J.E.C. Scully

The geomorphology of Ceres

INTRODUCTION Observations of Ceres, the largest object in the asteroid belt, have suggested that the dwarf planet is a geologically differentiated body with a silicate core and an ice-rich mantle. Data acquired by the Dawn spacecraft were used to perform a three-dimensional characterization of the surface to determine if the geomorphology of Ceres is consistent with the models of an icy interior. RATIONALE Instruments on Dawn have collected data at a variety of resolutions, including both clear-filter and color images. Digital terrain models have been derived from stereo images. A preliminary 1:10 M scale geologic map of Ceres was constructed using images obtained during the Approach and Survey orbital phases of the mission. We used the map, along with higher-resolution imagery, to assess the geology of Ceres at the global scale, to identify geomorphic and structural features, and to determine the geologic processes that have affected Ceres globally. RESULTS Impact craters are the most prevalent geomorphic feature on Ceres, and several of the craters have fractured floors. Geomorphic analysis of the fracture patterns shows that they are similar to lunar Floor-Fractured Craters (FFCs), and an analysis of the depth-to-diameter ratios shows that they are anomalously shallow compared with average Ceres craters. Both of these factors are consistent with FFC floors being uplifted due to an intrusion of cryomagma. Kilometer-scale linear structures cross much of Ceres. Some of these structures are oriented radially to large craters and most likely formed due to impact processes. However, a set of linear structures present only on a topographically high region do not have any obvious relationship to impact craters. Geomorphic analysis suggests that they represent subsurface faults and might have formed due to crustal uplift by cryomagmatic intrusion. Domes identified across the Ceres surface present a wide range of sizes (<10 km to >100 km), basal shapes, and profiles. Whether a single formation mechanism is responsible for their formation is still an open question. Cryovolcanic extrusion is one plausible process for the larger domes, although most small mounds (<10-km diameter) are more likely to be impact debris. Differences in lobate flow morphology suggest that multiple emplacement processes have operated on Ceres, where three types of flows have been identified. Type 1 flows are morphologically similar to ice-cored flows on Earth and Mars. Type 2 flows are comparable to long-runout landslides. Type 3 flows morphologically resemble the fluidized ejecta blankets of rampart craters, which are hypothesized to form by impact into ice-rich ground. CONCLUSION The global trend of lobate flows suggests that differences in their geomorphology could be explained by variations in ice content and temperature at the near surface. Geomorphic and topographic analyses of the FFCs suggest that cryomagmatism is active on Ceres, whereas the large domes are possibly formed by extrusions of cryolava. Although spectroscopic analysis to date has identified water ice in only one location on Ceres, the identification of these potentially ice-related features suggests that there may be more ice within localized regions of Ceres’ crust. Dawn high-altitude mapping orbit imagery (140 meters per pixel) of example morphologic features. (A) Occator crater; arrows point to floor fractures. (B) Linear structures, denoted by arrows

THE HAMO-BASED GLOBAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF CERES FROM NASA’S DAWN MISSION

This abstract discusses current results from the 1:2.5M-scale High Altitude Mapping Orbit (HAMO)-based global geologic mapping effort of Ceres using image, spectral and topographic data from the Dawn mission. Mapping base materials include the Dawn Framing Camera (FC) HAMO mosaic and individual images (∼140 m/pixel), the global HAMO DTM (137 m/pixel) derived from FC stereo images, and FC color mosaics (0.44-0.96 μm). These data are used to identify contacts and features, and for unit characterization. Geologic units are discriminated primarily by differences in albedo and surface texture; FC color images are used to spectrally constrain and characterize units. The map displays contacts and linear features (e.g., structures) represented by polylines, and singular features (e.g., albedo spots) represented by points. Because of map scale, only geologic units greater than 100 km2 in area, impact craters greater than 20 km in diameter, and linear features greater than 20 km in length are shown. Through geologic mapping we have defined several widespread units: cratered terrain, smooth material, and units of the Urvara/Yalode system. Cratered terrain forms the largest unit exposed on Ceres and contains rugged surfaces derived largely from the structures and deposits of impact features. This unit includes the oldest terrains exposed on Ceres, but the geologic materials likely consist of crustal materials mixed with impact materials. Smooth material forms a large deposit of nearly flat-lying to hummocky plains that fill and surround Kerwan basin, and embay the cratered terrain. Geologic materials related to the Urvara and Yalode basins consist of floor, rim, and ejecta deposits. Urvara ejecta consists of a rugged and a smooth facies; Yalode ejecta is distinguished by its smooth and rolling to stucco-like texture. Stratigraphic relations show that ejecta deposits and structures from Urvara superpose Yalode, indicating it is younger. Impact craters are the most prevalent features on the surface of Ceres, and appear to have caused most of the visible modification of the surface [1]. Impact craters exhibit sizes ranging from the limits of resolution to larger impact basins such as Urvara (170 km), Yalode (260 km), and Kerwan (284 km). Impact craters also exhibit a range of preservation states. Many craters of all sizes appear morphologically “fresh” to moderately degraded, with nearly circular rims that are raised above the surrounding terrain. Small fresh craters (<15 km) display simple bowl shapes, whereas larger fresh craters display steep walls and flat (sometimes fractured) floors [2], and most contain hummocky or irregular-shaped deposits on their floors. Many craters exhibit irregularly shaped, sometimes scalloped, rim structures, and contain debris lobes on their floors, suggesting instability in surface materials [1]. We are currently engaged in crater-based age dating, determining superposition relations, and using these to interpret Ceres chronostratigraphy, which will be presented at EGU. Support of the Dawn Instrument, Operations, & Science Teams is acknowledged. This work is supported by grants from NASA, DLR and MPG.