J. Ettema
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Ettema.
Science | 2009
Michiel R. van den Broeke; Jonathan L. Bamber; J. Ettema; Eric Rignot; Ernst J. O. Schrama; Willem Jan van de Berg; Erik van Meijgaard; I. Velicogna; Bert Wouters
GRACE and Movement Together Recent measurements of the rate of mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet vary approximately by a factor of three. Resolving these discrepancies is essential for determining the current mass balance of the ice sheet and to project sea level rise in the future. Van den Broeke et al. (p. 984) obtained consistent estimates from two independent methods, one based on observations of ice movement combined with model calculations and the other on remote gravity measurements made by the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellites. The combination of these approaches also resolves the separate contributions of surface processes and of ice dynamics, the two major routes of ice mass loss. The major components of decay contributing to mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet can be quantified. Mass budget calculations, validated with satellite gravity observations [from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites], enable us to quantify the individual components of recent Greenland mass loss. The total 2000–2008 mass loss of ~1500 gigatons, equivalent to 0.46 millimeters per year of global sea level rise, is equally split between surface processes (runoff and precipitation) and ice dynamics. Without the moderating effects of increased snowfall and refreezing, post-1996 Greenland ice sheet mass losses would have been 100% higher. Since 2006, high summer melt rates have increased Greenland ice sheet mass loss to 273 gigatons per year (0.75 millimeters per year of equivalent sea level rise). The seasonal cycle in surface mass balance fully accounts for detrended GRACE mass variations, confirming insignificant subannual variation in ice sheet discharge.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2010
Michiel R. van den Broeke; Carlijn Bus; J. Ettema; Paul A.M. Smeets
[1] Degree‐day factors (DDFs) are calculated for the ice sheet ablation zone in southwest Greenland, using measurements of automatic weather stations and a regional atmospheric climate model. The rapid increase of DDFs for snow and ice towards higher elevations is caused by the increasing dominance of short daytime melting and nocturnal refreezing. This spatial inhomogeneity can be avoided by choosing a lower threshold for daily average 2 m air temperature (268 K instead of 273.15 K) for the degree‐day calculation. Citation: van den Broeke, M., C. Bus, J. Ettema, and P. Smeets (2010), Temperature thresholds for degree‐day modelling of Greenland ice sheet melt rates,
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2008
B. J. J. M. van den Hurk; J. Ettema; Pedro Viterbo
Abstract This study aims at stimulating the development of soil moisture data assimilation systems in a direction where they can provide both the necessary control of slow drift in operational NWP applications and support the physical insight in the performance of the land surface component. It addresses four topics concerning the systematic nature of soil moisture data assimilation experiments over Europe during the growing season of 2000 involving the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model infrastructure. In the first topic the effect of the (spinup related) bias in 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) precipitation on the data assimilation is analyzed. From results averaged over 36 European locations, it appears that about half of the soil moisture increments in the 2000 growing season are attributable to the precipitation bias. A second topic considers a new soil moisture data assimilation system, demonstrated in a coupled single-column model (SCM) setup, where precipitation and ...
Remote Sensing | 2018
Riswan Sianturi; Victor Jetten; J. Ettema; Junun Sartohadi
An accurate flood detection method is essential for obtaining areas of irrigated rice fields affected by flooding. This paper aims to distinguish between rice fields with flooding and rice fields with agronomic inundation using MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 8 day 500 m spatial resolution (MOD09A1) imageries over irrigated rice fields with complex cropping patterns in West Java. Over the past decade, Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) ≤ 0.1 derived from moderate resolution remote sensing imageries has been used for detecting flooding in irrigated rice fields. Without additional farming information, this paper argues that EVI ≤ 0.1 cannot estimate flood areas correctly, given the existence of both hazardous flooding and non-hazardous agronomic inundation in irrigated rice fields. Adding a threshold of 40-day duration representing land preparation and transplanting activities enables EVI ≤ 0.1 to distinguish between agronomic inundation and flooding in irrigated rice fields. The difference in the Start of Season (SOS) between the wet planting season 2013/2014 and long-term average (2000–2015) shows that the Overall Accuracy (OA) and F1 scores are 75.96% and 81.74%, respectively. The confusion matrix using the respondents’ reports shows OA of 80.5% and Kappa of 60.16%. The quality of flood maps is partly influenced by environmental processes, human decisions, and mixed pixels.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2009
J. Ettema; Michiel R. van den Broeke; Erik van Meijgaard; Willem Jan van de Berg; Jonathan L. Bamber; Jason E. Box; Roger C. Bales
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
Jonathan L. Bamber; Michiel R. van den Broeke; J. Ettema; Jan T. M. Lenaerts; Eric Rignot
The Cryosphere | 2010
Xavier Fettweis; Marco Tedesco; M. R. van den Broeke; J. Ettema
The Cryosphere | 2010
J. Ettema; M. R. van den Broeke; E. van Meijgaard; W.J. van den Berg; Jason E. Box; Konrad Steffen
The Cryosphere | 2008
M. R. van den Broeke; Paul A.M. Smeets; J. Ettema; C. van der Veen; R. S. W. van de Wal; J. Oerlemans
Nature Geoscience | 2011
W. J. van de Berg; M.R. (Michiel) van den Broeke; J. Ettema; E. van Meijgaard; F. Kaspar