Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. J. Earnshaw is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. J. Earnshaw.


British Journal of Surgery | 2003

The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM).

W. D. Neary; B. P. Heather; J. J. Earnshaw

The development of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is described and its methods of analysis and value in a modern surgical practice are reviewed. A computerized search of all published data in Medline, the Cochrane Library and Embase was made for the last 12 years. Relevant articles were then searched manually for further papers on risk analysis, case‐mix comparison and POSSUM methodology.


British Journal of Surgery | 2010

Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

P. M. Bevis; R. A. J. Windhaber; P. A. Lear; K. R. Poskitt; J. J. Earnshaw; David Mitchell

Incisional herniation is a common complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. This study investigated whether prophylactic mesh placement could reduce the rate of postoperative incisional hernia after open repair of AAA.


British Journal of Surgery | 2003

Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms

R. J. McCarthy; E. Shaw; M. R. Whyman; J. J. Earnshaw; K. R. Poskitt; B. P. Heather

The aim was to determine the optimum rescreening interval for small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014

A Randomized Trial Comparing Treatments for Varicose Veins

Julie Brittenden; Seonaidh Cotton; Andrew Elders; Craig Ramsay; John Norrie; Jennifer Burr; Bruce Campbell; Paul Bachoo; Ian Chetter; Michael Gough; J. J. Earnshaw; Tim Lees; Julian Scott; Sara A Baker; Jill J Francis; Emma Tassie; Graham Scotland; Samantha Wileman; Marion K Campbell

BACKGROUND Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation are widely used alternatives to surgery for the treatment of varicose veins, but their comparative effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. METHODS In a randomized trial involving 798 participants with primary varicose veins at 11 centers in the United Kingdom, we compared the outcomes of foam, laser, and surgical treatments. Primary outcomes at 6 months were disease-specific quality of life and generic quality of life, as measured on several scales. Secondary outcomes included complications and measures of clinical success. RESULTS After adjustment for baseline scores and other covariates, the mean disease-specific quality of life was slightly worse after treatment with foam than after surgery (P=0.006) but was similar in the laser and surgery groups. There were no significant differences between the surgery group and the foam or the laser group in measures of generic quality of life. The frequency of procedural complications was similar in the foam group (6%) and the surgery group (7%) but was lower in the laser group (1%) than in the surgery group (P<0.001); the frequency of serious adverse events (approximately 3%) was similar among the groups. Measures of clinical success were similar among the groups, but successful ablation of the main trunks of the saphenous vein was less common in the foam group than in the surgery group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Quality-of-life measures were generally similar among the study groups, with the exception of a slightly worse disease-specific quality of life in the foam group than in the surgery group. All treatments had similar clinical efficacy, but complications were less frequent after laser treatment and ablation rates were lower after foam treatment. (Funded by the Health Technology Assessment Programme of the National Institute for Health Research; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51995477.).


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2012

Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

Rosie Darwood; J. J. Earnshaw; Glenda Turton; Elaine Shaw; M. R. Whyman; K. R. Poskitt; Caroline D. Rodd; B. P. Heather

OBJECTIVE An ultrasound screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men began in Gloucestershire in 1990 and has been running for 20 years. This report examines the workload and results. METHODS We reviewed the screening database for attendance and outcome records from AAA surgery in Gloucestershire and postmortem and death certificate results looking for men who died from ruptured AAAs in the screening cohort. The setting was an AAA screening program in the county of Gloucestershire, UK. Men aged 65 were invited by year of birth to attend for an ultrasound screening for AAAs. Men with an aorta <2.6 cm were reassured and discharged; men with an aorta between 2.6 cm and 5.4 cm were offered follow-up surveillance; men with an aorta >5.4 cm were considered for intervention. We analyzed attendance rates, screening and surveillance outcomes, and intervention rates and outcomes over the 20 years of the study. RESULTS Some 61,982 men were invited, and 52,690 attended for screening (85% attendance). At first scan, 50,130 men (95.14%) had an aortic diameter <2.6 cm in diameter and were reassured and discharged; 148 men (0.28%) had an AAA >5.4 cm in diameter and were referred for possible treatment; 2412 (4.57%) had an aortic diameter between 2.6 and 5.4 cm and entered a program of ultrasound surveillance. The overall mean aortic diameter on initial scan fell from 2.1 cm to 1.7 cm during the study (reduction 0.015 cm/y, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0144-0.0156 cm/y; P < .0001). Some 631 patients with AAAs had intervention treatment with a perioperative mortality rate of 3.9%; during the same interval, 372 AAAs detected incidentally were treated, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. The number of ruptured AAAs treated annually in Gloucestershire fell during the study (χ(2) for trend = 18.31, df = 1; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Screening reduced the number of ruptured AAAs in Gloucestershire during the 20 years of the program. There has been a significant reduction of men with an abnormal aorta, as the mean aortic diameter of the 65-year-old male has reduced over 20 years.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2013

Implementation of the National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program in England

Meryl Davis; Mike Harris; J. J. Earnshaw

The National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program (NAAASP) has been introduced after research and analysis of data from a number of randomized trials and existing local screening programs in England that showed a reduction in aneurysm-related mortality when men aged ≥ 65 years were offered ultrasound screening. The evidence was assessed by the United Kingdom National Screening Committee against a set of internationally recognized criteria that confirmed that screening all men aged ≥ 65 years saves lives. The introduction of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening to men aged 65 years is estimated to reduce premature death from ruptured AAAs by up to 50% over the next 10 years. This article describes the AAA screening program in England, its ongoing implementation and current challenges, and outcomes in the first 150,000 men.


British Journal of Surgery | 2005

Randomized clinical trial of compression plus surgery versus compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study)—haemodynamic and anatomical changes

M.S. Gohel; J. R. Barwell; J. J. Earnshaw; B. P. Heather; David Mitchell; M. R. Whyman; K. R. Poskitt

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical and haemodynamic effects of superficial venous surgery and compression on legs with chronic venous ulceration.


British Journal of Surgery | 2007

Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery

W. D. Neary; David Prytherch; Chris Foy; B. P. Heather; J. J. Earnshaw

The aim was to compare a number of risk scoring systems prospectively in a cohort of patients who underwent non‐elective surgery.


British Journal of Surgery | 2016

Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme

J. Jacomelli; L. Summers; A. Stevenson; T. Lees; J. J. Earnshaw

The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Screening Programme was introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to reduce the rate of death from ruptured AAA in men. The programme commenced in 2009 and was implemented completely across the country in April 2013. The aim was to review the first 5 years of the programme, looking specifically at compliance and early outcome.


British Journal of Surgery | 2003

Comparison of POSSUM scoring and the Hardman Index in selection of patients for repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

W. D. Neary; Paul Crow; Chris Foy; David Prytherch; B. P. Heather; J. J. Earnshaw

The aim was to assess to what extent the POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity) and Hardman scoring systems were predictive of outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA).

Collaboration


Dive into the J. J. Earnshaw's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. R. Poskitt

Cheltenham General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. R. Whyman

Cheltenham General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Elders

Glasgow Caledonian University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emma Tassie

University of Aberdeen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Chetter

Hull York Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Burr

University of St Andrews

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge