemustine is feasible for single-drug chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer even though poor prognostic variables such as brain metastases are present. It can be administered on an outpatient basis and toxicity is moderate and manageable. Thus, fotemustine can be considered as a putative drug in further combinations.

Phase II multicentre study of the nitrosourea fotemustine in inoperable squamous cell lung carcinoma

Fotemustine is a new amino acid phosphonate derivative of the nitrosourea group which has yielded good response rates in disseminated malignant melanoma (24.2%). It is associated with a good tolerance and an improved survival time [1, 2]. Other phase II studies have conducted investigations in other tumor types [3, 4]. The present study concerns the results obtained in squamous cell lung cancer

Cisplatin-fotemustine combination in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: Preliminary report of a French multicentre phase II trial

Fotemustine is a new nitrosourea derivative whose activity has been demonstrated on metastatic melanoma with specific activity on brain metastases and also on poor prognosis lung cancers. Results of in vitro studies of a cisplatin-fotemustine combination seem promising. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination, we performed two trials. 6 patients entered a preliminary study whose schedule was cisplatin 120 mg/m2 on day 1 and fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. 22 patients were enrolled in a second study which added 120 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 22 followed by a 4-week rest period. In both trials, maintenance therapy consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and fotemustine 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until progression. Despite the poor prognostic factors which characterised our population (metastatic disease 86%, brain metastases 59%, < or = 80% performance status 45%), the results remain attractive with a 23% partial response rate (29% in non-pretreated patients). Moreover, 3 out of 8 patients with evaluable cerebral metastases achieved a partial response (37.5%). Toxicity was mild and related to the cumulative dose of cisplatin (peripheral neuropathy and renal toxicity). We concluded that these results need to be confirmed in a randomised trial.

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.

Phase I–II and pharmacokinetic study of a new fotemustine schedule in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

UNLABELLED Fotemustine, a new nitrosourea derivative has already demonstrated activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to improve its therapeutic index, we designed a protocol in which Fotemustine was delivered with dose escalation on 3 consecutive days as induction therapy followed by a 5-week rest period. Maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data were assessed during this Phase I-II study and reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients with metastatic (17) or locally advanced (2) NSCLC were included in the present study. Ten of those with metastatic disease had brain metastases and 15 had previously received chemotherapy. Fotemustine was given at 50 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 1: four patients), 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 2: 16 patients including two who had already received 50 mg/m2) and 100 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 3: one patient). RESULTS The maximal tolerated dose was 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (total cumulated dose 225 mg/m2). At this dose level, we observed 25% of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and 31% of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. One patient died of pulmonary infection during aplasia. No other significant toxicity occurred. Of the 17 evaluable patients, one obtained a PR lasting 6 months in group 2 and 1 PR lasting 3 months in group 3. No significant difference was noted in the AUC between days 1, 2 or 3 in any of the seven patients in whom a pharmacokinetic study of Fotemustine was performed. CONCLUSION Administered on 3 consecutive days, Fotemustine seems to be less effective and more toxic than other schedules tested in NSCLC. Despite the quality of the two responses observed, this protocol has been discontinued and the standard administration on days 1 and 8 remains the schedule of choice in NSCLC.