J. DeRose
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. DeRose.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
C. Sánchez; Joseph Clampitt; A. Kovács; Bhuvnesh Jain; J. García-Bellido; Seshadri Nadathur; D. Gruen; Nico Hamaus; Dragan Huterer; P. Vielzeuf; Adam Amara; C. Bonnett; J. DeRose; W. G. Hartley; M. Jarvis; Ofer Lahav; R. Miquel; Eduardo Rozo; E. S. Rykoff; E. Sheldon; Risa H. Wechsler; J. Zuntz; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; J. Annis; A. Benoit-Lévy; G. M. Bernstein; Rebecca A. Bernstein; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks
Galaxies and their dark matter halos populate a complicated filamentary network around large, nearly empty regions known as cosmic voids. Cosmic voids are usually identified in spectroscopic galaxy surveys, where 3D information about the large-scale structure of the Universe is available. Although an increasing amount of photometric data is being produced, its potential for void studies is limited since photometric redshifts induce line-of-sight position errors of ∼50 Mpc/h or more that can render many voids undetectable. In this paper we present a new void finder designed for photometric surveys, validate it using simulations, and apply it to the high-quality photo-z redMaGiC galaxy sample of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES-SV) data. The algorithm works by projecting galaxies into 2D slices and finding voids in the smoothed 2D galaxy density field of the slice. Fixing the line-of-sight size of the slices to be at least twice the photo-z scatter, the number of voids found in these projected slices of simulated spectroscopic and photometric galaxy catalogs is within 20% for all transverse void sizes, and indistinguishable for the largest voids of radius ∼70 Mpc/h and larger. The positions, radii, and projected galaxy profiles of photometric voids also accurately match the spectroscopic void sample. Applying the algorithm to the DES-SV data in the redshift range 0.2<z<0.8 , we identify 87 voids with comoving radii spanning the range 18-120 Mpc/h , and carry out a stacked weak lensing measurement. With a significance of 4.4σ , the lensing measurement confirms the voids are truly underdense in the matter field and hence not a product of Poisson noise, tracer density effects or systematics in the data. It also demonstrates, for the first time in real data, the viability of void lensing studies in photometric surveys.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; J. Annis; K. Bechtol; J. Blazek; B. A. Benson; R. A. Bernstein; G. M. Bernstein; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; D. L. Burke; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; Francisco J. Castander; C. L. Chang; T. M. Crawford; C. E. Cunha; C. B. D’Andrea; L. N. da Costa; C. Davis; J. DeRose; S. Desai; H. T. Diehl; J. P. Dietrich; P. Doel; A. Drlica-Wagner; August E. Evrard; E. Fernández; B. Flaugher
We combine Dark Energy Survey Year 1 clustering and weak lensing data with baryon acoustic oscillations and Big Bang nucleosynthesis experiments to constrain the Hubble constant. Assuming a flat Lambda CDM model with minimal neutrino mass (Sigma m(v), = 0.06 eV), we find H-0 = 67.4(-1.2)(+1.1) km s(-1) Mpc(-1) (68 per cent CL). This result is completely independent of Hubble constant measurements based on the distance ladder, cosmic microwave background anisotropies (both temperature and polarization), and strong lensing constraints. There are now five data sets that: (a) have no shared observational systematics;and (b) each constrains the Hubble constant with fractional uncertainty at the few-per cent level. We compare these five independent estimates, and find that, as a set, the differences between them are significant at the 2.5 sigma level (chi(2)/dof = 24/11, probability to exceed = 1.1 per cent). Having set the threshold for consistency at 30 sigma we combine all five data sets to arrive at H-0 = 69.3(-0.6)(+0.4) km s(-1) Mpc(-1).
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
A. Kovács; C. Sánchez; J. García-Bellido; Seshadri Nadathur; Robert Crittenden; D. Gruen; Dragan Huterer; David Bacon; Joseph Clampitt; J. DeRose; S. Dodelson; E. Gaztanaga; Bhuvnesh Jain; D. Kirk; Ofer Lahav; R. Miquel; Krishna Naidoo; J. A. Peacock; B. Soergel; L. Whiteway; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; A. Benoit-Lévy; E. Bertin; D. Brooks; E. Buckley-Geer; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero
Small temperature anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) can be sourced by density perturbations via the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. Large voids and superclusters are excellent environments to make a localized measurement of this tiny imprint. In some cases excess signals have been reported. We probed these claims with an independent data set, using the first year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) in a different footprint, and using a different superstructure finding strategy. We identified 52 large voids and 102 superclusters at redshifts 0.2 < z < 0.65. We used the Jubilee simulation to a priori evaluate the optimal ISW measurement configuration for our compensated top-hat filtering technique, and then performed a stacking measurement of the CMB temperature field based on the DES data. For optimal configurations, we detected a cumulative cold imprint of voids with DeltaTf ≈ -5.0 ± 3.7 muK and a hot imprint of superclusters DeltaTf ≈ 5.1 ± 3.2 muK; this is ˜1.2sigma higher than the expected |DeltaTf| ≈ 0.6 muK imprint of such superstructures in Lambda cold dark matter (LambdaCDM). If we instead use an a posteriori selected filter size (R/Rv = 0.6), we can find a temperature decrement as large as DeltaTf ≈ -9.8 ± 4.7 muK for voids, which is ˜2sigma above LambdaCDM expectations and is comparable to previous measurements made using Sloan Digital Sky Survey superstructure data.
Physical Review D | 2018
O. Friedrich; D. Gruen; J. DeRose; D. Kirk; E. Krause; T. McClintock; Eli S. Rykoff; S. Seitz; Risa H. Wechsler; G. M. Bernstein; J. Blazek; C. L. Chang; Stefan Hilbert; Bhuvnesh Jain; András Kovács; O. Lahav; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; K. Bechtol; A. Benoit-Lévy; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; C. E. Cunha; C. B. D’Andrea; L. N. da Costa; C. J. Davis
We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and counts-in-cells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a large-scale measurement of both 2-point and 3-point statistics. Our method extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as counts-in-cells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology, the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter. In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and CiC from basic ingredients: a non-linear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias and shot-noise. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that this model is sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark Energy Survey.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
N MacCrann; J. DeRose; Risa H. Wechsler; J. Blazek; E. Gaztanaga; M. Crocce; E. S. Rykoff; M. R. Becker; Bhuvnesh Jain; Elisabeth Krause; T. F. Eifler; D. Gruen; J Zuntz; M. A. Troxel; J. Elvin-Poole; J. Prat; M Wang; S. Dodelson; Andrey V. Kravtsov; P Fosalba; Michael T. Busha; August E. Evrard; Dragan Huterer; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; S Avila; G. M. Bernstein; David J. Brooks
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1 cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins. While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1 realizations in the Omega(m) - sigma(8) plane. For one of the suites, we are able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) and Omega(m) are smaller than the DES Y1 1 - sigma uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive;we infer a roughly 60 per cent (70 per cent) probability that systematic bias in the recovered Omega(m) (S-8) is sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2017
Christopher Frohmaier; M. Sullivan; Peter E. Nugent; D. A. Goldstein; J. DeRose
We present the transient source detection efficiencies of the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF), parameterizing the number of transients that PTF found versus the number of similar transients that occurred over the same period in the survey search area but were missed. PTF was an optical sky survey carried out with the Palomar 48 inch telescope over 2009–2012, observing more than 8000 square degrees of sky with cadences of between one and five days, locating around 50,000 non-moving transient sources, and spectroscopically confirming around 1900 supernovae. We assess the effectiveness with which PTF detected transient sources, by inserting million artificial point sources into real PTF data. We then study the efficiency with which the PTF real-time pipeline recovered these sources as a function of the source magnitude, host galaxy surface brightness, and various observing conditions (using proxies for seeing, sky brightness, and transparency). The product of this study is a multi-dimensional recovery efficiency grid appropriate for the range of observing conditions that PTF experienced and that can then be used for studies of the rates, environments, and luminosity functions of different transient types using detailed Monte Carlo simulations. We illustrate the technique using the observationally well-understood class of type Ia supernovae.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2019
Matteo Costanzi; Eduardo Rozo; E. S. Rykoff; Arya Farahi; T. Jeltema; A. E. Evrard; A. Mantz; D. Gruen; Rachel Mandelbaum; J. DeRose; T. McClintock; T. N. Varga; Y. Zhang; J. Weller; Risa H. Wechsler; M. Aguena
The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for cluster abundance studies capable of reaching
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2018
Yao Yuan Mao; Eve Kovacs; Katrin Heitmann; Thomas D. Uram; Andrew J. Benson; Duncan Campbell; Sofía A. Cora; J. DeRose; Tiziana Di Matteo; Salman Habib; Andrew P. Hearin; J. Bryce Kalmbach; K. Simon Krughoff; François Lanusse; Zarija Lukić; Rachel Mandelbaum; Jeffrey A. Newman; Nelson D. Padilla; Enrique Paillas; Adrian Pope; Paul M. Ricker; Andrés N. Ruiz; Ananth Tenneti; Cristian A. Vega-Martínez; Risa H. Wechsler; Rongpu Zhou; Ying Zu
\approx 5\%
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
R. Cawthon; C. Davis; M. Gatti; P. Vielzeuf; J. Elvin-Poole; Eduardo Rozo; Joshua A. Frieman; E. S. Rykoff; A. Alarcon; G. M. Bernstein; C. Bonnett; A. Carnero Rosell; Francisco J. Castander; C. L. Chang; L. N. da Costa; J. De Vicente; J. DeRose; A. Drlica-Wagner; E. Gaztanaga; T. Giannantonio; D. Gruen; J. Gschwend; W. G. Hartley; B. Hoyle; H. Lin; M. A. G. Maia; R. Miquel; R. Ogando; Markus Rau; A. Roodman
mass calibration uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically, ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation --- i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the cluster normalization condition
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
Juliana Kwan; C. Sánchez; Joseph Clampitt; J. Blazek; M. Crocce; Bhuvnesh Jain; J. Zuntz; Adam Amara; M. R. Becker; G. M. Bernstein; C. Bonnett; J. DeRose; Scott Dodelson; T. F. Eifler; E. Gaztanaga; T. Giannantonio; D. Gruen; W. Hartley; Tomasz Kacprzak; D. Kirk; E. Krause; N. MacCrann; R. Miquel; Y. Park; A. Ross; Eduardo Rozo; E. S. Rykoff; E. Sheldon; M. A. Troxel; Risa H. Wechsler
S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{1/2}